Spinal Motion Palpation: A Comparison of Studies That Assessed Intersegmental End Feel Vs Excursion

Abstract Objective Spinal motion palpation (MP) is a procedure used to detect intersegmental hypomobility/hypermobility. Different means of assessing intersegmental mobility are described, assessing either excursion of the segments (quantity of movement) or end feel (quality of motion when stressed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 2008-10, Vol.31 (8), p.616-626
Hauptverfasser: Haneline, Michael T., DC, MPH, Cooperstein, Robert, MA, DC, Young, Morgan, DC, Birkeland, Kristopher, BA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 626
container_issue 8
container_start_page 616
container_title Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics
container_volume 31
creator Haneline, Michael T., DC, MPH
Cooperstein, Robert, MA, DC
Young, Morgan, DC
Birkeland, Kristopher, BA
description Abstract Objective Spinal motion palpation (MP) is a procedure used to detect intersegmental hypomobility/hypermobility. Different means of assessing intersegmental mobility are described, assessing either excursion of the segments (quantity of movement) or end feel (quality of motion when stressed against the paraphysiological space). The objective of this review was to classify and compare studies based on method of MP used, considering that some studies may have used both methods. Methods Four databases were searched: MEDLINE-PubMed, Manual Alternative and Natural Therapy System, Index to Chiropractic Literature, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases for the years 1965 through January 2007. Retrieved citations were independently screened for inclusion by 2 of the authors consistent with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included studies were appraised for quality, and data were extracted and recorded in tables. Results The search strategy generated 415 citations, and 29 were harvested from reference lists. After removing articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, 44 were considered relevant and appraised for quality. Fifteen studies focused on MP excursion, 24 focused on end feel, and 5 used both. Eight studies reported high levels of reproducibility ( κ = ≥0.4), although 4 were not of acceptable quality, and 2 were only marginally acceptable. When only high-quality studies were considered, 3 of 24 end-feel studies reported good reliability compared with 1 of 15 excursion studies. There was no statistical support for a difference between the 2 groupings. Conclusions A difference in reported reliability was observed when the method of MP varied, although it was not statistically significant. There was no support in the literature for the advantage of one MP method over the other.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.09.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69751382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0161475408002418</els_id><sourcerecordid>69751382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a5e4665edf471429e7fd59cb0f0b03a3faa9061b1566731c968a1b4ca08cc0b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVpabZpv0APRafe7IxsWZZKKSzLpgkkpLBpr0KWx61c_4tkl-bbV2YXAjkUBjSI9x7M7xHynkHKgImLNm37aU4zAJmCSgHKF2TDijxLRCHFS7KJIpbwsuBn5E0ILQCoXMnX5IxJJXnGiw2xh8kNpqO34-zGgX4z3WTW7RPd0t3YT8a7EP_Hhh7mpXYY6P0vM9NtCBinptfDjD7gzx6HOcbsh5peInb0R6D7v3bxIWa9Ja8a0wV8d3rPyffL_f3uKrm5-3q9294kloOaE1MgF6LAuuEl45nCsqkLZStooILc5I0xCgSrWCFEmTOrhDSs4taAtBaqPD8nH4-5kx8fFgyz7l2w2HVmwHEJWqiyYLnMojA7Cq0fQ_DY6Mm73vhHzUCvaHWrV7R6RatB6Yg2mj6c0peqx_rJcmIZBZ-PAow3_nHodbAOB4u182hnXY_u__lfntlt5wZnTfcbHzG04-JjUUEzHTIN-rCWu3YLEiDjTOb_ALwZn6M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69751382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spinal Motion Palpation: A Comparison of Studies That Assessed Intersegmental End Feel Vs Excursion</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Haneline, Michael T., DC, MPH ; Cooperstein, Robert, MA, DC ; Young, Morgan, DC ; Birkeland, Kristopher, BA</creator><creatorcontrib>Haneline, Michael T., DC, MPH ; Cooperstein, Robert, MA, DC ; Young, Morgan, DC ; Birkeland, Kristopher, BA</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective Spinal motion palpation (MP) is a procedure used to detect intersegmental hypomobility/hypermobility. Different means of assessing intersegmental mobility are described, assessing either excursion of the segments (quantity of movement) or end feel (quality of motion when stressed against the paraphysiological space). The objective of this review was to classify and compare studies based on method of MP used, considering that some studies may have used both methods. Methods Four databases were searched: MEDLINE-PubMed, Manual Alternative and Natural Therapy System, Index to Chiropractic Literature, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases for the years 1965 through January 2007. Retrieved citations were independently screened for inclusion by 2 of the authors consistent with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included studies were appraised for quality, and data were extracted and recorded in tables. Results The search strategy generated 415 citations, and 29 were harvested from reference lists. After removing articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, 44 were considered relevant and appraised for quality. Fifteen studies focused on MP excursion, 24 focused on end feel, and 5 used both. Eight studies reported high levels of reproducibility ( κ = ≥0.4), although 4 were not of acceptable quality, and 2 were only marginally acceptable. When only high-quality studies were considered, 3 of 24 end-feel studies reported good reliability compared with 1 of 15 excursion studies. There was no statistical support for a difference between the 2 groupings. Conclusions A difference in reported reliability was observed when the method of MP varied, although it was not statistically significant. There was no support in the literature for the advantage of one MP method over the other.