Mass casualty triage knowledge of military medical personnel
During battlefield and mass casualty incidents, triage has been traditionally performed by many different personnel, including medics, nurses, dentists, and physicians. The objective of this study was to determine which military medical providers are most knowledgeable in mass casualty triage. The d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Military medicine 1999-05, Vol.164 (5), p.332-335 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 335 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 332 |
container_title | Military medicine |
container_volume | 164 |
creator | JANOUSEK, J. T JACKSON, D. E DE LORENZO, R. A COPPOLA, M |
description | During battlefield and mass casualty incidents, triage has been traditionally performed by many different personnel, including medics, nurses, dentists, and physicians. The objective of this study was to determine which military medical providers are most knowledgeable in mass casualty triage. The design was a prospective, written, timed, case-based examination of triage knowledge. Participants were volunteers from the active duty medical (physician), dental, nursing, and enlisted corps of the three military services. Subjects completed a 16-minute written examination consisting of seven cases in each of three simulated mass casualty scenarios: combat; nuclear, biological, and chemical; and humanitarian. Tests were taken anonymously, although demographic data on medical specialty, training, and experience were collected. Participants were instructed to classify the cases using the NATO categories of immediate, delayed, minimal, or expectant. Scores were tabulated according to two grading scales: an absolute scale of number correct, and a weighted scale amplifying gross misclassifications. Median scores between groups were tested pairwise using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance with p < or = 0.05. Statistically significant differences were noted between the highest and lowest scoring groups in each scenario. Our conclusion is that among the subject groups tested, physicians were best at mass casualty triage. Dentists, nurses, and medics scored progressively less well on our examination. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/milmed/164.5.332 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69761757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69761757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-1cfd89ce69da689cf2929389d22de9aab4f6f97267f155e0e204ed46f7f2d71e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1LwzAUwIMobk7vnqQH8dYtH23SgBcZfsHEi4K3kCUvUk3bmbSM_fdmdLDTe_B-7-uH0DXBc4IlWzS1b8AuCC_m5ZwxeoKmRDKcc8K-TtEUY8rzAotygi5i_MGYFLIi52hCcIKJIFN0_6ZjzIyOg_b9LutDrb8h-227rQebss5laUnd67DL0qraaJ9tIMSubcFfojOnfYSrQ5yhz6fHj-VLvnp_fl0-rHLDOO9zYpytpAEureYpcVRSySppKbUgtV4XjjspKBeOlCVgoLgAW3AnHLWCAJuhu3HuJnR_A8ReNXU04L1uoRui4lJwIkqRQDyCJnQxBnBqE-om3a4IVntjajSmkjFVqiQhtdwcZg_rfeXYMCpKwO0B0DF974JuTR2PnKgoLTD7B0zYdXo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69761757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mass casualty triage knowledge of military medical personnel</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>JANOUSEK, J. T ; JACKSON, D. E ; DE LORENZO, R. A ; COPPOLA, M</creator><creatorcontrib>JANOUSEK, J. T ; JACKSON, D. E ; DE LORENZO, R. A ; COPPOLA, M</creatorcontrib><description>During battlefield and mass casualty incidents, triage has been traditionally performed by many different personnel, including medics, nurses, dentists, and physicians. The objective of this study was to determine which military medical providers are most knowledgeable in mass casualty triage. The design was a prospective, written, timed, case-based examination of triage knowledge. Participants were volunteers from the active duty medical (physician), dental, nursing, and enlisted corps of the three military services. Subjects completed a 16-minute written examination consisting of seven cases in each of three simulated mass casualty scenarios: combat; nuclear, biological, and chemical; and humanitarian. Tests were taken anonymously, although demographic data on medical specialty, training, and experience were collected. Participants were instructed to classify the cases using the NATO categories of immediate, delayed, minimal, or expectant. Scores were tabulated according to two grading scales: an absolute scale of number correct, and a weighted scale amplifying gross misclassifications. Median scores between groups were tested pairwise using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance with p < or = 0.05. Statistically significant differences were noted between the highest and lowest scoring groups in each scenario. Our conclusion is that among the subject groups tested, physicians were best at mass casualty triage. Dentists, nurses, and medics scored progressively less well on our examination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-613X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/milmed/164.5.332</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10332171</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MMEDA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: Association of Military Surgeons</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Disaster Planning - methods ; Educational Status ; Health Personnel - education ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Military Medicine - education ; Military Personnel - education ; Miscellaneous ; Patient Care Team ; Prospective Studies ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Triage - methods ; United States</subject><ispartof>Military medicine, 1999-05, Vol.164 (5), p.332-335</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-1cfd89ce69da689cf2929389d22de9aab4f6f97267f155e0e204ed46f7f2d71e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1782240$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10332171$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>JANOUSEK, J. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JACKSON, D. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE LORENZO, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COPPOLA, M</creatorcontrib><title>Mass casualty triage knowledge of military medical personnel</title><title>Military medicine</title><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><description>During battlefield and mass casualty incidents, triage has been traditionally performed by many different personnel, including medics, nurses, dentists, and physicians. The objective of this study was to determine which military medical providers are most knowledgeable in mass casualty triage. The design was a prospective, written, timed, case-based examination of triage knowledge. Participants were volunteers from the active duty medical (physician), dental, nursing, and enlisted corps of the three military services. Subjects completed a 16-minute written examination consisting of seven cases in each of three simulated mass casualty scenarios: combat; nuclear, biological, and chemical; and humanitarian. Tests were taken anonymously, although demographic data on medical specialty, training, and experience were collected. Participants were instructed to classify the cases using the NATO categories of immediate, delayed, minimal, or expectant. Scores were tabulated according to two grading scales: an absolute scale of number correct, and a weighted scale amplifying gross misclassifications. Median scores between groups were tested pairwise using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance with p < or = 0.05. Statistically significant differences were noted between the highest and lowest scoring groups in each scenario. Our conclusion is that among the subject groups tested, physicians were best at mass casualty triage. Dentists, nurses, and medics scored progressively less well on our examination.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Disaster Planning - methods</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Health Personnel - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Military Medicine - education</subject><subject>Military Personnel - education</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Patient Care Team</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Triage - methods</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0026-4075</issn><issn>1930-613X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1LwzAUwIMobk7vnqQH8dYtH23SgBcZfsHEi4K3kCUvUk3bmbSM_fdmdLDTe_B-7-uH0DXBc4IlWzS1b8AuCC_m5ZwxeoKmRDKcc8K-TtEUY8rzAotygi5i_MGYFLIi52hCcIKJIFN0_6ZjzIyOg_b9LutDrb8h-227rQebss5laUnd67DL0qraaJ9tIMSubcFfojOnfYSrQ5yhz6fHj-VLvnp_fl0-rHLDOO9zYpytpAEureYpcVRSySppKbUgtV4XjjspKBeOlCVgoLgAW3AnHLWCAJuhu3HuJnR_A8ReNXU04L1uoRui4lJwIkqRQDyCJnQxBnBqE-om3a4IVntjajSmkjFVqiQhtdwcZg_rfeXYMCpKwO0B0DF974JuTR2PnKgoLTD7B0zYdXo</recordid><startdate>19990501</startdate><enddate>19990501</enddate><creator>JANOUSEK, J. T</creator><creator>JACKSON, D. E</creator><creator>DE LORENZO, R. A</creator><creator>COPPOLA, M</creator><general>Association of Military Surgeons</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990501</creationdate><title>Mass casualty triage knowledge of military medical personnel</title><author>JANOUSEK, J. T ; JACKSON, D. E ; DE LORENZO, R. A ; COPPOLA, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-1cfd89ce69da689cf2929389d22de9aab4f6f97267f155e0e204ed46f7f2d71e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Disaster Planning - methods</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Health Personnel - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Military Medicine - education</topic><topic>Military Personnel - education</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Patient Care Team</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Triage - methods</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JANOUSEK, J. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JACKSON, D. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE LORENZO, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COPPOLA, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JANOUSEK, J. T</au><au>JACKSON, D. E</au><au>DE LORENZO, R. A</au><au>COPPOLA, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mass casualty triage knowledge of military medical personnel</atitle><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><date>1999-05-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>164</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>332</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>332-335</pages><issn>0026-4075</issn><eissn>1930-613X</eissn><coden>MMEDA9</coden><abstract>During battlefield and mass casualty incidents, triage has been traditionally performed by many different personnel, including medics, nurses, dentists, and physicians. The objective of this study was to determine which military medical providers are most knowledgeable in mass casualty triage. The design was a prospective, written, timed, case-based examination of triage knowledge. Participants were volunteers from the active duty medical (physician), dental, nursing, and enlisted corps of the three military services. Subjects completed a 16-minute written examination consisting of seven cases in each of three simulated mass casualty scenarios: combat; nuclear, biological, and chemical; and humanitarian. Tests were taken anonymously, although demographic data on medical specialty, training, and experience were collected. Participants were instructed to classify the cases using the NATO categories of immediate, delayed, minimal, or expectant. Scores were tabulated according to two grading scales: an absolute scale of number correct, and a weighted scale amplifying gross misclassifications. Median scores between groups were tested pairwise using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance with p < or = 0.05. Statistically significant differences were noted between the highest and lowest scoring groups in each scenario. Our conclusion is that among the subject groups tested, physicians were best at mass casualty triage. Dentists, nurses, and medics scored progressively less well on our examination.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>Association of Military Surgeons</pub><pmid>10332171</pmid><doi>10.1093/milmed/164.5.332</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0026-4075 |
ispartof | Military medicine, 1999-05, Vol.164 (5), p.332-335 |
issn | 0026-4075 1930-613X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69761757 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Analysis of Variance Biological and medical sciences Disaster Planning - methods Educational Status Health Personnel - education Humans Medical sciences Military Medicine - education Military Personnel - education Miscellaneous Patient Care Team Prospective Studies Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Triage - methods United States |
title | Mass casualty triage knowledge of military medical personnel |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T05%3A55%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mass%20casualty%20triage%20knowledge%20of%20military%20medical%20personnel&rft.jtitle=Military%20medicine&rft.au=JANOUSEK,%20J.%20T&rft.date=1999-05-01&rft.volume=164&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=332&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=332-335&rft.issn=0026-4075&rft.eissn=1930-613X&rft.coden=MMEDA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/milmed/164.5.332&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69761757%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69761757&rft_id=info:pmid/10332171&rfr_iscdi=true |