The prognostic importance of severity and type of post-transplant proteinuria
Proteinuria, developing after renal transplantation may influence allograft and patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of proteinuria on patient and allograft survival. Among 514 patients, 56 (11%) patients with good allograft function and proteinuria were evaluated retrospecti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical transplantation 1999-06, Vol.13 (3), p.241-244 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 244 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 241 |
container_title | Clinical transplantation |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Yıldız, A Erkoç, R Sever, Mş Türkmen, A Ecder, St Türk, S Kılıçarslan, I Ark, E |
description | Proteinuria, developing after renal transplantation may influence allograft and patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of proteinuria on patient and allograft survival. Among 514 patients, 56 (11%) patients with good allograft function and proteinuria were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with proteinuria were classified as group P (20 patients with permanent proteinuria, Male/Female: 16/4) and group T (36 patients with temporary proteinuria, M/F: 29/7) according to the type of proteinuria. Also, considering the amount of proteinuria, patients were classified as group M (32 patients with massive proteinuria, M/F: 29/3) and group NM (24 patients with non‐massive proteinuria, M/F: 16/8). The mean time interval between transplantation and appearance of proteinuria was 23.7 months (range 0–121 months) and no difference was found between groups. Two‐ and 5‐yr allograft survival rates were found to be 85 and 80% in group M, and 95 and 82% in group NM, respectively (p=0.24). In terms of type of proteinuria, 2‐ and 5‐yr allograft survival rates were found to be 70 and 58% in group P and 92 and 87% in group T, respectively. The difference between groups P and T was found to be statistically significant (p=0.02). Most (85%) of the patients with permanent proteinuria also had massive proteinuria. In conclusion, we found a significant relation between type and severity of proteinuria. The type of post‐transplant proteinuria had a stronger effect on allograft outcome than the severity of proteinuria. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1034/j.1399-0012.1999.130304.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69852216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69852216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4374-a564d194805d4a20e4097231ec0f72d1fb1dde8448b314dde04c55c0c69a3db73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkNFO2zAUhq0JtJZurzAFCXGX7jh2nPgOVKBjdJ1Uddql5TrO5pImwXahffs5pCpc7srHx9_5j_UhdI5hjIHQr-sxJpzHADgZY855uAIBOt59QMPjywkaAock1IwM0Jlz69BlmKUf0SCk5AQDHaIfy786am3zp26cNyoym7axXtZKR00ZOf2srfH7SNZF5Pfta7MNZOytrF1bydp3016bemuN_IROS1k5_flwjtCvu9vl5Fs8-zm9n1zPYkVJRmOZMlpgTnNICyoT0BR4lhCsFZRZUuByhYtC55TmK4JpKIGqNFWgGJekWGVkhC773LD7aaudFxvjlK7Cf3SzdYLxPE0SzALIe1DZxjmrS9Fas5F2LzCIzqVYi86Y6IyJzqXoXYpdmP1yWLJdbXTxbrKXF4CLAyCdklUZlCjj3riM5wySgF312Iup9P7_PyAmy0Vfh4i4jzDO690xQtpHwTKSpeL3fCrmN98XbJo9CE7-AdJXn2o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69852216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The prognostic importance of severity and type of post-transplant proteinuria</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Yıldız, A ; Erkoç, R ; Sever, Mş ; Türkmen, A ; Ecder, St ; Türk, S ; Kılıçarslan, I ; Ark, E</creator><creatorcontrib>Yıldız, A ; Erkoç, R ; Sever, Mş ; Türkmen, A ; Ecder, St ; Türk, S ; Kılıçarslan, I ; Ark, E</creatorcontrib><description>Proteinuria, developing after renal transplantation may influence allograft and patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of proteinuria on patient and allograft survival. Among 514 patients, 56 (11%) patients with good allograft function and proteinuria were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with proteinuria were classified as group P (20 patients with permanent proteinuria, Male/Female: 16/4) and group T (36 patients with temporary proteinuria, M/F: 29/7) according to the type of proteinuria. Also, considering the amount of proteinuria, patients were classified as group M (32 patients with massive proteinuria, M/F: 29/3) and group NM (24 patients with non‐massive proteinuria, M/F: 16/8). The mean time interval between transplantation and appearance of proteinuria was 23.7 months (range 0–121 months) and no difference was found between groups. Two‐ and 5‐yr allograft survival rates were found to be 85 and 80% in group M, and 95 and 82% in group NM, respectively (p=0.24). In terms of type of proteinuria, 2‐ and 5‐yr allograft survival rates were found to be 70 and 58% in group P and 92 and 87% in group T, respectively. The difference between groups P and T was found to be statistically significant (p=0.02). Most (85%) of the patients with permanent proteinuria also had massive proteinuria. In conclusion, we found a significant relation between type and severity of proteinuria. The type of post‐transplant proteinuria had a stronger effect on allograft outcome than the severity of proteinuria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0902-0063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.1999.130304.