Quantification and Interpretation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Sediment Samples by a GC/MS Method and Comparison with EPA 418.1 and a Rapid Field Method

Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as a lumped parameter can be easily and rapidly measured or monitored. Despite interpretational problems, it has become an accepted regulatory benchmark used widely to evaluate the extent of petroleum product contamination. Three currently used methods (GC/MS, conv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analytical chemistry (Washington) 1999-05, Vol.71 (9), p.1899-1904
Hauptverfasser: Xie, Guibo, Barcelona, Michael J, Fang, Jiasong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1904
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1899
container_title Analytical chemistry (Washington)
container_volume 71
creator Xie, Guibo
Barcelona, Michael J
Fang, Jiasong
description Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as a lumped parameter can be easily and rapidly measured or monitored. Despite interpretational problems, it has become an accepted regulatory benchmark used widely to evaluate the extent of petroleum product contamination. Three currently used methods (GC/MS, conventional EPA 418.1, and a rapid field method PetroFLAG) were performed to quantify the TPH content in samples collected from a site contaminated by transformer oil. To standardize the method and improve the comparability of TPH data, crucial GC-based quantification issues were examined, e.g., quantification based on internal standards (ISTD) vs external standards (ESTD), single vs multiple ISTD, and various area integration approaches. The interpretation of hydrocarbon chromatographic results was examined in the context of field samples. The performance of the GC/MS method was compared with those of EPA 418.1 and PetroFLAG. As a result, it was observed that the ISTD quantification method was preferred to the ESTD method, multiple ISTD might be better than single ISTD, and three different area integration approaches did not have a significant effect on TPH results. Evaluation of the chromatograms between a reference sample and three unknown samples showed that the extent of contamination varied appreciably with sample depth. It was also found that there existed a good positive correlation between GC/MS and both EPA 418.1 and PetroFLAG, and that EPA 418.1 produced the higher overall estimate while GC/MS and PetroFLAG resulted in lower, more statistically comparable TPH values.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/ac981244t
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69753921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69753921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e305bf08b8a214f432ff1f0d8cae7677b2466f8b61e65a817c0e0cb72afca8c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpl0d9qFDEUBvBBFLtWL3wBCaKCF9PmZP4kc1mWbrfQ4uqu4l04k0lo6sxkTDLovozP6thZWtGrQM4vHyd8SfIS6AlQBqeoKgEsz-OjZAEFo2kpBHucLCilWco4pUfJsxBuKQWgUD5NjoBmGa2ALZJfH0fsozVWYbSuJ9g35LKP2g9ex_nKGbJzEVuy0dG7Vo8dWe8b7xT62vWB2J5sdWM73UeyxW5odSD1niC5WJ5eb8m1jjeuuQteum5Ab8MU-sPGG3K-OSM5iBO4myL5hINtyMrqtjk8e548MdgG_eJwHiefV-e75Tq9-nBxuTy7SjFnIqY6o0VtqKgFMshNnjFjwNBGKNS85LxmeVkaUZegywIFcEU1VTVnaBQKRbPj5N2cO3j3fdQhys4GpdsWe-3GIMuKF1nFYIKv_4G3bvT9tJtkwAUXQlQTej8j5V0IXhs5eNuh30ug8k9j8r6xyb46BI51p5u_5FzRBN4cAAaFrfHYKxseHBdFUWUTS2dmQ9Q_78fov8mSZ7yQu81WriFfia_wRa4m_3b2qMLDH_7f7zcn4bf2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217878889</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantification and Interpretation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Sediment Samples by a GC/MS Method and Comparison with EPA 418.1 and a Rapid Field Method</title><source>ACS Publications</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Xie, Guibo ; Barcelona, Michael J ; Fang, Jiasong</creator><creatorcontrib>Xie, Guibo ; Barcelona, Michael J ; Fang, Jiasong</creatorcontrib><description>Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as a lumped parameter can be easily and rapidly measured or monitored. Despite interpretational problems, it has become an accepted regulatory benchmark used widely to evaluate the extent of petroleum product contamination. Three currently used methods (GC/MS, conventional EPA 418.1, and a rapid field method PetroFLAG) were performed to quantify the TPH content in samples collected from a site contaminated by transformer oil. To standardize the method and improve the comparability of TPH data, crucial GC-based quantification issues were examined, e.g., quantification based on internal standards (ISTD) vs external standards (ESTD), single vs multiple ISTD, and various area integration approaches. The interpretation of hydrocarbon chromatographic results was examined in the context of field samples. The performance of the GC/MS method was compared with those of EPA 418.1 and PetroFLAG. As a result, it was observed that the ISTD quantification method was preferred to the ESTD method, multiple ISTD might be better than single ISTD, and three different area integration approaches did not have a significant effect on TPH results. Evaluation of the chromatograms between a reference sample and three unknown samples