Determinants of the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs) by community pharmacies in England: A multi-method study

Abstract Objectives To explore and identify the key determinants influencing the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs), a new community pharmacy service in England. Methods Survey of all primary care organisations (PCOs) in England ( n = 303, response rate = 74%) and case study investigations of 10...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health policy (Amsterdam) 2008-12, Vol.88 (2), p.258-268
Hauptverfasser: Bradley, Fay, Wagner, Andrew C, Elvey, Rebecca, Noyce, Peter R, Ashcroft, Darren M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 268
container_issue 2
container_start_page 258
container_title Health policy (Amsterdam)
container_volume 88
creator Bradley, Fay
Wagner, Andrew C
Elvey, Rebecca
Noyce, Peter R
Ashcroft, Darren M
description Abstract Objectives To explore and identify the key determinants influencing the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs), a new community pharmacy service in England. Methods Survey of all primary care organisations (PCOs) in England ( n = 303, response rate = 74%) and case study investigations of 10 PCOs, involving interviews with a purposive sample of 43 key stakeholders, including PCO, Local Pharmaceutical Committee and community pharmacy representatives. National data on MUR activity were also analysed and multiple linear regression was used to test determinants of MUR uptake. Results The ownership category of the pharmacy was shown to be the most significant determinant of MUR uptake. Rates of MUR provision by multiple pharmacies were almost twice that of independent pharmacies. Interview data corroborated this finding, suggesting that organisational pressure within multiple pharmacies was driving forward MUR activity in some PCOs. Interviewees expressed concern about this quantity driven approach. The PCO survey respondents perceived the greatest barrier to MUR implementation to be a lack of support from general practitioners (GPs). Interviewees reported a lack of communication about MURs between community pharmacists and GPs. Conclusions The findings suggest that the organisational setting of the pharmacy is an important factor influencing the uptake of MURs. There is also a need for greater communication and collaboration with GPs regarding the MUR service.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69855583</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0168851008000870</els_id><sourcerecordid>69855583</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-d2b76efc4890263a25693f1413ddccd17419164884311c86eb5b1cdaa1fa15a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxS0EosvCVwCfEBwS7Dh2HA5Iq1IK0iIkoGfLcSbE2_yr7RTl2-N0V0XiUg4ej6X3RiP_HkKvKEkpoeLdIW1Bd6Gdxi7NCJEpYSmh7BHaUFlkiSA8f4w2USkTySk5Q8-8PxBCCsbEU3RGZS5kQdkG-Y8QwPV20EPweGxwaAHPU9DXsL56qK2xA3g8e8AObi389vjN16vv_i2uFmzGvp8HGxY8tdr12tgotQO-GH51eqjf4x3u5y7YpIfQjjX2Ya6X5-hJozsPL073Fl19uvh5_jnZf7v8cr7bJ4ZLEpI6qwoBjcllSTLBdMZFyRqaU1bXxtS0yGlJRS5lzig1UkDFK2pqrWmjKdeCbdHr49zJjTcz-KB66w10cTMYZ69EKTnnkj0o5EVWxB99WMgKmpVlHLlFxVFo3Oi9g0ZNzvbaLYoStRJUB3VPUK0EFWEqEozO_dHpYAJzbwOAFqLWqlvFtJSxLPHcOZm2a6tYrNPacakyIVUb-jju5WnjuYow_65xSkAU7I4CiCQiXqd8hDiYCN6BCaoe7X_s_OGfGaazgzW6u4YF_GGc3RBBK6p8poj6seZyjSWRMZKyIOwPwnzfsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37129958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinants of the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs) by community pharmacies in England: A multi-method study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Bradley, Fay ; Wagner, Andrew C ; Elvey, Rebecca ; Noyce, Peter R ; Ashcroft, Darren M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Fay ; Wagner, Andrew C ; Elvey, Rebecca ; Noyce, Peter R ; Ashcroft, Darren M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives To explore and identify the key determinants influencing the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs), a new community pharmacy service in England. Methods Survey of all primary care organisations (PCOs) in England ( n = 303, response rate = 74%) and case study investigations of 10 PCOs, involving interviews with a purposive sample of 43 key stakeholders, including PCO, Local Pharmaceutical Committee and community pharmacy representatives. National data on MUR activity were also analysed and multiple linear regression was used to test determinants of MUR uptake. Results The ownership category of the pharmacy was shown to be the most significant determinant of MUR uptake. Rates of MUR provision by multiple pharmacies were almost twice that of independent pharmacies. Interview data corroborated this finding, suggesting that organisational pressure within multiple pharmacies was driving forward MUR activity in some PCOs. Interviewees expressed concern about this quantity driven approach. The PCO survey respondents perceived the greatest barrier to MUR implementation to be a lack of support from general practitioners (GPs). Interviewees reported a lack of communication about MURs between community pharmacists and GPs. Conclusions The findings suggest that the organisational setting of the pharmacy is an important factor influencing the uptake of MURs. There is also a need for greater communication and collaboration with GPs regarding the MUR service.