Urinary screening tests for fetal Down syndrome: II. Hyperglycosylated hCG

Hyperglycosylated hCG is a form of hCG with more complex oligosaccharide side chains. A specific immunoassay was developed to measure hyperglycosylated hCG. Levels were measured in urine samples from 1157 women between 11 to 22 weeks of gestation, undergoing genetic analysis because of advanced mate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prenatal diagnosis 1999-04, Vol.19 (4), p.351-359
Hauptverfasser: Cole, Laurence A., Shahabi, Shohreh, Oz, Utku A., Rinne, Kirsi M., Omrani, Aziza, Bahado-Singh, Ray O., Mahoney, Maurice J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 359
container_issue 4
container_start_page 351
container_title Prenatal diagnosis
container_volume 19
creator Cole, Laurence A.
Shahabi, Shohreh
Oz, Utku A.
Rinne, Kirsi M.
Omrani, Aziza
Bahado-Singh, Ray O.
Mahoney, Maurice J.
description Hyperglycosylated hCG is a form of hCG with more complex oligosaccharide side chains. A specific immunoassay was developed to measure hyperglycosylated hCG. Levels were measured in urine samples from 1157 women between 11 to 22 weeks of gestation, undergoing genetic analysis because of advanced maternal age. Values were normalized to urine creatinine concentration and plotted against gestational age, median values were determined and multiples of the control median (MoM) calculated. The median MoM and log standard deviation (log SD) of the 1134 control samples was 1.0 and 0.47, and of the 23 Down syndrome cases was 7.8 and 0.48, respectively. This indicated a 7.8‐fold increase in hyperglycosylated hCG levels in Down syndrome cases. In the accompanying article, a stability problem was found with β‐core fragment measurements in frozen urine samples. In anticipation of similar problems, nine urine samples were tested for hyperglycosylated hCG fresh and after storage in the freezer. No clear difference was found in hyperglycosylated hCG values. In addition, no trend was found in hyperglycosylated hCG MoM values or in Down syndrome detection rates in urine samples stored for one, two or three years in the freezer. Samples were split into five equal groups according to creatinine concentration. A trend was observed, hyperglycosylated hCG MoM values decreasing with advancing creatinine concentration (1.77, 1.08, 1.01, 0.73 and 0.60 at 0.25, 0.50, 0.79, 1.11 and 1.73 mg l, respectively). An error was noted. This was corrected with a regression equation. After correction, the median MoM and log SD of the control samples was 1.0 and 0.44, and of Down syndrome samples was 7.3 and 0.42, respectively. Correction of this error, while reducing the elevation of Down syndrome cases, tightened the spread of samples. Samples were ranked and centiles determined. 18 of 23 Down syndrome cases (78 per cent) exceeded the 95th centile of the control population. ROC analysis indicated 79 per cent detection at 5 per cent false‐positive rate. Urine samples were collected during two periods of gestation, an early period (11th to 14th completed week) and the period when chemical screening is normally performed (15th to 21st week). ROC analysis indicated 80 per cent and 78 per cent detection rates, respectively, at 5 per cent false‐positive rate, in the two gestational periods. Hyperglycosylated hCG values were modelled with β‐core fragment values, total oestriol values and maternal age
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199904)19:4<351::AID-PD546>3.0.CO;2-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69752274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69752274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-901c295c0c20d96bda1f8842fc7a38c2b58b0ef11fb73b30004844f27deb44103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoMo7rj6F6QXIrsXHfPVphk_YOnobGVwBF3du0OaJmu1045Jh7X_3tQOo6Dg1QnhzctzHoLQS4LnBGP67OxDkRfnBEsRY0rZGZFSYn5O5IK_YAlZLC6KZfx-mfD0FZvjeb55TuPrO2h2fHEXzTAJZ5Yl5AQ98P5rqM2oFPfRCcGMCsLJDL29cnWr3BB57Yxp6_Ym6o3vfWQ7F1nTqyZadrdt5Ie2ct3WLKKimEeXw864m2bQnR8a1Zsq-pKvHqJ7VjXePDrMU3T15vXH_DJeb1ZFfrGONWckjSUmmspEY01xJdOyUsRmGadWC8UyTcskK7GxhNhSsJJhjHnGuaWiMiXngfwUPZ16d677vg-wsK29Nk2jWtPtPaRSJJQKzo4A2nXeO2Nh5-ptWBYIhlEywCgZRmUwKoNJchjAIUgGCJLhl2RggCHfAIXr0Pv4ALAvt6b6o3WyGgJPDgHltWqsU62u_e-cYJLLcZFPU-y2bszwF9x_2P6FNl2E4ngqrn1vfhyLlfsGqWAigc_vVkDH38HxGtbsJ18gsSc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69752274</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urinary screening tests for fetal Down syndrome: II. Hyperglycosylated hCG</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Cole, Laurence A. ; Shahabi, Shohreh ; Oz, Utku A. ; Rinne, Kirsi M. ; Omrani, Aziza ; Bahado-Singh, Ray O. ; Mahoney, Maurice J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cole, Laurence A. ; Shahabi, Shohreh ; Oz, Utku A. ; Rinne, Kirsi M. ; Omrani, Aziza ; Bahado-Singh, Ray O. ; Mahoney, Maurice J.