showed that the extent of contamination varied appreciably with sample depth. It was also found that there existed a good positive correlation between GC/MS and both EPA 418.1 and PetroFLAG, and that EPA 418.1 produced the higher overall estimate while GC/MS and PetroFLAG resulted in lower, more statistically comparable TPH values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2700</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6882</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ac981244t</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10330912</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANCHAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Analysis methods ; Analytical chemistry ; Applied sciences ; Chemistry ; Chemistry Techniques, Analytical - methods ; Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography ; Chromatography ; Exact sciences and technology ; Gas chromatographic methods ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Geologic Sediments - analysis ; Hydrocarbons ; Hydrocarbons - analysis ; Petroleum - analysis ; Pollution ; Sediments ; Soil and sediments pollution</subject><ispartof>Analytical chemistry (Washington), 1999-05, Vol.71 (9), p.1899-1904</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1999 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society May 1, 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e305bf08b8a214f432ff1f0d8cae7677b2466f8b61e65a817c0e0cb72afca8c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e305bf08b8a214f432ff1f0d8cae7677b2466f8b61e65a817c0e0cb72afca8c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ac981244t$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac981244t$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1785593$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10330912$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xie, Guibo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barcelona, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Jiasong</creatorcontrib><title>Quantification and Interpretation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Sediment Samples by a GC/MS Method and Comparison with EPA 418.1 and a Rapid Field Method</title><title>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</title><addtitle>Anal. Chem</addtitle><description>Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as a lumped parameter can be easily and rapidly measured or monitored. Despite interpretational problems, it has become an accepted regulatory benchmark used widely to evaluate the extent of petroleum product contamination. Three currently used methods (GC/MS, conventional EPA 418.1, and a rapid field method PetroFLAG) were performed to quantify the TPH content in samples collected from a site contaminated by transformer oil. To standardize the method and improve the comparability of TPH data, crucial GC-based quantification issues were examined, e.g., quantification based on internal standards (ISTD) vs external standards (ESTD), single vs multiple ISTD, and various area integration approaches. The interpretation of hydrocarbon chromatographic results was examined in the context of field samples. The performance of the GC/MS method was compared with those of EPA 418.1 and PetroFLAG. As a result, it was observed that the ISTD quantification method was preferred to the ESTD method, multiple ISTD might be better than single ISTD, and three different area integration approaches did not have a significant effect on TPH results. Evaluation of the chromatograms between a reference sample and three unknown samples showed that the extent of contamination varied appreciably with sample depth. It was also found that there existed a good positive correlation between GC/MS and both EPA 418.1 and PetroFLAG, and that EPA 418.1 produced the higher overall estimate while GC/MS and PetroFLAG resulted in lower, more statistically comparable TPH values.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Analysis methods</subject><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry Techniques, Analytical - methods</subject><subject>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Gas chromatographic methods</subject><subject>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments - analysis</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons - analysis</subject><subject>Petroleum - analysis</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Soil and sediments pollution</subject><issn>0003-2700</issn><issn>1520-6882</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpl0d9qFDEUBvBBFLtWL3wBCaKCF9PmZP4kc1mWbrfQ4uqu4l04k0lo6sxkTDLovozP6thZWtGrQM4vHyd8SfIS6AlQBqeoKgEsz-OjZAEFo2kpBHucLCilWco4pUfJsxBuKQWgUD5NjoBmGa2ALZJfH0fsozVWYbSuJ9g35LKP2g9ex_nKGbJzEVuy0dG7Vo8dWe8b7xT62vWB2J5sdWM73UeyxW5odSD1niC5WJ5eb8m1jjeuuQteum5Ab8MU-sPGG3K-OSM5iBO4myL5hINtyMrqtjk8e548MdgG_eJwHiefV-e75Tq9-nBxuTy7SjFnIqY6o0VtqKgFMshNnjFjwNBGKNS85LxmeVkaUZegywIFcEU1VTVnaBQKRbPj5N2cO3j3fdQhys4GpdsWe-3GIMuKF1nFYIKv_4G3bvT9tJtkwAUXQlQTej8j5V0IXhs5eNuh30ug8k9j8r6xyb46BI51p5u_5FzRBN4cAAaFrfHYKxseHBdFUWUTS2dmQ9Q_78fov8mSZ7yQu81WriFfia_wRa4m_3b2qMLDH_7f7zcn4bf2</recordid><startdate>19990501</startdate><enddate>19990501</enddate><creator>Xie, Guibo</creator><creator>Barcelona, Michael