Testing a Model of the Nursing Assessment of Infant Pain
The purpose of this study was to test whether elements of an infant pain assessment model interacted as postulated by the model. The elements are the infant’s response to comfort measures and the principle of consolability. Four different scenarios for each of 16 videotaped infants were prepared. Ea...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical nursing research 1999-02, Vol.8 (1), p.69-83 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 83 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 69 |
| container_title | Clinical nursing research |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Fuller, Barbara F. Neu, Madalynn Smith, Maureen Vojir, Carol P. |
| description | The purpose of this study was to test whether elements of an infant pain assessment model interacted as postulated by the model. The elements are the infant’s response to comfort measures and the principle of consolability. Four different scenarios for each of 16 videotaped infants were prepared. Each scenario represented one of four different combinations of likelihood of pain and consolability and consisted of a videotape plus written clinical information. Forty-eight volunteer pediatric nurses assessed infant pain of 16 scenarios, each depicting one of the 16 infants. Mean level of assessed pain was highest for the “high likelihood of pain and difficult to console” group, second highest for the “high likelihood of pain and easily consoled” group, third highest for the “low likelihood of pain and difficult to console” group and least for the “low likelihood of pain and easily consoled” group. Findings supported the infant pain assessment model. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/10547739922158151 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69806624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10547739922158151</sage_id><sourcerecordid>69806624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-e1ed90afc5b289fe1bbf82fb8a0daac43228ec28486f8402cec09787948861df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwA7igigO3jjhNGuc4TXxJ4-MwzlWaJqNTP0azHvj3ZOoOEwhxsmU_fm2_hFwCnQJIeQtUcCkTpRgDgSDgiIxBCBYnUqnjkId-HAAckTPv15RSziickhHQRCBXbExwaf22bFaRjp7bwlZR66Lth41e-s7vyjPvrfe1bba7zlPjdMjedNmckxOnK28v9nFC3u_vlvPHePH68DSfLWKTULWNLdhCUe2MyBkqZyHPHTKXo6aF1oYnjKE1DDmmDjllxhqqJErFEVMoXDIhN4Pupms_-3BsVpfe2KrSjW17n6UKaZoy_i8oJMcgnATw-ge4bvuuCU9koCSgoAwDBANkutb7zrps05W17r4yoNnO_OyX-WHmai_c57UtDiYGtwMwHQCvV_Zg65-K31Fnids</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197185028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing a Model of the Nursing Assessment of Infant Pain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Fuller, Barbara F. ; Neu, Madalynn ; Smith, Maureen ; Vojir, Carol P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Barbara F. ; Neu, Madalynn ; Smith, Maureen ; Vojir, Carol P.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to test whether elements of an infant pain assessment model interacted as postulated by the model. The elements are the infant’s response to comfort measures and the principle of consolability. Four different scenarios for each of 16 videotaped infants were prepared. Each scenario represented one of four different combinations of likelihood of pain and consolability and consisted of a videotape plus written clinical information. Forty-eight volunteer pediatric nurses assessed infant pain of 16 scenarios, each depicting one of the 16 infants. Mean level of assessed pain was highest for the “high likelihood of pain and difficult to console” group, second highest for the “high likelihood of pain and easily consoled” group, third highest for the “low likelihood of pain and difficult to console” group and least for the “low likelihood of pain and easily consoled” group. Findings supported the infant pain assessment model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1054-7738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3799</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10547739922158151</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10358492</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CNREFD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Assessment ; Babies ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Models, Nursing ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing Assessment - methods ; Nursing Evaluation Research ; Pain ; Pain - diagnosis ; Pain - nursing ; Pain - physiopathology ; Pain - psychology ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Pediatric Nursing - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Videotape Recording</subject><ispartof>Clinical nursing research, 1999-02, Vol.8 (1), p.69-83</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sage Publications, Inc. Feb 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-e1ed90afc5b289fe1bbf82fb8a0daac43228ec28486f8402cec09787948861df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-e1ed90afc5b289fe1bbf82fb8a0daac43228ec28486f8402cec09787948861df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10547739922158151$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10547739922158151$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,30997,30998,43619,43620</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10358492$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Barbara F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neu, Madalynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vojir, Carol P.