Esophageal motility and outcomes following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and fundoplication
Background: The addition of an antireflux procedure to all giant paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repairs remains controversial. In addition there are no series evaluating the impact of hernia repair and fundoplication on esophageal physiology. This study examines the outcomes of PEH repair with fundopli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 1999-05, Vol.177 (5), p.359-363 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 363 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 359 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 177 |
creator | Swanstrom, Lee L Jobe, Blair A Kinzie, Luke R Horvath, Karen D |
description | Background: The addition of an antireflux procedure to all giant paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repairs remains controversial. In addition there are no series evaluating the impact of hernia repair and fundoplication on esophageal physiology. This study examines the outcomes of PEH repair with fundoplication and examines the results of preoperative and postoperative motility and pH testing.
Methods: An analysis of a data base containing all patients undergoing PEH repair between September 1994 and December 1997. Patients underwent laparoscopic sac reduction, hernia repair, and fundoplication. Follow-up was performed under protocol and consisted of a symptoms assessment form, 24 hour pH, and manometry.
Results: Fifty-two patients (mean age 63) were treated: 59% complained of heartburn, 50% dysphagia, and 27% chest pain; 26% had a body motility disorder. Complete manometry was not possible in 41%. Mean operative time was 4 hours. There were 48 Nissen, 4 Toupet, and 7 Collis-Nissen procedures. There were 3 (6%) intraoperative and 3 (6%) postoperative complications. There were no operative mortalities. Hospital stay was 3 days (1 to 29). Late follow-up (18 months) was available for 96% of patients and showed dysphagia in 6%, heartburn in 10%, and recurrent herniation in 8%. Objective postoperative testing was available in 61% of the patients at a mean of 8 months. Twenty-four hour pH tests were abnormal in 4 patients (2 asymptomatic and 2 with a Collis). Lower esophageal sphincter pressures increased 63% and functioned well in 71% of patients; 50% of preoperative motility disorders improved following repair.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair of giant PEH is technically difficult but feasible. Routine addition of a fundoplication is advised, as preoperative testing is unreliable for a selective approach and fundoplications are well tolerated in this group of patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00062-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69810669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961099000628</els_id><sourcerecordid>2847445912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-48a2b05e1cbb0f5b872c2e843fed671d48648ef15397041bfd6a89dd8f3c93183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9rFTEUxYMo9ln9CMqAInYxmsxkMjcrKaVaoeBCXYdMcvOakpmMyYzSb9-8P1hx4yq58LsnJ-cQ8pLR94wy8eEbpbSppWD0nZRnZRBNDY_IhkEvawbQPiabP8gJeZbzbRkZ4-1TcsJoKzoQckO2lznON3qLOlRjXHzwy12lJ1vFdTFxxFy5GEL87adtFfSsU8wmzt5U5arxYfcG0-R1lXDWPu0F3DrZOAdv9OLj9Jw8cTpkfHE8T8mPT5ffL67q66-fv1ycX9eGA19qDroZaIfMDAN13QB9YxoE3jq0omeWg-CAjnWt7Clng7NCg7QWXGtky6A9JW8PunOKP1fMixp9NhiCnjCuWQkJjAohC_j6H_A2rmkq3lQDvOe8k6wpVHegTPl4TujUnPyo051iVO16UPse1C5kJaXa96B2Nl4d1ddhRPvX1iH4Arw5AjobHVzSk_H5gQPOQe7e_3jAsGT2y2NS2XicDFqf0CzKRv8fJ_e4O6W4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2847445912</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Esophageal motility and outcomes following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and fundoplication</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Swanstrom, Lee L ; Jobe, Blair A ; Kinzie, Luke R ; Horvath, Karen D</creator><creatorcontrib>Swanstrom, Lee L ; Jobe, Blair A ; Kinzie, Luke R ; Horvath, Karen D</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The addition of an antireflux procedure to all giant paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repairs remains controversial. In addition there are no series evaluating the impact of hernia repair and fundoplication on esophageal physiology. This study examines the outcomes of PEH repair with fundoplication and examines the results of preoperative and postoperative motility and pH testing.
Methods: An analysis of a data base containing all patients undergoing PEH repair between September 1994 and December 1997. Patients underwent laparoscopic sac reduction, hernia repair, and fundoplication. Follow-up was performed under protocol and consisted of a symptoms assessment form, 24 hour pH, and manometry.
