Laparoscopic urinary diversions

The treatment of the invasive bladder cancer and the recurrent T1G3 is clearly established in radical cystectomy and pelvic linphadenectomy. One of the fields where the laparoscopic approach implies more doubts is the treatment of bladder cancer, because it requires experience enough in pelvic lapar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Actas urologicas españolas 2008-10, Vol.32 (9), p.908-915
Hauptverfasser: Alonso y Gregorio, S, Alvarez Maestro, M, Cabrera Castillo, P M, Tabernero Gómez, A, Cansino Alcaide, R, Cisneros Ledo, J, De la Peña Barthel, J J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 915
container_issue 9
container_start_page 908
container_title Actas urologicas españolas
container_volume 32
creator Alonso y Gregorio, S
Alvarez Maestro, M
Cabrera Castillo, P M
Tabernero Gómez, A
Cansino Alcaide, R
Cisneros Ledo, J
De la Peña Barthel, J J
description The treatment of the invasive bladder cancer and the recurrent T1G3 is clearly established in radical cystectomy and pelvic linphadenectomy. One of the fields where the laparoscopic approach implies more doubts is the treatment of bladder cancer, because it requires experience enough in pelvic laparoscopic surgery and the urinary diversion implies great technical difficulties to the laparoscopic approach. The main goal of this article is to report our results with the urinary diversion after laparoscopic radical cystectomy where the ureteral anastomosis has been performed by a laparoscopic approach. From January 2005 to December 2007 we have performed 67 laparoscopic radical cistectomies. We conducted 28 laparoscopic urinary diversions with our technique: 7 neobladder with an average age of 54, 85 years and 21 ileal conduit with an average age of 69, 15 years. The averagesurgical time for enterocistoplasty with laparoscopic urethral and ureteral anastomosis is of 5 hours and 30 minutes. For the cutaneous ureteroileostomy with laparoscopic ureteral anastomosis the average surgical time has been of 4 hours and 30 minutes. We have had 1 case of urinary leakage in the laparoscopic neobladder and 3 cases in the laparoscopic ileal conduit (14%). We have not intestinal dehiscence nor ileal-ureteric stenosis. The average hospital stay for laparoscopic neobladder is for the 85% of cases of 13.6 days, and of 11.8 days for the 77.7% of ileal ureteric laparoscopies. The laparoscopic radical cystectomy is still a procedure reserved for groups with great experience in laparoscopic surgery. Nowadays, the most accepted procedure by most groups includes perform the cystectomy by a laparoscopic approach and the urinary diversion by an open approach. There is no evidence of the advantages of laparoscopic urinary diversion. It is necessary to perform comparative studies to clearly define the role of laparoscopic surgery in the urinary diversion.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0210-4806(08)73959-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69854583</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69854583</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-3fd9d9b56fa0a9b042167ff217345ebe1d1eee033c9ec76254b95fab280ab0093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j8tKBDEURLNQnHH0E9RZiS5ab97JUgZf0OBCXTdJ9w1E-hGTacG_d8DRVUFxOFQRckbhhgJVt6_AKFTCgLoCc625lbbSB2T5Xy_IcSkfAExwo4_IgloQggNdkovaJZen0k4ptus5x9Hl73UXvzCXOI3lhBwG1xc83eeKvD_cv22eqvrl8XlzV1eJcruteOhsZ71UwYGzHgSjSofAqOZCokfaUUQEzluLrVZMCm9lcJ4ZcB7A8hW5_PWmPH3OWLbNEEuLfe9GnObSKGukkIbvwPM9OPsBuyblOOwmN3-X-A9yl0v5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69854583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laparoscopic urinary diversions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Alonso y Gregorio, S ; Alvarez Maestro, M ; Cabrera Castillo, P M ; Tabernero Gómez, A ; Cansino Alcaide, R ; Cisneros Ledo, J ; De la Peña Barthel, J J</creator><creatorcontrib>Alonso y Gregorio, S ; Alvarez Maestro, M ; Cabrera Castillo, P M ; Tabernero Gómez, A ; Cansino Alcaide, R ; Cisneros Ledo, J ; De la Peña Barthel, J J</creatorcontrib><description>The treatment of the invasive bladder cancer and the recurrent T1G3 is clearly established in radical cystectomy and pelvic linphadenectomy. One of the fields where the laparoscopic approach implies more doubts is the treatment of bladder cancer, because it requires experience enough in pelvic laparoscopic surgery and the urinary diversion implies great technical difficulties to the laparoscopic approach. The main goal of this article is to report our results with the urinary diversion after laparoscopic radical cystectomy where the ureteral anastomosis has been performed by a laparoscopic approach. From January 2005 to December 2007 we have performed 67 laparoscopic radical cistectomies. We conducted 28 laparoscopic urinary diversions with our technique: 7 neobladder with an average age of 54, 85 years and 21 ileal conduit with an average age of 69, 15 years. The averagesurgical