OBESITY AND SELF-REPORTED OUTCOME AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION SURGERY
Abstract OBJECTIVE Many patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion are overweight or obese. The relationship between body habitus and outcome after lumbar spine fusion surgery is not well defined. METHODS We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of self-reported pain and quality of life measures...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurosurgery 2008-11, Vol.63 (5), p.956-960 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 960 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 956 |
container_title | Neurosurgery |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Rosen, David S. Ferguson, Sherise D. Ogden, Alfred T. Huo, Dezheng Fessler, Richard G. |
description | Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Many patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion are overweight or obese. The relationship between body habitus and outcome after lumbar spine fusion surgery is not well defined.
METHODS
We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of self-reported pain and quality of life measures, including Visual Analog Scale pain score, Short Form 36, and Oswestry Disability Index. We selected patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between September 2002 and June 2006 at a single institution. We used linear regression models and mixed-effects linear models to examine the relationships between body habitus and self-reported outcomes.
RESULTS
The analysis identified 110 patients meeting the study criteria, with a median follow-up period of 14.8 months. The mean age was 56 years, mean height was 169 cm, and mean weight was 82.2 kg. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.7 kg/m2; 31% of patients were overweight (BMI, 25–29.9), and 32% of patients were obese (BMI, >30). Linear regression analysis did not identify a correlation between weight or BMI and pre- and postsurgery changes in any of the outcome measures. The significant findings observed in the mixed-effects linear models were that the changing patterns of Short Form 36 Body Pain subscale and Short Form 36 Vitality subscale varied significantly by category of BMI (P = 0.01 and P = 0.002, respectively), but not significantly if continuous BMI was used (P = 0.53 and P = 0.46, respectively). BMI correlated marginally with estimated blood loss (P = 0.08), but not operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications.
CONCLUSION
Among this cohort of minimally invasive lumbar fusion patients, body habitus measured by BMI, weight, or height did not have a significant relationship with most self-reported outcome measures, operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications. Obesity should not be considered a contraindication to minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1227/01.NEU.0000313626.23194.3F |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69781145</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1227/01.NEU.0000313626.23194.3F</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1985684902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a8027d0c41bbde4e512864df3658e9e8aa89a34bc5a79d3c4dbb294e0441db1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtu2zAQRYmgQe0m_YWCaIHupHBIiiK7UxwqEaBHoEdSrwg9aMCBHTlStOjfV60NBMgus5nNuXcGB6HvQFyg1L8i4Ka6csk8DJigwqUMFHdZeIaW4FHucMLJJ7QkwKXDlPi9QF_G8YkQENyXn9ECFCEek2KJHrNrXUTlGgfpDS50HDq5vs_yUt_grCpXWaJxEJY6x0mURkkQx2scpQ9BET1oHFfJdZDj4j5KgxiHVRFlKS6q_Fbn60t0vql3o_162heoCnW5unPi7DZaBbHTMgWvTi0J9TvScmiaznLrAZWCdxsmPGmVlXUtVc1403q1rzrW8q5pqOKWcA5dAw27QD-PvYehf5ns-Gr227G1u139bPtpNEL5EoB7M_jjHfjUT8Pz_JsBJT0huSJ0pn4dqXbox3GwG3MYtvt6-GOAmH_yDQEzyzdv8s1_-YaFc_jb6cTU7G33Fj3ZngHvCPTT4SPFfwGAUoea</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1985684902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>OBESITY AND SELF-REPORTED OUTCOME AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION SURGERY</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Rosen, David S. ; Ferguson, Sherise D. ; Ogden, Alfred T. ; Huo, Dezheng ; Fessler, Richard G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosen, David S. ; Ferguson, Sherise D. ; Ogden, Alfred T. ; Huo, Dezheng ; Fessler, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Many patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion are overweight or obese. The relationship between body habitus and outcome after lumbar spine fusion surgery is not well defined.
METHODS
We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of self-reported pain and quality of life measures, including Visual Analog Scale pain score, Short Form 36, and Oswestry Disability Index. We selected patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between September 2002 and June 2006 at a single institution. We used linear regression models and mixed-effects linear models to examine the relationships between body habitus and self-reported outcomes.