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-4754</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.09.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18984245</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Chiropractic ; Chiropractic - methods ; Chiropractic - standards ; Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) ; Diagnosis-Related Groups ; Evidence-Based Practice ; Humans ; Joint Instability - diagnosis ; Joint Instability - physiopathology ; Observer Variation ; Palpation ; Palpation - methods ; Palpation - standards ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research Design ; Sacroiliac Joint ; Single-Blind Method ; Spinal Diseases - diagnosis ; Spinal Diseases - physiopathology ; Spine ; Vertebra</subject><ispartof>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2008-10, Vol.31 (8), p.616-626</ispartof><rights>National University of Health Sciences</rights><rights>2008 National University of Health Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a5e4665edf471429e7fd59cb0f0b03a3faa9061b1566731c968a1b4ca08cc0b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a5e4665edf471429e7fd59cb0f0b03a3faa9061b1566731c968a1b4ca08cc0b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475408002418$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18984245$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haneline, Michael T., DC, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooperstein, Robert, MA, DC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Morgan, DC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birkeland, Kristopher, BA</creatorcontrib><title>Spinal Motion Palpation: A Comparison of Studies That Assessed Intersegmental End Feel Vs Excursion</title><title>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</title><addtitle>J Manipulative Physiol Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective Spinal motion palpation (MP) is a procedure used to detect intersegmental hypomobility/hypermobility. Different means of assessing intersegmental mobility are described, assessing either excursion of the segments (quantity of movement) or end feel (quality of motion when stressed against the paraphysiological space). The objective of this review was to classify and compare studies based on method of MP used, considering that some studies may have used both methods. Methods Four databases were searched: MEDLINE-PubMed, Manual Alternative and Natural Therapy System, Index to Chiropractic Literature, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases for the years 1965 through January 2007. Retrieved citations were independently screened for inclusion by 2 of the authors consistent with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included studies were appraised for quality, and data were extracted and recorded in tables. Results The search strategy generated 415 citations, and 29 were harvested from reference lists. After removing articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, 44 were considered relevant and appraised for quality. Fifteen studies focused on MP excursion, 24 focused on end feel, and 5 used both. Eight studies reported high levels of reproducibility ( κ = ≥0.4), although 4 were not of acceptable quality, and 2 were only marginally acceptable. When only high-quality studies were considered, 3 of 24 end-feel studies reported good reliability compared with 1 of 15 excursion studies. There was no statistical support for a difference between the 2 groupings. Conclusions A difference in reported reliability was observed when the method of MP varied, although it was not statistically significant. There was no support in the literature for the advantage of one MP method over the other.</description><subject>Chiropractic</subject><subject>Chiropractic - methods</subject><subject>Chiropractic - standards</subject><subject>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</subject><subject>Diagnosis-Related Groups</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Instability - diagnosis</subject><subject>Joint Instability - physiopathology</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Palpation</subject><subject>Palpation - methods</subject><subject>Palpation - standards</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Sacroiliac Joint</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Vertebra</subject><issn>0161-4754</issn><issn>1532-6586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVpabZpv0APRafe7IxsWZZKKSzLpgkkpLBpr0KWx61c_4tkl-bbV2YXAjkUBjSI9x7M7xHynkHKgImLNm37aU4zAJmCSgHKF2TDijxLRCHFS7KJIpbwsuBn5E0ILQCoXMnX5IxJJXnGiw2xh8kNpqO34-zGgX4z3WTW7RPd0t3YT8a7EP_Hhh7mpXYY6P0vM9NtCBinptfDjD7gzx6HOcbsh5peInb0R6D7v3bxIWa9Ja8a0wV8d3rPyffL_f3uKrm5-3q9294kloOaE1MgF6LAuuEl45nCsqkLZStooILc5I0xCgSrWCFEmTOrhDSs4taAtBaqPD8nH4-5kx8fFgyz7l2w2HVmwHEJWqiyYLnMojA7Cq0fQ_DY6Mm73vhHzUCvaHWrV7R6RatB6Yg2mj6c0peqx_rJcmIZBZ-PAow3_nHodbAOB4u182hnXY_u__lfntlt5wZnTfcbHzG04-JjUUEzHTIN-rCWu3YLEiDjTOb_ALwZn6M</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Haneline, Michael T., DC, MPH</creator><creator>Cooperstein, Robert, MA, DC</creator><creator>Young, Morgan, DC</creator><creator>Birkeland, Kristopher, BA</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Spinal