</creatorcontrib><description>Hyperglycosylated hCG is a form of hCG with more complex oligosaccharide side chains. A specific immunoassay was developed to measure hyperglycosylated hCG. Levels were measured in urine samples from 1157 women between 11 to 22 weeks of gestation, undergoing genetic analysis because of advanced maternal age. Values were normalized to urine creatinine concentration and plotted against gestational age, median values were determined and multiples of the control median (MoM) calculated. The median MoM and log standard deviation (log SD) of the 1134 control samples was 1.0 and 0.47, and of the 23 Down syndrome cases was 7.8 and 0.48, respectively. This indicated a 7.8‐fold increase in hyperglycosylated hCG levels in Down syndrome cases. In the accompanying article, a stability problem was found with β‐core fragment measurements in frozen urine samples. In anticipation of similar problems, nine urine samples were tested for hyperglycosylated hCG fresh and after storage in the freezer. No clear difference was found in hyperglycosylated hCG values. In addition, no trend was found in hyperglycosylated hCG MoM values or in Down syndrome detection rates in urine samples stored for one, two or three years in the freezer. Samples were split into five equal groups according to creatinine concentration. A trend was observed, hyperglycosylated hCG MoM values decreasing with advancing creatinine concentration (1.77, 1.08, 1.01, 0.73 and 0.60 at 0.25, 0.50, 0.79, 1.11 and 1.73 mg l, respectively). An error was noted. This was corrected with a regression equation. After correction, the median MoM and log SD of the control samples was 1.0 and 0.44, and of Down syndrome samples was 7.3 and 0.42, respectively. Correction of this error, while reducing the elevation of Down syndrome cases, tightened the spread of samples. Samples were ranked and centiles determined. 18 of 23 Down syndrome cases (78 per cent) exceeded the 95th centile of the control population. ROC analysis indicated 79 per cent detection at 5 per cent false‐positive rate. Urine samples were collected during two periods of gestation, an early period (11th to 14th completed week) and the period when chemical screening is normally performed (15th to 21st week). ROC analysis indicated 80 per cent and 78 per cent detection rates, respectively, at 5 per cent false‐positive rate, in the two gestational periods. Hyperglycosylated hCG values were modelled with β‐core fragment values, total oestriol values and maternal age. ROC analysis indicated 97 per cent detection rate at 5 per cent false‐positive rate. This detection rate and this level of Down syndrome and control patient discrimination surpasses that of any other serum, urine or ultrasound screening protocol. Hyperglycosylated hCG should be considered as a new screening test for aneuploid pregnancies, with the potential of detecting almost all cases of Down syndrome. Evaluation is needed by other centres in order to bring hyperglycosylated hCG into clinical practice. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-3851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199904)19:4&lt;351::AID-PD546&gt;3.0.CO;2-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10327141</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PRDIDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Chorionic Gonadotropin - urine ; Creatinine - urine ; Down syndrome ; Down Syndrome - urine ; Drug Stability ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Fetal Diseases - urine ; Freezing ; Gestational Age ; glycosylation ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; hCG ; human chorionic gonadotrophin ; Humans ; hyperglycosylated hCG ; Management. Prenatal diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; oligosaccharide ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; prenatal diagnosis ; Prenatal Diagnosis - methods ; screening ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Prenatal diagnosis, 1999-04, Vol.19 (4), p.351-359</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1999 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-901c295c0c20d96bda1f8842fc7a38c2b58b0ef11fb73b30004844f27deb44103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0223%28199904%2919%3A4%3C351%3A%3AAID-PD546%3E3.0.CO%3B2-X$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0223%28199904%2919%3A4%3C351%3A%3AAID-PD546%3E3.0.CO%3B2-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1739490$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10327141$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cole, Laurence A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahabi, Shohreh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oz, Utku A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinne, Kirsi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omrani, Aziza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahado-Singh, Ray O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, Maurice J.</creatorcontrib><title>Urinary screening tests for fetal Down syndrome: II. Hyperglycosylated hCG</title><title>Prenatal diagnosis</title><addtitle>Prenat. Diagn</addtitle><description>Hyperglycosylated hCG is a form of hCG with more complex oligosaccharide side chains. A specific immunoassay was developed to measure hyperglycosylated hCG. Levels were measured in urine samples from 1157 women between 11 to 22 weeks of gestation, undergoing genetic analysis because of advanced maternal age. Values were normalized to urine creatinine concentration and plotted against gestational age, median values were determined and multiples of the control median (MoM) calculated. The median MoM and log standard deviation (log SD) of the 1134 control samples was 1.0 and 0.47, and of the 23 Down syndrome cases was 7.8 and 0.48, respectively. This indicated a 7.8‐fold increase in hyperglycosylated hCG levels in Down syndrome cases. In the accompanying article, a stability problem was found with β‐core fragment measurements in frozen urine samples. In anticipation of similar problems, nine urine samples were tested for hyperglycosylated hCG fresh and after storage in the freezer. No clear difference was found in hyperglycosylated hCG values. In addition, no trend was found in hyperglycosylated hCG MoM values or in Down syndrome detection rates in urine samples stored for one, two or three years in the freezer. Samples were split into five equal groups according to creatinine concentration. A trend was observed, hyperglycosylated hCG MoM values decreasing with advancing creatinine concentration (1.77, 1.08, 1.01, 0.73 and 0.60 at 0.25, 0.50, 0.79, 1.11 and 1.73 mg l, respectively). An error was noted. This was corrected with a regression equation. After correction, the median MoM and log SD of the control samples was 1.0 and 0.44, and of Down syndrome samples was 7.3 and 0.42, respectively. Correction of this error, while reducing the elevation of Down syndrome cases, tightened the spread of samples. Samples were ranked and centiles determined. 18 of 23 Down syndrome cases (78 per cent) exceeded the 95th centile of the control population. ROC analysis indicated 79 per cent detection at 5 per cent false‐positive rate. Urine samples were collected during two periods of gestation, an early period (11th to 14th completed week) and the period when chemical screening is normally performed (15th to 21st week). ROC analysis indicated 80 per cent and 78 per cent detection rates, respectively, at 5 per cent false‐positive rate, in the two gestational periods. Hyperglycosylated hCG values were modelled with β‐core fragment values, total oestriol values and maternal age. ROC analysis indicated 97 per cent detection rate at 5 per cent false‐positive rate. This detection rate and this level of Down syndrome and control patient discrimination surpasses that of any other serum, urine or ultrasound screening protocol. Hyperglycosylated hCG should be considered as a new screening test for aneuploid pregnancies, with the potential of detecting almost all cases of Down syndrome. Evaluation is needed by other centres in order to bring hyperglycosylated hCG into clinical practice. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chorionic Gonadotropin - urine</subject><subject>Creatinine - urine</subject><subject>Down syndrome</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - urine</subject><subject>Drug Stability</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Diseases - urine</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>glycosylation</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>hCG</subject><subject>human chorionic gonadotrophin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hyperglycosylated hCG</subject><subject>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>oligosaccharide</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0197-3851</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoMo7rj6F6QXIrsXHfPVphk_YOnobGVwBF3du0OaJmu1045Jh7X_3tQOo6Dg1QnhzctzHoLQS4LnBGP67OxDkRfnBEsRY0rZGZFSYn5O5IK_YAlZLC6KZfx-mfD0FZvjeb55TuPrO2h2fHEXzTAJZ5Yl5AQ98P5rqM2oFPfRCcGMCsLJDL29cnWr3BB57Yxp6_Ym6o3vfWQ7F1nTqyZadrdt5Ie2ct3WLKKimEeXw864m2bQnR8a1Zsq-pKvHqJ7VjXePDrMU3T15vXH_DJeb1ZFfrGONWckjSUmmspEY01xJdOyUsRmGadWC8UyTcskK7GxhNhSsJJhjHnGuaWiMiXngfwUPZ16d677vg-wsK29Nk2jWtPtPaRSJJQKzo4A2nXeO2Nh5-ptWBYIhlEywCgZRmUwKoNJchjAIUgGCJLhl2RggCHfAIXr0Pv4ALAvt6b6o3WyGgJPDgHltWqsU62u_e-cYJLLcZFPU-y2bszwF9x_2P6FNl2E4ngqrn1vfhyLlfsGqWAigc_vVkDH38HxGtbsJ18gsSc</recordid><startdate>199904</startdate><enddate>199904</enddate><creator>Cole, Laurence A.</creator><creator>Shahabi, Shohreh</creator><creator>Oz, Utku A.</creator><creator>Rinne, Kirsi M.</creator><creator>Omrani, Aziza</creator><creator>Bahado-Singh, Ray O.</creator><creator>Mahoney, Maurice J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199904</creationdate><title>Urinary screening tests for fetal Down syndrome: II. Hyperglycosylated hCG</title><author>Cole, Laurence A. ; Shahabi, Shohreh ; Oz, Utku A. ; Rinne, Kirsi M. ; Omrani, Aziza ; Bahado-Singh, Ray O. ; Mahoney, Maurice J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-901c295c0c20d96bda1f8842fc7a38c2b58b0ef11fb73b30004844f27deb44103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chorionic Gonadotropin - urine</topic><topic>Creatinine - urine</topic><topic>Down syndrome</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - urine</topic><topic>Drug Stability</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Diseases - urine</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>glycosylation</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>hCG</topic><topic>human chorionic gonadotrophin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hyperglycosylated hCG</topic><topic>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>oligosaccharide</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cole, Laurence A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahabi, Shohreh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oz, Utku A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinne, Kirsi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omrani, Aziza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahado-Singh, Ray O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, Maurice J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cole, Laurence A.</au><au>Shahabi, Shohreh</au><au>Oz, Utku A.</au><au>Rinne, Kirsi M.</au><au>Omrani, Aziza</au><au>Bahado-Singh, Ray O.</au><au>Mahoney, Maurice J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urinary screening tests for fetal Down syndrome: II. Hyperglycosylated hCG</atitle><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle><addtitle>Prenat. Diagn</addtitle><date>1999-04</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>351-359</pages><issn>0197-3851</issn><eissn>1097-0223</eissn><coden>PRDIDM</coden><abstract>Hyperglycosylated hCG is a form of hCG with more complex oligosaccharide side chains. A specific immunoassay was developed to measure hyperglycosylated hCG. Levels were measured in urine samples from 1157 women between 11 to 22 weeks of gestation, undergoing genetic analysis because of advanced maternal age. Values were normalized to urine creatinine concentration and plotted against gestational age, median values were