Hydrated versus lyophilized forms of porcine extracellular matrix derived from the urinary bladder
Biologic scaffolds composed of naturally occurring extracellular matrix (ECM) are currently in clinical use for the repair and reconstruction of damaged or missing tissues. The material and structural properties of the ECM scaffold are important determinants of the potential clinical applications an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B 2008-12, Vol.87A (4), p.862-872 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 872 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 862 |
container_title | Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B |
container_volume | 87A |
creator | Freytes, Donald O. Tullius, Robert S. Valentin, Jolene E. Stewart-Akers, Ann M. Badylak, Stephen F. |
description | Biologic scaffolds composed of naturally occurring extracellular matrix (ECM) are currently in clinical use for the repair and reconstruction of damaged or missing tissues. The material and structural properties of the ECM scaffold are important determinants of the potential clinical applications and these properties may be affected by manufacturing steps, processing steps, and storage conditions. The present study compared the structural properties of hydrated and lyophilized forms of a biologic scaffold derived from the porcine urinary bladder (urinary bladder matrix or UBM). The structural properties evaluated include: maximum load and elongation, maximum tangential stiffness, energy absorbed, suture retention strength, ball‐burst strength, and the hydrostatic permeability index. Other properties that were investigated include changes in the water content, structural morphology, and thickness and the ability to support in vitro growth of NIH 3T3 cells. Lyophilization caused no changes in the structural properties evaluated with the exception of a decrease in maximum elongation. NIH 3T3 cells showed invasion of the scaffold when seeded on the abluminal side of both hydrated and lyophilized UBM, and there were more cells present on lyophilized UBM when compared to hydrated UBM devices after the 7‐days culture period. Irreversible changes were observed in the microstructure and ultrastructure of lyophilized UBM devices. We conclude that lyophilization affects the overall in vitro cell growth of NIH 3T3 cells and the ultrastructural morphology of UBM devices, but does not result in significant changes in structural properties. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2008 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jbm.a.31821 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69780873</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>35831614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4641-69da161246472b4d372daef565608b1b7ad3921144e2318bf133c5e194294ac93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtP3DAQxq0KVB7tqXfkExeUJeNX4mOLyrtUSKD2ZjnxRJgmm62dwC5_PV52gVt7mtdvPs18hHyBfAJ5zg7vq25iJxxKBh_INkjJMqGV3FjmQmecabVFdmK8T7DKJftIthLLSiZhm1SnCxfsgI4-YIhjpO2in9351j-lVtOHLtK-obM-1H6KFOdDsDW27djaQDs7BD-nDoN_WNKh7-hwh3QMfmrDglatdWn4iWw2to34eR13ye3x95uj0-zy58nZ0dfLrBZKQKa0s6CApaJglXC8YM5iI5VUeVlBVVjHNQMQAll6tmqA81oiaMG0sLXmu2R_pTsL_d8R42A6H5fH2in2YzRKF2VeFvy_IJclT5eIBB6swDr0MQZszCz4Lr1mIDdL703y3ljz4n2i99ayY9Whe2fXZicAVsCjb3HxLy1z_u3Hq2i22vFxwPnbjg1_jCp4Ic2vqxNzIzWoi9_X5oo_A1YCnpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>35831614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydrated versus lyophilized forms of porcine extracellular matrix derived from the urinary bladder</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Freytes, Donald O. ; Tullius, Robert S. ; Valentin, Jolene E. ; Stewart-Akers, Ann M. ; Badylak, Stephen F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Freytes, Donald O. ; Tullius, Robert S. ; Valentin, Jolene E. ; Stewart-Akers, Ann M. ; Badylak, Stephen F.</creatorcontrib><description>Biologic scaffolds composed of naturally occurring extracellular matrix (ECM) are currently in clinical use for the repair and reconstruction of damaged or missing tissues. The material and structural properties of the ECM scaffold are important determinants of the potential clinical applications and these properties may be affected by manufacturing steps, processing steps, and storage conditions. The present study compared the structural properties of hydrated and lyophilized forms of a biologic scaffold derived from the porcine urinary bladder (urinary bladder matrix or UBM). The structural properties evaluated include: maximum load and elongation, maximum tangential stiffness, energy absorbed, suture retention strength, ball‐burst strength, and the hydrostatic permeability index. Other properties that were investigated include changes in the water content, structural morphology, and thickness and the ability to support in vitro growth of NIH 3T3 cells. Lyophilization caused no changes in the structural properties evaluated with the exception of a decrease in maximum elongation. NIH 3T3 cells showed invasion of the scaffold when seeded on the abluminal side of both hydrated and lyophilized UBM, and there were more cells present on lyophilized UBM when compared to hydrated UBM devices after the 7‐days culture period. Irreversible changes were observed in the microstructure and ultrastructure of lyophilized UBM devices. We conclude that lyophilization affects the overall in vitro cell growth of NIH 3T3 cells and the ultrastructural morphology of UBM devices, but does not result in significant changes in structural properties. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2008</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-3296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31821</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18228251</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry ; extracellular matrix ; Extracellular Matrix - chemistry ; Freeze Drying ; Humans ; Hydrostatic Pressure ; lyophilization ; Materials Testing ; Mice ; NIH 3T3 Cells ; Permeability ; scaffold ; Stress, Mechanical ; structural properties ; Swine ; Tissue Engineering - methods ; Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry ; urinary bladder ; Urinary Bladder - anatomy & histology ; Urinary Bladder - chemistry ; Water - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, 2008-12, Vol.87A (4), p.862-872</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4641-69da161246472b4d372daef565608b1b7ad3921144e2318bf133c5e194294ac93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4641-69da161246472b4d372daef565608b1b7ad3921144e2318bf133c5e194294ac93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjbm.a.31821$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjbm.a.31821$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18228251$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freytes, Donald O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tullius, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentin, Jolene E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart-Akers, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badylak, Stephen F.</creatorcontrib><title>Hydrated versus lyophilized forms of porcine extracellular matrix derived from the urinary bladder</title><title>Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B</title><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><description>Biologic scaffolds composed of naturally occurring extracellular matrix (ECM) are currently in clinical use for the repair and reconstruction of damaged or missing tissues. The material and structural properties of the ECM scaffold are important determinants of the potential clinical applications and these properties may be affected by manufacturing steps, processing steps, and storage conditions. The present study compared the structural properties of hydrated and lyophilized forms of a biologic scaffold derived from the porcine urinary bladder (urinary bladder matrix or UBM). The structural properties evaluated include: maximum load and elongation, maximum tangential stiffness, energy absorbed, suture retention strength, ball‐burst strength, and the hydrostatic permeability index. Other properties that were investigated include changes in the water content, structural morphology, and thickness and the ability to support in vitro growth of NIH 3T3 cells. Lyophilization caused no changes in the structural properties evaluated with the exception of a decrease in maximum elongation. NIH 3T3 cells showed invasion of the scaffold when seeded on the abluminal side of both hydrated and lyophilized UBM, and there were more cells present on lyophilized UBM when compared to hydrated UBM devices after the 7‐days culture period. Irreversible changes were observed in the microstructure and ultrastructure of lyophilized UBM devices. We conclude that lyophilization affects the overall in vitro cell growth of NIH 3T3 cells and the ultrastructural morphology of UBM devices, but does not result in significant changes in structural properties. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2008</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>extracellular matrix</subject><subject>Extracellular Matrix - chemistry</subject><subject>Freeze Drying</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrostatic Pressure</subject><subject>lyophilization</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>NIH 3T3 Cells</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>scaffold</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>structural properties</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Tissue Engineering - methods</subject><subject>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</subject><subject>urinary bladder</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - chemistry</subject><subject>Water - chemistry</subject><issn>1549-3296</issn><issn>1552-4965</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtP3DAQxq0KVB7tqXfkExeUJeNX4mOLyrtUSKD2ZjnxRJgmm62dwC5_PV52gVt7mtdvPs18hHyBfAJ5zg7vq25iJxxKBh_INkjJMqGV3FjmQmecabVFdmK8T7DKJftIthLLSiZhm1SnCxfsgI4-YIhjpO2in9351j-lVtOHLtK-obM-1H6KFOdDsDW27djaQDs7BD-nDoN_WNKh7-hwh3QMfmrDglatdWn4iWw2to34eR13ye3x95uj0-zy58nZ0dfLrBZKQKa0s6CApaJglXC8YM5iI5VUeVlBVVjHNQMQAll6tmqA81oiaMG0sLXmu2R_pTsL_d8R42A6H5fH2in2YzRKF2VeFvy_IJclT5eIBB6swDr0MQZszCz4Lr1mIDdL703y3ljz4n2i99ayY9Whe2fXZicAVsCjb3HxLy1z_u3Hq2i22vFxwPnbjg1_jCp4Ic2vqxNzIzWoi9_X5oo_A1YCnpg</recordid><startdate>20081215</startdate><enddate>20081215</enddate><creator>Freytes, Donald O.</creator><creator>Tullius, Robert S.</creator><creator>Valentin, Jolene E.</creator><creator>Stewart-Akers, Ann M.</creator><creator>Badylak, Stephen F.