time for enterocistoplasty with laparoscopic urethral and ureteral anastomosis is of 5 hours and 30 minutes. For the cutaneous ureteroileostomy with laparoscopic ureteral anastomosis the average surgical time has been of 4 hours and 30 minutes. We have had 1 case of urinary leakage in the laparoscopic neobladder and 3 cases in the laparoscopic ileal conduit (14%). We have not intestinal dehiscence nor ileal-ureteric stenosis. The average hospital stay for laparoscopic neobladder is for the 85% of cases of 13.6 days, and of 11.8 days for the 77.7% of ileal ureteric laparoscopies. The laparoscopic radical cystectomy is still a procedure reserved for groups with great experience in laparoscopic surgery. Nowadays, the most accepted procedure by most groups includes perform the cystectomy by a laparoscopic approach and the urinary diversion by an open approach. There is no evidence of the advantages of laparoscopic urinary diversion. It is necessary to perform comparative studies to clearly define the role of laparoscopic surgery in the urinary diversion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0210-4806</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0210-4806(08)73959-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19044301</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cystectomy - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Ileum - surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Urinary Diversion - methods</subject><ispartof>Actas urologicas españolas, 2008-10, Vol.32 (9), p.908-915</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19044301$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alonso y Gregorio, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez Maestro, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabrera Castillo, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabernero Gómez, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cansino Alcaide, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cisneros Ledo, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De la Peña Barthel, J J</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic urinary diversions</title><title>Actas urologicas españolas</title><addtitle>Actas Urol Esp</addtitle><description>The treatment of the invasive bladder cancer and the recurrent T1G3 is clearly established in radical cystectomy and pelvic linphadenectomy. One of the fields where the laparoscopic approach implies more doubts is the treatment of bladder cancer, because it requires experience enough in pelvic laparoscopic surgery and the urinary diversion implies great technical difficulties to the laparoscopic approach. The main goal of this article is to report our results with the urinary diversion after laparoscopic radical cystectomy where the ureteral anastomosis has been performed by a laparoscopic approach. From January 2005 to December 2007 we have performed 67 laparoscopic radical cistectomies. We conducted 28 laparoscopic urinary diversions with our technique: 7 neobladder with an average age of 54, 85 years and 21 ileal conduit with an average age of 69, 15 years. The averagesurgical time for enterocistoplasty with laparoscopic urethral and ureteral anastomosis is of 5 hours and 30 minutes. For the cutaneous ureteroileostomy with laparoscopic ureteral anastomosis the average surgical time has been of 4 hours and 30 minutes. We have had 1 case of urinary leakage in the laparoscopic neobladder and 3 cases in the laparoscopic ileal conduit (14%). We have not intestinal dehiscence nor ileal-ureteric stenosis. The average hospital stay for laparoscopic neobladder is for the 85% of cases of 13.6 days, and of 11.8 days for the 77.7% of ileal ureteric laparoscopies. The laparoscopic radical cystectomy is still a procedure reserved for groups with great experience in laparoscopic surgery. Nowadays, the most accepted procedure by most groups includes perform the cystectomy by a laparoscopic approach and the urinary diversion by an open approach. There is no evidence of the advantages of laparoscopic urinary diversion. It is necessary to perform comparative studies to clearly define the role of laparoscopic surgery in the urinary diversion.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cystectomy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ileum - surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Diversion - methods</subject><issn>0210-4806</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9j8tKBDEURLNQnHH0E9RZiS5ab97JUgZf0OBCXTdJ9w1E-hGTacG_d8DRVUFxOFQRckbhhgJVt6_AKFTCgLoCc625lbbSB2T5Xy_IcSkfAExwo4_IgloQggNdkovaJZen0k4ptus5x9Hl73UXvzCXOI3lhBwG1xc83eeKvD_cv22eqvrl8XlzV1eJcruteOhsZ71UwYGzHgSjSofAqOZCokfaUUQEzluLrVZMCm9lcJ4ZcB7A8hW5_PWmPH3OWLbNEEuLfe9GnObSKGukkIbvwPM9OPsBuyblOOwmN3-X-A9yl0v5</recordid><startdate>200810</startdate><enddate>200810</enddate><creator>Alonso y Gregorio, S</creator><creator>Alvarez Maestro, M</creator><creator>Cabrera Castillo, P M</creator><creator>Tabernero