determined and multiples of the control median (MoM) calculated. The median MoM and log standard deviation (log SD) of the 1134 control samples was 1.0 and 0.47, and of the 23 Down syndrome cases was 7.8 and 0.48, respectively. This indicated a 7.8‐fold increase in hyperglycosylated hCG levels in Down syndrome cases. In the accompanying article, a stability problem was found with β‐core fragment measurements in frozen urine samples. In anticipation of similar problems, nine urine samples were tested for hyperglycosylated hCG fresh and after storage in the freezer. No clear difference was found in hyperglycosylated hCG values. In addition, no trend was found in hyperglycosylated hCG MoM values or in Down syndrome detection rates in urine samples stored for one, two or three years in the freezer. Samples were split into five equal groups according to creatinine concentration. A trend was observed, hyperglycosylated hCG MoM values decreasing with advancing creatinine concentration (1.77, 1.08, 1.01, 0.73 and 0.60 at 0.25, 0.50, 0.79, 1.11 and 1.73 mg l, respectively). An error was noted. This was corrected with a regression equation. After correction, the median MoM and log SD of the control samples was 1.0 and 0.44, and of Down syndrome samples was 7.3 and 0.42, respectively. Correction of this error, while reducing the elevation of Down syndrome cases, tightened the spread of samples. Samples were ranked and centiles determined. 18 of 23 Down syndrome cases (78 per cent) exceeded the 95th centile of the control population. ROC analysis indicated 79 per cent detection at 5 per cent false‐positive rate. Urine samples were collected during two periods of gestation, an early period (11th to 14th completed week) and the period when chemical screening is normally performed (15th to 21st week). ROC analysis indicated 80 per cent and 78 per cent detection rates, respectively, at 5 per cent false‐positive rate, in the two gestational periods. Hyperglycosylated hCG values were modelled with β‐core fragment values, total oestriol values and maternal age. ROC analysis indicated 97 per cent detection rate at 5 per cent false‐positive rate. This detection rate and this level of Down syndrome and control patient discrimination surpasses that of any other serum, urine or ultrasound screening protocol. Hyperglycosylated hCG should be considered as a new screening test for aneuploid pregnancies, with the potential of detecting almost all cases of Down syndrome. Evaluation is needed by other centres in order to bring hyperglycosylated hCG into clinical practice. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>10327141</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199904)19:4&lt;351::AID-PD546&gt;3.0.CO;2-X</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-3851
ispartof Prenatal diagnosis, 1999-04, Vol.19 (4), p.351-359
issn 0197-3851
1097-0223
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69752274
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Chorionic Gonadotropin - urine
Creatinine - urine
Down syndrome
Down Syndrome - urine
Drug Stability
False Positive Reactions
Female
Fetal Diseases - urine
Freezing
Gestational Age
glycosylation
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
hCG
human chorionic gonadotrophin
Humans
hyperglycosylated hCG
Management. Prenatal diagnosis
Medical sciences
oligosaccharide
Pregnancy
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
prenatal diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis - methods
screening
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Urinary screening tests for fetal Down syndrome: II. Hyperglycosylated hCG
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A40%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urinary%20screening%20tests%20for%20fetal%20Down%20syndrome:%20II.%20Hyperglycosylated%20hCG&rft.jtitle=Prenatal%20diagnosis&rft.au=Cole,%20Laurence%20A.&rft.date=1999-04&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=351-359&rft.issn=0197-3851&rft.eissn=1097-0223&rft.coden=PRDIDM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199904)19:4%3C351::AID-PD546%3E3.0.CO;2-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69752274%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69752274&rft_id=info:pmid/10327141&rfr_iscdi=true