Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey
BACKGROUND After initial years of improvement, the multiple pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Europe now remains stable at 23% with single embryo transfer (SET) constituting 19% of all IVF cycles. Although elective SET prevents multiple pregnancies after IVF, couples and professio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human reproduction (Oxford) 2008-12, Vol.23 (12), p.2718-2723 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2723 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2718 |
container_title | Human reproduction (Oxford) |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | van Peperstraten, A.M. Hermens, R.P.M.G. Nelen, W.L.D.M. Stalmeier, P.F.M. Scheffer, G.J. Grol, R.P.T.M. Kremer, J.A.M. |
description | BACKGROUND After initial years of improvement, the multiple pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Europe now remains stable at 23% with single embryo transfer (SET) constituting 19% of all IVF cycles. Although elective SET prevents multiple pregnancies after IVF, couples and professionals apparently often decide to transfer more embryos. Previous qualitative research has identified factors that impede the use of elective SET. The aim of this study was to quantify those barriers among IVF professionals and to identify predictors of professionals’ willingness to perform elective SET. METHODS A national survey among all Dutch IVF professionals quantified the barriers suggested by a previous qualitative study and assessed characteristics of the professionals and clinics. Multivariate analysis identified predictors related to the willingness of IVF professionals to perform elective SET. RESULTS In total, 107 professionals participated. The most frequently mentioned barriers to elective SET use were suboptimal success rates associated with cryopreservation (96%), not seeing twin pregnancies as a complication (79%) and lack of a SET protocol (78%). Two variables seem to predict the professionals’ willingness to perform elective SET: university hospital of the initial fertility training (P< 0.01) and high scores of perceived barriers, e.g. professionals’ attitudes and skills (P < 0.01). The explained variance of these two variables was 25%. CONCLUSIONS This study has identified the main barriers to elective SET use and predictors for willingness of professionals to perform elective SET. This insight into the decision-making process could be critical in terms of increasing the use of elective SET. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/humrep/den327 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69806264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humrep/den327</oup_id><sourcerecordid>69806264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-5611d421bd005eaf5ac81e413f15586cdbb969ef32aee102350d81442877cf763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0MFv1yAUB3BiNO636dGrISZbvHTjQaHU21yc2zLjDuqMF6T0dXa25Se0i7__Xn5rMxMvnnjAJ_Del5AXwA6BleLox9QHXB_VOAhePCIryBXLuJDsMVkxrnQGoGCH7MZ4y1gqtXpKdkAXhdRarcj3KwwO2zusaWVDaDFEOnqKHboxndLYDjcdUuyrsPF0DHaIDQZqez_c0PMvp3QdfIMxtn6wXXxDLR3seL-hcQp3uHlGnjTpBp8v6x75fPru08lZdvnx_fnJ8WXmcqnHTCqAOudQ1YxJtI20TgPmIBqQUitXV1WpSmwEt4jAtgPWGvKcp0lcUyixRw7md1NDvyaMo-nb6LDr7IB-ikaVmimu8gRf_QNv_RS23RsOUAoBvEwom5ELPsaAjVmHtrdhY4CZbe5mzt3MuSf_cnl0qnqs_-ol6AT2F2Cjs12TgnRtfHCclbkq7t3r2flp_d8_lx7bOOLvB2zDT6MKUUhz9vWbKcXV9fWHtxep-AMfhaqC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211933129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>van Peperstraten, A.M. ; Hermens, R.P.M.G. ; Nelen, W.L.D.M. ; Stalmeier, P.F.M. ; Scheffer, G.J. ; Grol, R.P.T.M. ; Kremer, J.A.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>van Peperstraten, A.M. ; Hermens, R.P.M.G. ; Nelen, W.L.D.M. ; Stalmeier, P.F.M. ; Scheffer, G.J. ; Grol, R.P.T.M. ; Kremer, J.A.M.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND After initial years of improvement, the multiple pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Europe now remains stable at 23% with single embryo transfer (SET) constituting 19% of all IVF cycles. Although elective SET prevents multiple pregnancies after IVF, couples and professionals apparently often decide to transfer more embryos. Previous qualitative research has identified factors that impede the use of elective SET. The aim of this study was to quantify those barriers among IVF professionals and to identify predictors of professionals’ willingness to perform elective SET. METHODS A national survey among all Dutch IVF professionals quantified the barriers suggested by a previous qualitative study and assessed characteristics of the professionals and clinics. Multivariate analysis identified predictors related to the willingness of IVF professionals to perform elective SET. RESULTS In total, 107 professionals participated. The most frequently mentioned barriers to elective SET use were suboptimal success rates associated with cryopreservation (96%), not seeing twin pregnancies as a complication (79%) and lack of a SET protocol (78%). Two variables seem to predict the professionals’ willingness to perform elective SET: university hospital of the initial fertility training (P< 0.01) and high scores of perceived barriers, e.g. professionals’ attitudes and skills (P < 0.01). The explained variance of these two variables was 25%. CONCLUSIONS This study has identified the main barriers to elective SET use and predictors for willingness of professionals to perform elective SET. This insight into the decision-making process could be critical in terms of increasing the use of elective SET.