Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey

BACKGROUND After initial years of improvement, the multiple pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Europe now remains stable at 23% with single embryo transfer (SET) constituting 19% of all IVF cycles. Although elective SET prevents multiple pregnancies after IVF, couples and professio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 2008-12, Vol.23 (12), p.2718-2723
Hauptverfasser: van Peperstraten, A.M., Hermens, R.P.M.G., Nelen, W.L.D.M., Stalmeier, P.F.M., Scheffer, G.J., Grol, R.P.T.M., Kremer, J.A.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2723
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2718
container_title Human reproduction (Oxford)
container_volume 23
creator van Peperstraten, A.M.
Hermens, R.P.M.G.
Nelen, W.L.D.M.
Stalmeier, P.F.M.
Scheffer, G.J.
Grol, R.P.T.M.
Kremer, J.A.M.
description BACKGROUND After initial years of improvement, the multiple pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Europe now remains stable at 23% with single embryo transfer (SET) constituting 19% of all IVF cycles. Although elective SET prevents multiple pregnancies after IVF, couples and professionals apparently often decide to transfer more embryos. Previous qualitative research has identified factors that impede the use of elective SET. The aim of this study was to quantify those barriers among IVF professionals and to identify predictors of professionals’ willingness to perform elective SET. METHODS A national survey among all Dutch IVF professionals quantified the barriers suggested by a previous qualitative study and assessed characteristics of the professionals and clinics. Multivariate analysis identified predictors related to the willingness of IVF professionals to perform elective SET. RESULTS In total, 107 professionals participated. The most frequently mentioned barriers to elective SET use were suboptimal success rates associated with cryopreservation (96%), not seeing twin pregnancies as a complication (79%) and lack of a SET protocol (78%). Two variables seem to predict the professionals’ willingness to perform elective SET: university hospital of the initial fertility training (P< 0.01) and high scores of perceived barriers, e.g. professionals’ attitudes and skills (P < 0.01). The explained variance of these two variables was 25%. CONCLUSIONS This study has identified the main barriers to elective SET use and predictors for willingness of professionals to perform elective SET. This insight into the decision-making process could be critical in terms of increasing the use of elective SET.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/humrep/den327
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69806264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humrep/den327</oup_id><sourcerecordid>69806264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-5611d421bd005eaf5ac81e413f15586cdbb969ef32aee102350d81442877cf763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0MFv1yAUB3BiNO636dGrISZbvHTjQaHU21yc2zLjDuqMF6T0dXa25Se0i7__Xn5rMxMvnnjAJ_Del5AXwA6BleLox9QHXB_VOAhePCIryBXLuJDsMVkxrnQGoGCH7MZ4y1gqtXpKdkAXhdRarcj3KwwO2zusaWVDaDFEOnqKHboxndLYDjcdUuyrsPF0DHaIDQZqez_c0PMvp3QdfIMxtn6wXXxDLR3seL-hcQp3uHlGnjTpBp8v6x75fPru08lZdvnx_fnJ8WXmcqnHTCqAOudQ1YxJtI20TgPmIBqQUitXV1WpSmwEt4jAtgPWGvKcp0lcUyixRw7md1NDvyaMo-nb6LDr7IB-ikaVmimu8gRf_QNv_RS23RsOUAoBvEwom5ELPsaAjVmHtrdhY4CZbe5mzt3MuSf_cnl0qnqs_-ol6AT2F2Cjs12TgnRtfHCclbkq7t3r2flp_d8_lx7bOOLvB2zDT6MKUUhz9vWbKcXV9fWHtxep-AMfhaqC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211933129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>van Peperstraten, A.M. ; Hermens, R.P.M.G. ; Nelen, W.L.D.M. ; Stalmeier, P.F.M. ; Scheffer, G.J. ; Grol, R.P.T.M. ; Kremer, J.A.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>van Peperstraten, A.M. ; Hermens, R.P.M.G. ; Nelen, W.L.D.M. ; Stalmeier, P.F.M. ; Scheffer, G.J. ; Grol, R.P.T.M. ; Kremer, J.A.M.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND After initial years of improvement, the multiple pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Europe now remains stable at 23% with single embryo transfer (SET) constituting 19% of all IVF cycles. Although elective SET prevents multiple pregnancies after IVF, couples and professionals apparently often decide to transfer more embryos. Previous qualitative research has identified factors that impede the use of elective SET. The aim of this study was to quantify those barriers among IVF professionals and to identify predictors of professionals’ willingness to perform elective SET. METHODS A national survey among all Dutch IVF professionals quantified the barriers suggested by a previous qualitative study and assessed characteristics of the professionals and clinics. Multivariate analysis identified predictors related to the willingness of IVF professionals to perform elective SET. RESULTS In total, 107 professionals participated. The most frequently mentioned barriers to elective SET use were suboptimal success rates associated with cryopreservation (96%), not seeing twin pregnancies as a complication (79%) and lack of a SET protocol (78%). Two variables seem to predict the professionals’ willingness to perform elective SET: university hospital of the initial fertility training (P&lt; 0.01) and high scores of perceived barriers, e.g. professionals’ attitudes and skills (P &lt; 0.01). The explained variance of these two variables was 25%. CONCLUSIONS This study has identified the main barriers to elective SET use and predictors for willingness of professionals to perform elective SET. This insight into the decision-making process could be critical in terms of increasing the use of elective SET.