Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements

This study assessed the three-dimensional accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for measuring articular surface topographies and cartilage thicknesses of human cadaveric knee joints, by comparison with the calibrated stereophotogrammetric (SPG) method. Six fresh frozen cadaveric knees and the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Osteoarthritis and cartilage 1999-01, Vol.7 (1), p.95-109
Hauptverfasser: Cohen, Z A, McCarthy, D M, Kwak, S D, Legrand, P, Fogarasi, F, Ciaccio, E J, Ateshian, G A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 109
container_issue 1
container_start_page 95
container_title Osteoarthritis and cartilage
container_volume 7
creator Cohen, Z A
McCarthy, D M
Kwak, S D
Legrand, P
Fogarasi, F
Ciaccio, E J
Ateshian, G A
description This study assessed the three-dimensional accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for measuring articular surface topographies and cartilage thicknesses of human cadaveric knee joints, by comparison with the calibrated stereophotogrammetric (SPG) method. Six fresh frozen cadaveric knees and the knees of four volunteers were imaged with a three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition with fat suppression using a linear extremity coil in a 1.5 T superconducting magnet. The imaging voxel size was 0.47 x 0.47 x 1.0 mm. Both a manual and a semi-automated segmentation method were employed to extract topographic measurements from MRI. Following MRI, each of the six cadaveric knees was dissected and its articular surfaces quantified using stereophotogrammetry. The MRI surface measurements were compared numerically with the SPG measurements. For six cadaveric knees, the average accuracies of cartilage and subchondral bone surface measurements were found to be 0.22 mm and 0.14 mm respectively and the thickness measurements demonstrated an average accuracy of 0.31 mm. It was found that while most of the error may be attributed to random measurement error, the accuracy was somewhat affected by systematic errors. For each bone of the knee, accuracies were most favorable in the patella, followed by the femur and then the tibia. The more efficient semi-automated method provided equally good and sometimes better accuracies than manual segmentation. This study demonstrates that clinical MRI can provide accurate measurements of cartilage topography, thickness, contact areas and surface curvatures of the knee.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/joca.1998.0165
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69823600</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69823600</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9b2ed0a7f32573f3a16a4026eefbfd109feef3c27abcfc763511f6cfa9ac71513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkD1PwzAURT2AaCmsjMgTUxPsuHEaNlTxUVGEhGC2Xhy7TUnsYDuV-u9J2g5M70rv3DschG4oiSlJ2f3WSohpns9jQnl6hsaUcBbN0vlshC693xJCGKXkAo0oYTwjdD5G9s0ohSW4UNWwVjjY1q4dtJv9FIdNJX-M8n6KwZRYWhNABgxOgcfa2Qa_fy4fcGWiXRWc7VfqqnAQKmsOhcNjZ3HT851TjTLBX6FzDbVX16c7Qd_PT1-L12j18bJcPK4iyfIsRHmRqJJAplmSZkwzoBxmJOFK6UKXlOS6T0wmGRRSy4yzlFLNpYYcZEZTyibo7rjbOvvbKR9EU3mp6hqMsp0XPJ8njPdCJig-gtJZ753SonVVA24vKBGDVjFoFYNWMWjtC7en5a5oVPkPPzplf6i1eAI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69823600</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Cohen, Z A ; McCarthy, D M ; Kwak, S D ; Legrand, P ; Fogarasi, F ; Ciaccio, E J ; Ateshian, G A</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Z A ; McCarthy, D M ; Kwak, S D ; Legrand, P ; Fogarasi, F ; Ciaccio, E J ; Ateshian, G A</creatorcontrib><description>This study assessed the three-dimensional accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for measuring articular surface topographies and cartilage thicknesses of human cadaveric knee joints, by comparison with the calibrated stereophotogrammetric (SPG) method. Six fresh frozen cadaveric knees and the knees of four volunteers were imaged with a three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition with fat suppression using a linear extremity coil in a 1.5 T superconducting magnet. The imaging voxel size was 0.47 x 0.47 x 1.0 mm. Both a manual and a semi-automated segmentation method were employed to extract topographic measurements from MRI. Following MRI, each of the six cadaveric knees was dissected and its articular surfaces quantified using stereophotogrammetry. The MRI surface measurements were compared numerically with the SPG measurements. For six cadaveric knees, the average accuracies of cartilage and subchondral bone surface measurements were found to be 0.22 mm and 0.14 mm respectively and the thickness measurements demonstrated an average accuracy of 0.31 mm. It was found that while most of the error may be attributed to random measurement error, the accuracy was somewhat affected by systematic errors. For each bone of the knee, accuracies were most favorable in the patella, followed by the femur and then the tibia. The more efficient semi-automated method provided equally good and sometimes better accuracies than manual segmentation. This study demonstrates that clinical MRI can provide accurate measurements of cartilage topography, thickness, contact areas and surface curvatures of the knee.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-4584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/joca.1998.0165</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10367018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cartilage, Articular - anatomy &amp; histology ; Femur - anatomy &amp; histology ; Humans ; Knee Joint - anatomy &amp; histology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Middle Aged ; Patella - anatomy &amp; histology ; Photogrammetry ; Tibia - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><ispartof>Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 1999-01, Vol.7 (1), p.95-109</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9b2ed0a7f32573f3a16a4026eefbfd109feef3c27abcfc763511f6cfa9ac71513</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10367018$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Z A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, D M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, S D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legrand, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fogarasi, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciaccio, E J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ateshian, G A</creatorcontrib><title>Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements</title><title>Osteoarthritis and cartilage</title><addtitle>Osteoarthritis Cartilage</addtitle><description>This study assessed the three-dimensional accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for measuring articular surface topographies and cartilage thicknesses of human cadaveric knee joints, by comparison with the calibrated stereophotogrammetric (SPG) method. Six fresh frozen cadaveric knees and the