Access site management after peripheral percutaneous transluminal procedures: Neptune Pad compared with conventional manual compression

To investigate the safety and efficacy of the procoagulant wound dressing Neptune Pad (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) compared with those of conventional manual compression for access site management after peripheral percutaneous interventions. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiology 2008-12, Vol.249 (3), p.1058-1063
Hauptverfasser: MLEKUSCH, Wolfgang, MINAR, Erich, DICK, Petra, SABETI, Schila, BARTOK, Andrea, HAUMER, Markus, BONELLI, Michael, VORMITTAG, Laurenz, KOPPENSTEINER, Renate, SCHILLINGER, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1063
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1058
container_title Radiology
container_volume 249
creator MLEKUSCH, Wolfgang
MINAR, Erich
DICK, Petra
SABETI, Schila
BARTOK, Andrea
HAUMER, Markus
BONELLI, Michael
VORMITTAG, Laurenz
KOPPENSTEINER, Renate
SCHILLINGER, Martin
description To investigate the safety and efficacy of the procoagulant wound dressing Neptune Pad (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) compared with those of conventional manual compression for access site management after peripheral percutaneous interventions. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients gave written informed consent. Two hundred one consecutive patients were enrolled and were randomly assigned to be treated with the Neptune Pad (n = 100) or conventional manual compression (n = 101). Patients were followed up clinically until hospital discharge and with duplex ultrasonography at 24 hours after the procedure to evaluate occurrence of access site complications. Time to hemostasis and time to ambulation were recorded, and patient and physician discomfort were measured by using a visual analogue scale. The risk for access site complications was not significantly different between the Neptune Pad group and the conventional compression group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval: 0.47, 2.84; P = .76). Time to hemostasis was marginally reduced in the Neptune Pad group. Patient and physician discomfort were lessened with use of the device. The hemostatic device Neptune Pad does not improve the safety of access site management after peripheral percutaneous procedures. Markedly improved comfort was noted among patients in the Neptune Pad group and by the physicians obtaining hemostasis.
doi_str_mv 10.1148/radiol.2492080181
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69802047</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69802047</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-4481c4a393a5394e09c1877fbbb1915a1524f57d233b42b7c404289f267dd9fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtOHDEQRa0oKAyTfACbyJuwa3DZ7rGdHULhIY2ARVi33O5qxlG_YruD-IL8Nm7NCFZlu869rrqEnAI7B5D6ItjGj905l4YzzUDDJ7KCkqsCBJSfyYoxIQotwRyTkxj_MAay1OoLOQatJVMGVuT_pXMYI40-Ie3tYJ-xxyFR2yYMdMLgpx0G2y1HNyc74DhHmoIdYjf3flg6YXTYzAHjT3qPU5oHpI-2oW7sJxuwoS8-7fJt-JeN_bhI8kdzLguRZTE_fiVHre0ifjvUNXm6_vX76rbYPtzcXV1uCye4SYWUGpy0wghbCiORGQdaqbauazBQ2ry9bEvVcCFqyWvlJJNcm5ZvVNOYFsWanO1989R_Z4yp6n102HX7zaqN0YwzqTIIe9CFMcaAbTUF39vwWgGrlvSrffrVR_pZ8_1gPtc9Nh-KQ9wZ-HEAbHS2a3OMzsd3LvtIIzUTb9Iokew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69802047</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Access site management after peripheral percutaneous transluminal procedures: Neptune Pad compared with conventional manual compression</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>MLEKUSCH, Wolfgang ; MINAR, Erich ; DICK, Petra ; SABETI, Schila ; BARTOK, Andrea ; HAUMER, Markus ; BONELLI, Michael ; VORMITTAG, Laurenz ; KOPPENSTEINER, Renate ; SCHILLINGER, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>MLEKUSCH, Wolfgang ; MINAR, Erich ; DICK, Petra ; SABETI, Schila ; BARTOK, Andrea ; HAUMER, Markus ; BONELLI, Michael ; VORMITTAG, Laurenz ; KOPPENSTEINER, Renate ; SCHILLINGER, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate the safety and efficacy of the procoagulant wound dressing Neptune Pad (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) compared with those of conventional manual compression for access site management after peripheral percutaneous interventions. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients gave written informed consent. Two hundred one consecutive patients were enrolled and were randomly assigned to be treated with the Neptune Pad (n = 100) or conventional manual compression (n = 101). Patients were followed up clinically until hospital discharge and with duplex ultrasonography at 24 hours after the procedure to evaluate occurrence of access site complications. Time to hemostasis and time to ambulation were recorded, and patient and physician discomfort were measured by using a visual analogue scale. The risk for access site complications was not significantly different between the Neptune Pad group and the conventional compression group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval: 0.47, 2.84; P = .76). Time to hemostasis was marginally reduced in the Neptune Pad group. Patient and physician discomfort were lessened with use of the device. The hemostatic device Neptune Pad does not