Limit-feeding corn as an alternative to hay reduces manure and nutrient output by Holstein cows
Efficiency of limit-feeding a whole shelled corn-based diet as an alternate to a conventional forage-based diet for nonlactating dairy cattle was determined. Twelve nonlactating, multiparous Holstein cows (initial BW 642 +/- 50 kg) were used in a randomized complete block design. Nutrient digestibil...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 1999-04, Vol.77 (4), p.967-972 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 972 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 967 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Driedger, L.J Loerch, S.C |
description | Efficiency of limit-feeding a whole shelled corn-based diet as an alternate to a conventional forage-based diet for nonlactating dairy cattle was determined. Twelve nonlactating, multiparous Holstein cows (initial BW 642 +/- 50 kg) were used in a randomized complete block design. Nutrient digestibility, excretion of DM, N, and P, performance of cows, and feed costs were measured. Both diets were formulated to provide equal daily intakes of NE1, protein, vitamins, and minerals, according to National Research Council recommendations. Dry matter intake was restricted by 30% for cows fed the high-corn diet compared with the high-forage diet (6.8 vs 9.6 kg/d, respectively); therefore, concentrations of nutrients in the high-corn diet were increased to compensate for decreased DMI. Diets were fed once daily, and cows had unlimited access to fresh water. After a 28-d adaptation period, cows were placed in metabolism stalls for a 6-d total collection of feces and urine. The limit-fed, high-corn diet had a 15% greater DM digestibility than the high-forage diet. A 29% decrease in DMI for the high-corn diet vs the high-forage diet resulted in a 40% decrease in fecal DM excretion. Starch digestibility and digestibility of whole corn kernels were not affected (P greater than or equal to .62) by diet. Despite similar N intakes, total N excretion was 22% greater (P < .01) for cows fed the high-forage diet than for those limit-fed the high-grain diet. Cow weight and condition score change did not differ (P > .10) between diets. Feed costs were reduced by $.38/d with the high-corn diet vs the high-forage diet. Limit-feeding a corn-based diet is an economically and nutritionally viable alternative to forage-based diets for nonlactating Holstein cows. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/1999.774967x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69757814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69757814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-a724ba7a6c54f837f563b3f7d5164392ec52d6bb4664d8cde0bfb89ea93e6e713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0E1vEzEQBmALgWhauHEGCwGnbvG310dUlRYpUg_Qs-X1ziaO9iPY3pb8exxtJFAvM5dH72hehN5RcsUk01-pMeZKa2GU_vMCrahksuJU8ZdoRQijVV1TdobOU9oRQpk08jU6o4SzmiuxQnYdhpCrDqAN4wb7KY7YJezK7DPE0eXwCDhPeOsOOEI7e0h4cOMcoaAWj3OOAcaMpznv54ybA76b-pQhjCXsKb1BrzrXJ3h72hfo4fvNr-u7an1_--P627ry3OhcOc1E47RTXoqu5rqTije8062kSnDDwEvWqqYRSom29i2QpmtqA85wUKApv0Bfltx9nH7PkLIdQvLQ926EaU5WGS11TUWBH5_B3TSXP_tkGa0pl5yogi4X5OOUUoTO7mMYXDxYSuyxdXts3Z5aL_z9KXNuBmj_w0vNBXw6AZe867voRh_SP1dLqc3x7OeFbcNm-xQi2DS4vi-p1O5c0toKWw4W92FxnZus28QS9fCTEcoJM1QSwflfgfWfwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218135306</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Limit-feeding corn as an alternative to hay reduces manure and nutrient output by Holstein cows</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Driedger, L.J ; Loerch, S.C</creator><creatorcontrib>Driedger, L.J ; Loerch, S.C</creatorcontrib><description>Efficiency of limit-feeding a whole shelled corn-based diet as an alternate to a conventional forage-based diet for nonlactating dairy cattle was determined. Twelve nonlactating, multiparous Holstein cows (initial BW 642 +/- 50 kg) were used in a randomized complete block design. Nutrient digestibility, excretion of DM, N, and P, performance of cows, and feed costs were measured. Both diets were formulated to provide equal daily intakes of NE1, protein, vitamins, and minerals, according to National Research Council recommendations. Dry matter intake was restricted by 30% for cows fed the high-corn diet compared with the high-forage diet (6.8 vs 9.6 kg/d, respectively); therefore, concentrations of nutrients in the high-corn diet were increased to compensate for decreased DMI. Diets were fed once daily, and cows had unlimited access to fresh water. After a 28-d adaptation period, cows were placed in metabolism stalls for a 6-d total collection of feces and urine. The limit-fed, high-corn diet had a 15% greater DM digestibility than the high-forage diet. A 29% decrease in DMI for the high-corn diet vs the high-forage diet resulted in a 40% decrease in fecal DM excretion. Starch digestibility and digestibility of whole corn kernels were not affected (P greater than or equal to .62) by diet. Despite similar N intakes, total N excretion was 22% greater (P < .01) for cows fed the high-forage diet than for those limit-fed the high-grain diet. Cow weight and condition score change did not differ (P > .10) between diets. Feed costs were reduced by $.38/d with the high-corn diet vs the high-forage diet. Limit-feeding a corn-based diet is an economically and nutritionally viable alternative to forage-based diets for nonlactating Holstein cows.