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den327</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18775886</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUREEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Biological and medical sciences ; Decision Making ; Embryo Transfer - methods ; Embryo Transfer - psychology ; Female ; Gynecology - education ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; in vitro fertilisation ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; multiple pregnancy ; Netherlands ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Pregnancy Rate ; Pregnancy, Multiple ; shared decision-making ; single embryo transfer ; Twins</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 2008-12, Vol.23 (12), p.2718-2723</ispartof><rights>The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2008</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-5611d421bd005eaf5ac81e413f15586cdbb969ef32aee102350d81442877cf763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-5611d421bd005eaf5ac81e413f15586cdbb969ef32aee102350d81442877cf763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20946786$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18775886$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Peperstraten, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermens, R.P.M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelen, W.L.D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalmeier, P.F.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheffer, G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grol, R.P.T.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremer, J.A.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND After initial years of improvement, the multiple pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Europe now remains stable at 23% with single embryo transfer (SET) constituting 19% of all IVF cycles. Although elective SET prevents multiple pregnancies after IVF, couples and professionals apparently often decide to transfer more embryos. Previous qualitative research has identified factors that impede the use of elective SET. The aim of this study was to quantify those barriers among IVF professionals and to identify predictors of professionals’ willingness to perform elective SET. METHODS A national survey among all Dutch IVF professionals quantified the barriers suggested by a previous qualitative study and assessed characteristics of the professionals and clinics. Multivariate analysis identified predictors related to the willingness of IVF professionals to perform elective SET. RESULTS In total, 107 professionals participated. The most frequently mentioned barriers to elective SET use were suboptimal success rates associated with cryopreservation (96%), not seeing twin pregnancies as a complication (79%) and lack of a SET protocol (78%). Two variables seem to predict the professionals’ willingness to perform elective SET: university hospital of the initial fertility training (P&lt; 0.01) and high scores of perceived barriers, e.g. professionals’ attitudes and skills (P &lt; 0.01). The explained variance of these two variables was 25%. CONCLUSIONS This study has identified the main barriers to elective SET use and predictors for willingness of professionals to perform elective SET. This insight into the decision-making process could be critical in terms of increasing the use of elective SET.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - methods</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology - education</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>in vitro fertilisation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>multiple pregnancy</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Multiple</subject><subject>shared decision-making</subject><subject>single embryo transfer</subject><subject>Twins</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0MFv1yAUB3BiNO636dGrISZbvHTjQaHU21yc2zLjDuqMF6T0dXa25Se0i7__Xn5rMxMvnnjAJ_Del5AXwA6BleLox9QHXB_VOAhePCIryBXLuJDsMVkxrnQGoGCH7MZ4y1gqtXpKdkAXhdRarcj3KwwO2zusaWVDaDFEOnqKHboxndLYDjcdUuyrsPF0DHaIDQZqez_c0PMvp3QdfIMxtn6wXXxDLR3seL-hcQp3uHlGnjTpBp8v6x75fPru08lZdvnx_fnJ8WXmcqnHTCqAOudQ1YxJtI20TgPmIBqQUitXV1WpSmwEt4jAtgPWGvKcp0lcUyixRw7md1NDvyaMo-nb6LDr7IB-ikaVmimu8gRf_QNv_RS23RsOUAoBvEwom5ELPsaAjVmHtrdhY4CZbe5mzt3MuSf_cnl0qnqs_-ol6AT2F2Cjs12TgnRtfHCclbkq7t3r2flp_d8_lx7bOOLvB2zDT6MKUUhz9vWbKcXV9fWHtxep-AMfhaqC</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>van Peperstraten, A.M.</creator><creator>Hermens, R.P.M.G.</creator><creator>Nelen, W.L.D.M.