Results: Fifty-two patients (mean age 63) were treated: 59% complained of heartburn, 50% dysphagia, and 27% chest pain; 26% had a body motility disorder. Complete manometry was not possible in 41%. Mean operative time was 4 hours. There were 48 Nissen, 4 Toupet, and 7 Collis-Nissen procedures. There were 3 (6%) intraoperative and 3 (6%) postoperative complications. There were no operative mortalities. Hospital stay was 3 days (1 to 29). Late follow-up (18 months) was available for 96% of patients and showed dysphagia in 6%, heartburn in 10%, and recurrent herniation in 8%. Objective postoperative testing was available in 61% of the patients at a mean of 8 months. Twenty-four hour pH tests were abnormal in 4 patients (2 asymptomatic and 2 with a Collis). Lower esophageal sphincter pressures increased 63% and functioned well in 71% of patients; 50% of preoperative motility disorders improved following repair.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair of giant PEH is technically difficult but feasible. Routine addition of a fundoplication is advised, as preoperative testing is unreliable for a selective approach and fundoplications are well tolerated in this group of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00062-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10365869</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSUAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Asymptomatic ; Barium ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catheters ; Complications ; Dysphagia ; Esophageal Motility Disorders - pathology ; Esophageal Motility Disorders - surgery ; Esophageal sphincter ; Esophagus ; Female ; Fundoplication - methods ; Gastroesophageal reflux ; Hernia ; Hernia, Hiatal - surgery ; Hernias ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Length of stay ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; Motility ; Ostomy ; Patients ; pH effects ; Physiology ; Postoperative ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of life ; Signs and symptoms ; Sphincter ; Stomach ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; Treatment Outcome ; Vomiting</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 1999-05, Vol.177 (5), p.359-363</ispartof><rights>1999 Excerpta Medica Inc.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>1999. Excerpta Medica Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-48a2b05e1cbb0f5b872c2e843fed671d48648ef15397041bfd6a89dd8f3c93183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-48a2b05e1cbb0f5b872c2e843fed671d48648ef15397041bfd6a89dd8f3c93183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2847445912?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1844892$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10365869$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swanstrom, Lee L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jobe, Blair A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinzie, Luke R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horvath, Karen D</creatorcontrib><title>Esophageal motility and outcomes following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and fundoplication</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Background: The addition of an antireflux procedure to all giant paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repairs remains controversial. In addition there are no series evaluating the impact of hernia repair and fundoplication on esophageal physiology. This study examines the outcomes of PEH repair with fundoplication and examines the results of preoperative and postoperative motility and pH testing.
Methods: An analysis of a data base containing all patients undergoing PEH repair between September 1994 and December 1997. Patients underwent laparoscopic sac reduction, hernia repair, and fundoplication. Follow-up was performed under protocol and consisted of a symptoms assessment form, 24 hour pH, and manometry.
Results: Fifty-two patients (mean age 63) were treated: 59% complained of heartburn, 50% dysphagia, and 27% chest pain; 26% had a body motility disorder. Complete manometry was not possible in 41%. Mean operative time was 4 hours. There were 48 Nissen, 4 Toupet, and 7 Collis-Nissen procedures. There were 3 (6%) intraoperative and 3 (6%) postoperative complications. There were no operative mortalities. Hospital stay was 3 days (1 to 29). Late follow-up (18 months) was available for 96% of patients and showed dysphagia in 6%, heartburn in 10%, and recurrent herniation in 8%. Objective postoperative testing was available in 61% of the patients at a mean of 8 months. Twenty-four hour pH tests were abnormal in 4 patients (2 asymptomatic and 2 with a Collis). Lower esophageal sphincter pressures increased 63% and functioned well in 71% of patients; 50% of preoperative motility disorders improved following repair.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair of giant PEH is technically difficult but feasible. Routine addition of a fundoplication is advised, as preoperative testing is unreliable for a selective approach and fundoplications are well tolerated in this group of patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Asymptomatic</subject><subject>Barium</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Dysphagia</subject><subject>Esophageal Motility Disorders - pathology</subject><subject>Esophageal Motility Disorders - surgery</subject><subject>Esophageal sphincter</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundoplication - methods</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal reflux</subject><subject>Hernia</subject><subject>Hernia, Hiatal - surgery</subject><subject>Hernias</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Motility</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Postoperative</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Signs and symptoms</subject><subject>Sphincter</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9rFTEUxYMo9ln9CMqAInYxmsxkMjcrKaVaoeBCXYdMcvOakpmMyYzSb9-8P1hx4yq58LsnJ-cQ8pLR94wy8eEbpbSppWD0nZRnZRBNDY_IhkEvawbQPiabP8gJeZbzbRkZ4-1TcsJoKzoQckO2lznON3qLOlRjXHzwy12lJ1vFdTFxxFy5GEL87adtFfSsU8wmzt5U5arxYfcG0-R1lXDWPu0F3DrZOAdv9OLj9Jw8cTpkfHE8T8mPT5ffL67q66-fv1ycX9eGA19qDroZaIfMDAN13QB9YxoE3jq0omeWg-CAjnWt7Clng7NCg7QWXGtky6A9JW8PunOKP1fMixp9NhiCnjCuWQkJjAohC_j6H_A2rmkq3lQDvOe8k6wpVHegTPl4TujUnPyo051iVO16UPse1C5kJaXa96B2Nl4d1ddhRPvX1iH4Arw5AjobHVzSk_H5gQPOQe7e_3jAsGT2y2NS2XicDFqf0CzKRv8fJ_e4O6W4</recordid><startdate>19990501</startdate><enddate>19990501</enddate><creator>Swanstrom, Lee