improve the safety of access site management after peripheral percutaneous procedures. Markedly improved comfort was noted among patients in the Neptune Pad group and by the physicians obtaining hemostasis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8419</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2492080181</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18840791</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RADLAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oak Brook, IL: Radiological Society of North America</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Alginates - administration &amp; dosage ; Angioplasty, Balloon ; Bandages ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Glucuronic Acid - administration &amp; dosage ; Hemostatic Techniques - instrumentation ; Hexuronic Acids - administration &amp; dosage ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Patients ; Pressure ; Vascular Diseases - surgery</subject><ispartof>Radiology, 2008-12, Vol.249 (3), p.1058-1063</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>RSNA, 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-4481c4a393a5394e09c1877fbbb1915a1524f57d233b42b7c404289f267dd9fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-4481c4a393a5394e09c1877fbbb1915a1524f57d233b42b7c404289f267dd9fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20849480$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18840791$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MLEKUSCH, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MINAR, Erich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DICK, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SABETI, Schila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARTOK, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAUMER, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BONELLI, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VORMITTAG, Laurenz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOPPENSTEINER, Renate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHILLINGER, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Access site management after peripheral percutaneous transluminal procedures: Neptune Pad compared with conventional manual compression</title><title>Radiology</title><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><description>To investigate the safety and efficacy of the procoagulant wound dressing Neptune Pad (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) compared with those of conventional manual compression for access site management after peripheral percutaneous interventions. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients gave written informed consent. Two hundred one consecutive patients were enrolled and were randomly assigned to be treated with the Neptune Pad (n = 100) or conventional manual compression (n = 101). Patients were followed up clinically until hospital discharge and with duplex ultrasonography at 24 hours after the procedure to evaluate occurrence of access site complications. Time to hemostasis and time to ambulation were recorded, and patient and physician discomfort were measured by using a visual analogue scale. The risk for access site complications was not significantly different between the Neptune Pad group and the conventional compression group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval: 0.47, 2.84; P = .76). Time to hemostasis was marginally reduced in the Neptune Pad group. Patient and physician discomfort were lessened with use of the device. The hemostatic device Neptune Pad does not improve the safety of access site management after peripheral percutaneous procedures. Markedly improved comfort was noted among patients in the Neptune Pad group and by the physicians obtaining hemostasis.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Alginates - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon</subject><subject>Bandages</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glucuronic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Hemostatic Techniques - instrumentation</subject><subject>Hexuronic Acids - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Vascular Diseases - surgery</subject><issn>0033-8419</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMtOHDEQRa0oKAyTfACbyJuwa3DZ7rGdHULhIY2ARVi33O5qxlG_YruD-IL8Nm7NCFZlu869rrqEnAI7B5D6ItjGj905l4YzzUDDJ7KCkqsCBJSfyYoxIQotwRyTkxj_MAay1OoLOQatJVMGVuT_pXMYI40-Ie3tYJ-xxyFR2yYMdMLgpx0G2y1HNyc74DhHmoIdYjf3flg6YXTYzAHjT3qPU5oHpI-2oW7sJxuwoS8-7fJt-JeN_bhI8kdzLguRZTE_fiVHre0ifjvUNXm6_vX76rbYPtzcXV1uCye4SYWUGpy0wghbCiORGQdaqbauazBQ2ry9bEvVcCFqyWvlJJNcm5ZvVNOYFsWanO1989R_Z4yp6n102HX7zaqN0YwzqTIIe9CFMcaAbTUF39vwWgGrlvSrffrVR_pZ8_1gPtc9Nh-KQ9wZ-HEAbHS2a3OMzsd3LvtIIzUTb9Iokew</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>MLEKUSCH, Wolfgang</creator><creator>MINAR, Erich</creator><creator>DICK, Petra</creator><creator>SABETI, Schila</creator><creator>BARTOK, Andrea</creator><creator>HAUMER, Markus</creator><creator>BONELLI, Michael</creator><creator>VORMITTAG, Laurenz</creator><creator>KOPPENSTEINER, Renate</creator><creator>SCHILLINGER, Martin</creator><general>Radiological Society of North America</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Access