Salmeterol vs theophylline: sleep and Efficacy outcomes in patients with nocturnal asthma
To compare the efficacy, safety, and effects on sleep quality of salmeterol and extended-release theophylline in patients with nocturnal asthma. Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, three-period crossover. Outpatients at a single center. Patients spent 1 night during screening and 2 nights during...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chest 1999-06, Vol.115 (6), p.1525-1532 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1532 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1525 |
container_title | Chest |
container_volume | 115 |
creator | WIEGAND, L MENDE, C. N ZAIDEL, G ZWILLICH, C. W PETROCELLA, V. J YANCEY, S. W RICKARD, K. A |
description | To compare the efficacy, safety, and effects on sleep quality of salmeterol and extended-release theophylline in patients with nocturnal asthma.
Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, three-period crossover.
Outpatients at a single center. Patients spent 1 night during screening and 2 nights during each study period in a sleep laboratory for completion of sleep studies.
Male and female patients who were at least 18 years old with nocturnal asthma (baseline FEV1, 50 to 90% of predicted) and who required regular bronchodilator therapy. Patients on inhaled corticosteroids, cromolyn, and nedocromil were allowed into the study if their dosing remained constant throughout the study.
Inhaled salmeterol (42 microg per actuation), extended-release oral theophylline (titrated to serum levels of 10 to 20 microg/mL), and placebo taken twice daily.
Efficacy measurements included nocturnal spirometry, nocturnal polysomnography, sleep questionnaires, and daily measurements of lung function and symptoms. Salmeterol was superior to theophylline (p < or = 0.05) in maintaining nocturnal FEV1 levels and was superior to placebo (p < or = 0.05) in improving morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) and in decreasing nighttime albuterol use. The use of salmeterol significantly increased the percentage of days and nights with no albuterol use and decreased daytime albuterol use compared with theophylline and placebo (p < or = 0.05). Sleep quality global scores significantly improved with salmeterol and placebo (p < 0.001) but not with theophylline. The effects on sleep architecture were similar across treatment groups.
Salmeterol (but not theophylline) was associated with sustained improvements in morning PEF, protection from nighttime lung function deterioration, reductions in albuterol use, and improvements in patient perceptions of sleep. No differences were seen in polysomnographic measures of sleep quality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1378/chest.115.6.1525 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69844028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>42598598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p263t-9570746d7e6a1d1fdf41e88cef9b89b9d5ee4842034262724a9e3d191832aaa83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0E1LHEEQBuBGEnTdePckTRBvs_b3dHsLy6qBhRxiDjkNtT01zEjPh9M9hv33TnRF8FQUPG9RvIScc7biMrfXvsaYVpzrlVlxLfQRWXAneSa1kl_IgjEuMmmcOCGnMT6yeefOHJMTzua0VmpB_v6G0GLCsQ_0OdJUYz_U-xCaDm9oDIgDha6km6pqPPg97afk-xYjbTo6QGqwS5H-a1JNu96naewgUIipbuEb-VpBiHh2mEvy53bzsL7Ptr_ufq5_bLNBGJkyp3OWK1PmaICXvCorxdFaj5XbWbdzpUZUVgkmlTAiFwocypI7bqUAACuX5Ort7jD2T9PcR9E20WMI0GE_xcI4qxQT_-H3T_Cxf304FoIxpbTUZkYXBzTtWiyLYWxaGPfFe2MzuDwAiB5CNULnm_jhrLZMavkCqB56yQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200445356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Salmeterol vs theophylline: sleep and Efficacy outcomes in patients with nocturnal asthma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>WIEGAND, L ; MENDE, C. N ; ZAIDEL, G ; ZWILLICH, C. W ; PETROCELLA, V. J ; YANCEY, S. W ; RICKARD, K. A</creator><creatorcontrib>WIEGAND, L ; MENDE, C. N ; ZAIDEL, G ; ZWILLICH, C. W ; PETROCELLA, V. J ; YANCEY, S. W ; RICKARD, K. A</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the efficacy, safety, and effects on sleep quality of salmeterol and extended-release theophylline in patients with nocturnal asthma.
Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, three-period crossover.
Outpatients at a single center. Patients spent 1 night during screening and 2 nights during each study period in a sleep laboratory for completion of sleep studies.
Male and female patients who were at least 18 years old with nocturnal asthma (baseline FEV1, 50 to 90% of predicted) and who required regular bronchodilator therapy. Patients on inhaled corticosteroids, cromolyn, and nedocromil were allowed into the study if their dosing remained constant throughout the study.
Inhaled salmeterol (42 microg per actuation), extended-release oral theophylline (titrated to serum levels of 10 to 20 microg/mL), and placebo taken twice daily.
Efficacy measurements included nocturnal spirometry, nocturnal polysomnography, sleep questionnaires, and daily measurements of lung function and symptoms. Salmeterol was superior to theophylline (p < or = 0.05) in maintaining nocturnal FEV1 levels and was superior to placebo (p < or = 0.05) in improving morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) and in decreasing nighttime albuterol use. The use of salmeterol significantly increased the percentage of days and nights with no albuterol use and decreased daytime albuterol use compared with theophylline and placebo (p < or = 0.05). Sleep quality global scores significantly improved with salmeterol and placebo (p < 0.001) but not with theophylline. The effects on sleep architecture were similar across treatment groups.