L</creator><creator>Jobe, Blair A</creator><creator>Kinzie, Luke R</creator><creator>Horvath, Karen D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990501</creationdate><title>Esophageal motility and outcomes following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and fundoplication</title><author>Swanstrom, Lee L ; Jobe, Blair A ; Kinzie, Luke R ; Horvath, Karen D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-48a2b05e1cbb0f5b872c2e843fed671d48648ef15397041bfd6a89dd8f3c93183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Asymptomatic</topic><topic>Barium</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Dysphagia</topic><topic>Esophageal Motility Disorders - pathology</topic><topic>Esophageal Motility Disorders - surgery</topic><topic>Esophageal sphincter</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundoplication - methods</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal reflux</topic><topic>Hernia</topic><topic>Hernia, Hiatal - surgery</topic><topic>Hernias</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Motility</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Postoperative</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Signs and symptoms</topic><topic>Sphincter</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swanstrom, Lee L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jobe, Blair A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinzie, Luke R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horvath, Karen D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swanstrom, Lee L</au><au>Jobe, Blair A</au><au>Kinzie, Luke R</au><au>Horvath, Karen D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Esophageal motility and outcomes following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and fundoplication</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>1999-05-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>177</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>359</spage><epage>363</epage><pages>359-363</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><coden>AJSUAB</coden><abstract>Background: The addition of an antireflux procedure to all giant paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repairs remains controversial. In addition there are no series evaluating the impact of hernia repair and fundoplication on esophageal physiology. This study examines the outcomes of PEH repair with fundoplication and examines the results of preoperative and postoperative motility and pH testing.
Methods: An analysis of a data base containing all patients undergoing PEH repair between September 1994 and December 1997. Patients underwent laparoscopic sac reduction, hernia repair, and fundoplication. Follow-up was performed under protocol and consisted of a symptoms assessment form, 24 hour pH, and manometry.
Results: Fifty-two patients (mean age 63) were treated: 59% complained of heartburn, 50% dysphagia, and 27% chest pain; 26% had a body motility disorder. Complete manometry was not possible in 41%. Mean operative time was 4 hours. There were 48 Nissen, 4 Toupet, and 7 Collis-Nissen procedures. There were 3 (6%) intraoperative and 3 (6%) postoperative complications. There were no operative mortalities. Hospital stay was 3 days (1 to 29). Late follow-up (18 months) was available for 96% of patients and showed dysphagia in 6%, heartburn in 10%, and recurrent herniation in 8%. Objective postoperative testing was available in 61% of the patients at a mean of 8 months. Twenty-four hour pH tests were abnormal in 4 patients (2 asymptomatic and 2 with a Collis). Lower esophageal sphincter pressures increased 63% and functioned well in 71% of patients; 50% of preoperative motility disorders improved following repair.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair of giant PEH is technically difficult but feasible. Routine addition of a fundoplication is advised, as preoperative testing is unreliable for a selective approach and fundoplications are well tolerated in this group of patients.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10365869</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00062-8</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 1999-05, Vol.177 (5), p.359-363 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69810669 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Asymptomatic Barium Biological and medical sciences Catheters Complications Dysphagia Esophageal Motility Disorders - pathology Esophageal Motility Disorders - surgery Esophageal sphincter Esophagus Female Fundoplication - methods Gastroesophageal reflux Hernia Hernia, Hiatal - surgery Hernias Hospitals Humans Laparoscopy Laparoscopy - methods Length of stay Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Morbidity Motility Ostomy Patients pH effects Physiology Postoperative Prospective Studies Quality of life Signs and symptoms Sphincter Stomach Surgery Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the digestive system Treatment Outcome Vomiting |
title | Esophageal motility and outcomes following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and fundoplication |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T14%3A22%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Esophageal%20motility%20and%20outcomes%20following%20laparoscopic%20paraesophageal%20hernia%20repair%20and%20fundoplication&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Swanstrom,%20Lee%20L&rft.date=1999-05-01&rft.volume=177&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=359&rft.epage=363&rft.pages=359-363&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft.coden=AJSUAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00062-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2847445912%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2847445912&rft_id=info:pmid/10365869&rft_els_id=S0002961099000628&rfr_iscdi=true |