</creator><creator>Stalmeier, P.F.M.</creator><creator>Scheffer, G.J.</creator><creator>Grol, R.P.T.M.</creator><creator>Kremer, J.A.M.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey</title><author>van Peperstraten, A.M. ; Hermens, R.P.M.G. ; Nelen, W.L.D.M. ; Stalmeier, P.F.M. ; Scheffer, G.J. ; Grol, R.P.T.M. ; Kremer, J.A.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-5611d421bd005eaf5ac81e413f15586cdbb969ef32aee102350d81442877cf763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - methods</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology - education</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>in vitro fertilisation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>multiple pregnancy</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Multiple</topic><topic>shared decision-making</topic><topic>single embryo transfer</topic><topic>Twins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Peperstraten, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermens, R.P.M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelen, W.L.D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalmeier, P.F.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheffer, G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grol, R.P.T.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremer, J.A.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Peperstraten, A.M.</au><au>Hermens, R.P.M.G.</au><au>Nelen, W.L.D.M.</au><au>Stalmeier, P.F.M.</au><au>Scheffer, G.J.</au><au>Grol, R.P.T.M.</au><au>Kremer, J.A.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2718</spage><epage>2723</epage><pages>2718-2723</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><coden>HUREEE</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND After initial years of improvement, the multiple pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Europe now remains stable at 23% with single embryo transfer (SET) constituting 19% of all IVF cycles. Although elective SET prevents multiple pregnancies after IVF, couples and professionals apparently often decide to transfer more embryos. Previous qualitative research has identified factors that impede the use of elective SET. The aim of this study was to quantify those barriers among IVF professionals and to identify predictors of professionals’ willingness to perform elective SET. METHODS A national survey among all Dutch IVF professionals quantified the barriers suggested by a previous qualitative study and assessed characteristics of the professionals and clinics. Multivariate analysis identified predictors related to the willingness of IVF professionals to perform elective SET. RESULTS In total, 107 professionals participated. The most frequently mentioned barriers to elective SET use were suboptimal success rates associated with cryopreservation (96%), not seeing twin pregnancies as a complication (79%) and lack of a SET protocol (78%). Two variables seem to predict the professionals’ willingness to perform elective SET: university hospital of the initial fertility training (P&lt; 0.01) and high scores of perceived barriers, e.g. professionals’ attitudes and skills (P &lt; 0.01). The explained variance of these two variables was 25%. CONCLUSIONS This study has identified the main barriers to elective SET use and predictors for willingness of professionals to perform elective SET. This insight into the decision-making process could be critical in terms of increasing the use of elective SET.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>18775886</pmid><doi>10.1093/humrep/den327</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-1161
ispartof Human reproduction (Oxford), 2008-12, Vol.23 (12), p.2718-2723
issn 0268-1161
1460-2350
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69806264
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Attitude of Health Personnel
Biological and medical sciences
Decision Making
Embryo Transfer - methods
Embryo Transfer - psychology
Female
Gynecology - education
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
in vitro fertilisation
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
multiple pregnancy
Netherlands
Physician-Patient Relations
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications - prevention & control
Pregnancy Rate
Pregnancy, Multiple
shared decision-making
single embryo transfer
Twins
title Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A59%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceived%20barriers%20to%20elective%20single%20embryo%20transfer%20among%20IVF%20professionals:%20a%20national%20survey&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=van%20Peperstraten,%20A.M.&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2718&rft.epage=2723&rft.pages=2718-2723&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft.coden=HUREEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humrep/den327&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69806264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211933129&rft_id=info:pmid/18775886&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humrep/den327&rfr_iscdi=true