OBESITY AND SELF-REPORTED OUTCOME AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION SURGERY

Abstract OBJECTIVE Many patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion are overweight or obese. The relationship between body habitus and outcome after lumbar spine fusion surgery is not well defined. METHODS We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of self-reported pain and quality of life measures...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurosurgery 2008-11, Vol.63 (5), p.956-960
Hauptverfasser: Rosen, David S., Ferguson, Sherise D., Ogden, Alfred T., Huo, Dezheng, Fessler, Richard G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 960
container_issue 5
container_start_page 956
container_title Neurosurgery
container_volume 63
creator Rosen, David S.
Ferguson, Sherise D.
Ogden, Alfred T.
Huo, Dezheng
Fessler, Richard G.
description Abstract OBJECTIVE Many patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion are overweight or obese. The relationship between body habitus and outcome after lumbar spine fusion surgery is not well defined. METHODS We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of self-reported pain and quality of life measures, including Visual Analog Scale pain score, Short Form 36, and Oswestry Disability Index. We selected patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between September 2002 and June 2006 at a single institution. We used linear regression models and mixed-effects linear models to examine the relationships between body habitus and self-reported outcomes. RESULTS The analysis identified 110 patients meeting the study criteria, with a median follow-up period of 14.8 months. The mean age was 56 years, mean height was 169 cm, and mean weight was 82.2 kg. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.7 kg/m2; 31% of patients were overweight (BMI, 25–29.9), and 32% of patients were obese (BMI, >30). Linear regression analysis did not identify a correlation between weight or BMI and pre- and postsurgery changes in any of the outcome measures. The significant findings observed in the mixed-effects linear models were that the changing patterns of Short Form 36 Body Pain subscale and Short Form 36 Vitality subscale varied significantly by category of BMI (P = 0.01 and P = 0.002, respectively), but not significantly if continuous BMI was used (P = 0.53 and P = 0.46, respectively). BMI correlated marginally with estimated blood loss (P = 0.08), but not operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications. CONCLUSION Among this cohort of minimally invasive lumbar fusion patients, body habitus measured by BMI, weight, or height did not have a significant relationship with most self-reported outcome measures, operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications. Obesity should not be considered a contraindication to minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1227/01.NEU.0000313626.23194.3F
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69781145</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1227/01.NEU.0000313626.23194.3F</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1985684902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a8027d0c41bbde4e512864df3658e9e8aa89a34bc5a79d3c4dbb294e0441db1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtu2zAQRYmgQe0m_YWCaIHupHBIiiK7UxwqEaBHoEdSrwg9aMCBHTlStOjfV60NBMgus5nNuXcGB6HvQFyg1L8i4Ka6csk8DJigwqUMFHdZeIaW4FHucMLJJ7QkwKXDlPi9QF_G8YkQENyXn9ECFCEek2KJHrNrXUTlGgfpDS50HDq5vs_yUt_grCpXWaJxEJY6x0mURkkQx2scpQ9BET1oHFfJdZDj4j5KgxiHVRFlKS6q_Fbn60t0vql3o_162heoCnW5unPi7DZaBbHTMgWvTi0J9TvScmiaznLrAZWCdxsmPGmVlXUtVc1403q1rzrW8q5pqOKWcA5dAw27QD-PvYehf5ns-Gr227G1u139bPtpNEL5EoB7M_jjHfjUT8Pz_JsBJT0huSJ0pn4dqXbox3GwG3MYtvt6-GOAmH_yDQEzyzdv8s1_-YaFc_jb6cTU7G33Fj3ZngHvCPTT4SPFfwGAUoea</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1985684902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>OBESITY AND SELF-REPORTED OUTCOME AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION SURGERY</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Rosen, David S. ; Ferguson, Sherise D. ; Ogden, Alfred T. ; Huo, Dezheng ; Fessler, Richard G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosen, David S. ; Ferguson, Sherise D. ; Ogden, Alfred T. ; Huo, Dezheng ; Fessler, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract OBJECTIVE Many patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion are overweight or obese. The relationship between body habitus and outcome after lumbar spine fusion surgery is not well defined. METHODS We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of self-reported pain and quality of life measures, including Visual Analog Scale pain score, Short Form 36, and Oswestry Disability Index. We selected patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between September 2002 and June 2006 at a single institution. We used linear regression models and mixed-effects linear models to examine the relationships between body habitus and self-reported outcomes. RESULTS The analysis identified 110 patients meeting the study criteria, with a median follow-up period of 14.8 months. The mean age was 56 years, mean height was 169 cm, and mean weight was 82.2 kg. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.7 kg/m2; 31% of patients were overweight (BMI, 25–29.9), and 32% of patients were obese (BMI, &gt;30). Linear regression analysis did not identify a correlation between weight or BMI and pre- and postsurgery changes in any of the outcome measures. The significant findings observed in the mixed-effects linear models were that the changing patterns of Short Form 36 Body Pain subscale and Short Form 36 Vitality subscale varied significantly by category of BMI (P = 0.01 and P = 0.002, respectively), but not significantly if continuous BMI was used (P = 0.53 and P = 0.46, respectively). BMI correlated marginally with estimated blood loss (P = 0.08), but not operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications. CONCLUSION Among this cohort of minimally invasive lumbar fusion patients, body habitus measured by BMI, weight, or height did not have a significant relationship with most self-reported outcome measures, operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications. Obesity should not be considered a contraindication to minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-396X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000313626.23194.3F</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19005386</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Body mass index ; Databases, Factual ; Disability Evaluation ; Habitus ; Health Status ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Obesity - complications ; Pain ; Pain Measurement ; Quality of Life ; Regression analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Diseases - complications ; Spinal Diseases - surgery ; Spinal Fusion - adverse effects ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Neurosurgery, 2008-11, Vol.63 (5), p.956-960</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a8027d0c41bbde4e512864df3658e9e8aa89a34bc5a79d3c4dbb294e0441db1b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a8027d0c41bbde4e512864df3658e9e8aa89a34bc5a79d3c4dbb294e0441db1b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19005386$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosen, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Sherise D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogden, Alfred T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huo, Dezheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fessler, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><title>OBESITY AND SELF-REPORTED OUTCOME AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION SURGERY</title><title>Neurosurgery</title><addtitle>Neurosurgery</addtitle><description>Abstract OBJECTIVE Many patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion are overweight or obese. The relationship between body habitus and outcome after lumbar spine fusion surgery is not well defined. METHODS We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of self-reported pain and quality of life measures, including Visual Analog Scale pain score, Short Form 36, and Oswestry Disability Index. We selected patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between September 2002 and June 2006 at a single institution. We used linear regression models and mixed-effects linear models to examine the relationships between body habitus and self-reported outcomes. RESULTS The analysis identified 110 patients meeting the study criteria, with a median follow-up period of 14.8 months. The mean age was 56 years, mean height was 169 cm, and mean weight was 82.2 kg. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.7 kg/m2; 31% of patients were overweight (BMI, 25–29.9), and 32% of patients were obese (BMI, &gt;30). Linear regression analysis did not identify a correlation between weight or BMI and pre- and postsurgery changes in any of the outcome measures. The significant findings observed in the mixed-effects linear models were that the changing patterns of Short Form 36 Body Pain subscale and Short Form 36 Vitality subscale varied significantly by category of BMI (P = 0.01 and P = 0.002, respectively), but not significantly if continuous BMI was used (P = 0.53 and P = 0.46, respectively). BMI correlated marginally with estimated blood loss (P = 0.08), but not operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications. CONCLUSION Among this cohort of minimally invasive lumbar fusion patients, body habitus measured by BMI, weight, or height did not have a significant relationship with most self-reported outcome measures, operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications. Obesity should not be considered a contraindication to minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Habitus</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Obesity - complications</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - adverse effects</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0148-396X</issn><issn>1524-4040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMtu2zAQRYmgQe0m_YWCaIHupHBIiiK7UxwqEaBHoEdSrwg9aMCBHTlStOjfV60NBMgus5nNuXcGB6HvQFyg1L8i4Ka6csk8DJigwqUMFHdZeIaW4FHucMLJJ7QkwKXDlPi9QF_G8YkQENyXn9ECFCEek2KJHrNrXUTlGgfpDS50HDq5vs_yUt_grCpXWaJxEJY6x0mURkkQx2scpQ9BET1oHFfJdZDj4j5KgxiHVRFlKS6q_Fbn60t0vql3o_162heoCnW5unPi7DZaBbHTMgWvTi0J9TvScmiaznLrAZWCdxsmPGmVlXUtVc1403q1rzrW8q5pqOKWcA5dAw27QD-PvYehf5ns-Gr227G1u139bPtpNEL5EoB7M_jjHfjUT8Pz_JsBJT0huSJ0pn4dqXbox3GwG3MYtvt6-GOAmH_yDQEzyzdv8s1_-YaFc_jb6cTU7G33Fj3ZngHvCPTT4SPFfwGAUoea</recordid><startdate>20081101</startdate><enddate>20081101</enddate><creator>Rosen, David S.