Industrial inspection performance depends on both viewing distance and oculomotor characteristics

The influence of viewing distance and individual differences in the oculomotor resting states (dark vergence and dark focus) on both inspection performance and visual fatigue was investigated by asking 24 college students to perform a visual inspection task for 40 min twice, once with a 20 cm viewin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied ergonomics 1999-06, Vol.30 (3), p.223-228
Hauptverfasser: Jebaraj, Daniel, Tyrrell, Richard A., Gramopadhye, Anand K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 228
container_issue 3
container_start_page 223
container_title Applied ergonomics
container_volume 30
creator Jebaraj, Daniel
Tyrrell, Richard A.
Gramopadhye, Anand K.
description The influence of viewing distance and individual differences in the oculomotor resting states (dark vergence and dark focus) on both inspection performance and visual fatigue was investigated by asking 24 college students to perform a visual inspection task for 40 min twice, once with a 20 cm viewing distance and once with a 60 cm viewing distance. During the task participants visually searched enlarged images of contact lenses for six different types of defects. Lens images were presented at a constant visual angle (17.5°) on a CRT. Inspection performance varied significantly across the two viewing distances: participants spent on average more than twice as much time inspecting individual lenses in the near condition (mean=18.32 s lens -1) than in the far condition (mean=7.25 s lens -1). Participants also reported greater visual fatigue in the near condition than in the far condition. At both viewing distances, participants who experienced relatively large inward shifts in dark vergence also tended to be slow inspectors. Neither inspection performance nor measures of fatigue were related to dark focus. These results support existing evidence against the use of near viewing distances and suggest that an oculomotor mechanism links inspection performance and visual fatigue to viewing distance.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00025-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69749667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003687098000258</els_id><sourcerecordid>69749667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-e9fa529ccf1268a862b351106097cba976eb7ce537923bf1efc7c790682bc02f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuLFTEQRoMozvXqT1AaEdFFax7deawGGXwMDLhQ1yFdXXEydCdt0q34783ce1Fx4ypU6lRRnI-Qx4y-YpTJ158opaKVWtEXRr-sBe9bfYfsmFa8NYzLu2T3GzkjD0q5qaXuWH-fnDEquKK63xF3GcetrDm4qQmxLAhrSLFZMPuUZxcBmxEXjGNp6veQ1uvme8AfIX5txlDWA-Di2CTYpjSnNeUGrl12sGKu_QDlIbnn3VTw0endky_v3n6--NBefXx_efHmqoVOyrVF413PDYCvt2unJR9EzxiV1CgYnFESBwXYC2W4GDxDDwqUoVLzASj3Yk-eH_cuOX3bsKx2DgVwmlzEtBUrjeqMlKqCT_8Bb9KWY73NctpzLUTVsyf9EYKcSsno7ZLD7PJPy6i9DcAeArC3dq3R9hCA1XXuyWn5Nsw4_jV1NF6BZyfAFXCTz1VhKH841VEmuoqdHzGsyqrxbAsErLbHkGtGdkzhP5f8AlWKowk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205283310</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Industrial inspection performance depends on both viewing distance and oculomotor characteristics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Jebaraj, Daniel ; Tyrrell, Richard A. ; Gramopadhye, Anand K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jebaraj, Daniel ; Tyrrell, Richard A. ; Gramopadhye, Anand K.</creatorcontrib><description>The influence of viewing distance and individual differences in the oculomotor resting states (dark vergence and dark focus) on both inspection performance and visual fatigue was investigated by asking 24 college students to perform a visual inspection task for 40 min twice, once with a 20 cm viewing distance and once with a 60 cm viewing distance. During the task participants visually searched enlarged images of contact lenses for six different types of defects. Lens images were presented at a constant visual angle (17.5°) on a CRT. Inspection performance varied significantly across the two viewing distances: participants spent on average more than twice as much time inspecting individual lenses in the near condition (mean=18.32 s lens -1) than in the far condition (mean=7.25 s lens -1). Participants also reported greater visual fatigue in the near condition than in the far condition. At both viewing distances, participants who experienced relatively large inward shifts in dark vergence also tended to be slow inspectors. Neither inspection performance nor measures of fatigue were related to dark focus. These results support existing evidence against the use of near viewing distances and suggest that an oculomotor mechanism links inspection performance and visual fatigue to viewing distance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6870</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00025-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10327085</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AERGBW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accommodation, Ocular - physiology ; Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Applied physiology ; Asthenopia - physiopathology ; Asthenopia - prevention &amp; control ; Biological and medical sciences ; Darkness ; Ergonomics ; Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology ; Eyes &amp; eyesight ; Fatigue ; Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology ; Humans ; Inspection ; Inspections ; Medical sciences ; Near work ; Oculomotor ; Regression Analysis ; Space life sciences ; Vision, Binocular - physiology ; Visual fatigue ; Visual performance</subject><ispartof>Applied ergonomics, 1999-06, Vol.30 (3), p.223-228</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-e9fa529ccf1268a862b351106097cba976eb7ce537923bf1efc7c790682bc02f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00025-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1740134$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10327085$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jebaraj, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyrrell, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gramopadhye, Anand K.