J</creator><creator>Fang, Jiasong</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990501</creationdate><title>Quantification and Interpretation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Sediment Samples by a GC/MS Method and Comparison with EPA 418.1 and a Rapid Field Method</title><author>Xie, Guibo ; Barcelona, Michael J ; Fang, Jiasong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e305bf08b8a214f432ff1f0d8cae7677b2466f8b61e65a817c0e0cb72afca8c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Analysis methods</topic><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry Techniques, Analytical - methods</topic><topic>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Gas chromatographic methods</topic><topic>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments - analysis</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons - analysis</topic><topic>Petroleum - analysis</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Soil and sediments pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xie, Guibo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barcelona, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Jiasong</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xie, Guibo</au><au>Barcelona, Michael J</au><au>Fang, Jiasong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantification and Interpretation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Sediment Samples by a GC/MS Method and Comparison with EPA 418.1 and a Rapid Field Method</atitle><jtitle>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</jtitle><addtitle>Anal. Chem</addtitle><date>1999-05-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1899</spage><epage>1904</epage><pages>1899-1904</pages><issn>0003-2700</issn><eissn>1520-6882</eissn><coden>ANCHAM</coden><abstract>Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as a lumped parameter can be easily and rapidly measured or monitored. Despite interpretational problems, it has become an accepted regulatory benchmark used widely to evaluate the extent of petroleum product contamination. Three currently used methods (GC/MS, conventional EPA 418.1, and a rapid field method PetroFLAG) were performed to quantify the TPH content in samples collected from a site contaminated by transformer oil. To standardize the method and improve the comparability of TPH data, crucial GC-based quantification issues were examined, e.g., quantification based on internal standards (ISTD) vs external standards (ESTD), single vs multiple ISTD, and various area integration approaches. The interpretation of hydrocarbon chromatographic results was examined in the context of field samples. The performance of the GC/MS method was compared with those of EPA 418.1 and PetroFLAG. As a result, it was observed that the ISTD quantification method was preferred to the ESTD method, multiple ISTD might be better than single ISTD, and three different area integration approaches did not have a significant effect on TPH results. Evaluation of the chromatograms between a reference sample and three unknown samples showed that the extent of contamination varied appreciably with sample depth. It was also found that there existed a good positive correlation between GC/MS and both EPA 418.1 and PetroFLAG, and that EPA 418.1 produced the higher overall estimate while GC/MS and PetroFLAG resulted in lower, more statistically comparable TPH values.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>10330912</pmid><doi>10.1021/ac981244t</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2700
ispartof Analytical chemistry (Washington), 1999-05, Vol.71 (9), p.1899-1904
issn 0003-2700
1520-6882
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69753921
source ACS Publications; MEDLINE
subjects Analysis
Analysis methods
Analytical chemistry
Applied sciences
Chemistry
Chemistry Techniques, Analytical - methods
Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography
Chromatography
Exact sciences and technology
Gas chromatographic methods
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods
Geologic Sediments - analysis
Hydrocarbons
Hydrocarbons - analysis
Petroleum - analysis
Pollution
Sediments
Soil and sediments pollution
title Quantification and Interpretation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Sediment Samples by a GC/MS Method and Comparison with EPA 418.1 and a Rapid Field Method
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A28%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantification%20and%20Interpretation%20of%20Total%20Petroleum%20Hydrocarbons%20in%20Sediment%20Samples%20by%20a%20GC/MS%20Method%20and%20Comparison%20with%20EPA%20418.1%20and%20a%20Rapid%20Field%20Method&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20chemistry%20(Washington)&rft.au=Xie,%20Guibo&rft.date=1999-05-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1899&rft.epage=1904&rft.pages=1899-1904&rft.issn=0003-2700&rft.eissn=1520-6882&rft.coden=ANCHAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ac981244t&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69753921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217878889&rft_id=info:pmid/10330912&rfr_iscdi=true