Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task

Abstract Attention directs limited-capacity information processing resources to a subset of available perceptual representations. The mechanisms by which attention selects task-relevant representations for preferential processing are not fully known. Triesman and Gelade's [Triesman, A., Gelade,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain research 2008-10, Vol.1236, p.126-139
Hauptverfasser: Potts, Geoffrey F, Wood, Susan M, Kothmann, Delia, Martin, Laura E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 139
container_issue
container_start_page 126
container_title Brain research
container_volume 1236
creator Potts, Geoffrey F
Wood, Susan M
Kothmann, Delia
Martin, Laura E
description Abstract Attention directs limited-capacity information processing resources to a subset of available perceptual representations. The mechanisms by which attention selects task-relevant representations for preferential processing are not fully known. Triesman and Gelade's [Triesman, A., Gelade, G., 1980. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognit. Psychol. 12 , 97–136.] influential attention model posits that simple features are processed preattentively, in parallel, but that attention is required to serially conjoin multiple features into an object representation. Event-related potentials have provided evidence for this model showing parallel processing of perceptual features in the posterior Selection Negativity (SN) and serial, hierarchic processing of feature conjunctions in the Frontal Selection Positivity (FSP). Most prior studies have been done on conjunctions within one sensory modality while many real-world objects have multimodal features. It is not known if the same neural systems of posterior parallel processing of simple features and frontal serial processing of feature conjunctions seen within a sensory modality also operate on conjunctions between modalities. The current study used ERPs and simultaneously presented auditory and visual stimuli in three task conditions: Attend Auditory (auditory feature determines the target, visual features are irrelevant), Attend Visual (visual features relevant, auditory irrelevant), and Attend Conjunction (target defined by the co-occurrence of an auditory and a visual feature). In the Attend Conjunction condition when the auditory but not the visual feature was a target there was an SN over auditory cortex, when the visual but not auditory stimulus was a target there was an SN over visual cortex, and when both auditory and visual stimuli were targets (i.e. conjunction target) there were SNs over both auditory and visual cortex, indicating parallel processing of the simple features within each modality. In contrast, an FSP was present when either the visual only or both auditory and visual features were targets, but not when only the auditory stimulus was a target, indicating that the conjunction target determination was evaluated serially and hierarchically with visual information taking precedence. This indicates that the detection of a target defined by audio-visual conjunction is achieved via the same mechanism as within a single perceptual modality, through separate, parallel processing of the
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.104
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69812084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0006899308018271</els_id><sourcerecordid>69812084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c942043a30c562d2d8d4ed2afb4476217bc2c105cd86d862cbedf4b2e16d37063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt-LFDEMx4so3nr6Lxzzom-zpj-2M_siynH-gAMF9bl00ozbuW5nbWcW7r-3464KvhwUQpJPk5BvGLvisObA9eth3SXrY6K8FgDtGpoSV4_YireNqLVQ8JitAEDX7XYrL9iznIfiSrmFp-xigWTxVuzHF5tsCBSqAyWkwzTbUFHc2Yi0pzhVNrpq5ynZhDuPVaJAxyVZFRNmO_kxVj4WrLKz82N99HkpgWMc5oi_05PNd8_Zk96GTC_O9pJ9f3_z7fpjffv5w6frd7c1biRMNW6VACWtBNxo4YRrnSInbN8p1WjBmw4Fctiga3V5AjtyveoEce1kA1peslenuoc0_pwpT2bvM1IINtI4Z6O3LRfQqgdBwUGC4k0B9QnENOacqDeH5Pc23RsOZtHCDOaPFmbRwkBT4kuHq3OHuduT-_ftvPwCvDwDNqMNfSp79fkvJ6Aps4plgrcnjsrijkULk9FT0cD5RDgZN_qHZ3nzXwkMPvrS9Y7uKQ_jnGKRxXCThQHzdbmc5XCgBd6KhstfQvHBcw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21030417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Potts, Geoffrey F ; Wood, Susan M ; Kothmann, Delia ; Martin, Laura E</creator><creatorcontrib>Potts, Geoffrey F ; Wood, Susan M ; Kothmann, Delia ; Martin, Laura E</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Attention directs limited-capacity information processing resources to a subset of available perceptual representations. The mechanisms by which attention selects task-relevant representations for preferential processing are not fully known. Triesman and Gelade's [Triesman, A., Gelade, G., 1980. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognit. Psychol. 12 , 97–136.] influential attention model posits that simple features are processed preattentively, in parallel, but that attention is required to serially conjoin multiple features into an object representation. Event-related potentials have provided evidence for this model showing parallel processing of perceptual features in the posterior Selection Negativity (SN) and serial, hierarchic processing of feature conjunctions in the Frontal Selection Positivity (FSP). Most prior studies have been done on conjunctions within one sensory modality while many real-world objects have multimodal features. It is not known if the same neural systems of posterior parallel processing of simple features and frontal serial processing of feature conjunctions seen within a sensory modality also operate on conjunctions between modalities. The current study used ERPs and simultaneously presented auditory and visual stimuli in three task conditions: Attend Auditory (auditory feature determines the target, visual features are irrelevant), Attend