Systematic analysis of outcomes evaluations applied to drug management programs

To evaluate prior analyses that quantify how drug management programs impact health plans and patients with respect to those analyses' effectiveness in measuring program quality. We examined 77 US studies from 1996 to 2007 that evaluated the respective drug management programs of managed care,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of managed care 2008-11, Vol.14 (11 Suppl), p.SP36-SP45
Hauptverfasser: McAdam-Marx, Carrie, Schaaf, David T, Holtorf, Anke-Peggy, Eng, Benjamin, Oderda, Gary M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page SP45
container_issue 11 Suppl
container_start_page SP36
container_title The American journal of managed care
container_volume 14
creator McAdam-Marx, Carrie
Schaaf, David T
Holtorf, Anke-Peggy
Eng, Benjamin
Oderda, Gary M
description To evaluate prior analyses that quantify how drug management programs impact health plans and patients with respect to those analyses' effectiveness in measuring program quality. We examined 77 US studies from 1996 to 2007 that evaluated the respective drug management programs of managed care, indemnity insurance, Veterans Health Administration, and Medicaid health plans. Our review included those studies that assessed the ways in which specific drug management tools and the drug management program overall impacted economic, clinical, and/or humanistic outcomes. The 77 studies included in our review used 11 types of outcome end points. A total of 52 studies (68%) incorporated an economic end point; of these, 35 (68%) reported economic data only and did not address clinical or humanistic outcomes. Overall, 33 (43%) evaluated clinical or humanistic end points; of these, 17 (52%) also reported on an economic end point. Although the number of studies evaluating drug management programs has trended upward, only a handful have integrated economic, clinical, and/or humanistic outcomes when assessing the effects these programs have on health plans and patients. The efforts of these researchers to assess the overall quality of drug management programs have fallen short. To ensure that drug management tools have a desired effect on outcomes and medical costs, measures used to evaluate drug management programs must be improved.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69767139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69767139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-e0a0a8b486ad1bd9d589129bd2e5fd5e9b4f480b8c379f180718ba3e99252d7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UMtKxDAUDYI44-gvSFbuCnm0ae5SBl8wMAt1XW6a26HSNLVJhfl7C-rqLM6Tc8G2ErQplAG1YdcpfQqhjS3NFdtICyBLK7bs-HZOmQLmvuU44nBOfeKx43HJbQyUOH3jsKx0HBPHaRp68jxH7uflxMPqOFGgMfNpjqcZQ7phlx0OiW7_cMc-nh7f9y_F4fj8un84FJMSkAsSKNC60hr00nnwlQWpwHlFVecrAld26z5nW11DJ62opXWoCUBVyteod-z-N3ct_loo5Sb0qaVhwJHikhoDtamlhlV49ydcXCDfTHMfcD43_xfoH4uGWIc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69767139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic analysis of outcomes evaluations applied to drug management programs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>McAdam-Marx, Carrie ; Schaaf, David T ; Holtorf, Anke-Peggy ; Eng, Benjamin ; Oderda, Gary M</creator><creatorcontrib>McAdam-Marx, Carrie ; Schaaf, David T ; Holtorf, Anke-Peggy ; Eng, Benjamin ; Oderda, Gary M</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate prior analyses that quantify how drug management programs impact health plans and patients with respect to those analyses' effectiveness in measuring program quality. We examined 77 US studies from 1996 to 2007 that evaluated the respective drug management programs of managed care, indemnity insurance, Veterans Health Administration, and Medicaid health plans. Our review included those studies that assessed the ways in which specific drug management tools and the drug management program overall impacted economic, clinical, and/or humanistic outcomes. The 77 studies included in our review used 11 types of outcome end points. A total of 52 studies (68%) incorporated an economic end point; of these, 35 (68%) reported economic data only and did not address clinical or humanistic outcomes. Overall, 33 (43%) evaluated clinical or humanistic end points; of these, 17 (52%) also reported on an economic end point. Although the number of studies evaluating drug management programs has trended upward, only a handful have integrated economic, clinical, and/or humanistic outcomes when assessing the effects these programs have on health plans and patients. The efforts of these researchers to assess the overall quality of drug management programs have fallen short. To ensure that drug management tools have a desired effect on outcomes and medical costs, measures used to evaluate drug management programs must be improved.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1936-2692</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18991480</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Health administration ; Humans ; Managed Care Programs - economics ; Managed Care Programs - standards ; Medication Therapy Management - economics ; Medication Therapy Management - standards ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; United States</subject><ispartof>The American journal of managed care, 2008-11, Vol.14 (11 Suppl), p.SP36-SP45</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18991480$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McAdam-Marx, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaaf, David T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holtorf, Anke-Peggy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eng, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oderda, Gary M</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic analysis of outcomes evaluations applied to drug management programs</title><title>The American journal of managed care</title><addtitle>Am J Manag Care</addtitle><description>To evaluate prior analyses that quantify how drug management programs impact health plans and patients with respect to those analyses' effectiveness in measuring program quality. We examined 77 US studies from 1996 to 2007 that evaluated the respective drug management programs of managed care, indemnity insurance, Veterans Health Administration, and Medicaid