The prognostic importance of severity and type of post-transplant proteinuria

Proteinuria, developing after renal transplantation may influence allograft and patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of proteinuria on patient and allograft survival. Among 514 patients, 56 (11%) patients with good allograft function and proteinuria were evaluated retrospecti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical transplantation 1999-06, Vol.13 (3), p.241-244
Hauptverfasser: Yıldız, A, Erkoç, R, Sever, Mş, Türkmen, A, Ecder, St, Türk, S, Kılıçarslan, I, Ark, E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 244
container_issue 3
container_start_page 241
container_title Clinical transplantation
container_volume 13
creator Yıldız, A
Erkoç, R
Sever, Mş
Türkmen, A
Ecder, St
Türk, S
Kılıçarslan, I
Ark, E
description Proteinuria, developing after renal transplantation may influence allograft and patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of proteinuria on patient and allograft survival. Among 514 patients, 56 (11%) patients with good allograft function and proteinuria were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with proteinuria were classified as group P (20 patients with permanent proteinuria, Male/Female: 16/4) and group T (36 patients with temporary proteinuria, M/F: 29/7) according to the type of proteinuria. Also, considering the amount of proteinuria, patients were classified as group M (32 patients with massive proteinuria, M/F: 29/3) and group NM (24 patients with non‐massive proteinuria, M/F: 16/8). The mean time interval between transplantation and appearance of proteinuria was 23.7 months (range 0–121 months) and no difference was found between groups. Two‐ and 5‐yr allograft survival rates were found to be 85 and 80% in group M, and 95 and 82% in group NM, respectively (p=0.24). In terms of type of proteinuria, 2‐ and 5‐yr allograft survival rates were found to be 70 and 58% in group P and 92 and 87% in group T, respectively. The difference between groups P and T was found to be statistically significant (p=0.02). Most (85%) of the patients with permanent proteinuria also had massive proteinuria. In conclusion, we found a significant relation between type and severity of proteinuria. The type of post‐transplant proteinuria had a stronger effect on allograft outcome than the severity of proteinuria.
doi_str_mv 10.1034/j.1399-0012.1999.130304.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69852216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69852216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4374-a564d194805d4a20e4097231ec0f72d1fb1dde8448b314dde04c55c0c69a3db73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkNFO2zAUhq0JtJZurzAFCXGX7jh2nPgOVKBjdJ1Uddql5TrO5pImwXahffs5pCpc7srHx9_5j_UhdI5hjIHQr-sxJpzHADgZY855uAIBOt59QMPjywkaAock1IwM0Jlz69BlmKUf0SCk5AQDHaIfy786am3zp26cNyoym7axXtZKR00ZOf2srfH7SNZF5Pfta7MNZOytrF1bydp3016bemuN_IROS1k5_flwjtCvu9vl5Fs8-zm9n1zPYkVJRmOZMlpgTnNICyoT0BR4lhCsFZRZUuByhYtC55TmK4JpKIGqNFWgGJekWGVkhC773LD7aaudFxvjlK7Cf3SzdYLxPE0SzALIe1DZxjmrS9Fas5F2LzCIzqVYi86Y6IyJzqXoXYpdmP1yWLJdbXTxbrKXF4CLAyCdklUZlCjj3riM5wySgF312Iup9P7_PyAmy0Vfh4i4jzDO690xQtpHwTKSpeL3fCrmN98XbJo9CE7-AdJXn2o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69852216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The prognostic importance of severity and type of post-transplant proteinuria</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Yıldız, A ; Erkoç, R ; Sever, Mş ; Türkmen, A ; Ecder, St ; Türk, S ; Kılıçarslan, I ; Ark, E</creator><creatorcontrib>Yıldız, A ; Erkoç, R ; Sever, Mş ; Türkmen, A ; Ecder, St ; Türk, S ; Kılıçarslan, I ; Ark, E</creatorcontrib><description>Proteinuria, developing after renal transplantation may influence allograft and patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of proteinuria on patient and allograft survival. Among 514 patients, 56 (11%) patients with good allograft function and proteinuria were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with proteinuria were classified as group P (20 patients with permanent proteinuria, Male/Female: 16/4) and group T (36 patients with temporary proteinuria, M/F: 29/7) according to the type of proteinuria. Also, considering the amount of proteinuria, patients were classified as group M (32 patients with massive proteinuria, M/F: 29/3) and group NM (24 patients with non‐massive proteinuria, M/F: 16/8). The mean time interval between transplantation and appearance of proteinuria was 23.7 months (range 0–121 months) and no difference was found between groups. Two‐ and 5‐yr allograft survival rates were found to be 85 and 80% in group M, and 95 and 82% in group NM, respectively (p=0.24). In terms of type of proteinuria, 2‐ and 5‐yr allograft survival rates were found to be 70 and 58% in group P and 92 and 87% in group T, respectively. The difference between groups P and T was found to be statistically significant (p=0.02). Most (85%) of the patients with permanent proteinuria also had massive proteinuria. In conclusion, we found a significant relation between type and severity of proteinuria. The type of post‐transplant proteinuria had a stronger effect on allograft outcome than the severity of proteinuria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0902-0063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.1999.130304.