Fluoride release/uptake of polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the fluoride uptake/release of polyacid‐modified resin composites (compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions. Two compomers (Dyract® and Compoglass®) were tested and the conventional glass–ionomer cement (GIC) Vivaglass Base® served as a control....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oral rehabilitation 1999-05, Vol.26 (5), p.388-393 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 393 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 388 |
container_title | Journal of oral rehabilitation |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Attin, T. Buchalla, W. Siewert, C. Hellwig, E. |
description | The aim of the present study was to evaluate the fluoride uptake/release of polyacid‐modified resin composites (compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions. Two compomers (Dyract® and Compoglass®) were tested and the conventional glass–ionomer cement (GIC) Vivaglass Base® served as a control. Forty specimens were fabricated from each of the respective materials. Twenty of these specimens were placed in artificial saliva and the other 20 specimens in a fluoridated dentifrice slurry for 5 min. Then, 10 fluoridated and 10 non‐fluoridated specimens were immersed in a neutral buffer solution (pH 6·8), and the other specimens were immersed in an acidic solution (pH 4·0). After 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days the samples were again placed in either a fluoridated dentifrice slurry or saliva for 5 min, after which time they were transferred to fresh buffer solutions. The fluoride content of the solutions was assessed with a fluoride sensitive electrode. Fluoride release from all the materials decreased continuously during the experiment, with a significantly higher release in the acidic solution compared to the neutral buffer solution. Fluoridation did not result in an increased fluoride release for the compomers. However, the conventional GIC revealed a significantly higher fluoride release after fluoridation. It is concluded that Dyract® and Compoglass® can not be replenished with fluoride, irrespective of the pH value of the environment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00413.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69833266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69833266</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4693-eb836f1b05eab7e6c2536ed92cef0e056f83efea8ab71218efee4028f9fec7193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFu1DAURS0EotPCLyCvECyS2nHiOAsWUNpCVc1IFQh2luM8S546cWonYubvcZqqYsnKV7r3PEsHIUxJTknJz_c5ZbzKClEWOW2aJiekpCw_vECb5-Il2hBGqoyK4vcJOo1xTwgRrKpfoxNKWM2IqDZovHKzD7YDHMCBinA-j5O6B-wNHr07Km27rPedNRa6tIl2wNr3o492gog_POYeQvyIUzPAPAXlsBo6vJBW43Y2BgKO3s2T9UN8g14Z5SK8fXrP0M-ryx8X37Lb3fX3i8-3mS55wzJoBeOGtqQC1dbAdVExDl1TaDAESMWNYGBAidTSgoqUoSSFMI0BXdOGnaH3690x-IcZ4iR7GzU4pwbwc5S8EYwVnKehWIc6-BgDGDkG26twlJTIxbbcy0WqXKTKxbZ8tC0PCX339Mfc9tD9A6560-DTOvhjHRz_-7C82e3uUkp8tvI2TnB45lW4l7xmdSV_ba9l-eXu5ivbbmXF_gK0q6BG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69833266</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fluoride release/uptake of polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection</source><creator>Attin, T. ; Buchalla, W. ; Siewert, C. ; Hellwig, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Attin, T. ; Buchalla, W. ; Siewert, C. ; Hellwig, E.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the fluoride uptake/release of polyacid‐modified resin composites (compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions. Two compomers (Dyract® and Compoglass®) were tested and the conventional glass–ionomer cement (GIC) Vivaglass Base® served as a control. Forty specimens were fabricated from each of the respective materials. Twenty of these specimens were placed in artificial saliva and the other 20 specimens in a fluoridated dentifrice slurry for 5 min. Then, 10 fluoridated and 10 non‐fluoridated specimens were immersed in a neutral buffer solution (pH 6·8), and the other specimens were immersed in an acidic solution (pH 4·0). After 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days the samples were again placed in either a fluoridated dentifrice slurry or saliva for 5 min, after which time they were transferred to fresh buffer solutions. The fluoride content of the solutions was assessed with a fluoride sensitive electrode. Fluoride release from all the materials decreased continuously during the experiment, with a significantly higher release in the acidic solution compared to the neutral buffer solution. Fluoridation did not result in an increased fluoride release for the compomers. However, the conventional GIC revealed a significantly higher fluoride release after fluoridation. It is concluded that Dyract® and Compoglass® can not be replenished with fluoride, irrespective of the pH value of the environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-182X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2842</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00413.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10373085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Buffers ; Compomers ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Dentistry ; Fluorides - chemistry ; Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Materials Testing ; Methacrylates - chemistry ; Silicates - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral rehabilitation, 1999-05, Vol.26 (5), p.388-393</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4693-eb836f1b05eab7e6c2536ed92cef0e056f83efea8ab71218efee4028f9fec7193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4693-eb836f1b05eab7e6c2536ed92cef0e056f83efea8ab71218efee4028f9fec7193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2842.1999.00413.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2842.1999.00413.