Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task
Abstract Attention directs limited-capacity information processing resources to a subset of available perceptual representations. The mechanisms by which attention selects task-relevant representations for preferential processing are not fully known. Triesman and Gelade's [Triesman, A., Gelade,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brain research 2008-10, Vol.1236, p.126-139 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 139 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 126 |
container_title | Brain research |
container_volume | 1236 |
creator | Potts, Geoffrey F Wood, Susan M Kothmann, Delia Martin, Laura E |
description | Abstract Attention directs limited-capacity information processing resources to a subset of available perceptual representations. The mechanisms by which attention selects task-relevant representations for preferential processing are not fully known. Triesman and Gelade's [Triesman, A., Gelade, G., 1980. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognit. Psychol. 12 , 97–136.] influential attention model posits that simple features are processed preattentively, in parallel, but that attention is required to serially conjoin multiple features into an object representation. Event-related potentials have provided evidence for this model showing parallel processing of perceptual features in the posterior Selection Negativity (SN) and serial, hierarchic processing of feature conjunctions in the Frontal Selection Positivity (FSP). Most prior studies have been done on conjunctions within one sensory modality while many real-world objects have multimodal features. It is not known if the same neural systems of posterior parallel processing of simple features and frontal serial processing of feature conjunctions seen within a sensory modality also operate on conjunctions between modalities. The current study used ERPs and simultaneously presented auditory and visual stimuli in three task conditions: Attend Auditory (auditory feature determines the target, visual features are irrelevant), Attend Visual (visual features relevant, auditory irrelevant), and Attend Conjunction (target defined by the co-occurrence of an auditory and a visual feature). In the Attend Conjunction condition when the auditory but not the visual feature was a target there was an SN over auditory cortex, when the visual but not auditory stimulus was a target there was an SN over visual cortex, and when both auditory and visual stimuli were targets (i.e. conjunction target) there were SNs over both auditory and visual cortex, indicating parallel processing of the simple features within each modality. In contrast, an FSP was present when either the visual only or both auditory and visual features were targets, but not when only the auditory stimulus was a target, indicating that the conjunction target determination was evaluated serially and hierarchically with visual information taking precedence. This indicates that the detection of a target defined by audio-visual conjunction is achieved via the same mechanism as within a single perceptual modality, through separate, parallel processing of the |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.104 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69812084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0006899308018271</els_id><sourcerecordid>69812084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c942043a30c562d2d8d4ed2afb4476217bc2c105cd86d862cbedf4b2e16d37063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt-LFDEMx4so3nr6Lxzzom-zpj-2M_siynH-gAMF9bl00ozbuW5nbWcW7r-3464KvhwUQpJPk5BvGLvisObA9eth3SXrY6K8FgDtGpoSV4_YireNqLVQ8JitAEDX7XYrL9iznIfiSrmFp-xigWTxVuzHF5tsCBSqAyWkwzTbUFHc2Yi0pzhVNrpq5ynZhDuPVaJAxyVZFRNmO_kxVj4WrLKz82N99HkpgWMc5oi_05PNd8_Zk96GTC_O9pJ9f3_z7fpjffv5w6frd7c1biRMNW6VACWtBNxo4YRrnSInbN8p1WjBmw4Fctiga3V5AjtyveoEce1kA1peslenuoc0_pwpT2bvM1IINtI4Z6O3LRfQqgdBwUGC4k0B9QnENOacqDeH5Pc23RsOZtHCDOaPFmbRwkBT4kuHq3OHuduT-_ftvPwCvDwDNqMNfSp79fkvJ6Aps4plgrcnjsrijkULk9FT0cD5RDgZN_qHZ3nzXwkMPvrS9Y7uKQ_jnGKRxXCThQHzdbmc5XCgBd6KhstfQvHBcw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21030417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Potts, Geoffrey F ; Wood, Susan M ; Kothmann, Delia ; Martin, Laura E</creator><creatorcontrib>Potts, Geoffrey F ; Wood, Susan M ; Kothmann, Delia ; Martin, Laura E</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Attention directs limited-capacity information processing resources to a subset of available perceptual representations. The mechanisms by which attention selects task-relevant representations for preferential processing are not fully known. Triesman and Gelade's [Triesman, A., Gelade, G., 1980. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognit. Psychol. 12 , 97–136.] influential attention model posits that simple features are processed preattentively, in parallel, but that attention is required to serially conjoin multiple features into an object representation. Event-related potentials have provided evidence for this model showing parallel processing of perceptual features in the posterior Selection Negativity (SN) and serial, hierarchic processing of feature conjunctions in the Frontal Selection Positivity (FSP). Most prior studies have been done on conjunctions within one sensory modality while many real-world objects have multimodal features. It is not known if the same neural systems of posterior parallel processing of simple features and frontal serial processing of feature conjunctions seen within a sensory modality also operate on conjunctions between modalities. The current study used ERPs and simultaneously presented auditory and visual stimuli in three task conditions: Attend Auditory (auditory feature determines the target, visual features are irrelevant), Attend Visual (visual features relevant, auditory