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den327</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18775886</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUREEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Biological and medical sciences ; Decision Making ; Embryo Transfer - methods ; Embryo Transfer - psychology ; Female ; Gynecology - education ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; in vitro fertilisation ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; multiple pregnancy ; Netherlands ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications - prevention & control ; Pregnancy Rate ; Pregnancy, Multiple ; shared decision-making ; single embryo transfer ; Twins</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 2008-12, Vol.23 (12), p.2718-2723</ispartof><rights>The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2008</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-5611d421bd005eaf5ac81e413f15586cdbb969ef32aee102350d81442877cf763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-5611d421bd005eaf5ac81e413f15586cdbb969ef32aee102350d81442877cf763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20946786$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18775886$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Peperstraten, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermens, R.P.M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelen, W.L.D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalmeier, P.F.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheffer, G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grol, R.P.T.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremer, J.A.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND After initial years of improvement, the multiple pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Europe now remains stable at 23% with single embryo transfer (SET) constituting 19% of all IVF cycles. Although elective SET prevents multiple pregnancies after IVF, couples and professionals apparently often decide to transfer more embryos. Previous qualitative research has identified factors that impede the use of elective SET. The aim of this study was to quantify those barriers among IVF professionals and to identify predictors of professionals’ willingness to perform elective SET. METHODS A national survey among all Dutch IVF professionals quantified the barriers suggested by a previous qualitative study and assessed characteristics of the professionals and clinics. Multivariate analysis identified predictors related to the willingness of IVF professionals to perform elective SET. RESULTS In total, 107 professionals participated. The most frequently mentioned barriers to elective SET use were suboptimal success rates associated with cryopreservation (96%), not seeing twin pregnancies as a complication (79%) and lack of a SET protocol (78%). Two variables seem to predict the professionals’ willingness to perform elective SET: university hospital of the initial fertility training (P< 0.01) and high scores of perceived barriers, e.g. professionals’ attitudes and skills (P < 0.01). The explained variance of these two variables was 25%. CONCLUSIONS This study has identified the main barriers to elective SET use and predictors for willingness of professionals to perform elective SET. This insight into the decision-making process could be critical in terms of increasing the use of elective SET.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - methods</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology - education</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>in vitro fertilisation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>multiple pregnancy</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Multiple</subject><subject>shared decision-making</subject><subject>single embryo transfer</subject><subject>Twins</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0MFv1yAUB3BiNO636dGrISZbvHTjQaHU21yc2zLjDuqMF6T0dXa25Se0i7__Xn5rMxMvnnjAJ_Del5AXwA6BleLox9QHXB_VOAhePCIryBXLuJDsMVkxrnQGoGCH7MZ4y1gqtXpKdkAXhdRarcj3KwwO2zusaWVDaDFEOnqKHboxndLYDjcdUuyrsPF0DHaIDQZqez_c0PMvp3QdfIMxtn6wXXxDLR3seL-hcQp3uHlGnjTpBp8v6x75fPru08lZdvnx_fnJ8WXmcqnHTCqAOudQ1YxJtI20TgPmIBqQUitXV1WpSmwEt4jAtgPWGvKcp0lcUyixRw7md1NDvyaMo-nb6LDr7IB-ikaVmimu8gRf_QNv_RS23RsOUAoBvEwom5ELPsaAjVmHtrdhY4CZbe5mzt3MuSf_cnl0qnqs_-ol6AT2F2Cjs12TgnRtfHCclbkq7t3r2flp_d8_lx7bOOLvB2zDT6MKUUhz9vWbKcXV9fWHtxep-AMfhaqC</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>van Peperstraten, A.M.</creator><creator>Hermens, R.P.M.G.</creator><creator>Nelen, W.L.D.M.