RESULTS
The analysis identified 110 patients meeting the study criteria, with a median follow-up period of 14.8 months. The mean age was 56 years, mean height was 169 cm, and mean weight was 82.2 kg. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.7 kg/m2; 31% of patients were overweight (BMI, 25–29.9), and 32% of patients were obese (BMI, >30). Linear regression analysis did not identify a correlation between weight or BMI and pre- and postsurgery changes in any of the outcome measures. The significant findings observed in the mixed-effects linear models were that the changing patterns of Short Form 36 Body Pain subscale and Short Form 36 Vitality subscale varied significantly by category of BMI (P = 0.01 and P = 0.002, respectively), but not significantly if continuous BMI was used (P = 0.53 and P = 0.46, respectively). BMI correlated marginally with estimated blood loss (P = 0.08), but not operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications.
CONCLUSION
Among this cohort of minimally invasive lumbar fusion patients, body habitus measured by BMI, weight, or height did not have a significant relationship with most self-reported outcome measures, operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications. Obesity should not be considered a contraindication to minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-396X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000313626.23194.3F</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19005386</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Body mass index ; Databases, Factual ; Disability Evaluation ; Habitus ; Health Status ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Obesity - complications ; Pain ; Pain Measurement ; Quality of Life ; Regression analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Diseases - complications ; Spinal Diseases - surgery ; Spinal Fusion - adverse effects ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Neurosurgery, 2008-11, Vol.63 (5), p.956-960</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a8027d0c41bbde4e512864df3658e9e8aa89a34bc5a79d3c4dbb294e0441db1b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a8027d0c41bbde4e512864df3658e9e8aa89a34bc5a79d3c4dbb294e0441db1b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19005386$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosen, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Sherise D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogden, Alfred T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huo, Dezheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fessler, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><title>OBESITY AND SELF-REPORTED OUTCOME AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION SURGERY</title><title>Neurosurgery</title><addtitle>Neurosurgery</addtitle><description>Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Many patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion are overweight or obese. The relationship between body habitus and outcome after lumbar spine fusion surgery is not well defined.
METHODS
We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of self-reported pain and quality of life measures, including Visual Analog Scale pain score, Short Form 36, and Oswestry Disability Index. We selected patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between September 2002 and June 2006 at a single institution. We used linear regression models and mixed-effects linear models to examine the relationships between body habitus and self-reported outcomes.
RESULTS
The analysis identified 110 patients meeting the study criteria, with a median follow-up period of 14.8 months. The mean age was 56 years, mean height was 169 cm, and mean weight was 82.2 kg. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.7 kg/m2; 31% of patients were overweight (BMI, 25–29.9), and 32% of patients were obese (BMI, >30). Linear regression analysis did not identify a correlation between weight or BMI and pre- and postsurgery changes in any of the outcome measures. The significant findings observed in the mixed-effects linear models were that the changing patterns of Short Form 36 Body Pain subscale and Short Form 36 Vitality subscale varied significantly by category of BMI (P = 0.01 and P = 0.002, respectively), but not significantly if continuous BMI was used (P = 0.53 and P = 0.46, respectively). BMI correlated marginally with estimated blood loss (P = 0.08), but not operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications.