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10383104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Copenhagen: Munksgaard</publisher><subject>Adult ; allograft outcome ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Female ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage ; Kidney Transplantation ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; proteinuria ; Proteinuria - etiology ; renal transplantation ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the urinary system ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical transplantation, 1999-06, Vol.13 (3), p.241-244</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4374-a564d194805d4a20e4097231ec0f72d1fb1dde8448b314dde04c55c0c69a3db73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4374-a564d194805d4a20e4097231ec0f72d1fb1dde8448b314dde04c55c0c69a3db73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1034%2Fj.1399-0012.1999.130304.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1034%2Fj.1399-0012.1999.130304.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1798602$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10383104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yıldız, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erkoç, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sever, Mş</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Türkmen, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ecder, St</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Türk, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kılıçarslan, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ark, E</creatorcontrib><title>The prognostic importance of severity and type of post-transplant proteinuria</title><title>Clinical transplantation</title><addtitle>J Clin Transplant</addtitle><description>Proteinuria, developing after renal transplantation may influence allograft and patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of proteinuria on patient and allograft survival. Among 514 patients, 56 (11%) patients with good allograft function and proteinuria were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with proteinuria were classified as group P (20 patients with permanent proteinuria, Male/Female: 16/4) and group T (36 patients with temporary proteinuria, M/F: 29/7) according to the type of proteinuria. Also, considering the amount of proteinuria, patients were classified as group M (32 patients with massive proteinuria, M/F: 29/3) and group NM (24 patients with non‐massive proteinuria, M/F: 16/8). The mean time interval between transplantation and appearance of proteinuria was 23.7 months (range 0–121 months) and no difference was found between groups. Two‐ and 5‐yr allograft survival rates were found to be 85 and 80% in group M, and 95 and 82% in group NM, respectively (p=0.24). In terms of type of proteinuria, 2‐ and 5‐yr allograft survival rates were found to be 70 and 58% in group P and 92 and 87% in group T, respectively. The difference between groups P and T was found to be statistically significant (p=0.02). Most (85%) of the patients with permanent proteinuria also had massive proteinuria. In conclusion, we found a significant relation between type and severity of proteinuria. The type of post‐transplant proteinuria had a stronger effect on allograft outcome than the severity of proteinuria.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>allograft outcome</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>proteinuria</subject><subject>Proteinuria - etiology</subject><subject>renal transplantation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the urinary system</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0902-0063</issn><issn>1399-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkNFO2zAUhq0JtJZurzAFCXGX7jh2nPgOVKBjdJ1Uddql5TrO5pImwXahffs5pCpc7srHx9_5j_UhdI5hjIHQr-sxJpzHADgZY855uAIBOt59QMPjywkaAock1IwM0Jlz69BlmKUf0SCk5AQDHaIfy786am3zp26cNyoym7axXtZKR00ZOf2srfH7SNZF5Pfta7MNZOytrF1bydp3016bemuN_IROS1k5_flwjtCvu9vl5Fs8-zm9n1zPYkVJRmOZMlpgTnNICyoT0BR4lhCsFZRZUuByhYtC55TmK4JpKIGqNFWgGJekWGVkhC773LD7aaudFxvjlK7Cf3SzdYLxPE0SzALIe1DZxjmrS9Fas5F2LzCIzqVYi86Y6IyJzqXoXYpdmP1yWLJdbXTxbrKXF4CLAyCdklUZlCjj3riM5wySgF312Iup9P7_PyAmy0Vfh4i4jzDO690xQtpHwTKSpeL3fCrmN98XbJo9CE7-AdJXn2o</recordid><startdate>19990601</startdate><enddate>19990601</enddate><creator>Yıldız, A</creator><creator>Erkoç, R</creator><creator>Sever, Mş</creator><creator>Türkmen, A</creator><creator>Ecder, St</creator><creator>Türk, S</creator><creator>Kılıçarslan, I</creator><creator>Ark, E</creator><general>Munksgaard</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990601</creationdate><title>The