site management after peripheral percutaneous transluminal procedures: Neptune Pad compared with conventional manual compression</title><author>MLEKUSCH, Wolfgang ; MINAR, Erich ; DICK, Petra ; SABETI, Schila ; BARTOK, Andrea ; HAUMER, Markus ; BONELLI, Michael ; VORMITTAG, Laurenz ; KOPPENSTEINER, Renate ; SCHILLINGER, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-4481c4a393a5394e09c1877fbbb1915a1524f57d233b42b7c404289f267dd9fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Alginates - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon</topic><topic>Bandages</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glucuronic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Hemostatic Techniques - instrumentation</topic><topic>Hexuronic Acids - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Vascular Diseases - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MLEKUSCH, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MINAR, Erich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DICK, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SABETI, Schila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARTOK, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAUMER, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BONELLI, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VORMITTAG, Laurenz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOPPENSTEINER, Renate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHILLINGER, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MLEKUSCH, Wolfgang</au><au>MINAR, Erich</au><au>DICK, Petra</au><au>SABETI, Schila</au><au>BARTOK, Andrea</au><au>HAUMER, Markus</au><au>BONELLI, Michael</au><au>VORMITTAG, Laurenz</au><au>KOPPENSTEINER, Renate</au><au>SCHILLINGER, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Access site management after peripheral percutaneous transluminal procedures: Neptune Pad compared with conventional manual compression</atitle><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>249</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1058</spage><epage>1063</epage><pages>1058-1063</pages><issn>0033-8419</issn><eissn>1527-1315</eissn><coden>RADLAX</coden><abstract>To investigate the safety and efficacy of the procoagulant wound dressing Neptune Pad (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) compared with those of conventional manual compression for access site management after peripheral percutaneous interventions. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients gave written informed consent. Two hundred one consecutive patients were enrolled and were randomly assigned to be treated with the Neptune Pad (n = 100) or conventional manual compression (n = 101). Patients were followed up clinically until hospital discharge and with duplex ultrasonography at 24 hours after the procedure to evaluate occurrence of access site complications. Time to hemostasis and time to ambulation were recorded, and patient and physician discomfort were measured by using a visual analogue scale. The risk for access site complications was not significantly different between the Neptune Pad group and the conventional compression group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval: 0.47, 2.84; P = .76). Time to hemostasis was marginally reduced in the Neptune Pad group. Patient and physician discomfort were lessened with use of the device. The hemostatic device Neptune Pad does not improve the safety of access site management after peripheral percutaneous procedures. Markedly improved comfort was noted among patients in the Neptune Pad group and by the physicians obtaining hemostasis.</abstract><cop>Oak Brook, IL</cop><pub>Radiological Society of North America</pub><pmid>18840791</pmid><doi>10.1148/radiol.2492080181</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-8419
ispartof Radiology, 2008-12, Vol.249 (3), p.1058-1063
issn 0033-8419
1527-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69802047
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alginates - administration & dosage
Angioplasty, Balloon
Bandages
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Glucuronic Acid - administration & dosage
Hemostatic Techniques - instrumentation
Hexuronic Acids - administration & dosage
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Patients
Pressure
Vascular Diseases - surgery
title Access site management after peripheral percutaneous transluminal procedures: Neptune Pad compared with conventional manual compression
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T06%3A10%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Access%20site%20management%20after%20peripheral%20percutaneous%20transluminal%20procedures:%20Neptune%20Pad%20compared%20with%20conventional%20manual%20compression&rft.jtitle=Radiology&rft.au=MLEKUSCH,%20Wolfgang&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=249&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1058&rft.epage=1063&rft.pages=1058-1063&rft.issn=0033-8419&rft.eissn=1527-1315&rft.coden=RADLAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2492080181&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69802047%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69802047&rft_id=info:pmid/18840791&rfr_iscdi=true