health plans. Our review included those studies that assessed the ways in which specific drug management tools and the drug management program overall impacted economic, clinical, and/or humanistic outcomes. The 77 studies included in our review used 11 types of outcome end points. A total of 52 studies (68%) incorporated an economic end point; of these, 35 (68%) reported economic data only and did not address clinical or humanistic outcomes. Overall, 33 (43%) evaluated clinical or humanistic end points; of these, 17 (52%) also reported on an economic end point. Although the number of studies evaluating drug management programs has trended upward, only a handful have integrated economic, clinical, and/or humanistic outcomes when assessing the effects these programs have on health plans and patients. The efforts of these researchers to assess the overall quality of drug management programs have fallen short. To ensure that drug management tools have a desired effect on outcomes and medical costs, measures used to evaluate drug management programs must be improved.</description><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs - economics</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs - standards</subject><subject>Medication Therapy Management - economics</subject><subject>Medication Therapy Management - standards</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1936-2692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UMtKxDAUDYI44-gvSFbuCnm0ae5SBl8wMAt1XW6a26HSNLVJhfl7C-rqLM6Tc8G2ErQplAG1YdcpfQqhjS3NFdtICyBLK7bs-HZOmQLmvuU44nBOfeKx43HJbQyUOH3jsKx0HBPHaRp68jxH7uflxMPqOFGgMfNpjqcZQ7phlx0OiW7_cMc-nh7f9y_F4fj8un84FJMSkAsSKNC60hr00nnwlQWpwHlFVecrAld26z5nW11DJ62opXWoCUBVyteod-z-N3ct_loo5Sb0qaVhwJHikhoDtamlhlV49ydcXCDfTHMfcD43_xfoH4uGWIc</recordid><startdate>200811</startdate><enddate>200811</enddate><creator>McAdam-Marx, Carrie</creator><creator>Schaaf, David T</creator><creator>Holtorf, Anke-Peggy</creator><creator>Eng, Benjamin</creator><creator>Oderda, Gary M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200811</creationdate><title>Systematic analysis of outcomes evaluations applied to drug management programs</title><author>McAdam-Marx, Carrie ; Schaaf, David T ; Holtorf, Anke-Peggy ; Eng, Benjamin ; Oderda, Gary M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-e0a0a8b486ad1bd9d589129bd2e5fd5e9b4f480b8c379f180718ba3e99252d7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs - economics</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs - standards</topic><topic>Medication Therapy Management - economics</topic><topic>Medication Therapy Management - standards</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McAdam-Marx, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaaf, David T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holtorf, Anke-Peggy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eng, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oderda, Gary M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of managed care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McAdam-Marx, Carrie</au><au>Schaaf, David T</au><au>Holtorf, Anke-Peggy</au><au>Eng, Benjamin</au><au>Oderda, Gary M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic analysis of outcomes evaluations applied to drug management programs</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of managed care</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Manag Care</addtitle><date>2008-11</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>11 Suppl</issue><spage>SP36</spage><epage>SP45</epage><pages>SP36-SP45</pages><eissn>1936-2692</eissn><abstract>To evaluate prior analyses that quantify how drug management programs impact health plans and patients with respect to those analyses' effectiveness in measuring program quality. We examined 77 US studies from 1996 to 2007 that evaluated the respective drug management programs of managed care, indemnity insurance, Veterans Health Administration, and Medicaid health plans. Our review included those studies that assessed the ways in which specific drug management tools and the drug management program overall impacted economic, clinical, and/or humanistic outcomes. The 77 studies included in our review used 11 types of outcome end points. A total of 52 studies (68%) incorporated an economic end point; of these, 35 (68%) reported economic data only and did not address clinical or humanistic outcomes. Overall, 33 (43%) evaluated clinical or humanistic end points; of these, 17 (52%) also reported on an economic end point. Although the number of studies evaluating drug management programs has trended upward, only a handful have integrated economic, clinical, and/or humanistic outcomes when assessing the effects these programs have on health plans and patients. The efforts of these researchers to assess the overall quality of drug management programs have fallen short. To ensure that drug management tools have a desired effect on outcomes and medical costs, measures used to evaluate drug management programs must be improved.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>18991480</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1936-2692
ispartof The American journal of managed care, 2008-11, Vol.14 (11 Suppl), p.SP36-SP45
issn 1936-2692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69767139
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Health administration
Humans
Managed Care Programs - economics
Managed Care Programs - standards
Medication Therapy Management - economics
Medication Therapy Management - standards
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
United States
title Systematic analysis of outcomes evaluations applied to drug management programs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T19%3A57%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20analysis%20of%20outcomes%20evaluations%20applied%20to%20drug%20management%20programs&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20managed%20care&rft.au=McAdam-Marx,%20Carrie&rft.date=2008-11&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=11%20Suppl&rft.spage=SP36&rft.epage=SP45&rft.pages=SP36-SP45&rft.eissn=1936-2692&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69767139%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69767139&rft_id=info:pmid/18991480&rfr_iscdi=true