knees of four volunteers were imaged with a three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition with fat suppression using a linear extremity coil in a 1.5 T superconducting magnet. The imaging voxel size was 0.47 x 0.47 x 1.0 mm. Both a manual and a semi-automated segmentation method were employed to extract topographic measurements from MRI. Following MRI, each of the six cadaveric knees was dissected and its articular surfaces quantified using stereophotogrammetry. The MRI surface measurements were compared numerically with the SPG measurements. For six cadaveric knees, the average accuracies of cartilage and subchondral bone surface measurements were found to be 0.22 mm and 0.14 mm respectively and the thickness measurements demonstrated an average accuracy of 0.31 mm. It was found that while most of the error may be attributed to random measurement error, the accuracy was somewhat affected by systematic errors. For each bone of the knee, accuracies were most favorable in the patella, followed by the femur and then the tibia. The more efficient semi-automated method provided equally good and sometimes better accuracies than manual segmentation. This study demonstrates that clinical MRI can provide accurate measurements of cartilage topography, thickness, contact areas and surface curvatures of the knee.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cartilage, Articular - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Femur - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Joint - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patella - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Photogrammetry</subject><subject>Tibia - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><issn>1063-4584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkD1PwzAURT2AaCmsjMgTUxPsuHEaNlTxUVGEhGC2Xhy7TUnsYDuV-u9J2g5M70rv3DschG4oiSlJ2f3WSohpns9jQnl6hsaUcBbN0vlshC693xJCGKXkAo0oYTwjdD5G9s0ohSW4UNWwVjjY1q4dtJv9FIdNJX-M8n6KwZRYWhNABgxOgcfa2Qa_fy4fcGWiXRWc7VfqqnAQKmsOhcNjZ3HT851TjTLBX6FzDbVX16c7Qd_PT1-L12j18bJcPK4iyfIsRHmRqJJAplmSZkwzoBxmJOFK6UKXlOS6T0wmGRRSy4yzlFLNpYYcZEZTyibo7rjbOvvbKR9EU3mp6hqMsp0XPJ8njPdCJig-gtJZ753SonVVA24vKBGDVjFoFYNWMWjtC7en5a5oVPkPPzplf6i1eAI</recordid><startdate>199901</startdate><enddate>199901</enddate><creator>Cohen, Z A</creator><creator>McCarthy, D M</creator><creator>Kwak, S D</creator><creator>Legrand, P</creator><creator>Fogarasi, F</creator><creator>Ciaccio, E J</creator><creator>Ateshian, G A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199901</creationdate><title>Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements</title><author>Cohen, Z A ; McCarthy, D M ; Kwak, S D ; Legrand, P ; Fogarasi, F ; Ciaccio, E J ; Ateshian, G A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9b2ed0a7f32573f3a16a4026eefbfd109feef3c27abcfc763511f6cfa9ac71513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cartilage, Articular - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Femur - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Joint - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patella - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Photogrammetry</topic><topic>Tibia - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Z A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, D M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, S D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legrand, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fogarasi, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciaccio, E J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ateshian, G A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Osteoarthritis and cartilage</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Z A</au><au>McCarthy, D M</au><au>Kwak, S D</au><au>Legrand, P</au><au>Fogarasi, F</au><au>Ciaccio, E J</au><au>Ateshian, G A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements</atitle><jtitle>Osteoarthritis and cartilage</jtitle><addtitle>Osteoarthritis Cartilage</addtitle><date>1999-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>95-109</pages><issn>1063-4584</issn><abstract>This study assessed the three-dimensional accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for measuring articular surface topographies and cartilage thicknesses of human cadaveric knee joints, by comparison with the calibrated stereophotogrammetric (SPG) method. Six fresh frozen cadaveric knees and the knees of four volunteers were imaged with a three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition with fat suppression using a linear extremity coil in a 1.5 T superconducting magnet. The imaging voxel size was 0.47 x 0.47 x 1.0 mm. Both a manual and a semi-automated segmentation method were employed to extract topographic measurements from MRI. Following MRI, each of the six cadaveric knees was dissected and its articular surfaces quantified using stereophotogrammetry. The MRI surface measurements were compared numerically with the SPG measurements. For six cadaveric knees, the average accuracies of cartilage and subchondral bone surface measurements were found to be 0.22 mm and 0.14 mm respectively and the thickness measurements demonstrated an average accuracy of 0.31 mm. It was found that while most of the error may be attributed to random measurement error, the accuracy was somewhat affected by systematic errors. For each bone of the knee, accuracies were most favorable in the patella, followed by the femur and then the tibia. The more efficient semi-automated method provided equally good and sometimes better accuracies than manual segmentation. This study demonstrates that clinical MRI can provide accurate measurements of cartilage topography, thickness, contact areas and surface curvatures of the knee.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>10367018</pmid><doi>10.1053/joca.1998.0165</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1063-4584
ispartof Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 1999-01, Vol.7 (1), p.95-109
issn 1063-4584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69823600
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Cartilage, Articular - anatomy & histology
Femur - anatomy & histology
Humans
Knee Joint - anatomy & histology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Middle Aged
Patella - anatomy & histology
Photogrammetry
Tibia - anatomy & histology
title Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A33%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knee%20cartilage%20topography,%20thickness,%20and%20contact%20areas%20from%20MRI:%20in-vitro%20calibration%20and%20in-vivo%20measurements&rft.jtitle=Osteoarthritis%20and%20cartilage&rft.au=Cohen,%20Z%20A&rft.date=1999-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=95-109&rft.issn=1063-4584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/joca.1998.0165&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69823600%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69823600&rft_id=info:pmid/10367018&rfr_iscdi=true