prognostic importance of severity and type of post-transplant proteinuria</title><author>Yıldız, A ; Erkoç, R ; Sever, Mş ; Türkmen, A ; Ecder, St ; Türk, S ; Kılıçarslan, I ; Ark, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4374-a564d194805d4a20e4097231ec0f72d1fb1dde8448b314dde04c55c0c69a3db73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>allograft outcome</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>proteinuria</topic><topic>Proteinuria - etiology</topic><topic>renal transplantation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the urinary system</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yıldız, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erkoç, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sever, Mş</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Türkmen, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ecder, St</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Türk, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kılıçarslan, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ark, E</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yıldız, A</au><au>Erkoç, R</au><au>Sever, Mş</au><au>Türkmen, A</au><au>Ecder, St</au><au>Türk, S</au><au>Kılıçarslan, I</au><au>Ark, E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The prognostic importance of severity and type of post-transplant proteinuria</atitle><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Transplant</addtitle><date>1999-06-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>241-244</pages><issn>0902-0063</issn><eissn>1399-0012</eissn><abstract>Proteinuria, developing after renal transplantation may influence allograft and patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of proteinuria on patient and allograft survival. Among 514 patients, 56 (11%) patients with good allograft function and proteinuria were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with proteinuria were classified as group P (20 patients with permanent proteinuria, Male/Female: 16/4) and group T (36 patients with temporary proteinuria, M/F: 29/7) according to the type of proteinuria. Also, considering the amount of proteinuria, patients were classified as group M (32 patients with massive proteinuria, M/F: 29/3) and group NM (24 patients with non‐massive proteinuria, M/F: 16/8). The mean time interval between transplantation and appearance of proteinuria was 23.7 months (range 0–121 months) and no difference was found between groups. Two‐ and 5‐yr allograft survival rates were found to be 85 and 80% in group M, and 95 and 82% in group NM, respectively (p=0.24). In terms of type of proteinuria, 2‐ and 5‐yr allograft survival rates were found to be 70 and 58% in group P and 92 and 87% in group T, respectively. The difference between groups P and T was found to be statistically significant (p=0.02). Most (85%) of the patients with permanent proteinuria also had massive proteinuria. In conclusion, we found a significant relation between type and severity of proteinuria. The type of post‐transplant proteinuria had a stronger effect on allograft outcome than the severity of proteinuria.</abstract><cop>Copenhagen</cop><pub>Munksgaard</pub><pmid>10383104</pmid><doi>10.1034/j.1399-0012.1999.130304.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0902-0063 |
ispartof | Clinical transplantation, 1999-06, Vol.13 (3), p.241-244 |
issn | 0902-0063 1399-0012 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69852216 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Adult allograft outcome Biological and medical sciences Chi-Square Distribution Female Graft Survival Humans Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage Kidney Transplantation Male Medical sciences Postoperative Complications - etiology proteinuria Proteinuria - etiology renal transplantation Retrospective Studies Statistics, Nonparametric Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the urinary system Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome |
title | The prognostic importance of severity and type of post-transplant proteinuria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A39%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20prognostic%20importance%20of%20severity%20and%20type%20of%20post-transplant%20proteinuria&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20transplantation&rft.au=Y%C4%B1ld%C4%B1z,%20A&rft.date=1999-06-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=241-244&rft.issn=0902-0063&rft.eissn=1399-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.1034/j.1399-0012.1999.130304.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69852216%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69852216&rft_id=info:pmid/10383104&rfr_iscdi=true |