Motion Palpation: A Comparison of Studies That Assessed Intersegmental End Feel Vs Excursion</title><author>Haneline, Michael T., DC, MPH ; Cooperstein, Robert, MA, DC ; Young, Morgan, DC ; Birkeland, Kristopher, BA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a5e4665edf471429e7fd59cb0f0b03a3faa9061b1566731c968a1b4ca08cc0b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Chiropractic</topic><topic>Chiropractic - methods</topic><topic>Chiropractic - standards</topic><topic>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</topic><topic>Diagnosis-Related Groups</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Instability - diagnosis</topic><topic>Joint Instability - physiopathology</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Palpation</topic><topic>Palpation - methods</topic><topic>Palpation - standards</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Sacroiliac Joint</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Vertebra</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haneline, Michael T., DC, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooperstein, Robert, MA, DC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Morgan, DC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birkeland, Kristopher, BA</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haneline, Michael T., DC, MPH</au><au>Cooperstein, Robert, MA, DC</au><au>Young, Morgan, DC</au><au>Birkeland, Kristopher, BA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spinal Motion Palpation: A Comparison of Studies That Assessed Intersegmental End Feel Vs Excursion</atitle><jtitle>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>J Manipulative Physiol Ther</addtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>616</spage><epage>626</epage><pages>616-626</pages><issn>0161-4754</issn><eissn>1532-6586</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective Spinal motion palpation (MP) is a procedure used to detect intersegmental hypomobility/hypermobility. Different means of assessing intersegmental mobility are described, assessing either excursion of the segments (quantity of movement) or end feel (quality of motion when stressed against the paraphysiological space). The objective of this review was to classify and compare studies based on method of MP used, considering that some studies may have used both methods. Methods Four databases were searched: MEDLINE-PubMed, Manual Alternative and Natural Therapy System, Index to Chiropractic Literature, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases for the years 1965 through January 2007. Retrieved citations were independently screened for inclusion by 2 of the authors consistent with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included studies were appraised for quality, and data were extracted and recorded in tables. Results The search strategy generated 415 citations, and 29 were harvested from reference lists. After removing articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, 44 were considered relevant and appraised for quality. Fifteen studies focused on MP excursion, 24 focused on end feel, and 5 used both. Eight studies reported high levels of reproducibility ( κ = ≥0.4), although 4 were not of acceptable quality, and 2 were only marginally acceptable. When only high-quality studies were considered, 3 of 24 end-feel studies reported good reliability compared with 1 of 15 excursion studies. There was no statistical support for a difference between the 2 groupings. Conclusions A difference in reported reliability was observed when the method of MP varied, although it was not statistically significant. There was no support in the literature for the advantage of one MP method over the other.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>18984245</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.09.007</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-4754
ispartof Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2008-10, Vol.31 (8), p.616-626
issn 0161-4754
1532-6586
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69751382
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Chiropractic
Chiropractic - methods
Chiropractic - standards
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Diagnosis-Related Groups
Evidence-Based Practice
Humans
Joint Instability - diagnosis
Joint Instability - physiopathology
Observer Variation
Palpation
Palpation - methods
Palpation - standards
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Range of Motion, Articular
Reproducibility of Results
Research Design
Sacroiliac Joint
Single-Blind Method
Spinal Diseases - diagnosis
Spinal Diseases - physiopathology
Spine
Vertebra
title Spinal Motion Palpation: A Comparison of Studies That Assessed Intersegmental End Feel Vs Excursion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T11%3A34%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spinal%20Motion%20Palpation:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Studies%20That%20Assessed%20Intersegmental%20End%20Feel%20Vs%20Excursion&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20manipulative%20and%20physiological%20therapeutics&rft.au=Haneline,%20Michael%20T.,%20DC,%20MPH&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=616&rft.epage=626&rft.pages=616-626&rft.issn=0161-4754&rft.eissn=1532-6586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.09.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69751382%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69751382&rft_id=info:pmid/18984245&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0161475408002418&rfr_iscdi=true