Salmeterol (but not theophylline) was associated with sustained improvements in morning PEF, protection from nighttime lung function deterioration, reductions in albuterol use, and improvements in patient perceptions of sleep. No differences were seen in polysomnographic measures of sleep quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1378/chest.115.6.1525</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10378544</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHETBF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Northbrook, IL: American College of Chest Physicians</publisher><subject>Administration, Inhalation ; Adolescent ; Adrenergic beta-Agonists - administration & dosage ; Adrenergic beta-Agonists - therapeutic use ; Adult ; Albuterol - administration & dosage ; Albuterol - analogs & derivatives ; Albuterol - therapeutic use ; Asthma - drug therapy ; Asthma - physiopathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bronchodilator Agents - administration & dosage ; Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use ; Circadian Rhythm ; Cross-Over Studies ; Delayed-Action Preparations ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Respiratory Function Tests ; Respiratory system ; Safety ; Salmeterol Xinafoate ; Sleep - physiology ; Theophylline - administration & dosage ; Theophylline - therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Chest, 1999-06, Vol.115 (6), p.1525-1532</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American College of Chest Physicians Jun 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1858035$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10378544$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WIEGAND, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MENDE, C. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZAIDEL, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZWILLICH, C. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PETROCELLA, V. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YANCEY, S. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RICKARD, K. A</creatorcontrib><title>Salmeterol vs theophylline: sleep and Efficacy outcomes in patients with nocturnal asthma</title><title>Chest</title><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><description>To compare the efficacy, safety, and effects on sleep quality of salmeterol and extended-release theophylline in patients with nocturnal asthma.
Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, three-period crossover.
Outpatients at a single center. Patients spent 1 night during screening and 2 nights during each study period in a sleep laboratory for completion of sleep studies.
Male and female patients who were at least 18 years old with nocturnal asthma (baseline FEV1, 50 to 90% of predicted) and who required regular bronchodilator therapy. Patients on inhaled corticosteroids, cromolyn, and nedocromil were allowed into the study if their dosing remained constant throughout the study.
Inhaled salmeterol (42 microg per actuation), extended-release oral theophylline (titrated to serum levels of 10 to 20 microg/mL), and placebo taken twice daily.
Efficacy measurements included nocturnal spirometry, nocturnal polysomnography, sleep questionnaires, and daily measurements of lung function and symptoms. Salmeterol was superior to theophylline (p < or = 0.05) in maintaining nocturnal FEV1 levels and was superior to placebo (p < or = 0.05) in improving morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) and in decreasing nighttime albuterol use. The use of salmeterol significantly increased the percentage of days and nights with no albuterol use and decreased daytime albuterol use compared with theophylline and placebo (p < or = 0.05). Sleep quality global scores significantly improved with salmeterol and placebo (p < 0.001) but not with theophylline. The effects on sleep architecture were similar across treatment groups.
Salmeterol (but not theophylline) was associated with sustained improvements in morning PEF, protection from nighttime lung function deterioration, reductions in albuterol use, and improvements in patient perceptions of sleep. No differences were seen in polysomnographic measures of sleep quality.</description><subject>Administration, Inhalation</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adrenergic beta-Agonists - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Adrenergic beta-Agonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Albuterol - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Albuterol - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Albuterol - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Asthma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Asthma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bronchodilator Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Circadian Rhythm</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Delayed-Action Preparations</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Respiratory Function Tests</subject><subject>Respiratory system</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Salmeterol Xinafoate</subject><subject>Sleep - physiology</subject><subject>Theophylline - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Theophylline - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0012-3692</issn><issn>1931-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0E1LHEEQBuBGEnTdePckTRBvs_b3dHsLy6qBhRxiDjkNtT01zEjPh9M9hv33TnRF8FQUPG9RvIScc7biMrfXvsaYVpzrlVlxLfQRWXAneSa1kl_IgjEuMmmcOCGnMT6yeefOHJMTzua0VmpB_v6G0GLCsQ_0OdJUYz_U-xCaDm9oDIgDha6km6pqPPg97afk-xYjbTo6QGqwS5H-a1JNu96naewgUIipbuEb-VpBiHh2mEvy53bzsL7Ptr_ufq5_bLNBGJkyp3OWK1PmaICXvCorxdFaj5XbWbdzpUZUVgkmlTAiFwocypI7bqUAACuX5Ort7jD2T9PcR9E20WMI0GE_xcI4qxQT_-H3T_Cxf304FoIxpbTUZkYXBzTtWiyLYWxaGPfFe2MzuDwAiB5CNULnm_jhrLZMavkCqB56yQ</recordid><startdate>19990601</startdate><enddate>19990601</enddate><creator>WIEGAND, L</creator><creator>MENDE, C. N</creator><creator>ZAIDEL, G</creator><creator>ZWILLICH, C. W</creator><creator>PETROCELLA, V. J</creator><creator>YANCEY, S. W</creator><creator>RICKARD, K. A</creator><general>American College of Chest Physicians</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990601</creationdate><title>Salmeterol vs theophylline: sleep and Efficacy outcomes in patients with nocturnal asthma</title><author>WIEGAND, L ; MENDE, C. N ; ZAIDEL, G ; ZWILLICH, C. W ; PETROCELLA, V. J ; YANCEY, S. W ; RICKARD, K. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p263t-9570746d7e6a1d1fdf41e88cef9b89b9d5ee4842034262724a9e3d191832aaa83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Administration, Inhalation</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adrenergic beta-Agonists - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Adrenergic beta-Agonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Albuterol - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Albuterol - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Albuterol - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Asthma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Asthma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bronchodilator Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Circadian Rhythm</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Delayed-Action Preparations</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Respiratory Function Tests</topic><topic>Respiratory system</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Salmeterol Xinafoate</topic><topic>Sleep - physiology</topic><topic>Theophylline - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Theophylline - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WIEGAND, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MENDE, C. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZAIDEL, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZWILLICH, C. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PETROCELLA, V. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YANCEY, S. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RICKARD, K. A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WIEGAND, L</au><au>MENDE, C. N</au><au>ZAIDEL, G</au><au>ZWILLICH, C. W</au><au>PETROCELLA, V. J</au><au>YANCEY, S. W</au><au>RICKARD, K. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Salmeterol vs theophylline: sleep and Efficacy outcomes in patients with nocturnal asthma</atitle><jtitle>Chest</jtitle><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><date>1999-06-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1525</spage><epage>1532</epage><pages>1525-1532</pages><issn>0012-3692</issn><eissn>1931-3543</eissn><coden>CHETBF</coden><abstract>To compare the efficacy, safety, and effects on sleep quality of salmeterol and extended-release theophylline in patients with nocturnal asthma.
Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, three-period crossover.
Outpatients at a single center. Patients spent 1 night during screening and 2 nights during each study period in a sleep laboratory for completion of sleep studies.
Male and female patients who were at least 18 years old with nocturnal asthma (baseline FEV1, 50 to 90% of predicted) and who required regular bronchodilator therapy. Patients on inhaled corticosteroids, cromolyn, and nedocromil were allowed into the study if their dosing remained constant throughout the study.
Inhaled salmeterol (42 microg per actuation), extended-release oral theophylline (titrated to serum levels of 10 to 20 microg/mL), and placebo taken twice daily.
Efficacy measurements included nocturnal spirometry, nocturnal polysomnography, sleep questionnaires, and daily measurements of lung function and symptoms. Salmeterol was superior to theophylline (p < or = 0.05) in maintaining nocturnal FEV1 levels and was superior to placebo (p < or = 0.05) in improving morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) and in decreasing nighttime albuterol use. The use of salmeterol significantly increased the percentage of days and nights with no albuterol use and decreased daytime albuterol use compared with theophylline and placebo (p < or = 0.05). Sleep quality global scores significantly improved with salmeterol and placebo (p < 0.001) but not with theophylline. The effects on sleep architecture were similar across treatment groups.
Salmeterol (but not theophylline) was associated with sustained improvements in morning PEF, protection from nighttime lung function deterioration, reductions in albuterol use, and improvements in patient perceptions of sleep. No differences were seen in polysomnographic measures of sleep quality.</abstract><cop>Northbrook, IL</cop><pub>American College of Chest Physicians</pub><pmid>10378544</pmid><doi>10.1378/chest.115.6.1525</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-3692 |
ispartof | Chest, 1999-06, Vol.115 (6), p.1525-1532 |
issn | 0012-3692 1931-3543 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69844028 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Administration, Inhalation Adolescent Adrenergic beta-Agonists - administration & dosage Adrenergic beta-Agonists - therapeutic use Adult Albuterol - administration & dosage Albuterol - analogs & derivatives Albuterol - therapeutic use Asthma - drug therapy Asthma - physiopathology Biological and medical sciences Bronchodilator Agents - administration & dosage Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use Circadian Rhythm Cross-Over Studies Delayed-Action Preparations Double-Blind Method Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Medical sciences Pharmacology. Drug treatments Respiratory Function Tests Respiratory system Safety Salmeterol Xinafoate Sleep - physiology Theophylline - administration & dosage Theophylline - therapeutic use Treatment Outcome |
title | Salmeterol vs theophylline: sleep and Efficacy outcomes in patients with nocturnal asthma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T13%3A25%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Salmeterol%20vs%20theophylline:%20sleep%20and%20Efficacy%20outcomes%20in%20patients%20with%20nocturnal%20asthma&rft.jtitle=Chest&rft.au=WIEGAND,%20L&rft.date=1999-06-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1525&rft.epage=1532&rft.pages=1525-1532&rft.issn=0012-3692&rft.eissn=1931-3543&rft.coden=CHETBF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1378/chest.115.6.1525&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E42598598%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200445356&rft_id=info:pmid/10378544&rfr_iscdi=true |