Otoacoustic emission criteria for neonatal hearing screening

Transient evoked otoacoustic emission measures are gaining acceptance as a technique in new-born hearing screening. At present a wide variety of pass–fail screening criteria are used in otoacoustic emission screening programs. In a study of 100 special care neonates and 35 well, full term babies, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 1999-04, Vol.48 (1), p.9-15
Hauptverfasser: Smyth, Veronica, McPherson, Bradley, Kei, Joseph, Young, June, Tudehope, David, Maurer, Marion, Rankin, Geraldine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 15
container_issue 1
container_start_page 9
container_title International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology
container_volume 48
creator Smyth, Veronica
McPherson, Bradley
Kei, Joseph
Young, June
Tudehope, David
Maurer, Marion
Rankin, Geraldine
description Transient evoked otoacoustic emission measures are gaining acceptance as a technique in new-born hearing screening. At present a wide variety of pass–fail screening criteria are used in otoacoustic emission screening programs. In a study of 100 special care neonates and 35 well, full term babies, a number of screening criteria were examined for sensitivity and specificity characteristics when compared to a standard auditory brainstem response protocol. Results indicate that, for normal and special care neonates with a gestational age at test of 38–41 weeks, high sensitivity (>80%) could be obtained when a pass–fail criterion involving analysis of emission reproducibility, or emission reproducibility and emission response level, was set. Sensitivity was reduced for special care neonates who fell outside this age range. Specificity was found to be relatively low overall (always
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0165-5876(99)00005-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69815571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165587699000051</els_id><sourcerecordid>69815571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-3c567f5ed863f6095a4c0338e922bced6f7bc6140267a80b6bdd0dac9f88e2a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKxDAUhoMozjj6CEoXIrqoJm1zA0Fk8AYDs1DXIU1PNNJpNGkF397MBXVnFidZfOecPx9ChwSfE0zYxWMqNKeCs1Mpz3A6NCdbaEwEL3JRsWobjX-QEdqL8Q1jwjGlu2hEcMmoZHyMLue918YPsXcmg4WL0fkuM8H1EJzOrA9ZB77TvW6zV9DBdS9ZNAGgS699tGN1G-Fgc0_Q8-3N0_Q-n83vHqbXs9xUgvZ5aSjjlkIjWGkZllRXBpelAFkUtYGGWV4bRipcMK4FrlndNLjRRlohoNCynKCT9dz34D8GiL1KQQ20rU7ZhqiYFIRSThJI16AJPsYAVr0Ht9DhSxGsltrUSptaOlFSqpU2tew72iwY6gU0f7rWnhJwvAF0NLq1QXfGxV-OU0EYS9jVGoNk49NBUNE46NIfXQDTq8a7f5J8Ay9Aia8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69815571</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Otoacoustic emission criteria for neonatal hearing screening</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Smyth, Veronica ; McPherson, Bradley ; Kei, Joseph ; Young, June ; Tudehope, David ; Maurer, Marion ; Rankin, Geraldine</creator><creatorcontrib>Smyth, Veronica ; McPherson, Bradley ; Kei, Joseph ; Young, June ; Tudehope, David ; Maurer, Marion ; Rankin, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><description>Transient evoked otoacoustic emission measures are gaining acceptance as a technique in new-born hearing screening. At present a wide variety of pass–fail screening criteria are used in otoacoustic emission screening programs. In a study of 100 special care neonates and 35 well, full term babies, a number of screening criteria were examined for sensitivity and specificity characteristics when compared to a standard auditory brainstem response protocol. Results indicate that, for normal and special care neonates with a gestational age at test of 38–41 weeks, high sensitivity (&gt;80%) could be obtained when a pass–fail criterion involving analysis of emission reproducibility, or emission reproducibility and emission response level, was set. Sensitivity was reduced for special care neonates who fell outside this age range. Specificity was found to be relatively low overall (always &lt;65%) and may relate to clinical factors in special care neonates not investigated in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5876</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0165-5876(99)00005-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10365967</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IPOTDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology ; Gestational Age ; Hearing ; Hearing Disorders - diagnosis ; Hearing Disorders - epidemiology ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Neonatal Screening ; Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous - physiology ; Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...) ; Screening ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Special care neonates ; Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions</subject><ispartof>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 1999-04, Vol.48 (1), p.9-15</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-3c567f5ed863f6095a4c0338e922bced6f7bc6140267a80b6bdd0dac9f88e2a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-3c567f5ed863f6095a4c0338e922bced6f7bc6140267a80b6bdd0dac9f88e2a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587699000051$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1758166$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10365967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smyth, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McPherson, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kei, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, June</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tudehope, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rankin, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><title>Otoacoustic emission criteria for neonatal hearing screening</title><title>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</title><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>Transient evoked otoacoustic emission measures are gaining acceptance as a technique in new-born hearing screening. At present a wide variety of pass–fail screening criteria are used in otoacoustic emission screening programs. In a study of 100 special care neonates and 35 well, full term babies, a number of screening criteria were examined for sensitivity and specificity characteristics when compared to a standard auditory brainstem response protocol. Results indicate that, for normal and special care neonates with a gestational age at test of 38–41 weeks, high sensitivity (&gt;80%) could be obtained when a pass–fail criterion involving analysis of emission reproducibility, or emission reproducibility and emission response level, was set. Sensitivity was reduced for special care neonates who fell outside this age range. Specificity was found to be relatively low overall (always &lt;65%) and may relate to clinical factors in special care neonates not investigated in this study.