Prospective experience with integrated prenatal screening and first trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center

Objectives To evaluate the performance of integrated prenatal screening (IPS) and first trimester combined screening (FTS) for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center. Method Prospective data collection on women having FTS at one center from 1 November 2003 to 31 December 2005, or IPS at another...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prenatal diagnosis 2008-11, Vol.28 (11), p.987-992
Hauptverfasser: Okun, Nanette, Summers, Anne M., Hoffman, Barry, Huang, Tianhua, Winsor, Elizabeth, Chitayat, David, Staines, A., Johnson, Jo-Ann
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 992
container_issue 11
container_start_page 987
container_title Prenatal diagnosis
container_volume 28
creator Okun, Nanette
Summers, Anne M.
Hoffman, Barry
Huang, Tianhua
Winsor, Elizabeth
Chitayat, David
Staines, A.
Johnson, Jo-Ann
description Objectives To evaluate the performance of integrated prenatal screening (IPS) and first trimester combined screening (FTS) for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center. Method Prospective data collection on women having FTS at one center from 1 November 2003 to 31 December 2005, or IPS at another from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005. A positive screen was defined as adjusted risk for trisomy 21 ≥ 1/200 at term or nuchal translucency ≥ 3.5 mm. Results 32 227 and 14 487 women were screened in the IPS and FTS programs, respectively. Detection rates (DRs) and positive rates (PRs) for trisomy 21 were 88.4% (95% CI: 81.6–91.5) and 3.3% (95% CI: 3.1–3.5) for IPS, and 83.9% (95% CI: 74.7–93.0) and 4.0% (95% CI: 3.7–4.3) for FTS. DR adjusted for viability bias was 85.2% for IPS and 78.6% for FTS. Applying both the screens to the 78 134 women who submitted prenatal screens in Ontario in 2005, thereby eliminating the effect of differences in the distribution of maternal age between screens, gave a DR (corrected for viability bias) and PR of 81 and 3.1% for IPS, and 76 and 3.4% for FTS. Conclusions Both IPS and FTS perform well and are feasible in a practical clinical setting. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pd.2084
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69760152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69760152</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-7397da3e389d66bc2db2af18a793d3f5794ffa0efb35a349e4cd39f2ecd31133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10c1u1DAQB3ALgehSEG-AfAEOVYo_8uUj2kJBqqCHFT1aE3u8GBIn2FnafQseuV5t1J64eHz4acbzNyGvOTvnjIkPkz0XrC2fkBVnqimYEPIpWTGe77Kt-Al5kdKvDFuhmufkhLdKVLWQK_LvOo5pQjP7v0jxbsLoMRikt37-SX2YcRthRkuniAFm6GkyETH4sKUQLHU-ppnO0Q-YZozUjEPnQ_aPzI3xANI47KnguScF2kPcIl1DAOsh0F3s8mkwj4svyTMHfcJXSz0lm8-fNusvxdX3y6_rj1eFka0si0aqxoJE2Spb150RthPgeAuNkla6qlGlc8DQdbICWSosjZXKCcyFcylPybtj2ymOf3b58XrwyWDfQ8Bxl3StmprxSmT4_ghNDipFdHrK20Lca870IXs9WX3IPss3S8tdN6B9dEvYGbxdACQDvYsQjE8PLjdhZd4nu7Oju_U97v83T19fLGOLo_b5B-4eNMTfum5kU-mbb5eaix-tlDcXeiPvATr-q14</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69760152</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective experience with integrated prenatal screening and first trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Okun, Nanette ; Summers, Anne M. ; Hoffman, Barry ; Huang, Tianhua ; Winsor, Elizabeth ; Chitayat, David ; Staines, A. ; Johnson, Jo-Ann</creator><creatorcontrib>Okun, Nanette ; Summers, Anne M. ; Hoffman, Barry ; Huang, Tianhua ; Winsor, Elizabeth ; Chitayat, David ; Staines, A. ; Johnson, Jo-Ann</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To evaluate the performance of integrated prenatal screening (IPS) and first trimester combined screening (FTS) for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center. Method Prospective data collection on women having FTS at one center from 1 November 2003 to 31 December 2005, or IPS at another from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005. A positive screen was defined as adjusted risk for trisomy 21 ≥ 1/200 at term or nuchal translucency ≥ 3.5 mm. Results 32 227 and 14 487 women were screened in the IPS and FTS programs, respectively. Detection rates (DRs) and positive rates (PRs) for trisomy 21 were 88.4% (95% CI: 81.6–91.5) and 3.3% (95% CI: 3.1–3.5) for IPS, and 83.9% (95% CI: 74.7–93.0) and 4.0% (95% CI: 3.7–4.3) for FTS. DR adjusted for viability bias was 85.2% for IPS and 78.6% for FTS. Applying both the screens to the 78 134 women who submitted prenatal screens in Ontario in 2005, thereby eliminating the effect of differences in the distribution of maternal age between screens, gave a DR (corrected for viability bias) and PR of 81 and 3.1% for IPS, and 76 and 3.4% for FTS. Conclusions Both IPS and FTS perform well and are feasible in a practical clinical setting. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-3851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pd.2084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18925623</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PRDIDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Canada - epidemiology ; Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation ; detection rate ; Down Syndrome - embryology ; Down Syndrome - epidemiology ; false positive rate ; Female ; first trimester combined screening ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; integrated prenatal screening ; Mass Screening - methods ; Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Molecular and cellular biology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; Prenatal Care ; trisomy 21 ; Urban Population - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>Prenatal diagnosis, 2008-11, Vol.28 (11), p.987-992</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-7397da3e389d66bc2db2af18a793d3f5794ffa0efb35a349e4cd39f2ecd31133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-7397da3e389d66bc2db2af18a793d3f5794ffa0efb35a349e4cd39f2ecd31133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpd.2084$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpd.2084$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20804389$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18925623$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Okun, Nanette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Tianhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winsor, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chitayat, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staines, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Jo-Ann</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective experience with integrated prenatal screening and first trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center</title><title>Prenatal diagnosis</title><addtitle>Prenat. Diagn</addtitle><description>Objectives To evaluate the performance of integrated prenatal screening (IPS) and first trimester combined screening (FTS) for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center. Method Prospective data collection on women having FTS at one center from 1 November 2003 to 31 December 2005, or IPS at another from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005. A positive screen was defined as adjusted risk for trisomy 21 ≥ 1/200 at term or nuchal translucency ≥ 3.5 mm. Results 32 227 and 14 487 women were screened in the IPS and FTS programs, respectively. Detection rates (DRs) and positive rates (PRs) for trisomy 21 were 88.4% (95% CI: 81.6–91.5) and 3.3% (95% CI: 3.1–3.5) for IPS, and 83.9% (95% CI: 74.7–93.0) and 4.0% (95% CI: 3.7–4.3) for FTS. DR adjusted for viability bias was 85.2% for IPS and 78.6% for FTS. Applying both the screens to the 78 134 women who submitted prenatal screens in Ontario in 2005, thereby eliminating the effect of differences in the distribution of maternal age between screens, gave a DR (corrected for viability bias) and PR of 81 and 3.1% for IPS, and 76 and 3.4% for FTS. Conclusions Both IPS and FTS perform well and are feasible in a practical clinical setting. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Canada - epidemiology</subject><subject>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</subject><subject>detection rate</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - embryology</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - epidemiology</subject><subject>false positive rate</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>first trimester combined screening</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>integrated prenatal screening</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Molecular and cellular biology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, First</subject><subject>Prenatal Care</subject><subject>trisomy 21</subject><subject>Urban Population - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0197-3851</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10c1u1DAQB3ALgehSEG-AfAEOVYo_8uUj2kJBqqCHFT1aE3u8GBIn2FnafQseuV5t1J64eHz4acbzNyGvOTvnjIkPkz0XrC2fkBVnqimYEPIpWTGe77Kt-Al5kdKvDFuhmufkhLdKVLWQK_LvOo5pQjP7v0jxbsLoMRikt37-SX2YcRthRkuniAFm6GkyETH4sKUQLHU-ppnO0Q-YZozUjEPnQ_aPzI3xANI47KnguScF2kPcIl1DAOsh0F3s8mkwj4svyTMHfcJXSz0lm8-fNusvxdX3y6_rj1eFka0si0aqxoJE2Spb150RthPgeAuNkla6qlGlc8DQdbICWSosjZXKCcyFcylPybtj2ymOf3b58XrwyWDfQ8Bxl3StmprxSmT4_ghNDipFdHrK20Lca870IXs9WX3IPss3S8tdN6B9dEvYGbxdACQDvYsQjE8PLjdhZd4nu7Oju_U97v83T19fLGOLo_b5B-4eNMTfum5kU-mbb5eaix-tlDcXeiPvATr-q14</recordid><startdate>200811</startdate><enddate>200811</enddate><creator>Okun, Nanette</creator><creator>Summers, Anne M.</creator><creator>Hoffman, Barry</creator><creator>Huang, Tianhua</creator><creator>Winsor, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Chitayat, David</creator><creator>Staines, A.