Prospective experience with integrated prenatal screening and first trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center
Objectives To evaluate the performance of integrated prenatal screening (IPS) and first trimester combined screening (FTS) for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center. Method Prospective data collection on women having FTS at one center from 1 November 2003 to 31 December 2005, or IPS at another...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Prenatal diagnosis 2008-11, Vol.28 (11), p.987-992 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 992 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 987 |
container_title | Prenatal diagnosis |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Okun, Nanette Summers, Anne M. Hoffman, Barry Huang, Tianhua Winsor, Elizabeth Chitayat, David Staines, A. Johnson, Jo-Ann |
description | Objectives
To evaluate the performance of integrated prenatal screening (IPS) and first trimester combined screening (FTS) for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center.
Method
Prospective data collection on women having FTS at one center from 1 November 2003 to 31 December 2005, or IPS at another from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005. A positive screen was defined as adjusted risk for trisomy 21 ≥ 1/200 at term or nuchal translucency ≥ 3.5 mm.
Results
32 227 and 14 487 women were screened in the IPS and FTS programs, respectively. Detection rates (DRs) and positive rates (PRs) for trisomy 21 were 88.4% (95% CI: 81.6–91.5) and 3.3% (95% CI: 3.1–3.5) for IPS, and 83.9% (95% CI: 74.7–93.0) and 4.0% (95% CI: 3.7–4.3) for FTS. DR adjusted for viability bias was 85.2% for IPS and 78.6% for FTS. Applying both the screens to the 78 134 women who submitted prenatal screens in Ontario in 2005, thereby eliminating the effect of differences in the distribution of maternal age between screens, gave a DR (corrected for viability bias) and PR of 81 and 3.1% for IPS, and 76 and 3.4% for FTS.
Conclusions
Both IPS and FTS perform well and are feasible in a practical clinical setting. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pd.2084 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69760152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69760152</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-7397da3e389d66bc2db2af18a793d3f5794ffa0efb35a349e4cd39f2ecd31133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10c1u1DAQB3ALgehSEG-AfAEOVYo_8uUj2kJBqqCHFT1aE3u8GBIn2FnafQseuV5t1J64eHz4acbzNyGvOTvnjIkPkz0XrC2fkBVnqimYEPIpWTGe77Kt-Al5kdKvDFuhmufkhLdKVLWQK_LvOo5pQjP7v0jxbsLoMRikt37-SX2YcRthRkuniAFm6GkyETH4sKUQLHU-ppnO0Q-YZozUjEPnQ_aPzI3xANI47KnguScF2kPcIl1DAOsh0F3s8mkwj4svyTMHfcJXSz0lm8-fNusvxdX3y6_rj1eFka0si0aqxoJE2Spb150RthPgeAuNkla6qlGlc8DQdbICWSosjZXKCcyFcylPybtj2ymOf3b58XrwyWDfQ8Bxl3StmprxSmT4_ghNDipFdHrK20Lca870IXs9WX3IPss3S8tdN6B9dEvYGbxdACQDvYsQjE8PLjdhZd4nu7Oju_U97v83T19fLGOLo_b5B-4eNMTfum5kU-mbb5eaix-tlDcXeiPvATr-q14</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69760152</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective experience with integrated prenatal screening and first trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Okun, Nanette ; Summers, Anne M. ; Hoffman, Barry ; Huang, Tianhua ; Winsor, Elizabeth ; Chitayat, David ; Staines, A. ; Johnson, Jo-Ann</creator><creatorcontrib>Okun, Nanette ; Summers, Anne M. ; Hoffman, Barry ; Huang, Tianhua ; Winsor, Elizabeth ; Chitayat, David ; Staines, A. ; Johnson, Jo-Ann</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To evaluate the performance of integrated prenatal screening (IPS) and first trimester combined screening (FTS) for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center.
Method
Prospective data collection on women having FTS at one center from 1 November 2003 to 31 December 2005, or IPS at another from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005. A positive screen was defined as adjusted risk for trisomy 21 ≥ 1/200 at term or nuchal translucency ≥ 3.5 mm.