</creatorcontrib><title>Industrial inspection performance depends on both viewing distance and oculomotor characteristics</title><title>Applied ergonomics</title><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><description>The influence of viewing distance and individual differences in the oculomotor resting states (dark vergence and dark focus) on both inspection performance and visual fatigue was investigated by asking 24 college students to perform a visual inspection task for 40 min twice, once with a 20 cm viewing distance and once with a 60 cm viewing distance. During the task participants visually searched enlarged images of contact lenses for six different types of defects. Lens images were presented at a constant visual angle (17.5°) on a CRT. Inspection performance varied significantly across the two viewing distances: participants spent on average more than twice as much time inspecting individual lenses in the near condition (mean=18.32 s lens -1) than in the far condition (mean=7.25 s lens -1). Participants also reported greater visual fatigue in the near condition than in the far condition. At both viewing distances, participants who experienced relatively large inward shifts in dark vergence also tended to be slow inspectors. Neither inspection performance nor measures of fatigue were related to dark focus. These results support existing evidence against the use of near viewing distances and suggest that an oculomotor mechanism links inspection performance and visual fatigue to viewing distance.</description><subject>Accommodation, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Applied physiology</subject><subject>Asthenopia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Asthenopia - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Darkness</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology</subject><subject>Eyes &amp; eyesight</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Inspections</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Near work</subject><subject>Oculomotor</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Vision, Binocular - physiology</subject><subject>Visual fatigue</subject><subject>Visual performance</subject><issn>0003-6870</issn><issn>1872-9126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUuLFTEQRoMozvXqT1AaEdFFax7deawGGXwMDLhQ1yFdXXEydCdt0q34783ce1Fx4ypU6lRRnI-Qx4y-YpTJ158opaKVWtEXRr-sBe9bfYfsmFa8NYzLu2T3GzkjD0q5qaXuWH-fnDEquKK63xF3GcetrDm4qQmxLAhrSLFZMPuUZxcBmxEXjGNp6veQ1uvme8AfIX5txlDWA-Di2CTYpjSnNeUGrl12sGKu_QDlIbnn3VTw0endky_v3n6--NBefXx_efHmqoVOyrVF413PDYCvt2unJR9EzxiV1CgYnFESBwXYC2W4GDxDDwqUoVLzASj3Yk-eH_cuOX3bsKx2DgVwmlzEtBUrjeqMlKqCT_8Bb9KWY73NctpzLUTVsyf9EYKcSsno7ZLD7PJPy6i9DcAeArC3dq3R9hCA1XXuyWn5Nsw4_jV1NF6BZyfAFXCTz1VhKH841VEmuoqdHzGsyqrxbAsErLbHkGtGdkzhP5f8AlWKowk</recordid><startdate>19990601</startdate><enddate>19990601</enddate><creator>Jebaraj, Daniel</creator><creator>Tyrrell, Richard A.</creator><creator>Gramopadhye, Anand K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990601</creationdate><title>Industrial inspection performance depends on both viewing distance and oculomotor characteristics</title><author>Jebaraj, Daniel ; Tyrrell, Richard A. ; Gramopadhye, Anand K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-e9fa529ccf1268a862b351106097cba976eb7ce537923bf1efc7c790682bc02f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Accommodation, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Applied physiology</topic><topic>Asthenopia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Asthenopia - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Darkness</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology</topic><topic>Eyes &amp; eyesight</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Inspections</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Near work</topic><topic>Oculomotor</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Vision, Binocular - physiology</topic><topic>Visual fatigue</topic><topic>Visual performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jebaraj, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyrrell, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gramopadhye, Anand K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jebaraj, Daniel</au><au>Tyrrell, Richard A.</au><au>Gramopadhye, Anand K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Industrial inspection performance depends on both viewing distance and oculomotor characteristics</atitle><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><date>1999-06-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>223-228</pages><issn>0003-6870</issn><eissn>1872-9126</eissn><coden>AERGBW</coden><abstract>The influence of viewing distance and individual differences in the oculomotor resting states (dark vergence and dark focus) on both inspection performance and visual fatigue was investigated by asking 24 college students to perform a visual inspection task for 40 min twice, once with a 20 cm viewing distance and once with a 60 cm viewing distance. During the task participants visually searched enlarged images of contact lenses for six different types of defects. Lens images were presented at a constant visual angle (17.5°) on a CRT. Inspection performance varied significantly across the two viewing distances: participants spent on average more than twice as much time inspecting individual lenses in the near condition (mean=18.32 s lens -1) than in the far condition (mean=7.25 s lens -1). Participants also reported greater visual fatigue in the near condition than in the far condition. At both viewing distances, participants who experienced relatively large inward shifts in dark vergence also tended to be slow inspectors. Neither inspection performance nor measures of fatigue were related to dark focus. These results support existing evidence against the use of near viewing distances and suggest that an oculomotor mechanism links inspection performance and visual fatigue to viewing distance.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>10327085</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00025-8</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-6870
ispartof Applied ergonomics, 1999-06, Vol.30 (3), p.223-228
issn 0003-6870
1872-9126
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69749667
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Accommodation, Ocular - physiology
Adult
Analysis of Variance
Applied physiology
Asthenopia - physiopathology
Asthenopia - prevention & control
Biological and medical sciences
Darkness
Ergonomics
Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology
Eyes & eyesight
Fatigue
Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology
Humans
Inspection
Inspections
Medical sciences
Near work
Oculomotor
Regression Analysis
Space life sciences
Vision, Binocular - physiology
Visual fatigue
Visual performance
title Industrial inspection performance depends on both viewing distance and oculomotor characteristics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A41%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Industrial%20inspection%20performance%20depends%20on%20both%20viewing%20distance%20and%20oculomotor%20characteristics&rft.jtitle=Applied%20ergonomics&rft.au=Jebaraj,%20Daniel&rft.date=1999-06-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=223-228&rft.issn=0003-6870&rft.eissn=1872-9126&rft.coden=AERGBW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00025-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69749667%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205283310&rft_id=info:pmid/10327085&rft_els_id=S0003687098000258&rfr_iscdi=true