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/1999.774967x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10328364</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>ad libitum feeding ; Animal Feed ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle ; Cattle - metabolism ; Corn ; Dactylis glomerata ; dairy cows ; Dairying - methods ; Diet ; Dietary Carbohydrates - metabolism ; digestibility ; Digestion ; dry matter ; dry period ; excretion ; feces ; feces collection ; feces composition ; feed intake ; Female ; forage ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grain ; hay ; Manure ; Manures ; nitrogen ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; organic matter ; Phosphorus, Dietary - metabolism ; production costs ; restricted feeding ; starch digestion ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 1999-04, Vol.77 (4), p.967-972</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Apr 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-a724ba7a6c54f837f563b3f7d5164392ec52d6bb4664d8cde0bfb89ea93e6e713</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1855796$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10328364$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Driedger, L.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loerch, S.C</creatorcontrib><title>Limit-feeding corn as an alternative to hay reduces manure and nutrient output by Holstein cows</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>Efficiency of limit-feeding a whole shelled corn-based diet as an alternate to a conventional forage-based diet for nonlactating dairy cattle was determined. Twelve nonlactating, multiparous Holstein cows (initial BW 642 +/- 50 kg) were used in a randomized complete block design. Nutrient digestibility, excretion of DM, N, and P, performance of cows, and feed costs were measured. Both diets were formulated to provide equal daily intakes of NE1, protein, vitamins, and minerals, according to National Research Council recommendations. Dry matter intake was restricted by 30% for cows fed the high-corn diet compared with the high-forage diet (6.8 vs 9.6 kg/d, respectively); therefore, concentrations of nutrients in the high-corn diet were increased to compensate for decreased DMI. Diets were fed once daily, and cows had unlimited access to fresh water. After a 28-d adaptation period, cows were placed in metabolism stalls for a 6-d total collection of feces and urine. The limit-fed, high-corn diet had a 15% greater DM digestibility than the high-forage diet. A 29% decrease in DMI for the high-corn diet vs the high-forage diet resulted in a 40% decrease in fecal DM excretion. Starch digestibility and digestibility of whole corn kernels were not affected (P greater than or equal to .62) by diet. Despite similar N intakes, total N excretion was 22% greater (P < .01) for cows fed the high-forage diet than for those limit-fed the high-grain diet. Cow weight and condition score change did not differ (P > .10) between diets. Feed costs were reduced by $.38/d with the high-corn diet vs the high-forage diet. Limit-feeding a corn-based diet is an economically and nutritionally viable alternative to forage-based diets for nonlactating Holstein cows.</description><subject>ad libitum feeding</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle - metabolism</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Dactylis glomerata</subject><subject>dairy cows</subject><subject>Dairying - methods</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietary Carbohydrates - metabolism</subject><subject>digestibility</subject><subject>Digestion</subject><subject>dry matter</subject><subject>dry period</subject><subject>excretion</subject><subject>feces</subject><subject>feces collection</subject><subject>feces composition</subject><subject>feed intake</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>forage</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>hay</subject><subject>Manure</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>organic matter</subject><subject>Phosphorus, Dietary - metabolism</subject><subject>production costs</subject><subject>restricted feeding</subject><subject>starch digestion</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><issn>0021-8812</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0E1vEzEQBmALgWhauHEGCwGnbvG310dUlRYpUg_Qs-X1ziaO9iPY3pb8exxtJFAvM5dH72hehN5RcsUk01-pMeZKa2GU_vMCrahksuJU8ZdoRQijVV1TdobOU9oRQpk08jU6o4SzmiuxQnYdhpCrDqAN4wb7KY7YJezK7DPE0eXwCDhPeOsOOEI7e0h4cOMcoaAWj3OOAcaMpznv54ybA76b-pQhjCXsKb1BrzrXJ3h72hfo4fvNr-u7an1_--P627ry3OhcOc1E47RTXoqu5rqTije8062kSnDDwEvWqqYRSom29i2QpmtqA85wUKApv0Bfltx9nH7PkLIdQvLQ926EaU5WGS11TUWBH5_B3TSXP_tkGa0pl5yogi4X5OOUUoTO7mMYXDxYSuyxdXts3Z5aL_z9KXNuBmj_w0vNBXw6AZe867voRh_SP1dLqc3x7OeFbcNm-xQi2DS4vi-p1O5c0toKWw4W92FxnZus28QS9fCTEcoJM1QSwflfgfWfwQ</recordid><startdate>19990401</startdate><enddate>19990401</enddate><creator>Driedger, L.J</creator><creator>Loerch, S.C</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><general>American Society of Animal Science</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990401</creationdate><title>Limit-feeding