</creator><creator>Ferguson, Sherise D.</creator><creator>Ogden, Alfred T.</creator><creator>Huo, Dezheng</creator><creator>Fessler, Richard G.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081101</creationdate><title>OBESITY AND SELF-REPORTED OUTCOME AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION SURGERY</title><author>Rosen, David S. ; Ferguson, Sherise D. ; Ogden, Alfred T. ; Huo, Dezheng ; Fessler, Richard G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a8027d0c41bbde4e512864df3658e9e8aa89a34bc5a79d3c4dbb294e0441db1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Habitus</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Obesity - complications</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - adverse effects</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosen, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Sherise D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogden, Alfred T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huo, Dezheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fessler, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosen, David S.</au><au>Ferguson, Sherise D.</au><au>Ogden, Alfred T.</au><au>Huo, Dezheng</au><au>Fessler, Richard G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OBESITY AND SELF-REPORTED OUTCOME AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION SURGERY</atitle><jtitle>Neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Neurosurgery</addtitle><date>2008-11-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>956</spage><epage>960</epage><pages>956-960</pages><issn>0148-396X</issn><eissn>1524-4040</eissn><abstract>Abstract OBJECTIVE Many patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion are overweight or obese. The relationship between body habitus and outcome after lumbar spine fusion surgery is not well defined. METHODS We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of self-reported pain and quality of life measures, including Visual Analog Scale pain score, Short Form 36, and Oswestry Disability Index. We selected patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between September 2002 and June 2006 at a single institution. We used linear regression models and mixed-effects linear models to examine the relationships between body habitus and self-reported outcomes. RESULTS The analysis identified 110 patients meeting the study criteria, with a median follow-up period of 14.8 months. The mean age was 56 years, mean height was 169 cm, and mean weight was 82.2 kg. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.7 kg/m2; 31% of patients were overweight (BMI, 25–29.9), and 32% of patients were obese (BMI, &gt;30). Linear regression analysis did not identify a correlation between weight or BMI and pre- and postsurgery changes in any of the outcome measures. The significant findings observed in the mixed-effects linear models were that the changing patterns of Short Form 36 Body Pain subscale and Short Form 36 Vitality subscale varied significantly by category of BMI (P = 0.01 and P = 0.002, respectively), but not significantly if continuous BMI was used (P = 0.53 and P = 0.46, respectively). BMI correlated marginally with estimated blood loss (P = 0.08), but not operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications. CONCLUSION Among this cohort of minimally invasive lumbar fusion patients, body habitus measured by BMI, weight, or height did not have a significant relationship with most self-reported outcome measures, operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications. Obesity should not be considered a contraindication to minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>19005386</pmid><doi>10.1227/01.NEU.0000313626.23194.3F</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-396X
ispartof Neurosurgery, 2008-11, Vol.63 (5), p.956-960
issn 0148-396X
1524-4040
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69781145
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Body mass index
Databases, Factual
Disability Evaluation
Habitus
Health Status
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery
Middle Aged
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Obesity - complications
Pain
Pain Measurement
Quality of Life
Regression analysis
Retrospective Studies
Spinal Diseases - complications
Spinal Diseases - surgery
Spinal Fusion - adverse effects
Spinal Fusion - methods
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title OBESITY AND SELF-REPORTED OUTCOME AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION SURGERY
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T06%3A24%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OBESITY%20AND%20SELF-REPORTED%20OUTCOME%20AFTER%20MINIMALLY%20INVASIVE%20LUMBAR%20SPINAL%20FUSION%20SURGERY&rft.jtitle=Neurosurgery&rft.au=Rosen,%20David%20S.&rft.date=2008-11-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=956&rft.epage=960&rft.pages=956-960&rft.issn=0148-396X&rft.eissn=1524-4040&rft_id=info:doi/10.1227/01.NEU.0000313626.23194.3F&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1985684902%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1985684902&rft_id=info:pmid/19005386&rft_oup_id=10.1227/01.NEU.0000313626.23194.3F&rfr_iscdi=true