Gómez, A</creator><creator>Cansino Alcaide, R</creator><creator>Cisneros Ledo, J</creator><creator>De la Peña Barthel, J J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200810</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic urinary diversions</title><author>Alonso y Gregorio, S ; Alvarez Maestro, M ; Cabrera Castillo, P M ; Tabernero Gómez, A ; Cansino Alcaide, R ; Cisneros Ledo, J ; De la Peña Barthel, J J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-3fd9d9b56fa0a9b042167ff217345ebe1d1eee033c9ec76254b95fab280ab0093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cystectomy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ileum - surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Diversion - methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alonso y Gregorio, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez Maestro, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabrera Castillo, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabernero Gómez, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cansino Alcaide, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cisneros Ledo, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De la Peña Barthel, J J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Actas urologicas españolas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alonso y Gregorio, S</au><au>Alvarez Maestro, M</au><au>Cabrera Castillo, P M</au><au>Tabernero Gómez, A</au><au>Cansino Alcaide, R</au><au>Cisneros Ledo, J</au><au>De la Peña Barthel, J J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic urinary diversions</atitle><jtitle>Actas urologicas españolas</jtitle><addtitle>Actas Urol Esp</addtitle><date>2008-10</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>908</spage><epage>915</epage><pages>908-915</pages><issn>0210-4806</issn><abstract>The treatment of the invasive bladder cancer and the recurrent T1G3 is clearly established in radical cystectomy and pelvic linphadenectomy. One of the fields where the laparoscopic approach implies more doubts is the treatment of bladder cancer, because it requires experience enough in pelvic laparoscopic surgery and the urinary diversion implies great technical difficulties to the laparoscopic approach. The main goal of this article is to report our results with the urinary diversion after laparoscopic radical cystectomy where the ureteral anastomosis has been performed by a laparoscopic approach. From January 2005 to December 2007 we have performed 67 laparoscopic radical cistectomies. We conducted 28 laparoscopic urinary diversions with our technique: 7 neobladder with an average age of 54, 85 years and 21 ileal conduit with an average age of 69, 15 years. The averagesurgical time for enterocistoplasty with laparoscopic urethral and ureteral anastomosis is of 5 hours and 30 minutes. For the cutaneous ureteroileostomy with laparoscopic ureteral anastomosis the average surgical time has been of 4 hours and 30 minutes. We have had 1 case of urinary leakage in the laparoscopic neobladder and 3 cases in the laparoscopic ileal conduit (14%). We have not intestinal dehiscence nor ileal-ureteric stenosis. The average hospital stay for laparoscopic neobladder is for the 85% of cases of 13.6 days, and of 11.8 days for the 77.7% of ileal ureteric laparoscopies. The laparoscopic radical cystectomy is still a procedure reserved for groups with great experience in laparoscopic surgery. Nowadays, the most accepted procedure by most groups includes perform the cystectomy by a laparoscopic approach and the urinary diversion by an open approach. There is no evidence of the advantages of laparoscopic urinary diversion. It is necessary to perform comparative studies to clearly define the role of laparoscopic surgery in the urinary diversion.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>19044301</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0210-4806(08)73959-7</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0210-4806
ispartof Actas urologicas españolas, 2008-10, Vol.32 (9), p.908-915
issn 0210-4806
language spa
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69854583
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged
Cystectomy - methods
Female
Humans
Ileum - surgery
Laparoscopy
Male
Middle Aged
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery
Urinary Diversion - methods
title Laparoscopic urinary diversions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T11%3A26%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20urinary%20diversions&rft.jtitle=Actas%20urologicas%20espa%C3%B1olas&rft.au=Alonso%20y%20Gregorio,%20S&rft.date=2008-10&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=908&rft.epage=915&rft.pages=908-915&rft.issn=0210-4806&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0210-4806(08)73959-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69854583%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69854583&rft_id=info:pmid/19044301&rfr_iscdi=true