</creator><creator>Stalmeier, P.F.M.</creator><creator>Scheffer, G.J.</creator><creator>Grol, R.P.T.M.</creator><creator>Kremer, J.A.M.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey</title><author>van Peperstraten, A.M. ; Hermens, R.P.M.G. ; Nelen, W.L.D.M. ; Stalmeier, P.F.M. ; Scheffer, G.J. ; Grol, R.P.T.M. ; Kremer, J.A.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-5611d421bd005eaf5ac81e413f15586cdbb969ef32aee102350d81442877cf763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - methods</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology - education</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>in vitro fertilisation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>multiple pregnancy</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Multiple</topic><topic>shared decision-making</topic><topic>single embryo transfer</topic><topic>Twins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Peperstraten, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermens, R.P.M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelen, W.L.D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalmeier, P.F.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheffer, G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grol, R.P.T.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremer, J.A.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Peperstraten, A.M.</au><au>Hermens, R.P.M.G.</au><au>Nelen, W.L.D.M.</au><au>Stalmeier, P.F.M.</au><au>Scheffer, G.J.</au><au>Grol, R.P.T.M.</au><au>Kremer, J.A.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2718</spage><epage>2723</epage><pages>2718-2723</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><coden>HUREEE</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND After initial years of improvement, the multiple pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Europe now remains stable at 23% with single embryo transfer (SET) constituting 19% of all IVF cycles. Although elective SET prevents multiple pregnancies after IVF, couples and professionals apparently often decide to transfer more embryos. Previous qualitative research has identified factors that impede the use of elective SET. The aim of this study was to quantify those barriers among IVF professionals and to identify predictors of professionals’ willingness to perform elective SET. METHODS A national survey among all Dutch IVF professionals quantified the barriers suggested by a previous qualitative study and assessed characteristics of the professionals and clinics. Multivariate analysis identified predictors related to the willingness of IVF professionals to perform elective SET. RESULTS In total, 107 professionals participated. The most frequently mentioned barriers to elective SET use were suboptimal success rates associated with cryopreservation (96%), not seeing twin pregnancies as a complication (79%) and lack of a SET protocol (78%). Two variables seem to predict the professionals’ willingness to perform elective SET: university hospital of the initial fertility training (P< 0.01) and high scores of perceived barriers, e.g. professionals’ attitudes and skills (P < 0.01). The explained variance of these two variables was 25%. CONCLUSIONS This study has identified the main barriers to elective SET use and predictors for willingness of professionals to perform elective SET. This insight into the decision-making process could be critical in terms of increasing the use of elective SET.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>18775886</pmid><doi>10.1093/humrep/den327</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-1161 |
ispartof | Human reproduction (Oxford), 2008-12, Vol.23 (12), p.2718-2723 |
issn | 0268-1161 1460-2350 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69806264 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Attitude of Health Personnel Biological and medical sciences Decision Making Embryo Transfer - methods Embryo Transfer - psychology Female Gynecology - education Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans in vitro fertilisation Male Medical sciences Middle Aged multiple pregnancy Netherlands Physician-Patient Relations Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications - prevention & control Pregnancy Rate Pregnancy, Multiple shared decision-making single embryo transfer Twins |
title | Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A59%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceived%20barriers%20to%20elective%20single%20embryo%20transfer%20among%20IVF%20professionals:%20a%20national%20survey&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=van%20Peperstraten,%20A.M.&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2718&rft.epage=2723&rft.pages=2718-2723&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft.coden=HUREEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humrep/den327&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69806264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211933129&rft_id=info:pmid/18775886&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humrep/den327&rfr_iscdi=true |