</creatorcontrib><title>Testing a Model of the Nursing Assessment of Infant Pain</title><title>Clinical nursing research</title><addtitle>Clin Nurs Res</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to test whether elements of an infant pain assessment model interacted as postulated by the model. The elements are the infant’s response to comfort measures and the principle of consolability. Four different scenarios for each of 16 videotaped infants were prepared. Each scenario represented one of four different combinations of likelihood of pain and consolability and consisted of a videotape plus written clinical information. Forty-eight volunteer pediatric nurses assessed infant pain of 16 scenarios, each depicting one of the 16 infants. Mean level of assessed pain was highest for the “high likelihood of pain and difficult to console” group, second highest for the “high likelihood of pain and easily consoled” group, third highest for the “low likelihood of pain and difficult to console” group and least for the “low likelihood of pain and easily consoled” group. Findings supported the infant pain assessment model.</description><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Nursing</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Nursing Evaluation Research</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pain - nursing</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Pediatric Nursing - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Videotape Recording</subject><issn>1054-7738</issn><issn>1552-3799</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwA7igigO3jjhNGuc4TXxJ4-MwzlWaJqNTP0azHvj3ZOoOEwhxsmU_fm2_hFwCnQJIeQtUcCkTpRgDgSDgiIxBCBYnUqnjkId-HAAckTPv15RSziickhHQRCBXbExwaf22bFaRjp7bwlZR66Lth41e-s7vyjPvrfe1bba7zlPjdMjedNmckxOnK28v9nFC3u_vlvPHePH68DSfLWKTULWNLdhCUe2MyBkqZyHPHTKXo6aF1oYnjKE1DDmmDjllxhqqJErFEVMoXDIhN4Pupms_-3BsVpfe2KrSjW17n6UKaZoy_i8oJMcgnATw-ge4bvuuCU9koCSgoAwDBANkutb7zrps05W17r4yoNnO_OyX-WHmai_c57UtDiYGtwMwHQCvV_Zg65-K31Fnids</recordid><startdate>199902</startdate><enddate>199902</enddate><creator>Fuller, Barbara F.</creator><creator>Neu, Madalynn</creator><creator>Smith, Maureen</creator><creator>Vojir, Carol P.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199902</creationdate><title>Testing a Model of the Nursing Assessment of Infant Pain</title><author>Fuller, Barbara F. ; Neu, Madalynn ; Smith, Maureen ; Vojir, Carol P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-e1ed90afc5b289fe1bbf82fb8a0daac43228ec28486f8402cec09787948861df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Nursing</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Nursing Evaluation Research</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pain - nursing</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Pediatric Nursing - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Videotape Recording</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Barbara F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neu, Madalynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vojir, Carol P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical nursing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fuller, Barbara F.</au><au>Neu, Madalynn</au><au>Smith, Maureen</au><au>Vojir, Carol P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing a Model of the Nursing Assessment of Infant Pain</atitle><jtitle>Clinical nursing research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Nurs Res</addtitle><date>1999-02</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>69-83</pages><issn>1054-7738</issn><eissn>1552-3799</eissn><coden>CNREFD</coden><abstract>The purpose of this study was to test whether elements of an infant pain assessment model interacted as postulated by the model. The elements are the infant’s response to comfort measures and the principle of consolability. Four different scenarios for each of 16 videotaped infants were prepared. Each scenario represented one of four different combinations of likelihood of pain and consolability and consisted of a videotape plus written clinical information. Forty-eight volunteer pediatric nurses assessed infant pain of 16 scenarios, each depicting one of the 16 infants. Mean level of assessed pain was highest for the “high likelihood of pain and difficult to console” group, second highest for the “high likelihood of pain and easily consoled” group, third highest for the “low likelihood of pain and difficult to console” group and least for the “low likelihood of pain and easily consoled” group. Findings supported the infant pain assessment model.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><pmid>10358492</pmid><doi>10.1177/10547739922158151</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1054-7738 |
| ispartof | Clinical nursing research, 1999-02, Vol.8 (1), p.69-83 |
| issn | 1054-7738 1552-3799 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69806624 |
| source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Assessment Babies Female Humans Infant Male Models, Nursing Nurses Nursing Nursing Assessment - methods Nursing Evaluation Research Pain Pain - diagnosis Pain - nursing Pain - physiopathology Pain - psychology Pain Measurement - methods Pediatric Nursing - methods Reproducibility of Results Videotape Recording |
| title | Testing a Model of the Nursing Assessment of Infant Pain |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T05%3A26%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20a%20Model%20of%20the%20Nursing%20Assessment%20of%20Infant%20Pain&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20nursing%20research&rft.au=Fuller,%20Barbara%20F.&rft.date=1999-02&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=69-83&rft.issn=1054-7738&rft.eissn=1552-3799&rft.coden=CNREFD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10547739922158151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69806624%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197185028&rft_id=info:pmid/10358492&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10547739922158151&rfr_iscdi=true |