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10383104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Copenhagen: Munksgaard</publisher><subject>Adult ; allograft outcome ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Female ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Kidney Transplantation ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; proteinuria ; Proteinuria - etiology ; renal transplantation ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the urinary system ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical transplantation, 1999-06, Vol.13 (3), p.241-244</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4374-a564d194805d4a20e4097231ec0f72d1fb1dde8448b314dde04c55c0c69a3db73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4374-a564d194805d4a20e4097231ec0f72d1fb1dde8448b314dde04c55c0c69a3db73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1034%2Fj.1399-0012.1999.130304.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1034%2Fj.1399-0012.1999.130304.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1798602$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10383104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yıldız, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erkoç, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sever, Mş</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Türkmen, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ecder, St</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Türk, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kılıçarslan, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ark, E</creatorcontrib><title>The prognostic importance of severity and type of post-transplant proteinuria</title><title>Clinical transplantation</title><addtitle>J Clin Transplant</addtitle><description>Proteinuria, developing after renal transplantation may influence allograft and patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of proteinuria on patient and allograft survival. Among 514 patients, 56 (11%) patients with good allograft function and proteinuria were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with proteinuria were classified as group P (20 patients with permanent proteinuria, Male/Female: 16/4) and group T (36 patients with temporary proteinuria, M/F: 29/7) according to the type of proteinuria. Also, considering the amount of proteinuria, patients were classified as group M (32 patients with massive proteinuria, M/F: 29/3) and group NM (24 patients with non‐massive proteinuria, M/F: 16/8). The mean time interval between transplantation and appearance of proteinuria was 23.7 months (range 0–121 months) and no difference was found between groups. Two‐ and 5‐yr allograft survival rates were found to be 85 and 80% in group M, and 95 and 82% in group NM, respectively (p=0.24). In terms of type of proteinuria, 2‐ and 5‐yr allograft survival rates were found to be 70 and 58% in group P and 92 and 87% in group T, respectively. The difference between groups P and T was found to be statistically significant (p=0.02). Most (85%) of the patients with permanent proteinuria also had massive proteinuria. In conclusion, we found a significant relation between type and severity of proteinuria. The type of post‐transplant proteinuria had a stronger effect on allograft outcome than the severity of proteinuria.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>allograft outcome</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>proteinuria</subject><subject>Proteinuria - etiology</subject><subject>renal transplantation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the urinary system</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0902-0063</issn><issn>1399-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkNFO2zAUhq0JtJZurzAFCXGX7jh2nPgOVKBjdJ1Uddql5TrO5pImwXahffs5pCpc7srHx9_5j_UhdI5hjIHQr-sxJpzHADgZY855uAIBOt59QMPjywkaAock1IwM0Jlz69BlmKUf0SCk5AQDHaIfy786am3zp26cNyoym7axXtZKR00ZOf2srfH7SNZF5Pfta7MNZOytrF1bydp3016bemuN_IROS1k5_flwjtCvu9vl5Fs8-zm9n1zPYkVJRmOZMlpgTnNICyoT0BR4lhCsFZRZUuByhYtC55TmK4JpKIGqNFWgGJekWGVkhC773LD7aaudFxvjlK7Cf3SzdYLxPE0SzALIe1DZxjmrS9Fas5F2LzCIzqVYi86Y6IyJzqXoXYpdmP1yWLJdbXTxbrKXF4CLAyCdklUZlCjj3riM5wySgF312Iup9P7_PyAmy0Vfh4i4jzDO690xQtpHwTKSpeL3fCrmN98XbJo9CE7-AdJXn2o</recordid><startdate>19990601</startdate><enddate>19990601</enddate><creator>Yıldız, A</creator><creator>Erkoç, R</creator><creator>Sever, Mş</creator><creator>Türkmen, A</creator><creator>Ecder, St</creator><creator>Türk, S</creator><creator>Kılıçarslan, I</creator><creator>Ark, E</creator><general>Munksgaard</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990601</creationdate><title>The