Determinants of the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs) by community pharmacies in England: A multi-method study
Abstract Objectives To explore and identify the key determinants influencing the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs), a new community pharmacy service in England. Methods Survey of all primary care organisations (PCOs) in England ( n = 303, response rate = 74%) and case study investigations of 10...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health policy (Amsterdam) 2008-12, Vol.88 (2), p.258-268 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 268 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 258 |
container_title | Health policy (Amsterdam) |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Bradley, Fay Wagner, Andrew C Elvey, Rebecca Noyce, Peter R Ashcroft, Darren M |
description | Abstract Objectives To explore and identify the key determinants influencing the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs), a new community pharmacy service in England. Methods Survey of all primary care organisations (PCOs) in England ( n = 303, response rate = 74%) and case study investigations of 10 PCOs, involving interviews with a purposive sample of 43 key stakeholders, including PCO, Local Pharmaceutical Committee and community pharmacy representatives. National data on MUR activity were also analysed and multiple linear regression was used to test determinants of MUR uptake. Results The ownership category of the pharmacy was shown to be the most significant determinant of MUR uptake. Rates of MUR provision by multiple pharmacies were almost twice that of independent pharmacies. Interview data corroborated this finding, suggesting that organisational pressure within multiple pharmacies was driving forward MUR activity in some PCOs. Interviewees expressed concern about this quantity driven approach. The PCO survey respondents perceived the greatest barrier to MUR implementation to be a lack of support from general practitioners (GPs). Interviewees reported a lack of communication about MURs between community pharmacists and GPs. Conclusions The findings suggest that the organisational setting of the pharmacy is an important factor influencing the uptake of MURs. There is also a need for greater communication and collaboration with GPs regarding the MUR service. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69855583</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0168851008000870</els_id><sourcerecordid>69855583</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-d2b76efc4890263a25693f1413ddccd17419164884311c86eb5b1cdaa1fa15a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxS0EosvCVwCfEBwS7Dh2HA5Iq1IK0iIkoGfLcSbE2_yr7RTl2-N0V0XiUg4ej6X3RiP_HkKvKEkpoeLdIW1Bd6Gdxi7NCJEpYSmh7BHaUFlkiSA8f4w2USkTySk5Q8-8PxBCCsbEU3RGZS5kQdkG-Y8QwPV20EPweGxwaAHPU9DXsL56qK2xA3g8e8AObi389vjN16vv_i2uFmzGvp8HGxY8tdr12tgotQO-GH51eqjf4x3u5y7YpIfQjjX2Ya6X5-hJozsPL073Fl19uvh5_jnZf7v8cr7bJ4ZLEpI6qwoBjcllSTLBdMZFyRqaU1bXxtS0yGlJRS5lzig1UkDFK2pqrWmjKdeCbdHr49zJjTcz-KB66w10cTMYZ69EKTnnkj0o5EVWxB99WMgKmpVlHLlFxVFo3Oi9g0ZNzvbaLYoStRJUB3VPUK0EFWEqEozO_dHpYAJzbwOAFqLWqlvFtJSxLPHcOZm2a6tYrNPacakyIVUb-jju5WnjuYow_65xSkAU7I4CiCQiXqd8hDiYCN6BCaoe7X_s_OGfGaazgzW6u4YF_GGc3RBBK6p8poj6seZyjSWRMZKyIOwPwnzfsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37129958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinants of the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs) by community pharmacies in England: A multi-method study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Bradley, Fay ; Wagner, Andrew C ; Elvey, Rebecca ; Noyce, Peter R ; Ashcroft, Darren M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Fay ; Wagner, Andrew C ; Elvey, Rebecca ; Noyce, Peter R ; Ashcroft, Darren M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives To explore and identify the key determinants influencing the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs), a new community pharmacy service in England. Methods Survey of all primary care organisations (PCOs) in England ( n = 303, response rate = 74%) and case study investigations of 10 PCOs, involving interviews with a purposive sample of 43 key stakeholders, including PCO, Local Pharmaceutical Committee and community pharmacy representatives. National data on MUR activity were also analysed and multiple linear regression was used to test determinants of MUR uptake. Results The ownership category of the pharmacy was shown to be the most significant determinant of MUR uptake. Rates of MUR provision by multiple pharmacies were almost twice that of independent pharmacies. Interview data corroborated this finding, suggesting that organisational pressure within multiple pharmacies was driving forward MUR activity in some PCOs. Interviewees expressed concern about this quantity driven approach. The PCO survey respondents perceived the greatest barrier to MUR implementation to be a lack of support from general practitioners (GPs). Interviewees reported a lack of communication about MURs between community pharmacists and GPs. Conclusions The findings suggest that the organisational setting of the pharmacy is an important factor influencing the uptake of MURs. There is also a need for greater communication and collaboration with GPs regarding the MUR service.