CONCLUSION
Among this cohort of minimally invasive lumbar fusion patients, body habitus measured by BMI, weight, or height did not have a significant relationship with most self-reported outcome measures, operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications. Obesity should not be considered a contraindication to minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Habitus</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Obesity - complications</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - adverse effects</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0148-396X</issn><issn>1524-4040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMtu2zAQRYmgQe0m_YWCaIHupHBIiiK7UxwqEaBHoEdSrwg9aMCBHTlStOjfV60NBMgus5nNuXcGB6HvQFyg1L8i4Ka6csk8DJigwqUMFHdZeIaW4FHucMLJJ7QkwKXDlPi9QF_G8YkQENyXn9ECFCEek2KJHrNrXUTlGgfpDS50HDq5vs_yUt_grCpXWaJxEJY6x0mURkkQx2scpQ9BET1oHFfJdZDj4j5KgxiHVRFlKS6q_Fbn60t0vql3o_162heoCnW5unPi7DZaBbHTMgWvTi0J9TvScmiaznLrAZWCdxsmPGmVlXUtVc1403q1rzrW8q5pqOKWcA5dAw27QD-PvYehf5ns-Gr227G1u139bPtpNEL5EoB7M_jjHfjUT8Pz_JsBJT0huSJ0pn4dqXbox3GwG3MYtvt6-GOAmH_yDQEzyzdv8s1_-YaFc_jb6cTU7G33Fj3ZngHvCPTT4SPFfwGAUoea</recordid><startdate>20081101</startdate><enddate>20081101</enddate><creator>Rosen, David S.</creator><creator>Ferguson, Sherise D.</creator><creator>Ogden, Alfred T.</creator><creator>Huo, Dezheng</creator><creator>Fessler, Richard G.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081101</creationdate><title>OBESITY AND SELF-REPORTED OUTCOME AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION SURGERY</title><author>Rosen, David S. ; Ferguson, Sherise D. ; Ogden, Alfred T. ; Huo, Dezheng ; Fessler, Richard G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a8027d0c41bbde4e512864df3658e9e8aa89a34bc5a79d3c4dbb294e0441db1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Habitus</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Obesity - complications</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - adverse effects</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosen, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Sherise D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogden, Alfred T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huo, Dezheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fessler, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosen, David S.</au><au>Ferguson, Sherise D.</au><au>Ogden, Alfred T.</au><au>Huo, Dezheng</au><au>Fessler, Richard G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OBESITY AND SELF-REPORTED OUTCOME AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION SURGERY</atitle><jtitle>Neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Neurosurgery</addtitle><date>2008-11-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>956</spage><epage>960</epage><pages>956-960</pages><issn>0148-396X</issn><eissn>1524-4040</eissn><abstract>Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Many patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion are overweight or obese. The relationship between body habitus and outcome after lumbar spine fusion surgery is not well defined.
METHODS
We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of self-reported pain and quality of life measures, including Visual Analog Scale pain score, Short Form 36, and Oswestry Disability Index. We selected patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between September 2002 and June 2006 at a single institution. We used linear regression models and mixed-effects linear models to examine the relationships between body habitus and self-reported outcomes.
RESULTS
The analysis identified 110 patients meeting the study criteria, with a median follow-up period of 14.8 months. The mean age was 56 years, mean height was 169 cm, and mean weight was 82.2 kg. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.7 kg/m2; 31% of patients were overweight (BMI, 25–29.9), and 32% of patients were obese (BMI, >30). Linear regression analysis did not identify a correlation between weight or BMI and pre- and postsurgery changes in any of the outcome measures. The significant findings observed in the mixed-effects linear models were that the changing patterns of Short Form 36 Body Pain subscale and Short Form 36 Vitality subscale varied significantly by category of BMI (P = 0.01 and P = 0.002, respectively), but not significantly if continuous BMI was used (P = 0.53 and P = 0.46, respectively). BMI correlated marginally with estimated blood loss (P = 0.08), but not operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications.
CONCLUSION
Among this cohort of minimally invasive lumbar fusion patients, body habitus measured by BMI, weight, or height did not have a significant relationship with most self-reported outcome measures, operative time, length of hospital stay, or complications. Obesity should not be considered a contraindication to minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>19005386</pmid><doi>10.1227/01.NEU.0000313626.23194.3F</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-396X |
ispartof | Neurosurgery, 2008-11, Vol.63 (5), p.956-960 |
issn | 0148-396X 1524-4040 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69781145 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Body mass index Databases, Factual Disability Evaluation Habitus Health Status Humans Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery Middle Aged Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Obesity - complications Pain Pain Measurement Quality of Life Regression analysis Retrospective Studies Spinal Diseases - complications Spinal Diseases - surgery Spinal Fusion - adverse effects Spinal Fusion - methods Surgery Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
title | OBESITY AND SELF-REPORTED OUTCOME AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION SURGERY |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T06%3A24%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OBESITY%20AND%20SELF-REPORTED%20OUTCOME%20AFTER%20MINIMALLY%20INVASIVE%20LUMBAR%20SPINAL%20FUSION%20SURGERY&rft.jtitle=Neurosurgery&rft.au=Rosen,%20David%20S.&rft.date=2008-11-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=956&rft.epage=960&rft.pages=956-960&rft.issn=0148-396X&rft.eissn=1524-4040&rft_id=info:doi/10.1227/01.NEU.0000313626.23194.3F&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1985684902%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1985684902&rft_id=info:pmid/19005386&rft_oup_id=10.1227/01.NEU.0000313626.23194.3F&rfr_iscdi=true |