Prediction of "Intent," "Discrepancy with Intent," and "Discrepancy with Nonintent" for the Patient with Chronic Pain to Return to Work after Treatment at a Pain Facility

OBJECTIVE:We previously determined that "intent" to return to work post pain facility treatment is the strongest predictor for actual return to work. The purposes of the present study were the followingto identify variables predicting "intent"; to predict membership in the "...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Clinical journal of pain 1999-06, Vol.15 (2), p.141-150
Hauptverfasser: Fishbain, David A, Cutler, R Brian, Rosomoff, Hubert L, Khalil, Tarek, Steele-Rosomoff, Renee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 150
container_issue 2
container_start_page 141
container_title The Clinical journal of pain
container_volume 15
creator Fishbain, David A
Cutler, R Brian
Rosomoff, Hubert L
Khalil, Tarek
Steele-Rosomoff, Renee
description OBJECTIVE:We previously determined that "intent" to return to work post pain facility treatment is the strongest predictor for actual return to work. The purposes of the present study were the followingto identify variables predicting "intent"; to predict membership in the "discrepant with intent" group [those chronic pain patients (CPPs) who do intend to return to work but do not]; and to predict membership in the "discrepant with nonintent" group (those CPPs who do not intend to return to work but do). DESIGN:A total of 128 CPPs completed a series of rating scales and yes/no questions relating to their preinjury job perceptions and a question relating to "intent" to return to the same type of preinjury job post-pain facility treatment. These CPPs were part of a grant study for prediction of return to work, and therefore their work status was determined at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months posttreatment. Preinjury job perceptions and other demographic variables were utilized using stepwise discriminant analysis to identify variables predicting "intent" and predicting membership in the "discrepant with intent" and "discrepant with nonintent" groups. SETTING:Pain facility (multidisciplinary pain center). PATIENTS:Consecutive low back pain CPPs, mean age 41.66 ± 9.54 years, with the most frequent highest educational status being high school completion (54.7%) and 60.2% being worker compensation CPPs. RESULTS:"Intent" was predicted by (in decreasing order of probability) postinjury job availability variables, job characteristic variables, and a litigation variable. "Discrepant with intent" was predicted by (in decreasing order of probability) for the 1-month follow-up time point, postinjury job availability variables, pain variables, a litigation variable, and a function perception variable, and for the final follow-up time point, pain variables only. "Discrepant with nonintent" was predicted by (in order of decreasing probability) for the 1-month follow-up time point, a job availability variable, a demographic variable, and a functional perception variable, and for the final follow-up time point a pain variable and a job availability variable. The percentage of CPPs correctly classified by each of these analyses was as follows"intent" 81.25%, "discrepant with intent" 87.01% (at 1-month follow-up) and 74.03% (final follow-up), "discrepant with nonintent" 92.16% (at 1-month follow-up) and 75.00% (final follow-up). CONCLUSIONS:CPPs intentions of returning to t
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00002508-199906000-00012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69846694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69846694</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3852-b986cb9e7209aea8e5e47afeeb69995fac764237b0ad3ea0b0041f7434669dbf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks1u1DAQxy1ERZfCKyBrhTg11EmcxD6ihUKlqq1QEUdr4owV02y82I5W-0o8Zb2bpXAAy5btmd_4Y_5DCM3Z-5zJ5oKlVlRMZLmUktVpl6WRF8_IIq_KOqs4k8_JgjVcZoLx5pS8DOFHIqpCsBfkNGelKGQhF-TXncfO6mjdSJ2hy6sx4hjPl3T50QbtcQOj3tGtjT19csHY_cN940Z7IJbUOE9jj_QOok2G2b_qfSJ0MtqRRke_Ypz8YfXd-QcKJqKn9x4hrvcxkPrMXoK2g427V-TEwBDw9XE-I98uP92vvmTXt5-vVh-uM12KqshaKWrdSmwKJgFBYIW8AYPY1ilZlQHd1Lwom5ZBVyKwljGem4aXvK5l15ryjLybz91493PCENU6_RWHAUZ0U1C1FHuUJ1DMoPYuBI9Gbbxdg9-pnKm9Tuq3TupJJ3XQKYW-Od4xtWvs_gqchUnA2yMAQcNgfEq0DX84UTIm9k_gM7Z1Q8pfeBimLXrVIwyxV_8rk_IRwpCrPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69846694</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction of "Intent," "Discrepancy with Intent," and "Discrepancy with Nonintent" for the Patient with Chronic Pain to Return to Work after Treatment at a Pain Facility</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Fishbain, David A ; Cutler, R Brian ; Rosomoff, Hubert L ; Khalil, Tarek ; Steele-Rosomoff, Renee</creator><creatorcontrib>Fishbain, David A ; Cutler, R Brian ; Rosomoff, Hubert L ; Khalil, Tarek ; Steele-Rosomoff, Renee</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE:We previously determined that "intent" to return to work post pain facility treatment is the strongest predictor for actual return to work. The purposes of the present study were the followingto identify variables predicting "intent"; to predict membership in the "discrepant with intent" group [those chronic pain patients (CPPs) who do intend to return to work but do not]; and to predict membership in the "discrepant with nonintent" group (those CPPs who do not intend to return to work but do). DESIGN:A total of 128 CPPs completed a series of rating scales and yes/no questions relating to their preinjury job perceptions and a question relating to "intent" to return to the same type of preinjury job post-pain facility treatment. These CPPs were part of a grant study for prediction of return to work, and therefore their work status was determined at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months posttreatment. Preinjury job perceptions and other demographic variables were utilized using stepwise discriminant analysis to identify variables predicting "intent" and predicting membership in the "discrepant with intent" and "discrepant with nonintent" groups. SETTING:Pain facility (multidisciplinary pain center). PATIENTS:Consecutive low back pain CPPs, mean age 41.66 ± 9.54 years, with the most frequent highest educational status being high school completion (54.7%) and 60.2% being worker compensation CPPs. RESULTS:"Intent" was predicted by (in decreasing order of probability) postinjury job availability variables, job characteristic variables, and a litigation variable. "Discrepant with intent" was predicted by (in decreasing order of probability) for the 1-month follow-up time point, postinjury job availability variables, pain variables, a litigation variable, and a function perception variable, and for the final follow-up time point, pain variables only. "Discrepant with nonintent" was predicted by (in order of decreasing probability) for the 1-month follow-up time point, a job availability variable, a demographic variable, and a functional perception variable, and for the final follow-up time point a pain variable and a job availability variable. The percentage of CPPs correctly classified by each of these analyses was as follows"intent" 81.25%, "discrepant with intent" 87.01% (at 1-month follow-up) and 74.03% (final follow-up), "discrepant with nonintent" 92.16% (at 1-month follow-up) and 75.00% (final follow-up). CONCLUSIONS:CPPs intentions of returning to their preinjury jobs are mainly determined by job availability and job characteristic variables but surprisingly not by pain variables. However, the results with "discrepant with intent" and "discrepant with nonintent" groups indicate that actual return to work is determined by an interaction between job availability variables and pain variables with pain variables predominating for long-term outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8047</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00002508-199906000-00012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10382929</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJPAEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chronic Disease ; Disability Evaluation ; Discriminant Analysis ; Employment - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment) ; Low Back Pain - rehabilitation ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pain Clinics ; Predictive Value of Tests</subject><ispartof>The Clinical journal of pain, 1999-06, Vol.15 (2), p.141-150</ispartof><rights>1999 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3852-b986cb9e7209aea8e5e47afeeb69995fac764237b0ad3ea0b0041f7434669dbf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3852-b986cb9e7209aea8e5e47afeeb69995fac764237b0ad3ea0b0041f7434669dbf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1830084$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10382929$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fishbain, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutler, R Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosomoff, Hubert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalil, Tarek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele-Rosomoff, Renee</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction of "Intent," "Discrepancy with Intent," and "Discrepancy with Nonintent" for the Patient with Chronic Pain to Return to Work after Treatment at a Pain Facility</title><title>The Clinical journal of pain</title><addtitle>Clin J Pain</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE:We previously determined that "intent" to return to work post pain facility treatment is the strongest predictor for actual return to work. The purposes of the present study were the followingto identify variables predicting "intent"; to predict membership in the "discrepant with intent" group [those chronic pain patients (CPPs) who do intend to return to work but do not]; and to predict membership in the "discrepant with nonintent" group (those CPPs who do not intend to return to work but do). DESIGN:A total of 128 CPPs completed a series of rating scales and yes/no questions relating to their preinjury job perceptions and a question relating to "intent" to return to the same type of preinjury job post-pain facility treatment. These CPPs were part of a grant study for prediction of return to work, and therefore their work status was determined at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months posttreatment. Preinjury job perceptions and other demographic variables were utilized using stepwise discriminant analysis to identify variables predicting "intent" and predicting membership in the "discrepant with intent" and "discrepant with nonintent" groups. SETTING:Pain facility (multidisciplinary pain center). PATIENTS:Consecutive low back pain CPPs, mean age 41.66 ± 9.54 years, with the most frequent highest educational status being high school completion (54.7%) and 60.2% being worker compensation CPPs. RESULTS:"Intent" was predicted by (in decreasing order of probability) postinjury job availability variables, job characteristic variables, and a litigation variable. "Discrepant with intent" was predicted by (in decreasing order of probability) for the 1-month follow-up time point, postinjury job availability variables, pain variables, a litigation variable, and a function perception variable, and for the final follow-up time point, pain variables only. "Discrepant with nonintent" was predicted by (in order of decreasing probability) for the 1-month follow-up time point, a job availability variable, a demographic variable, and a functional perception variable, and for the final follow-up time point a pain variable and a job availability variable. The percentage of CPPs correctly classified by each of these analyses was as follows"intent" 81.25%, "discrepant with intent" 87.01% (at 1-month follow-up) and 74.03% (final follow-up), "discrepant with nonintent" 92.16% (at 1-month follow-up) and 75.00% (final follow-up). CONCLUSIONS:CPPs intentions of returning to their preinjury jobs are mainly determined by job availability and job characteristic variables but surprisingly not by pain variables. However, the results with "discrepant with intent" and "discrepant with nonintent" groups indicate that actual return to work is determined by an interaction between job availability variables and pain variables with pain variables predominating for long-term outcome.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Discriminant Analysis</subject><subject>Employment - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment)</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain Clinics</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><issn>0749-8047</issn><issn>1536-5409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks1u1DAQxy1ERZfCKyBrhTg11EmcxD6ihUKlqq1QEUdr4owV02y82I5W-0o8Zb2bpXAAy5btmd_4Y_5DCM3Z-5zJ5oKlVlRMZLmUktVpl6WRF8_IIq_KOqs4k8_JgjVcZoLx5pS8DOFHIqpCsBfkNGelKGQhF-TXncfO6mjdSJ2hy6sx4hjPl3T50QbtcQOj3tGtjT19csHY_cN940Z7IJbUOE9jj_QOok2G2b_qfSJ0MtqRRke_Ypz8YfXd-QcKJqKn9x4hrvcxkPrMXoK2g427V-TEwBDw9XE-I98uP92vvmTXt5-vVh-uM12KqshaKWrdSmwKJgFBYIW8AYPY1ilZlQHd1Lwom5ZBVyKwljGem4aXvK5l15ryjLybz91493PCENU6_RWHAUZ0U1C1FHuUJ1DMoPYuBI9Gbbxdg9-pnKm9Tuq3TupJJ3XQKYW-Od4xtWvs_gqchUnA2yMAQcNgfEq0DX84UTIm9k_gM7Z1Q8pfeBimLXrVIwyxV_8rk_IRwpCrPQ</recordid><startdate>199906</startdate><enddate>199906</enddate><creator>Fishbain, David A</creator><creator>Cutler, R Brian</creator><creator>Rosomoff, Hubert L</creator><creator>Khalil, Tarek</creator><creator>Steele-Rosomoff, Renee</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams and Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199906</creationdate><title>Prediction of "Intent," "Discrepancy with Intent," and "Discrepancy with Nonintent" for the Patient with Chronic Pain to Return to Work after Treatment at a Pain Facility</title><author>Fishbain, David A ; Cutler, R Brian ; Rosomoff, Hubert L ; Khalil, Tarek ; Steele-Rosomoff, Renee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3852-b986cb9e7209aea8e5e47afeeb69995fac764237b0ad3ea0b0041f7434669dbf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Discriminant Analysis</topic><topic>Employment - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment)</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain Clinics</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fishbain, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutler, R Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosomoff, Hubert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalil, Tarek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele-Rosomoff, Renee</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Clinical journal of pain</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fishbain, David A</au><au>Cutler, R Brian</au><au>Rosomoff, Hubert L</au><au>Khalil, Tarek</au><au>Steele-Rosomoff, Renee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction of "Intent," "Discrepancy with Intent," and "Discrepancy with Nonintent" for the Patient with Chronic Pain to Return to Work after Treatment at a Pain Facility</atitle><jtitle>The Clinical journal of pain</jtitle><addtitle>Clin J Pain</addtitle><date>1999-06</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>141-150</pages><issn>0749-8047</issn><eissn>1536-5409</eissn><coden>CJPAEU</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVE:We previously determined that "intent" to return to work post pain facility treatment is the strongest predictor for actual return to work. The purposes of the present study were the followingto identify variables predicting "intent"; to predict membership in the "discrepant with intent" group [those chronic pain patients (CPPs) who do intend to return to work but do not]; and to predict membership in the "discrepant with nonintent" group (those CPPs who do not intend to return to work but do). DESIGN:A total of 128 CPPs completed a series of rating scales and yes/no questions relating to their preinjury job perceptions and a question relating to "intent" to return to the same type of preinjury job post-pain facility treatment. These CPPs were part of a grant study for prediction of return to work, and therefore their work status was determined at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months posttreatment. Preinjury job perceptions and other demographic variables were utilized using stepwise discriminant analysis to identify variables predicting "intent" and predicting membership in the "discrepant with intent" and "discrepant with nonintent" groups. SETTING:Pain facility (multidisciplinary pain center). PATIENTS:Consecutive low back pain CPPs, mean age 41.66 ± 9.54 years, with the most frequent highest educational status being high school completion (54.7%) and 60.2% being worker compensation CPPs. RESULTS:"Intent" was predicted by (in decreasing order of probability) postinjury job availability variables, job characteristic variables, and a litigation variable. "Discrepant with intent" was predicted by (in decreasing order of probability) for the 1-month follow-up time point, postinjury job availability variables, pain variables, a litigation variable, and a function perception variable, and for the final follow-up time point, pain variables only. "Discrepant with nonintent" was predicted by (in order of decreasing probability) for the 1-month follow-up time point, a job availability variable, a demographic variable, and a functional perception variable, and for the final follow-up time point a pain variable and a job availability variable. The percentage of CPPs correctly classified by each of these analyses was as follows"intent" 81.25%, "discrepant with intent" 87.01% (at 1-month follow-up) and 74.03% (final follow-up), "discrepant with nonintent" 92.16% (at 1-month follow-up) and 75.00% (final follow-up). CONCLUSIONS:CPPs intentions of returning to their preinjury jobs are mainly determined by job availability and job characteristic variables but surprisingly not by pain variables. However, the results with "discrepant with intent" and "discrepant with nonintent" groups indicate that actual return to work is determined by an interaction between job availability variables and pain variables with pain variables predominating for long-term outcome.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>10382929</pmid><doi>10.1097/00002508-199906000-00012</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-8047
ispartof The Clinical journal of pain, 1999-06, Vol.15 (2), p.141-150
issn 0749-8047
1536-5409
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69846694
source Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Chronic Disease
Disability Evaluation
Discriminant Analysis
Employment - statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment)
Low Back Pain - rehabilitation
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Pain Clinics
Predictive Value of Tests
title Prediction of "Intent," "Discrepancy with Intent," and "Discrepancy with Nonintent" for the Patient with Chronic Pain to Return to Work after Treatment at a Pain Facility
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T07%3A30%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20of%20%22Intent,%22%20%22Discrepancy%20with%20Intent,%22%20and%20%22Discrepancy%20with%20Nonintent%22%20for%20the%20Patient%20with%20Chronic%20Pain%20to%20Return%20to%20Work%20after%20Treatment%20at%20a%20Pain%20Facility&rft.jtitle=The%20Clinical%20journal%20of%20pain&rft.au=Fishbain,%20David%20A&rft.date=1999-06&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=141-150&rft.issn=0749-8047&rft.eissn=1536-5409&rft.coden=CJPAEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00002508-199906000-00012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69846694%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69846694&rft_id=info:pmid/10382929&rfr_iscdi=true