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8510</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6054</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18468713</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Community pharmacists ; Community Pharmacy Services ; Community pharmacy services Policy development Health care delivery Medicines use review England ; Consultation ; Drug Utilization Review ; England ; Health administration ; Health care ; Health care delivery ; Health Care Surveys ; Health policy ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicines use review ; Pharmaceuticals ; Pharmacy services ; Policy development ; Policy Making ; State Medicine ; United Kingdom ; Uptake</subject><ispartof>Health policy (Amsterdam), 2008-12, Vol.88 (2), p.258-268</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-d2b76efc4890263a25693f1413ddccd17419164884311c86eb5b1cdaa1fa15a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-d2b76efc4890263a25693f1413ddccd17419164884311c86eb5b1cdaa1fa15a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27924,27925,31000,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18468713$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeehepoli/v_3a88_3ay_3a2008_3ai_3a2-3_3ap_3a258-268.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Fay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elvey, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noyce, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashcroft, Darren M</creatorcontrib><title>Determinants of the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs) by community pharmacies in England: A multi-method study</title><title>Health policy (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Health Policy</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives To explore and identify the key determinants influencing the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs), a new community pharmacy service in England. Methods Survey of all primary care organisations (PCOs) in England ( n = 303, response rate = 74%) and case study investigations of 10 PCOs, involving interviews with a purposive sample of 43 key stakeholders, including PCO, Local Pharmaceutical Committee and community pharmacy representatives. National data on MUR activity were also analysed and multiple linear regression was used to test determinants of MUR uptake. Results The ownership category of the pharmacy was shown to be the most significant determinant of MUR uptake. Rates of MUR provision by multiple pharmacies were almost twice that of independent pharmacies. Interview data corroborated this finding, suggesting that organisational pressure within multiple pharmacies was driving forward MUR activity in some PCOs. Interviewees expressed concern about this quantity driven approach. The PCO survey respondents perceived the greatest barrier to MUR implementation to be a lack of support from general practitioners (GPs). Interviewees reported a lack of communication about MURs between community pharmacists and GPs. Conclusions The findings suggest that the organisational setting of the pharmacy is an important factor influencing the uptake of MURs. There is also a need for greater communication and collaboration with GPs regarding the MUR service.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Community pharmacists</subject><subject>Community Pharmacy Services</subject><subject>Community pharmacy services Policy development Health care delivery Medicines use review England</subject><subject>Consultation</subject><subject>Drug Utilization Review</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care delivery</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicines use review</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Pharmacy services</subject><subject>Policy development</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>State Medicine</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><issn>0168-8510</issn><issn>1872-6054</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxS0EosvCVwCfEBwS7Dh2HA5Iq1IK0iIkoGfLcSbE2_yr7RTl2-N0V0XiUg4ej6X3RiP_HkKvKEkpoeLdIW1Bd6Gdxi7NCJEpYSmh7BHaUFlkiSA8f4w2USkTySk5Q8-8PxBCCsbEU3RGZS5kQdkG-Y8QwPV20EPweGxwaAHPU9DXsL56qK2xA3g8e8AObi389vjN16vv_i2uFmzGvp8HGxY8tdr12tgotQO-GH51eqjf4x3u5y7YpIfQjjX2Ya6X5-hJozsPL073Fl19uvh5_jnZf7v8cr7bJ4ZLEpI6qwoBjcllSTLBdMZFyRqaU1bXxtS0yGlJRS5lzig1UkDFK2pqrWmjKdeCbdHr49zJjTcz-KB66w10cTMYZ69EKTnnkj0o5EVWxB99WMgKmpVlHLlFxVFo3Oi9g0ZNzvbaLYoStRJUB3VPUK0EFWEqEozO_dHpYAJzbwOAFqLWqlvFtJSxLPHcOZm2a6tYrNPacakyIVUb-jju5WnjuYow_65xSkAU7I4CiCQiXqd8hDiYCN6BCaoe7X_s_OGfGaazgzW6u4YF_GGc3RBBK6p8poj6seZyjSWRMZKyIOwPwnzfsA</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Bradley, Fay</creator><creator>Wagner, Andrew C</creator><creator>Elvey, Rebecca</creator><creator>Noyce, Peter R</creator><creator>Ashcroft, Darren