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8510</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6054</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18468713</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Community pharmacists ; Community Pharmacy Services ; Community pharmacy services Policy development Health care delivery Medicines use review England ; Consultation ; Drug Utilization Review ; England ; Health administration ; Health care ; Health care delivery ; Health Care Surveys ; Health policy ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicines use review ; Pharmaceuticals ; Pharmacy services ; Policy development ; Policy Making ; State Medicine ; United Kingdom ; Uptake</subject><ispartof>Health policy (Amsterdam), 2008-12, Vol.88 (2), p.258-268</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-d2b76efc4890263a25693f1413ddccd17419164884311c86eb5b1cdaa1fa15a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-d2b76efc4890263a25693f1413ddccd17419164884311c86eb5b1cdaa1fa15a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27924,27925,31000,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18468713$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeehepoli/v_3a88_3ay_3a2008_3ai_3a2-3_3ap_3a258-268.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Fay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elvey, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noyce, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashcroft, Darren M</creatorcontrib><title>Determinants of the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs) by community pharmacies in England: A multi-method study</title><title>Health policy (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Health Policy</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives To explore and identify the key determinants influencing the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs), a new community pharmacy service in England. Methods Survey of all primary care organisations (PCOs) in England ( n = 303, response rate = 74%) and case study investigations of 10 PCOs, involving interviews with a purposive sample of 43 key stakeholders, including PCO, Local Pharmaceutical Committee and community pharmacy representatives. National data on MUR activity were also analysed and multiple linear regression was used to test determinants of MUR uptake. Results The ownership category of the pharmacy was shown to be the most significant determinant of MUR uptake. Rates of MUR provision by multiple pharmacies were almost twice that of independent pharmacies. Interview data corroborated this finding, suggesting that organisational pressure within multiple pharmacies was driving forward MUR activity in some PCOs. Interviewees expressed concern about this quantity driven approach. The PCO survey respondents perceived the greatest barrier to MUR implementation to be a lack of support from general practitioners (GPs). Interviewees reported a lack of communication about MURs between community pharmacists and GPs. Conclusions The findings suggest that the organisational setting of the pharmacy is an important factor influencing the uptake of MURs. There is also a need for greater communication and collaboration with GPs regarding the MUR service.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Community pharmacists</subject><subject>Community Pharmacy Services</subject><subject>Community pharmacy services Policy development Health care delivery Medicines use review England</subject><subject>Consultation</subject><subject>Drug Utilization Review</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care delivery</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicines use review</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Pharmacy services</subject><subject>Policy development</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>State Medicine</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><issn>0168-8510</issn><issn>1872-6054</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxS0EosvCVwCfEBwS7Dh2HA5Iq1IK0iIkoGfLcSbE2_yr7RTl2-N0V0XiUg4ej6X3RiP_HkKvKEkpoeLdIW1Bd6Gdxi7NCJEpYSmh7BHaUFlkiSA8f4w2USkTySk5Q8-8PxBCCsbEU3RGZS5kQdkG-Y8QwPV20EPweGxwaAHPU9DXsL56qK2xA3g8e8AObi389vjN16vv_i2uFmzGvp8HGxY8tdr12tgotQO-GH51eqjf4x3u5y7YpIfQjjX2Ya6X5-hJozsPL073Fl19uvh5_jnZf7v8cr7bJ4ZLEpI6qwoBjcllSTLBdMZFyRqaU1bXxtS0yGlJRS5lzig1UkDFK2pqrWmjKdeCbdHr49zJjTcz-KB66w10cTMYZ69EKTnnkj0o5EVWxB99WMgKmpVlHLlFxVFo3Oi9g0ZNzvbaLYoStRJUB3VPUK0EFWEqEozO_dHpYAJzbwOAFqLWqlvFtJSxLPHcOZm2a6tYrNPacakyIVUb-jju5WnjuYow_65xSkAU7I4CiCQiXqd8hDiYCN6BCaoe7X_s_OGfGaazgzW6u4YF_GGc3RBBK6p8poj6seZyjSWRMZKyIOwPwnzfsA</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Bradley, Fay</creator><creator>Wagner, Andrew C</creator><creator>Elvey, Rebecca</creator><creator>Noyce, Peter R</creator><creator>Ashcroft, Darren