corn as an alternative to hay reduces manure and nutrient output by Holstein cows</title><author>Driedger, L.J ; Loerch, S.C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-a724ba7a6c54f837f563b3f7d5164392ec52d6bb4664d8cde0bfb89ea93e6e713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>ad libitum feeding</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle - metabolism</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Dactylis glomerata</topic><topic>dairy cows</topic><topic>Dairying - methods</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietary Carbohydrates - metabolism</topic><topic>digestibility</topic><topic>Digestion</topic><topic>dry matter</topic><topic>dry period</topic><topic>excretion</topic><topic>feces</topic><topic>feces collection</topic><topic>feces composition</topic><topic>feed intake</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>forage</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>hay</topic><topic>Manure</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>organic matter</topic><topic>Phosphorus, Dietary - metabolism</topic><topic>production costs</topic><topic>restricted feeding</topic><topic>starch digestion</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Driedger, L.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loerch, S.C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Driedger, L.J</au><au>Loerch, S.C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Limit-feeding corn as an alternative to hay reduces manure and nutrient output by Holstein cows</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>1999-04-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>967</spage><epage>972</epage><pages>967-972</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><eissn>0021-8812</eissn><abstract>Efficiency of limit-feeding a whole shelled corn-based diet as an alternate to a conventional forage-based diet for nonlactating dairy cattle was determined. Twelve nonlactating, multiparous Holstein cows (initial BW 642 +/- 50 kg) were used in a randomized complete block design. Nutrient digestibility, excretion of DM, N, and P, performance of cows, and feed costs were measured. Both diets were formulated to provide equal daily intakes of NE1, protein, vitamins, and minerals, according to National Research Council recommendations. Dry matter intake was restricted by 30% for cows fed the high-corn diet compared with the high-forage diet (6.8 vs 9.6 kg/d, respectively); therefore, concentrations of nutrients in the high-corn diet were increased to compensate for decreased DMI. Diets were fed once daily, and cows had unlimited access to fresh water. After a 28-d adaptation period, cows were placed in metabolism stalls for a 6-d total collection of feces and urine. The limit-fed, high-corn diet had a 15% greater DM digestibility than the high-forage diet. A 29% decrease in DMI for the high-corn diet vs the high-forage diet resulted in a 40% decrease in fecal DM excretion. Starch digestibility and digestibility of whole corn kernels were not affected (P greater than or equal to .62) by diet. Despite similar N intakes, total N excretion was 22% greater (P < .01) for cows fed the high-forage diet than for those limit-fed the high-grain diet. Cow weight and condition score change did not differ (P > .10) between diets. Feed costs were reduced by $.38/d with the high-corn diet vs the high-forage diet. Limit-feeding a corn-based diet is an economically and nutritionally viable alternative to forage-based diets for nonlactating Holstein cows.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>10328364</pmid><doi>10.2527/1999.774967x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 1999-04, Vol.77 (4), p.967-972 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 0021-8812 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69757814 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE |
subjects | ad libitum feeding Animal Feed Animal productions Animals Biological and medical sciences Cattle Cattle - metabolism Corn Dactylis glomerata dairy cows Dairying - methods Diet Dietary Carbohydrates - metabolism digestibility Digestion dry matter dry period excretion feces feces collection feces composition feed intake Female forage Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Grain hay Manure Manures nitrogen Nitrogen - metabolism organic matter Phosphorus, Dietary - metabolism production costs restricted feeding starch digestion Terrestrial animal productions Vertebrates Zea mays |
title | Limit-feeding corn as an alternative to hay reduces manure and nutrient output by Holstein cows |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T10%3A58%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Limit-feeding%20corn%20as%20an%20alternative%20to%20hay%20reduces%20manure%20and%20nutrient%20output%20by%20Holstein%20cows&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Driedger,%20L.J&rft.date=1999-04-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=967&rft.epage=972&rft.pages=967-972&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/1999.774967x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69757814%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218135306&rft_id=info:pmid/10328364&rfr_iscdi=true |