Visual (visual features relevant, auditory irrelevant), and Attend Conjunction (target defined by the co-occurrence of an auditory and a visual feature). In the Attend Conjunction condition when the auditory but not the visual feature was a target there was an SN over auditory cortex, when the visual but not auditory stimulus was a target there was an SN over visual cortex, and when both auditory and visual stimuli were targets (i.e. conjunction target) there were SNs over both auditory and visual cortex, indicating parallel processing of the simple features within each modality. In contrast, an FSP was present when either the visual only or both auditory and visual features were targets, but not when only the auditory stimulus was a target, indicating that the conjunction target determination was evaluated serially and hierarchically with visual information taking precedence. This indicates that the detection of a target defined by audio-visual conjunction is achieved via the same mechanism as within a single perceptual modality, through separate, parallel processing of the auditory and visual features and serial processing of the feature conjunction elements, rather than by evaluation of a fused multimodal percept.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.104</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18723003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRREAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Attention ; Attention - physiology ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain Mapping ; Cerebral Cortex - anatomy &amp; histology ; Cerebral Cortex - physiology ; Electroencephalography ; Electrophysiology ; Event-related potentials ; Evoked Potentials - physiology ; Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multisensory ; Neurology ; Perception ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Brain research, 2008-10, Vol.1236, p.126-139</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c942043a30c562d2d8d4ed2afb4476217bc2c105cd86d862cbedf4b2e16d37063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c942043a30c562d2d8d4ed2afb4476217bc2c105cd86d862cbedf4b2e16d37063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899308018271$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20781227$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18723003$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Potts, Geoffrey F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kothmann, Delia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Laura E</creatorcontrib><title>Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task</title><title>Brain research</title><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><description>Abstract Attention directs limited-capacity information processing resources to a subset of available perceptual representations. The mechanisms by which attention selects task-relevant representations for preferential processing are not fully known. Triesman and Gelade's [Triesman, A., Gelade, G., 1980. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognit. Psychol. 12 , 97–136.] influential attention model posits that simple features are processed preattentively, in parallel, but that attention is required to serially conjoin multiple features into an object representation. Event-related potentials have provided evidence for this model showing parallel processing of perceptual features in the posterior Selection Negativity (SN) and serial, hierarchic processing of feature conjunctions in the Frontal Selection Positivity (FSP). Most prior studies have been done on conjunctions within one sensory modality while many real-world objects have multimodal features. It is not known if the same neural systems of posterior parallel processing of simple features and frontal serial processing of feature conjunctions seen within a sensory modality also operate on conjunctions between modalities. The current study used ERPs and simultaneously presented auditory and visual stimuli in three task conditions: Attend Auditory (auditory feature determines the target, visual features are irrelevant), Attend Visual (visual features relevant, auditory irrelevant), and Attend Conjunction (target defined by the co-occurrence of an auditory and a visual feature). In the Attend Conjunction condition when the auditory but not the visual feature was a target there was an SN over auditory cortex, when the visual but not auditory stimulus was a target there was an SN over visual cortex, and when both auditory and visual stimuli were targets (i.e. conjunction target) there were SNs over both auditory and visual cortex, indicating parallel processing of the simple features within each modality. In contrast, an FSP was present when either the visual only or both auditory and visual features were targets, but not when only the auditory stimulus was a target, indicating that the conjunction target determination was evaluated serially and hierarchically with visual information taking precedence. This indicates that the detection of a target defined by audio-visual conjunction is achieved via the same mechanism as within a single perceptual modality, through separate, parallel processing of the auditory and visual features and serial processing of the feature conjunction elements, rather than by evaluation of a fused multimodal percept.