Mitochondrial genes collectively suggest the paraphyly of Crustacea with respect to Insecta
Complete sequences of seven protein coding genes from Penaeus notialis mitochondrial DNA were compared in base composition and codon usage with homologous genes from Artemia franciscana and four insects. The crustacean genes are significantly less A + T-rich than their counterpart in insects and the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of molecular evolution 1999-07, Vol.49 (1), p.142-149 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 149 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 142 |
| container_title | Journal of molecular evolution |
| container_volume | 49 |
| creator | García-Machado, E Pempera, M Dennebouy, N Oliva-Suarez, M Mounolou, J C Monnerot, M |
| description | Complete sequences of seven protein coding genes from Penaeus notialis mitochondrial DNA were compared in base composition and codon usage with homologous genes from Artemia franciscana and four insects. The crustacean genes are significantly less A + T-rich than their counterpart in insects and the pattern of codon usage (ratio of G + C-rich versus A + T-rich codon) is less biased. A phylogenetic analysis using amino acid sequences of the seven corresponding polypeptides supports a sister-taxon status for mollusks-annelid and arthropods. Furthermore, a distance matrix-based tree and two most-parsimonious trees both suggest that crustaceans are paraphyletic with respect to insects. This is also supported by the inclusion of Panulirus argus COII (complete) and COI and COIII (partial) sequence data. From analysis of single and combined genes to infer phylogenies, it is observed that obtained from single genes are not well supported in most topologies cases and notably differ from that of the tree based on all seven genes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/PL00006527 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69824262</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2611684481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-c03763560f9414d226f9eec4c5867bf41c5745f850acbce078f1e2469ee03f283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMotlYv_gAJHjwIq_ne7FGKX1DRg548LGk6abdsN2uyq_Tfm9KC4sU5zAzDM8PMvAidUnJFCcmvXyYkmZIs30NDKjjLNm4fDQlhLGNaiAE6inFJCM1lwQ_RgBKuUpkN0ftT1Xm78M0sVKbGc2ggYuvrGmxXfUK9xrGfzyF2uFsAbk0w7WKdqt7hcehjZywY_FV1CxwgtqkJdx4_NjFl5hgdOFNHONnFEXq7u30dP2ST5_vH8c0ks1yzLrOE54pLRVwhqJgxplwBYIWVWuVTJ6iVuZBOS2Ls1ALJtaPAhEoQ4Y5pPkIX27lt8B992rVcVdFCXZsGfB9LVWgmmGL_glQLIqXcgOd_wKXvQ5OOKAumc775b4Iut5ANPsYArmxDtTJhXVJSboQpf4RJ8NluYj9dwewXulWCfwNl-oeI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>928731432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mitochondrial genes collectively suggest the paraphyly of Crustacea with respect to Insecta</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>García-Machado, E ; Pempera, M ; Dennebouy, N ; Oliva-Suarez, M ; Mounolou, J C ; Monnerot, M</creator><creatorcontrib>García-Machado, E ; Pempera, M ; Dennebouy, N ; Oliva-Suarez, M ; Mounolou, J C ; Monnerot, M</creatorcontrib><description>Complete sequences of seven protein coding genes from Penaeus notialis mitochondrial DNA were compared in base composition and codon usage with homologous genes from Artemia franciscana and four insects. The crustacean genes are significantly less A + T-rich than their counterpart in insects and the pattern of codon usage (ratio of G + C-rich versus A + T-rich codon) is less biased. A phylogenetic analysis using amino acid sequences of the seven corresponding polypeptides supports a sister-taxon status for mollusks-annelid and arthropods. Furthermore, a distance matrix-based tree and two most-parsimonious trees both suggest that crustaceans are paraphyletic with respect to insects. This is also supported by the inclusion of Panulirus argus COII (complete) and COI and COIII (partial) sequence data. From analysis of single and combined genes to infer phylogenies, it is observed that obtained from single genes are not well supported in most topologies cases and notably differ from that of the tree based on all seven genes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1432</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/PL00006527</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10368442</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Amino acids ; Animals ; Artemia - classification ; Artemia - genetics ; Base Sequence ; Cloning, Molecular ; Codon ; Crustacea - classification ; Crustacea - genetics ; Crustaceans ; DNA, Mitochondrial - genetics ; Evolution, Molecular ; Evolutionary biology ; Genetic Markers ; Genomics ; Insecta - classification ; Insecta - genetics ; Insects ; Mitochondrial DNA ; Molecular Sequence Data ; Mollusks ; Phylogeny ; Proteins</subject><ispartof>Journal of molecular evolution, 1999-07, Vol.49 (1), p.142-149</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-c03763560f9414d226f9eec4c5867bf41c5745f850acbce078f1e2469ee03f283</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10368442$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>García-Machado, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pempera, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennebouy, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliva-Suarez, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mounolou, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monnerot, M</creatorcontrib><title>Mitochondrial genes collectively suggest the paraphyly of Crustacea with respect to Insecta</title><title>Journal of molecular evolution</title><addtitle>J Mol Evol</addtitle><description>Complete sequences of seven protein coding genes from Penaeus notialis mitochondrial DNA were compared in base composition and codon usage with homologous genes from Artemia franciscana and four insects. The crustacean genes are significantly less A + T-rich than their counterpart in insects and the pattern of codon usage (ratio of G + C-rich versus A + T-rich codon) is less biased. A phylogenetic analysis using amino acid sequences of the seven corresponding polypeptides supports a sister-taxon status for mollusks-annelid and arthropods. Furthermore, a distance matrix-based tree and two most-parsimonious trees both suggest that crustaceans are paraphyletic with respect to insects. This is also supported by the inclusion of Panulirus argus COII (complete) and COI and COIII (partial) sequence data. From analysis of single and combined genes to infer phylogenies, it is observed that obtained from single genes are not well supported in most topologies cases and notably differ from that of the tree based on all seven genes.