M</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Determinants of the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs) by community pharmacies in England: A multi-method study</title><author>Bradley, Fay ; Wagner, Andrew C ; Elvey, Rebecca ; Noyce, Peter R ; Ashcroft, Darren M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-d2b76efc4890263a25693f1413ddccd17419164884311c86eb5b1cdaa1fa15a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Community pharmacists</topic><topic>Community Pharmacy Services</topic><topic>Community pharmacy services Policy development Health care delivery Medicines use review England</topic><topic>Consultation</topic><topic>Drug Utilization Review</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care delivery</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicines use review</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Pharmacy services</topic><topic>Policy development</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>State Medicine</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Fay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elvey, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noyce, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashcroft, Darren M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health policy (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradley, Fay</au><au>Wagner, Andrew C</au><au>Elvey, Rebecca</au><au>Noyce, Peter R</au><au>Ashcroft, Darren M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinants of the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs) by community pharmacies in England: A multi-method study</atitle><jtitle>Health policy (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Health Policy</addtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>258</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>258-268</pages><issn>0168-8510</issn><eissn>1872-6054</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives To explore and identify the key determinants influencing the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs), a new community pharmacy service in England. Methods Survey of all primary care organisations (PCOs) in England ( n = 303, response rate = 74%) and case study investigations of 10 PCOs, involving interviews with a purposive sample of 43 key stakeholders, including PCO, Local Pharmaceutical Committee and community pharmacy representatives. National data on MUR activity were also analysed and multiple linear regression was used to test determinants of MUR uptake. Results The ownership category of the pharmacy was shown to be the most significant determinant of MUR uptake. Rates of MUR provision by multiple pharmacies were almost twice that of independent pharmacies. Interview data corroborated this finding, suggesting that organisational pressure within multiple pharmacies was driving forward MUR activity in some PCOs. Interviewees expressed concern about this quantity driven approach. The PCO survey respondents perceived the greatest barrier to MUR implementation to be a lack of support from general practitioners (GPs). Interviewees reported a lack of communication about MURs between community pharmacists and GPs. Conclusions The findings suggest that the organisational setting of the pharmacy is an important factor influencing the uptake of MURs. There is also a need for greater communication and collaboration with GPs regarding the MUR service.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>18468713</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.013</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-8510
ispartof Health policy (Amsterdam), 2008-12, Vol.88 (2), p.258-268
issn 0168-8510
1872-6054
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69855583
source MEDLINE; RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
Community pharmacists
Community Pharmacy Services
Community pharmacy services Policy development Health care delivery Medicines use review England
Consultation
Drug Utilization Review
England
Health administration
Health care
Health care delivery
Health Care Surveys
Health policy
Internal Medicine
Medicine
Medicines use review
Pharmaceuticals
Pharmacy services
Policy development
Policy Making
State Medicine
United Kingdom
Uptake
title Determinants of the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs) by community pharmacies in England: A multi-method study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T02%3A44%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinants%20of%20the%20uptake%20of%20medicines%20use%20reviews%20(MURs)%20by%20community%20pharmacies%20in%20England:%20A%20multi-method%20study&rft.jtitle=Health%20policy%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Bradley,%20Fay&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=258-268&rft.issn=0168-8510&rft.eissn=1872-6054&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69855583%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37129958&rft_id=info:pmid/18468713&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0168851008000870&rfr_iscdi=true