Mass casualty triage knowledge of military medical personnel

During battlefield and mass casualty incidents, triage has been traditionally performed by many different personnel, including medics, nurses, dentists, and physicians. The objective of this study was to determine which military medical providers are most knowledgeable in mass casualty triage. The d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Military medicine 1999-05, Vol.164 (5), p.332-335
Hauptverfasser: JANOUSEK, J. T, JACKSON, D. E, DE LORENZO, R. A, COPPOLA, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 335
container_issue 5
container_start_page 332
container_title Military medicine
container_volume 164
creator JANOUSEK, J. T
JACKSON, D. E
DE LORENZO, R. A
COPPOLA, M
description During battlefield and mass casualty incidents, triage has been traditionally performed by many different personnel, including medics, nurses, dentists, and physicians. The objective of this study was to determine which military medical providers are most knowledgeable in mass casualty triage. The design was a prospective, written, timed, case-based examination of triage knowledge. Participants were volunteers from the active duty medical (physician), dental, nursing, and enlisted corps of the three military services. Subjects completed a 16-minute written examination consisting of seven cases in each of three simulated mass casualty scenarios: combat; nuclear, biological, and chemical; and humanitarian. Tests were taken anonymously, although demographic data on medical specialty, training, and experience were collected. Participants were instructed to classify the cases using the NATO categories of immediate, delayed, minimal, or expectant. Scores were tabulated according to two grading scales: an absolute scale of number correct, and a weighted scale amplifying gross misclassifications. Median scores between groups were tested pairwise using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance with p < or = 0.05. Statistically significant differences were noted between the highest and lowest scoring groups in each scenario. Our conclusion is that among the subject groups tested, physicians were best at mass casualty triage. Dentists, nurses, and medics scored progressively less well on our examination.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/milmed/164.5.332
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69761757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69761757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-1cfd89ce69da689cf2929389d22de9aab4f6f97267f155e0e204ed46f7f2d71e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1LwzAUwIMobk7vnqQH8dYtH23SgBcZfsHEi4K3kCUvUk3bmbSM_fdmdLDTe_B-7-uH0DXBc4IlWzS1b8AuCC_m5ZwxeoKmRDKcc8K-TtEUY8rzAotygi5i_MGYFLIi52hCcIKJIFN0_6ZjzIyOg_b9LutDrb8h-227rQebss5laUnd67DL0qraaJ9tIMSubcFfojOnfYSrQ5yhz6fHj-VLvnp_fl0-rHLDOO9zYpytpAEureYpcVRSySppKbUgtV4XjjspKBeOlCVgoLgAW3AnHLWCAJuhu3HuJnR_A8ReNXU04L1uoRui4lJwIkqRQDyCJnQxBnBqE-om3a4IVntjajSmkjFVqiQhtdwcZg_rfeXYMCpKwO0B0DF974JuTR2PnKgoLTD7B0zYdXo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69761757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mass casualty triage knowledge of military medical personnel</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>JANOUSEK, J. T ; JACKSON, D. E ; DE LORENZO, R. A ; COPPOLA, M</creator><creatorcontrib>JANOUSEK, J. T ; JACKSON, D. E ; DE LORENZO, R. A ; COPPOLA, M</creatorcontrib><description>During battlefield and mass casualty incidents, triage has been traditionally performed by many different personnel, including medics, nurses, dentists, and physicians. The objective of this study was to determine which military medical providers are most knowledgeable in mass casualty triage. The design was a prospective, written, timed, case-based examination of triage knowledge. Participants were volunteers from the active duty medical (physician), dental, nursing, and enlisted corps of the three military services. Subjects completed a 16-minute written examination consisting of seven cases in each of three simulated mass casualty scenarios: combat; nuclear, biological, and chemical; and humanitarian. Tests were taken anonymously, although demographic data on medical specialty, training, and experience were collected. Participants were instructed to classify the cases using the NATO categories of immediate, delayed, minimal, or expectant. Scores were tabulated according to two grading scales: an absolute scale of number correct, and a weighted scale amplifying gross misclassifications. Median scores between groups were tested pairwise using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance with p &lt; or = 0.05. Statistically significant differences were noted between the highest and lowest scoring groups in each scenario. Our conclusion is that among the subject groups tested, physicians were best at mass casualty triage. Dentists, nurses, and medics scored progressively less well on our examination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-613X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/milmed/164.5.332</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10332171</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MMEDA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: Association of Military Surgeons</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Disaster Planning - methods ; Educational Status ; Health Personnel - education ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Military Medicine - education ; Military Personnel - education ; Miscellaneous ; Patient Care Team ; Prospective Studies ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Triage - methods ; United States</subject><ispartof>Military medicine, 1999-05, Vol.164 (5), p.332-335</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-1cfd89ce69da689cf2929389d22de9aab4f6f97267f155e0e204ed46f7f2d71e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1782240$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10332171$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>JANOUSEK, J. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JACKSON, D. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE LORENZO, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COPPOLA, M</creatorcontrib><title>Mass casualty triage knowledge of military medical personnel</title><title>Military medicine</title><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><description>During battlefield and mass casualty incidents, triage has been traditionally performed by many different personnel, including medics, nurses, dentists, and physicians. The objective of this study was to determine which military medical providers are most knowledgeable in mass casualty triage. The design was a prospective, written, timed, case-based examination of triage knowledge. Participants were volunteers from the active duty medical (physician), dental, nursing, and enlisted corps of the three military services. Subjects completed a 16-minute written examination consisting of seven cases in each of three simulated mass casualty scenarios: combat; nuclear, biological, and chemical; and humanitarian. Tests were taken anonymously, although demographic data on medical specialty, training, and experience were collected. Participants were instructed to classify the cases using the NATO categories of immediate, delayed, minimal, or expectant. Scores were tabulated according to two grading scales: an absolute scale of number correct, and a weighted scale amplifying gross misclassifications. Median scores between groups were tested pairwise using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance with p &lt; or = 0.05. Statistically significant differences were noted between the highest and lowest scoring groups in each scenario. Our conclusion is that among the subject groups tested, physicians were best at mass casualty triage. Dentists, nurses, and medics scored progressively less well on our examination.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Disaster Planning - methods</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Health Personnel - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Military Medicine - education</subject><subject>Military Personnel - education</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Patient Care Team</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Triage - methods</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0026-4075</issn><issn>1930-613X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1LwzAUwIMobk7vnqQH8dYtH23SgBcZfsHEi4K3kCUvUk3bmbSM_fdmdLDTe_B-7-uH0DXBc4IlWzS1b8AuCC_m5ZwxeoKmRDKcc8K-TtEUY8rzAotygi5i_MGYFLIi52hCcIKJIFN0_6ZjzIyOg_b9LutDrb8h-227rQebss5laUnd67DL0qraaJ9tIMSubcFfojOnfYSrQ5yhz6fHj-VLvnp_fl0-rHLDOO9zYpytpAEureYpcVRSySppKbUgtV4XjjspKBeOlCVgoLgAW3AnHLWCAJuhu3HuJnR_A8ReNXU04L1uoRui4lJwIkqRQDyCJnQxBnBqE-om3a4IVntjajSmkjFVqiQhtdwcZg_rfeXYMCpKwO0B0DF974JuTR2PnKgoLTD7B0zYdXo</recordid><startdate>19990501</startdate><enddate>19990501</enddate><creator>JANOUSEK, J. T</creator><creator>JACKSON, D. E</creator><creator>DE LORENZO, R. A</creator><creator>COPPOLA, M</creator><general>Association of Military Surgeons</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990501</creationdate><title>Mass casualty triage knowledge of military medical personnel</title><author>JANOUSEK, J. T ; JACKSON, D. E ; DE LORENZO, R. A ; COPPOLA, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-1cfd89ce69da689cf2929389d22de9aab4f6f97267f155e0e204ed46f7f2d71e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Disaster Planning - methods</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Health Personnel - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Military Medicine - education</topic><topic>Military Personnel - education</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Patient Care Team</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Triage - methods</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JANOUSEK, J. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JACKSON, D. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE LORENZO, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COPPOLA, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JANOUSEK, J. T</au><au>JACKSON, D. E</au><au>DE LORENZO, R. A</au><au>COPPOLA, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mass casualty triage knowledge of military medical personnel</atitle><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><date>1999-05-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>164</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>332</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>332-335</pages><issn>0026-4075</issn><eissn>1930-613X</eissn><coden>MMEDA9</coden><abstract>During battlefield and mass casualty incidents, triage has been traditionally performed by many different personnel, including medics, nurses, dentists, and physicians. The objective of this study was to determine which military medical providers are most knowledgeable in mass casualty triage. The design was a prospective, written, timed, case-based examination of triage knowledge. Participants were volunteers from the active duty medical (physician), dental, nursing, and enlisted corps of the three military services. Subjects completed a 16-minute written examination consisting of seven cases in each of three simulated mass casualty scenarios: combat; nuclear, biological, and chemical; and humanitarian. Tests were taken anonymously, although demographic data on medical specialty, training, and experience were collected. Participants were instructed to classify the cases using the NATO categories of immediate, delayed, minimal, or expectant. Scores were tabulated according to two grading scales: an absolute scale of number correct, and a weighted scale amplifying gross misclassifications. Median scores between groups were tested pairwise using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance with p &lt; or = 0.05. Statistically significant differences were noted between the highest and lowest scoring groups in each scenario. Our conclusion is that among the subject groups tested, physicians were best at mass casualty triage. Dentists, nurses, and medics scored progressively less well on our examination.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>Association of Military Surgeons</pub><pmid>10332171</pmid><doi>10.1093/milmed/164.5.332</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-4075
ispartof Military medicine, 1999-05, Vol.164 (5), p.332-335
issn 0026-4075
1930-613X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69761757
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Analysis of Variance
Biological and medical sciences
Disaster Planning - methods
Educational Status
Health Personnel - education
Humans
Medical sciences
Military Medicine - education
Military Personnel - education
Miscellaneous
Patient Care Team
Prospective Studies
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Triage - methods
United States
title Mass casualty triage knowledge of military medical personnel
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T05%3A55%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mass%20casualty%20triage%20knowledge%20of%20military%20medical%20personnel&rft.jtitle=Military%20medicine&rft.au=JANOUSEK,%20J.%20T&rft.date=1999-05-01&rft.volume=164&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=332&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=332-335&rft.issn=0026-4075&rft.eissn=1930-613X&rft.coden=MMEDA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/milmed/164.5.332&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69761757%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69761757&rft_id=info:pmid/10332171&rfr_iscdi=true