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Event-related potentials</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multisensory</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0006-8993</issn><issn>1872-6240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt-LFDEMx4so3nr6Lxzzom-zpj-2M_siynH-gAMF9bl00ozbuW5nbWcW7r-3464KvhwUQpJPk5BvGLvisObA9eth3SXrY6K8FgDtGpoSV4_YireNqLVQ8JitAEDX7XYrL9iznIfiSrmFp-xigWTxVuzHF5tsCBSqAyWkwzTbUFHc2Yi0pzhVNrpq5ynZhDuPVaJAxyVZFRNmO_kxVj4WrLKz82N99HkpgWMc5oi_05PNd8_Zk96GTC_O9pJ9f3_z7fpjffv5w6frd7c1biRMNW6VACWtBNxo4YRrnSInbN8p1WjBmw4Fctiga3V5AjtyveoEce1kA1peslenuoc0_pwpT2bvM1IINtI4Z6O3LRfQqgdBwUGC4k0B9QnENOacqDeH5Pc23RsOZtHCDOaPFmbRwkBT4kuHq3OHuduT-_ftvPwCvDwDNqMNfSp79fkvJ6Aps4plgrcnjsrijkULk9FT0cD5RDgZN_qHZ3nzXwkMPvrS9Y7uKQ_jnGKRxXCThQHzdbmc5XCgBd6KhstfQvHBcw</recordid><startdate>20081021</startdate><enddate>20081021</enddate><creator>Potts, Geoffrey F</creator><creator>Wood, Susan M</creator><creator>Kothmann, Delia</creator><creator>Martin, Laura E</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081021</creationdate><title>Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task</title><author>Potts, Geoffrey F ; Wood, Susan M ; Kothmann, Delia ; Martin, Laura E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c942043a30c562d2d8d4ed2afb4476217bc2c105cd86d862cbedf4b2e16d37063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Event-related potentials</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multisensory</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Potts, Geoffrey F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kothmann, Delia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Laura E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Potts, Geoffrey F</au><au>Wood, Susan M</au><au>Kothmann, Delia</au><au>Martin, Laura E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task</atitle><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><date>2008-10-21</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>1236</volume><spage>126</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>126-139</pages><issn>0006-8993</issn><eissn>1872-6240</eissn><coden>BRREAP</coden><abstract>Abstract Attention directs limited-capacity information processing resources to a subset of available perceptual representations. The mechanisms by which attention selects task-relevant representations for preferential processing are not fully known. Triesman and Gelade's [Triesman, A., Gelade, G., 1980. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognit. Psychol. 12 , 97–136.] influential attention model posits that simple features are processed preattentively, in parallel, but that attention is required to serially conjoin multiple features into an object representation. Event-related potentials have provided evidence for this model showing parallel processing of perceptual features in the posterior Selection Negativity (SN) and serial, hierarchic processing of feature conjunctions in the Frontal Selection Positivity (FSP). Most prior studies have been done on conjunctions within one sensory modality while many real-world objects have multimodal features. It is not known if the same neural systems of posterior parallel processing of simple features and frontal serial processing of feature conjunctions seen within a sensory modality also operate on conjunctions between modalities. The current study used ERPs and simultaneously presented auditory and visual stimuli in three task conditions: Attend Auditory (auditory feature determines the target, visual features are irrelevant), Attend Visual (visual features relevant, auditory irrelevant), and Attend Conjunction (target defined by the co-occurrence of an auditory and a visual feature). In the Attend Conjunction condition when the auditory but not the visual feature was a target there was an SN over auditory cortex, when the visual but not auditory stimulus was a target there was an SN over visual cortex, and when both auditory and visual stimuli were targets (i.e. conjunction target) there were SNs over both auditory and visual cortex, indicating parallel processing of the simple features within each modality. In contrast, an FSP was present when either the visual only or both auditory and visual features were targets, but not when only the auditory stimulus was a target, indicating that the conjunction target determination was evaluated serially and hierarchically with visual information taking precedence. This indicates that the detection of a target defined by audio-visual conjunction is achieved via the same mechanism as within a single perceptual modality, through separate, parallel processing of the auditory and visual features and serial processing of the feature conjunction elements, rather than by evaluation of a fused multimodal percept.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>18723003</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.104</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-8993
ispartof Brain research, 2008-10, Vol.1236, p.126-139
issn 0006-8993
1872-6240
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69812084
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Acoustic Stimulation - methods
Adult
Analysis of Variance
Attention
Attention - physiology
Auditory Perception - physiology
Behavioral psychophysiology
Biological and medical sciences
Brain Mapping
Cerebral Cortex - anatomy & histology
Cerebral Cortex - physiology
Electroencephalography
Electrophysiology
Event-related potentials
Evoked Potentials - physiology
Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Multisensory
Neurology
Perception
Photic Stimulation - methods
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
Visual Perception - physiology
Young Adult
title Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A35%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parallel%20perceptual%20enhancement%20and%20hierarchic%20relevance%20evaluation%20in%20an%20audio-visual%20conjunction%20task&rft.jtitle=Brain%20research&rft.au=Potts,%20Geoffrey%20F&rft.date=2008-10-21&rft.volume=1236&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=126-139&rft.issn=0006-8993&rft.eissn=1872-6240&rft.coden=BRREAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69812084%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21030417&rft_id=info:pmid/18723003&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0006899308018271&rfr_iscdi=true