Results
32 227 and 14 487 women were screened in the IPS and FTS programs, respectively. Detection rates (DRs) and positive rates (PRs) for trisomy 21 were 88.4% (95% CI: 81.6–91.5) and 3.3% (95% CI: 3.1–3.5) for IPS, and 83.9% (95% CI: 74.7–93.0) and 4.0% (95% CI: 3.7–4.3) for FTS. DR adjusted for viability bias was 85.2% for IPS and 78.6% for FTS. Applying both the screens to the 78 134 women who submitted prenatal screens in Ontario in 2005, thereby eliminating the effect of differences in the distribution of maternal age between screens, gave a DR (corrected for viability bias) and PR of 81 and 3.1% for IPS, and 76 and 3.4% for FTS.
Conclusions
Both IPS and FTS perform well and are feasible in a practical clinical setting. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-3851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pd.2084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18925623</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PRDIDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Canada - epidemiology ; Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation ; detection rate ; Down Syndrome - embryology ; Down Syndrome - epidemiology ; false positive rate ; Female ; first trimester combined screening ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; integrated prenatal screening ; Mass Screening - methods ; Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Molecular and cellular biology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; Prenatal Care ; trisomy 21 ; Urban Population - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>Prenatal diagnosis, 2008-11, Vol.28 (11), p.987-992</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-7397da3e389d66bc2db2af18a793d3f5794ffa0efb35a349e4cd39f2ecd31133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-7397da3e389d66bc2db2af18a793d3f5794ffa0efb35a349e4cd39f2ecd31133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpd.2084$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpd.2084$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20804389$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18925623$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Okun, Nanette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Tianhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winsor, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chitayat, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staines, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Jo-Ann</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective experience with integrated prenatal screening and first trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center</title><title>Prenatal diagnosis</title><addtitle>Prenat. Diagn</addtitle><description>Objectives
To evaluate the performance of integrated prenatal screening (IPS) and first trimester combined screening (FTS) for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center.
Method
Prospective data collection on women having FTS at one center from 1 November 2003 to 31 December 2005, or IPS at another from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005. A positive screen was defined as adjusted risk for trisomy 21 ≥ 1/200 at term or nuchal translucency ≥ 3.5 mm.
Results
32 227 and 14 487 women were screened in the IPS and FTS programs, respectively. Detection rates (DRs) and positive rates (PRs) for trisomy 21 were 88.4% (95% CI: 81.6–91.5) and 3.3% (95% CI: 3.1–3.5) for IPS, and 83.9% (95% CI: 74.7–93.0) and 4.0% (95% CI: 3.7–4.3) for FTS. DR adjusted for viability bias was 85.2% for IPS and 78.6% for FTS. Applying both the screens to the 78 134 women who submitted prenatal screens in Ontario in 2005, thereby eliminating the effect of differences in the distribution of maternal age between screens, gave a DR (corrected for viability bias) and PR of 81 and 3.1% for IPS, and 76 and 3.4% for FTS.
Conclusions
Both IPS and FTS perform well and are feasible in a practical clinical setting. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Canada - epidemiology</subject><subject>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</subject><subject>detection rate</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - embryology</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - epidemiology</subject><subject>false positive rate</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>first trimester combined screening</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>integrated prenatal screening</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Molecular and cellular biology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, First</subject><subject>Prenatal Care</subject><subject>trisomy 21</subject><subject>Urban Population - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>0197-3851</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10c1u1DAQB3ALgehSEG-AfAEOVYo_8uUj2kJBqqCHFT1aE3u8GBIn2FnafQseuV5t1J64eHz4acbzNyGvOTvnjIkPkz0XrC2fkBVnqimYEPIpWTGe77Kt-Al5kdKvDFuhmufkhLdKVLWQK_LvOo5pQjP7v0jxbsLoMRikt37-SX2YcRthRkuniAFm6GkyETH4sKUQLHU-ppnO0Q-YZozUjEPnQ_aPzI3xANI47KnguScF2kPcIl1DAOsh0F3s8mkwj4svyTMHfcJXSz0lm8-fNusvxdX3y6_rj1eFka0si0aqxoJE2Spb150RthPgeAuNkla6qlGlc8DQdbICWSosjZXKCcyFcylPybtj2ymOf3b58XrwyWDfQ8Bxl3StmprxSmT4_ghNDipFdHrK20Lca870IXs9WX3IPss3S8tdN6B9dEvYGbxdACQDvYsQjE8PLjdhZd4nu7Oju_U97v83T19fLGOLo_b5B-4eNMTfum5kU-mbb5eaix-tlDcXeiPvATr-q14</recordid><startdate>200811</startdate><enddate>200811</enddate><creator>Okun, Nanette</creator><creator>Summers, Anne M.