</creator><creator>Johnson, Jo-Ann</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200811</creationdate><title>Prospective experience with integrated prenatal screening and first trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center</title><author>Okun, Nanette ; Summers, Anne M. ; Hoffman, Barry ; Huang, Tianhua ; Winsor, Elizabeth ; Chitayat, David ; Staines, A. ; Johnson, Jo-Ann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-7397da3e389d66bc2db2af18a793d3f5794ffa0efb35a349e4cd39f2ecd31133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Canada - epidemiology</topic><topic>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</topic><topic>detection rate</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - embryology</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - epidemiology</topic><topic>false positive rate</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>first trimester combined screening</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>integrated prenatal screening</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Molecular and cellular biology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, First</topic><topic>Prenatal Care</topic><topic>trisomy 21</topic><topic>Urban Population - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okun, Nanette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Tianhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winsor, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chitayat, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staines, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Jo-Ann</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okun, Nanette</au><au>Summers, Anne M.</au><au>Hoffman, Barry</au><au>Huang, Tianhua</au><au>Winsor, Elizabeth</au><au>Chitayat, David</au><au>Staines, A.</au><au>Johnson, Jo-Ann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective experience with integrated prenatal screening and first trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center</atitle><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle><addtitle>Prenat. Diagn</addtitle><date>2008-11</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>987</spage><epage>992</epage><pages>987-992</pages><issn>0197-3851</issn><eissn>1097-0223</eissn><coden>PRDIDM</coden><abstract>Objectives To evaluate the performance of integrated prenatal screening (IPS) and first trimester combined screening (FTS) for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center. Method Prospective data collection on women having FTS at one center from 1 November 2003 to 31 December 2005, or IPS at another from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005. A positive screen was defined as adjusted risk for trisomy 21 ≥ 1/200 at term or nuchal translucency ≥ 3.5 mm. Results 32 227 and 14 487 women were screened in the IPS and FTS programs, respectively. Detection rates (DRs) and positive rates (PRs) for trisomy 21 were 88.4% (95% CI: 81.6–91.5) and 3.3% (95% CI: 3.1–3.5) for IPS, and 83.9% (95% CI: 74.7–93.0) and 4.0% (95% CI: 3.7–4.3) for FTS. DR adjusted for viability bias was 85.2% for IPS and 78.6% for FTS. Applying both the screens to the 78 134 women who submitted prenatal screens in Ontario in 2005, thereby eliminating the effect of differences in the distribution of maternal age between screens, gave a DR (corrected for viability bias) and PR of 81 and 3.1% for IPS, and 76 and 3.4% for FTS. Conclusions Both IPS and FTS perform well and are feasible in a practical clinical setting. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>18925623</pmid><doi>10.1002/pd.2084</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-3851
ispartof Prenatal diagnosis, 2008-11, Vol.28 (11), p.987-992
issn 0197-3851
1097-0223
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69760152
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Canada - epidemiology
Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation
detection rate
Down Syndrome - embryology
Down Syndrome - epidemiology
false positive rate
Female
first trimester combined screening
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
integrated prenatal screening
Mass Screening - methods
Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data
Medical sciences
Molecular and cellular biology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, First
Prenatal Care
trisomy 21
Urban Population - statistics & numerical data
title Prospective experience with integrated prenatal screening and first trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T23%3A17%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20experience%20with%20integrated%20prenatal%20screening%20and%20first%20trimester%20combined%20screening%20for%20trisomy%2021%20in%20a%20large%20Canadian%20urban%20center&rft.jtitle=Prenatal%20diagnosis&rft.au=Okun,%20Nanette&rft.date=2008-11&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=987&rft.epage=992&rft.pages=987-992&rft.issn=0197-3851&rft.eissn=1097-0223&rft.coden=PRDIDM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pd.2084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69760152%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69760152&rft_id=info:pmid/18925623&rfr_iscdi=true