prognostic importance of severity and type of post-transplant proteinuria</title><author>Yıldız, A ; Erkoç, R ; Sever, Mş ; Türkmen, A ; Ecder, St ; Türk, S ; Kılıçarslan, I ; Ark, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4374-a564d194805d4a20e4097231ec0f72d1fb1dde8448b314dde04c55c0c69a3db73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>allograft outcome</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>proteinuria</topic><topic>Proteinuria - etiology</topic><topic>renal transplantation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the urinary system</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yıldız, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erkoç, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sever, Mş</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Türkmen, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ecder, St</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Türk, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kılıçarslan, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ark, E</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yıldız, A</au><au>Erkoç, R</au><au>Sever, Mş</au><au>Türkmen, A</au><au>Ecder, St</au><au>Türk, S</au><au>Kılıçarslan, I</au><au>Ark, E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The prognostic importance of severity and type of post-transplant proteinuria</atitle><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Transplant</addtitle><date>1999-06-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>241-244</pages><issn>0902-0063</issn><eissn>1399-0012</eissn><abstract>Proteinuria, developing after renal transplantation may influence allograft and patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of proteinuria on patient and allograft survival. Among 514 patients, 56 (11%) patients with good allograft function and proteinuria were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with proteinuria were classified as group P (20 patients with permanent proteinuria, Male/Female: 16/4) and group T (36 patients with temporary proteinuria, M/F: 29/7) according to the type of proteinuria. Also, considering the amount of proteinuria, patients were classified as group M (32 patients with massive proteinuria, M/F: 29/3) and group NM (24 patients with non‐massive proteinuria, M/F: 16/8). The mean time interval between transplantation and appearance of proteinuria was 23.7 months (range 0–121 months) and no difference was found between groups. Two‐ and 5‐yr allograft survival rates were found to be 85 and 80% in group M, and 95 and 82% in group NM, respectively (p=0.24). In terms of type of proteinuria, 2‐ and 5‐yr allograft survival rates were found to be 70 and 58% in group P and 92 and 87% in group T, respectively. The difference between groups P and T was found to be statistically significant (p=0.02). Most (85%) of the patients with permanent proteinuria also had massive proteinuria. In conclusion, we found a significant relation between type and severity of proteinuria. The type of post‐transplant proteinuria had a stronger effect on allograft outcome than the severity of proteinuria.</abstract><cop>Copenhagen</cop><pub>Munksgaard</pub><pmid>10383104</pmid><doi>10.1034/j.1399-0012.1999.130304.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0902-0063
ispartof Clinical transplantation, 1999-06, Vol.13 (3), p.241-244
issn 0902-0063
1399-0012
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69852216
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Adult
allograft outcome
Biological and medical sciences
Chi-Square Distribution
Female
Graft Survival
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage
Kidney Transplantation
Male
Medical sciences
Postoperative Complications - etiology
proteinuria
Proteinuria - etiology
renal transplantation
Retrospective Studies
Statistics, Nonparametric
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the urinary system
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
title The prognostic importance of severity and type of post-transplant proteinuria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A39%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20prognostic%20importance%20of%20severity%20and%20type%20of%20post-transplant%20proteinuria&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20transplantation&rft.au=Y%C4%B1ld%C4%B1z,%20A&rft.date=1999-06-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=241-244&rft.issn=0902-0063&rft.eissn=1399-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.1034/j.1399-0012.1999.130304.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69852216%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69852216&rft_id=info:pmid/10383104&rfr_iscdi=true