irrelevant), and Attend Conjunction (target defined by the co-occurrence of an auditory and a visual feature). In the Attend Conjunction condition when the auditory but not the visual feature was a target there was an SN over auditory cortex, when the visual but not auditory stimulus was a target there was an SN over visual cortex, and when both auditory and visual stimuli were targets (i.e. conjunction target) there were SNs over both auditory and visual cortex, indicating parallel processing of the simple features within each modality. In contrast, an FSP was present when either the visual only or both auditory and visual features were targets, but not when only the auditory stimulus was a target, indicating that the conjunction target determination was evaluated serially and hierarchically with visual information taking precedence. This indicates that the detection of a target defined by audio-visual conjunction is achieved via the same mechanism as within a single perceptual modality, through separate, parallel processing of the auditory and visual features and serial processing of the feature conjunction elements, rather than by evaluation of a fused multimodal percept.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.104</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18723003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRREAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Attention ; Attention - physiology ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain Mapping ; Cerebral Cortex - anatomy & histology ; Cerebral Cortex - physiology ; Electroencephalography ; Electrophysiology ; Event-related potentials ; Evoked Potentials - physiology ; Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multisensory ; Neurology ; Perception ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Brain research, 2008-10, Vol.1236, p.126-139</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c942043a30c562d2d8d4ed2afb4476217bc2c105cd86d862cbedf4b2e16d37063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c942043a30c562d2d8d4ed2afb4476217bc2c105cd86d862cbedf4b2e16d37063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899308018271$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20781227$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18723003$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Potts, Geoffrey F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kothmann, Delia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Laura E</creatorcontrib><title>Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task</title><title>Brain research</title><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><description>Abstract Attention directs limited-capacity information processing resources to a subset of available perceptual representations. The mechanisms by which attention selects task-relevant representations for preferential processing are not fully known. Triesman and Gelade's [Triesman, A., Gelade, G., 1980. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognit. Psychol. 12 , 97–136.] influential attention model posits that simple features are processed preattentively, in parallel, but that attention is required to serially conjoin multiple features into an object representation. Event-related potentials have provided evidence for this model showing parallel processing of perceptual features in the posterior Selection Negativity (SN) and serial, hierarchic processing of feature conjunctions in the Frontal Selection Positivity (FSP). Most prior studies have been done on conjunctions within one sensory modality while many real-world objects have multimodal features. It is not known if the same neural systems of posterior parallel processing of simple features and frontal serial processing of feature conjunctions seen within a sensory modality also operate on conjunctions between modalities. The current study used ERPs and simultaneously presented auditory and visual stimuli in three task conditions: Attend Auditory (auditory feature determines the target, visual features are irrelevant), Attend Visual (visual features relevant, auditory irrelevant), and Attend Conjunction (target defined by the co-occurrence of an auditory and a visual feature). In the Attend Conjunction condition when the auditory but not the visual feature was a target there was an SN over auditory cortex, when the visual but not auditory stimulus was a target there was an SN over visual cortex, and when both auditory and visual stimuli were targets (i.e. conjunction target) there were SNs over both auditory and visual cortex, indicating parallel processing of the simple features within each modality. In contrast, an FSP was present when either the visual only or both auditory and visual features were targets, but not when only the auditory stimulus was a target, indicating that the conjunction target determination was evaluated serially and hierarchically with visual information taking precedence. This indicates that the detection of a target defined by audio-visual conjunction is achieved via the same mechanism as within a single perceptual modality, through separate, parallel processing of the auditory and visual features and serial processing of the feature conjunction elements, rather than by evaluation of a fused multimodal percept.