</description><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Artemia - classification</subject><subject>Artemia - genetics</subject><subject>Base Sequence</subject><subject>Cloning, Molecular</subject><subject>Codon</subject><subject>Crustacea - classification</subject><subject>Crustacea - genetics</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>DNA, Mitochondrial - genetics</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Evolutionary biology</subject><subject>Genetic Markers</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Insecta - classification</subject><subject>Insecta - genetics</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><issn>0022-2844</issn><issn>1432-1432</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMotlYv_gAJHjwIq_ne7FGKX1DRg548LGk6abdsN2uyq_Tfm9KC4sU5zAzDM8PMvAidUnJFCcmvXyYkmZIs30NDKjjLNm4fDQlhLGNaiAE6inFJCM1lwQ_RgBKuUpkN0ftT1Xm78M0sVKbGc2ggYuvrGmxXfUK9xrGfzyF2uFsAbk0w7WKdqt7hcehjZywY_FV1CxwgtqkJdx4_NjFl5hgdOFNHONnFEXq7u30dP2ST5_vH8c0ks1yzLrOE54pLRVwhqJgxplwBYIWVWuVTJ6iVuZBOS2Ls1ALJtaPAhEoQ4Y5pPkIX27lt8B992rVcVdFCXZsGfB9LVWgmmGL_glQLIqXcgOd_wKXvQ5OOKAumc775b4Iut5ANPsYArmxDtTJhXVJSboQpf4RJ8NluYj9dwewXulWCfwNl-oeI</recordid><startdate>19990701</startdate><enddate>19990701</enddate><creator>García-Machado, E</creator><creator>Pempera, M</creator><creator>Dennebouy, N</creator><creator>Oliva-Suarez, M</creator><creator>Mounolou, J C</creator><creator>Monnerot, M</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990701</creationdate><title>Mitochondrial genes collectively suggest the paraphyly of Crustacea with respect to Insecta</title><author>García-Machado, E ; Pempera, M ; Dennebouy, N ; Oliva-Suarez, M ; Mounolou, J C ; Monnerot, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-c03763560f9414d226f9eec4c5867bf41c5745f850acbce078f1e2469ee03f283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Artemia - classification</topic><topic>Artemia - genetics</topic><topic>Base Sequence</topic><topic>Cloning, Molecular</topic><topic>Codon</topic><topic>Crustacea - classification</topic><topic>Crustacea - genetics</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>DNA, Mitochondrial - genetics</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Evolutionary biology</topic><topic>Genetic Markers</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Insecta - classification</topic><topic>Insecta - genetics</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>García-Machado, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pempera, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennebouy, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliva-Suarez, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mounolou, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monnerot, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of molecular evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>García-Machado, E</au><au>Pempera, M</au><au>Dennebouy, N</au><au>Oliva-Suarez, M</au><au>Mounolou, J C</au><au>Monnerot, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mitochondrial genes collectively suggest the paraphyly of Crustacea with respect to Insecta</atitle><jtitle>Journal of molecular evolution</jtitle><addtitle>J Mol Evol</addtitle><date>1999-07-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>142</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>142-149</pages><issn>0022-2844</issn><eissn>1432-1432</eissn><abstract>Complete sequences of seven protein coding genes from Penaeus notialis mitochondrial DNA were compared in base composition and codon usage with homologous genes from Artemia franciscana and four insects. The crustacean genes are significantly less A + T-rich than their counterpart in insects and the pattern of codon usage (ratio of G + C-rich versus A + T-rich codon) is less biased. A phylogenetic analysis using amino acid sequences of the seven corresponding polypeptides supports a sister-taxon status for mollusks-annelid and arthropods. Furthermore, a distance matrix-based tree and two most-parsimonious trees both suggest that crustaceans are paraphyletic with respect to insects. This is also supported by the inclusion of Panulirus argus COII (complete) and COI and COIII (partial) sequence data. From analysis of single and combined genes to infer phylogenies, it is observed that obtained from single genes are not well supported in most topologies cases and notably differ from that of the tree based on all seven genes.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>10368442</pmid><doi>10.1007/PL00006527</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-2844 |
| ispartof | Journal of molecular evolution, 1999-07, Vol.49 (1), p.142-149 |
| issn | 0022-2844 1432-1432 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69824262 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Amino acids Animals Artemia - classification Artemia - genetics Base Sequence Cloning, Molecular Codon Crustacea - classification Crustacea - genetics Crustaceans DNA, Mitochondrial - genetics Evolution, Molecular Evolutionary biology Genetic Markers Genomics Insecta - classification Insecta - genetics Insects Mitochondrial DNA Molecular Sequence Data Mollusks Phylogeny Proteins |
| title | Mitochondrial genes collectively suggest the paraphyly of Crustacea with respect to Insecta |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T11%3A37%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mitochondrial%20genes%20collectively%20suggest%20the%20paraphyly%20of%20Crustacea%20with%20respect%20to%20Insecta&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20molecular%20evolution&rft.au=Garc%C3%ADa-Machado,%20E&rft.date=1999-07-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=142&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=142-149&rft.issn=0022-2844&rft.eissn=1432-1432&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/PL00006527&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2611684481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=928731432&rft_id=info:pmid/10368442&rfr_iscdi=true |