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Hearing Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hearing Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neonatal Screening</subject><subject>Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous - physiology</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...)</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Special care neonates</subject><subject>Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions</subject><issn>0165-5876</issn><issn>1872-8464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtKxDAUhoMozjj6CEoXIrqoJm1zA0Fk8AYDs1DXIU1PNNJpNGkF397MBXVnFidZfOecPx9ChwSfE0zYxWMqNKeCs1Mpz3A6NCdbaEwEL3JRsWobjX-QEdqL8Q1jwjGlu2hEcMmoZHyMLue918YPsXcmg4WL0fkuM8H1EJzOrA9ZB77TvW6zV9DBdS9ZNAGgS699tGN1G-Fgc0_Q8-3N0_Q-n83vHqbXs9xUgvZ5aSjjlkIjWGkZllRXBpelAFkUtYGGWV4bRipcMK4FrlndNLjRRlohoNCynKCT9dz34D8GiL1KQQ20rU7ZhqiYFIRSThJI16AJPsYAVr0Ht9DhSxGsltrUSptaOlFSqpU2tew72iwY6gU0f7rWnhJwvAF0NLq1QXfGxV-OU0EYS9jVGoNk49NBUNE46NIfXQDTq8a7f5J8Ay9Aia8</recordid><startdate>19990425</startdate><enddate>19990425</enddate><creator>Smyth, Veronica</creator><creator>McPherson, Bradley</creator><creator>Kei, Joseph</creator><creator>Young, June</creator><creator>Tudehope, David</creator><creator>Maurer, Marion</creator><creator>Rankin, Geraldine</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990425</creationdate><title>Otoacoustic emission criteria for neonatal hearing screening</title><author>Smyth, Veronica ; McPherson, Bradley ; Kei, Joseph ; Young, June ; Tudehope, David ; Maurer, Marion ; Rankin, Geraldine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-3c567f5ed863f6095a4c0338e922bced6f7bc6140267a80b6bdd0dac9f88e2a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Hearing Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hearing Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neonatal Screening</topic><topic>Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous - physiology</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...)</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Special care neonates</topic><topic>Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smyth, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McPherson, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kei, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, June</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tudehope, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rankin, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smyth, Veronica</au><au>McPherson, Bradley</au><au>Kei, Joseph</au><au>Young, June</au><au>Tudehope, David</au><au>Maurer, Marion</au><au>Rankin, Geraldine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Otoacoustic emission criteria for neonatal hearing screening</atitle><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>1999-04-25</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>9-15</pages><issn>0165-5876</issn><eissn>1872-8464</eissn><coden>IPOTDJ</coden><abstract>Transient evoked otoacoustic emission measures are gaining acceptance as a technique in new-born hearing screening. At present a wide variety of pass–fail screening criteria are used in otoacoustic emission screening programs. In a study of 100 special care neonates and 35 well, full term babies, a number of screening criteria were examined for sensitivity and specificity characteristics when compared to a standard auditory brainstem response protocol. Results indicate that, for normal and special care neonates with a gestational age at test of 38–41 weeks, high sensitivity (&gt;80%) could be obtained when a pass–fail criterion involving analysis of emission reproducibility, or emission reproducibility and emission response level, was set. Sensitivity was reduced for special care neonates who fell outside this age range. Specificity was found to be relatively low overall (always &lt;65%) and may relate to clinical factors in special care neonates not investigated in this study.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>10365967</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0165-5876(99)00005-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-5876
ispartof International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 1999-04, Vol.48 (1), p.9-15
issn 0165-5876
1872-8464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69815571
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology
Gestational Age
Hearing
Hearing Disorders - diagnosis
Hearing Disorders - epidemiology
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Medical sciences
Neonatal Screening
Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous - physiology
Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...)
Screening
Sensitivity and Specificity
Special care neonates
Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions
title Otoacoustic emission criteria for neonatal hearing screening
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T17%3A58%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Otoacoustic%20emission%20criteria%20for%20neonatal%20hearing%20screening&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20pediatric%20otorhinolaryngology&rft.au=Smyth,%20Veronica&rft.date=1999-04-25&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=9-15&rft.issn=0165-5876&rft.eissn=1872-8464&rft.coden=IPOTDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0165-5876(99)00005-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69815571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69815571&rft_id=info:pmid/10365967&rft_els_id=S0165587699000051&rfr_iscdi=true