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Event-related potentials</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multisensory</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0006-8993</issn><issn>1872-6240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt-LFDEMx4so3nr6Lxzzom-zpj-2M_siynH-gAMF9bl00ozbuW5nbWcW7r-3464KvhwUQpJPk5BvGLvisObA9eth3SXrY6K8FgDtGpoSV4_YireNqLVQ8JitAEDX7XYrL9iznIfiSrmFp-xigWTxVuzHF5tsCBSqAyWkwzTbUFHc2Yi0pzhVNrpq5ynZhDuPVaJAxyVZFRNmO_kxVj4WrLKz82N99HkpgWMc5oi_05PNd8_Zk96GTC_O9pJ9f3_z7fpjffv5w6frd7c1biRMNW6VACWtBNxo4YRrnSInbN8p1WjBmw4Fctiga3V5AjtyveoEce1kA1peslenuoc0_pwpT2bvM1IINtI4Z6O3LRfQqgdBwUGC4k0B9QnENOacqDeH5Pc23RsOZtHCDOaPFmbRwkBT4kuHq3OHuduT-_ftvPwCvDwDNqMNfSp79fkvJ6Aps4plgrcnjsrijkULk9FT0cD5RDgZN_qHZ3nzXwkMPvrS9Y7uKQ_jnGKRxXCThQHzdbmc5XCgBd6KhstfQvHBcw</recordid><startdate>20081021</startdate><enddate>20081021</enddate><creator>Potts, Geoffrey F</creator><creator>Wood, Susan M</creator><creator>Kothmann, Delia</creator><creator>Martin, Laura E</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081021</creationdate><title>Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task</title><author>Potts, Geoffrey F ; Wood, Susan M ; Kothmann, Delia ; Martin, Laura E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c942043a30c562d2d8d4ed2afb4476217bc2c105cd86d862cbedf4b2e16d37063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Event-related potentials</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multisensory</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Potts, Geoffrey F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kothmann, Delia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Laura E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Potts, Geoffrey F</au><au>Wood, Susan M</au><au>Kothmann, Delia</au><au>Martin, Laura E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task</atitle><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><date>2008-10-21</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>1236</volume><spage>126</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>126-139</pages><issn>0006-8993</issn><eissn>1872-6240</eissn><coden>BRREAP</coden><abstract>Abstract Attention directs limited-capacity information processing resources to a subset of available perceptual representations. The mechanisms by which attention selects task-relevant representations for preferential processing are not fully known. Triesman and Gelade's [Triesman, A., Gelade, G., 1980. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognit. Psychol. 12 , 97–136.] influential attention model posits that simple features are processed preattentively, in parallel, but that attention is required to serially conjoin multiple features into an object representation. Event-related potentials have provided evidence for this model showing parallel processing of perceptual features in the posterior Selection Negativity (SN) and serial, hierarchic processing of feature conjunctions in the Frontal Selection Positivity (FSP). Most prior studies have been done on conjunctions within one sensory modality while many real-world objects have multimodal features. It is not known if the same neural systems of posterior parallel processing of simple features and frontal serial processing of feature conjunctions seen within a sensory modality also operate on conjunctions between modalities. The current study used ERPs and simultaneously presented auditory and visual stimuli in three task conditions: Attend Auditory (auditory feature determines the target, visual features are irrelevant), Attend Visual (visual features relevant, auditory irrelevant), and Attend Conjunction (target defined by the co-occurrence of an auditory and a visual feature). In the Attend Conjunction condition when the auditory but not the visual feature was a target there was an SN over auditory cortex, when the visual but not auditory stimulus was a target there was an SN over visual cortex, and when both auditory and visual stimuli were targets (i.e. conjunction target) there were SNs over both auditory and visual cortex, indicating parallel processing of the simple features within each modality. In contrast, an FSP was present when either the visual only or both auditory and visual features were targets, but not when only the auditory stimulus was a target, indicating that the conjunction target determination was evaluated serially and hierarchically with visual information taking precedence. This indicates that the detection of a target defined by audio-visual conjunction is achieved via the same mechanism as within a single perceptual modality, through separate, parallel processing of the auditory and visual features and serial processing of the feature conjunction elements, rather than by evaluation of a fused multimodal percept.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>18723003</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.104</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-8993 |
ispartof | Brain research, 2008-10, Vol.1236, p.126-139 |
issn | 0006-8993 1872-6240 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69812084 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation - methods Adult Analysis of Variance Attention Attention - physiology Auditory Perception - physiology Behavioral psychophysiology Biological and medical sciences Brain Mapping Cerebral Cortex - anatomy & histology Cerebral Cortex - physiology Electroencephalography Electrophysiology Event-related potentials Evoked Potentials - physiology Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Middle Aged Multisensory Neurology Perception Photic Stimulation - methods Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs Visual Perception - physiology Young Adult |
title | Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A35%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parallel%20perceptual%20enhancement%20and%20hierarchic%20relevance%20evaluation%20in%20an%20audio-visual%20conjunction%20task&rft.jtitle=Brain%20research&rft.au=Potts,%20Geoffrey%20F&rft.date=2008-10-21&rft.volume=1236&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=126-139&rft.issn=0006-8993&rft.eissn=1872-6240&rft.coden=BRREAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69812084%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21030417&rft_id=info:pmid/18723003&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0006899308018271&rfr_iscdi=true |