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081215</creationdate><title>Hydrated versus lyophilized forms of porcine extracellular matrix derived from the urinary bladder</title><author>Freytes, Donald O. ; Tullius, Robert S. ; Valentin, Jolene E. ; Stewart-Akers, Ann M. ; Badylak, Stephen F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4641-69da161246472b4d372daef565608b1b7ad3921144e2318bf133c5e194294ac93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>extracellular matrix</topic><topic>Extracellular Matrix - chemistry</topic><topic>Freeze Drying</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrostatic Pressure</topic><topic>lyophilization</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>NIH 3T3 Cells</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>scaffold</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>structural properties</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Tissue Engineering - methods</topic><topic>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</topic><topic>urinary bladder</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - chemistry</topic><topic>Water - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freytes, Donald O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tullius, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentin, Jolene E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart-Akers, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badylak, Stephen F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freytes, Donald O.</au><au>Tullius, Robert S.</au><au>Valentin, Jolene E.</au><au>Stewart-Akers, Ann M.</au><au>Badylak, Stephen F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydrated versus lyophilized forms of porcine extracellular matrix derived from the urinary bladder</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B</jtitle><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><date>2008-12-15</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>87A</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>862</spage><epage>872</epage><pages>862-872</pages><issn>1549-3296</issn><eissn>1552-4965</eissn><eissn>1552-4981</eissn><abstract>Biologic scaffolds composed of naturally occurring extracellular matrix (ECM) are currently in clinical use for the repair and reconstruction of damaged or missing tissues. The material and structural properties of the ECM scaffold are important determinants of the potential clinical applications and these properties may be affected by manufacturing steps, processing steps, and storage conditions. The present study compared the structural properties of hydrated and lyophilized forms of a biologic scaffold derived from the porcine urinary bladder (urinary bladder matrix or UBM). The structural properties evaluated include: maximum load and elongation, maximum tangential stiffness, energy absorbed, suture retention strength, ball‐burst strength, and the hydrostatic permeability index. Other properties that were investigated include changes in the water content, structural morphology, and thickness and the ability to support in vitro growth of NIH 3T3 cells. Lyophilization caused no changes in the structural properties evaluated with the exception of a decrease in maximum elongation. NIH 3T3 cells showed invasion of the scaffold when seeded on the abluminal side of both hydrated and lyophilized UBM, and there were more cells present on lyophilized UBM when compared to hydrated UBM devices after the 7‐days culture period. Irreversible changes were observed in the microstructure and ultrastructure of lyophilized UBM devices. We conclude that lyophilization affects the overall in vitro cell growth of NIH 3T3 cells and the ultrastructural morphology of UBM devices, but does not result in significant changes in structural properties. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2008</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>18228251</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.a.31821</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1549-3296 |
ispartof | Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, 2008-12, Vol.87A (4), p.862-872 |
issn | 1549-3296 1552-4965 1552-4981 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69780873 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Animals Biocompatible Materials - chemistry extracellular matrix Extracellular Matrix - chemistry Freeze Drying Humans Hydrostatic Pressure lyophilization Materials Testing Mice NIH 3T3 Cells Permeability scaffold Stress, Mechanical structural properties Swine Tissue Engineering - methods Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry urinary bladder Urinary Bladder - anatomy & histology Urinary Bladder - chemistry Water - chemistry |
title | Hydrated versus lyophilized forms of porcine extracellular matrix derived from the urinary bladder |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A32%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydrated%20versus%20lyophilized%20forms%20of%20porcine%20extracellular%20matrix%20derived%20from%20the%20urinary%20bladder&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Biomedical%20Materials%20Research%20Part%20B&rft.au=Freytes,%20Donald%20O.&rft.date=2008-12-15&rft.volume=87A&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=862&rft.epage=872&rft.pages=862-872&rft.issn=1549-3296&rft.eissn=1552-4965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.a.31821&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E35831614%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=35831614&rft_id=info:pmid/18228251&rfr_iscdi=true |