M</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Determinants of the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs) by community pharmacies in England: A multi-method study</title><author>Bradley, Fay ; Wagner, Andrew C ; Elvey, Rebecca ; Noyce, Peter R ; Ashcroft, Darren M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-d2b76efc4890263a25693f1413ddccd17419164884311c86eb5b1cdaa1fa15a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Community pharmacists</topic><topic>Community Pharmacy Services</topic><topic>Community pharmacy services Policy development Health care delivery Medicines use review England</topic><topic>Consultation</topic><topic>Drug Utilization Review</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care delivery</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicines use review</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Pharmacy services</topic><topic>Policy development</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>State Medicine</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Fay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elvey, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noyce, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashcroft, Darren M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health policy (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradley, Fay</au><au>Wagner, Andrew C</au><au>Elvey, Rebecca</au><au>Noyce, Peter R</au><au>Ashcroft, Darren M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinants of the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs) by community pharmacies in England: A multi-method study</atitle><jtitle>Health policy (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Health Policy</addtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>258</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>258-268</pages><issn>0168-8510</issn><eissn>1872-6054</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives To explore and identify the key determinants influencing the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs), a new community pharmacy service in England. Methods Survey of all primary care organisations (PCOs) in England ( n = 303, response rate = 74%) and case study investigations of 10 PCOs, involving interviews with a purposive sample of 43 key stakeholders, including PCO, Local Pharmaceutical Committee and community pharmacy representatives. National data on MUR activity were also analysed and multiple linear regression was used to test determinants of MUR uptake. Results The ownership category of the pharmacy was shown to be the most significant determinant of MUR uptake. Rates of MUR provision by multiple pharmacies were almost twice that of independent pharmacies. Interview data corroborated this finding, suggesting that organisational pressure within multiple pharmacies was driving forward MUR activity in some PCOs. Interviewees expressed concern about this quantity driven approach. The PCO survey respondents perceived the greatest barrier to MUR implementation to be a lack of support from general practitioners (GPs). Interviewees reported a lack of communication about MURs between community pharmacists and GPs. Conclusions The findings suggest that the organisational setting of the pharmacy is an important factor influencing the uptake of MURs. There is also a need for greater communication and collaboration with GPs regarding the MUR service.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>18468713</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.013</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-8510 |
ispartof | Health policy (Amsterdam), 2008-12, Vol.88 (2), p.258-268 |
issn | 0168-8510 1872-6054 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69855583 |
source | MEDLINE; RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Community pharmacists Community Pharmacy Services Community pharmacy services Policy development Health care delivery Medicines use review England Consultation Drug Utilization Review England Health administration Health care Health care delivery Health Care Surveys Health policy Internal Medicine Medicine Medicines use review Pharmaceuticals Pharmacy services Policy development Policy Making State Medicine United Kingdom Uptake |
title | Determinants of the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs) by community pharmacies in England: A multi-method study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T02%3A44%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinants%20of%20the%20uptake%20of%20medicines%20use%20reviews%20(MURs)%20by%20community%20pharmacies%20in%20England:%20A%20multi-method%20study&rft.jtitle=Health%20policy%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Bradley,%20Fay&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=258-268&rft.issn=0168-8510&rft.eissn=1872-6054&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69855583%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37129958&rft_id=info:pmid/18468713&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0168851008000870&rfr_iscdi=true |