</creator><creator>Hoffman, Barry</creator><creator>Huang, Tianhua</creator><creator>Winsor, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Chitayat, David</creator><creator>Staines, A.</creator><creator>Johnson, Jo-Ann</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200811</creationdate><title>Prospective experience with integrated prenatal screening and first trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center</title><author>Okun, Nanette ; Summers, Anne M. ; Hoffman, Barry ; Huang, Tianhua ; Winsor, Elizabeth ; Chitayat, David ; Staines, A. ; Johnson, Jo-Ann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-7397da3e389d66bc2db2af18a793d3f5794ffa0efb35a349e4cd39f2ecd31133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Canada - epidemiology</topic><topic>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</topic><topic>detection rate</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - embryology</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - epidemiology</topic><topic>false positive rate</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>first trimester combined screening</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>integrated prenatal screening</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Molecular and cellular biology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, First</topic><topic>Prenatal Care</topic><topic>trisomy 21</topic><topic>Urban Population - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okun, Nanette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Tianhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winsor, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chitayat, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staines, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Jo-Ann</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okun, Nanette</au><au>Summers, Anne M.</au><au>Hoffman, Barry</au><au>Huang, Tianhua</au><au>Winsor, Elizabeth</au><au>Chitayat, David</au><au>Staines, A.</au><au>Johnson, Jo-Ann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective experience with integrated prenatal screening and first trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center</atitle><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle><addtitle>Prenat. Diagn</addtitle><date>2008-11</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>987</spage><epage>992</epage><pages>987-992</pages><issn>0197-3851</issn><eissn>1097-0223</eissn><coden>PRDIDM</coden><abstract>Objectives
To evaluate the performance of integrated prenatal screening (IPS) and first trimester combined screening (FTS) for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center.
Method
Prospective data collection on women having FTS at one center from 1 November 2003 to 31 December 2005, or IPS at another from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005. A positive screen was defined as adjusted risk for trisomy 21 ≥ 1/200 at term or nuchal translucency ≥ 3.5 mm.
Results
32 227 and 14 487 women were screened in the IPS and FTS programs, respectively. Detection rates (DRs) and positive rates (PRs) for trisomy 21 were 88.4% (95% CI: 81.6–91.5) and 3.3% (95% CI: 3.1–3.5) for IPS, and 83.9% (95% CI: 74.7–93.0) and 4.0% (95% CI: 3.7–4.3) for FTS. DR adjusted for viability bias was 85.2% for IPS and 78.6% for FTS. Applying both the screens to the 78 134 women who submitted prenatal screens in Ontario in 2005, thereby eliminating the effect of differences in the distribution of maternal age between screens, gave a DR (corrected for viability bias) and PR of 81 and 3.1% for IPS, and 76 and 3.4% for FTS.
Conclusions
Both IPS and FTS perform well and are feasible in a practical clinical setting. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>18925623</pmid><doi>10.1002/pd.2084</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0197-3851 |
ispartof | Prenatal diagnosis, 2008-11, Vol.28 (11), p.987-992 |
issn | 0197-3851 1097-0223 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69760152 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Canada - epidemiology Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation detection rate Down Syndrome - embryology Down Syndrome - epidemiology false positive rate Female first trimester combined screening Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans integrated prenatal screening Mass Screening - methods Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data Medical sciences Molecular and cellular biology Pregnancy Pregnancy Trimester, First Prenatal Care trisomy 21 Urban Population - statistics & numerical data |
title | Prospective experience with integrated prenatal screening and first trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T23%3A17%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20experience%20with%20integrated%20prenatal%20screening%20and%20first%20trimester%20combined%20screening%20for%20trisomy%2021%20in%20a%20large%20Canadian%20urban%20center&rft.jtitle=Prenatal%20diagnosis&rft.au=Okun,%20Nanette&rft.date=2008-11&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=987&rft.epage=992&rft.pages=987-992&rft.issn=0197-3851&rft.eissn=1097-0223&rft.coden=PRDIDM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pd.2084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69760152%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69760152&rft_id=info:pmid/18925623&rfr_iscdi=true |