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10373085$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Attin, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchalla, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siewert, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellwig, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Fluoride release/uptake of polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions</title><title>Journal of oral rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</addtitle><description>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the fluoride uptake/release of polyacid‐modified resin composites (compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions. Two compomers (Dyract® and Compoglass®) were tested and the conventional glass–ionomer cement (GIC) Vivaglass Base® served as a control. Forty specimens were fabricated from each of the respective materials. Twenty of these specimens were placed in artificial saliva and the other 20 specimens in a fluoridated dentifrice slurry for 5 min. Then, 10 fluoridated and 10 non‐fluoridated specimens were immersed in a neutral buffer solution (pH 6·8), and the other specimens were immersed in an acidic solution (pH 4·0). After 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days the samples were again placed in either a fluoridated dentifrice slurry or saliva for 5 min, after which time they were transferred to fresh buffer solutions. The fluoride content of the solutions was assessed with a fluoride sensitive electrode. Fluoride release from all the materials decreased continuously during the experiment, with a significantly higher release in the acidic solution compared to the neutral buffer solution. Fluoridation did not result in an increased fluoride release for the compomers. However, the conventional GIC revealed a significantly higher fluoride release after fluoridation. It is concluded that Dyract® and Compoglass® can not be replenished with fluoride, irrespective of the pH value of the environment.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Compomers</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Fluorides - chemistry</subject><subject>Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Methacrylates - chemistry</subject><subject>Silicates - chemistry</subject><issn>0305-182X</issn><issn>1365-2842</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMFu1DAURS0EotPCLyCvECyS2nHiOAsWUNpCVc1IFQh2luM8S546cWonYubvcZqqYsnKV7r3PEsHIUxJTknJz_c5ZbzKClEWOW2aJiekpCw_vECb5-Il2hBGqoyK4vcJOo1xTwgRrKpfoxNKWM2IqDZovHKzD7YDHMCBinA-j5O6B-wNHr07Km27rPedNRa6tIl2wNr3o492gog_POYeQvyIUzPAPAXlsBo6vJBW43Y2BgKO3s2T9UN8g14Z5SK8fXrP0M-ryx8X37Lb3fX3i8-3mS55wzJoBeOGtqQC1dbAdVExDl1TaDAESMWNYGBAidTSgoqUoSSFMI0BXdOGnaH3690x-IcZ4iR7GzU4pwbwc5S8EYwVnKehWIc6-BgDGDkG26twlJTIxbbcy0WqXKTKxbZ8tC0PCX339Mfc9tD9A6560-DTOvhjHRz_-7C82e3uUkp8tvI2TnB45lW4l7xmdSV_ba9l-eXu5ivbbmXF_gK0q6BG</recordid><startdate>199905</startdate><enddate>199905</enddate><creator>Attin, T.</creator><creator>Buchalla, W.</creator><creator>Siewert, C.</creator><creator>Hellwig, E.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199905</creationdate><title>Fluoride release/uptake of polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions</title><author>Attin, T. ; Buchalla, W. ; Siewert, C. ; Hellwig, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4693-eb836f1b05eab7e6c2536ed92cef0e056f83efea8ab71218efee4028f9fec7193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Compomers</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Fluorides - chemistry</topic><topic>Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Methacrylates - chemistry</topic><topic>Silicates - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Attin, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchalla, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siewert, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellwig, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Attin, T.</au><au>Buchalla, W.</au><au>Siewert, C.</au><au>Hellwig, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fluoride release/uptake of polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</addtitle><date>1999-05</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>388</spage><epage>393</epage><pages>388-393</pages><issn>0305-182X</issn><eissn>1365-2842</eissn><abstract>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the fluoride uptake/release of polyacid‐modified resin composites (compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions. Two compomers (Dyract® and Compoglass®) were tested and the conventional glass–ionomer cement (GIC) Vivaglass Base® served as a control. Forty specimens were fabricated from each of the respective materials. Twenty of these specimens were placed in artificial saliva and the other 20 specimens in a fluoridated dentifrice slurry for 5 min. Then, 10 fluoridated and 10 non‐fluoridated specimens were immersed in a neutral buffer solution (pH 6·8), and the other specimens were immersed in an acidic solution (pH 4·0). After 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days the samples were again placed in either a fluoridated dentifrice slurry or saliva for 5 min, after which time they were transferred to fresh buffer solutions. The fluoride content of the solutions was assessed with a fluoride sensitive electrode. Fluoride release from all the materials decreased continuously during the experiment, with a significantly higher release in the acidic solution compared to the neutral buffer solution. Fluoridation did not result in an increased fluoride release for the compomers. However, the conventional GIC revealed a significantly higher fluoride release after fluoridation. It is concluded that Dyract® and Compoglass® can not be replenished with fluoride, irrespective of the pH value of the environment.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>10373085</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00413.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-182X |
ispartof | Journal of oral rehabilitation, 1999-05, Vol.26 (5), p.388-393 |
issn | 0305-182X 1365-2842 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69833266 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection |
subjects | Analysis of Variance Buffers Compomers Composite Resins - chemistry Dentistry Fluorides - chemistry Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Materials Testing Methacrylates - chemistry Silicates - chemistry |
title | Fluoride release/uptake of polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A27%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fluoride%20release/uptake%20of%20polyacid-modified%20resin%20composites%20(compomers)%20in%20neutral%20and%20acidic%20buffer%20solutions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Attin,%20T.&rft.date=1999-05&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=388&rft.epage=393&rft.pages=388-393&rft.issn=0305-182X&rft.eissn=1365-2842&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00413.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69833266%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69833266&rft_id=info:pmid/10373085&rfr_iscdi=true |