Laparoscopic and open operation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer
Objectives: To compare the results of laparoscopic and open operations in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: Central hospital, Norway Subjects: 74 patients (36 men, 38 women, median age 69.5 years (18–86)) admitted with perforated peptic ulcers from Novem...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The European journal of surgery 1999-03, Vol.165 (3), p.209-214 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 214 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 209 |
| container_title | The European journal of surgery |
| container_volume | 165 |
| creator | Næsgaard, Jens Marius Edwin, Bjørn Reiertsen, Ola Trondsen, Erik Færden, Arne E. Rosseland, Arne R. |
| description | Objectives:
To compare the results of laparoscopic and open operations in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.
Design:
Retrospective analysis.
Setting:
Central hospital, Norway
Subjects:
74 patients (36 men, 38 women, median age 69.5 years (18–86)) admitted with perforated peptic ulcers from November 1991‐May 1996.
Interventions:
Suture of the ulcer, patching with the greater omentum and lavage, in 49 by open operation and 25 laparoscopically.
Main outcome measures:
Duration of postoperative hospital stay, operating time, number of doses of analgesic, postoperative body temperature, complications, and mortality.
Results:
There was a significant difference (p = 0.0001) in median operating time: 100 minutes (range 48–160) in the laparoscopic group and 50 minutes (range 20–160) in the open group. The median hospital stay was 8 days in both groups: range 3–23 days in the laparoscopic group and 2–28 days in the open group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to median number of doses of analgesic, median body temperature, complications or mortality.
Conclusion:
Laparoscopic operation for perforated peptic ulcer can be considered as safe as open operation. Copyright © 1999 Taylor and Francis Ltd. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/110241599750007063 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69734687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69734687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4130-1b106295eddc5dbba497f5062ff80fee3a87447f3f36d0767bf12ab7496380f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PxCAQhonR-P0HPJgejLcqFMq0R7Pxe9WDGr0RSiGi3bZCN-q_d0w3auLFC0xmnmcILyE7jB4wWtBDxmgmWF6WkFNKgUq-RNYZCJaWGbBlrBFIkWBrZCPGZ4QYh2yVrGGfM5nzdXI21b0OXTRd702i2zrpett-HUEPvmsT3yY9VrYdYvLmh6cEJ67Doa2x7Ae05o2xYYusON1Eu724N8n9yfHd5Cyd3pyeT46mqRGM05RVjMqszG1dm7yuKi1KcDm2nCuos5brAoQAxx2XNQUJlWOZrkCUkiNQ8k2yP-7tQ_c6t3FQMx-NbRrd2m4elSyBC1kAgtkIGvxeDNapPviZDh-KUfWVn_qbH0q7i-3zambrX8oYGAJ7C0BHoxsXdGt8_OGA8xwKxOSIvfnGfvzjZXV8cQuSopiOoo-Dff8WdXhREjjk6uH6VF0JuHyQxaOa8E8LUJVN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69734687</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laparoscopic and open operation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Næsgaard, Jens Marius ; Edwin, Bjørn ; Reiertsen, Ola ; Trondsen, Erik ; Færden, Arne E. ; Rosseland, Arne R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Næsgaard, Jens Marius ; Edwin, Bjørn ; Reiertsen, Ola ; Trondsen, Erik ; Færden, Arne E. ; Rosseland, Arne R.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives:
To compare the results of laparoscopic and open operations in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.
Design:
Retrospective analysis.
Setting:
Central hospital, Norway
Subjects:
74 patients (36 men, 38 women, median age 69.5 years (18–86)) admitted with perforated peptic ulcers from November 1991‐May 1996.
Interventions:
Suture of the ulcer, patching with the greater omentum and lavage, in 49 by open operation and 25 laparoscopically.
Main outcome measures:
Duration of postoperative hospital stay, operating time, number of doses of analgesic, postoperative body temperature, complications, and mortality.
Results:
There was a significant difference (p = 0.0001) in median operating time: 100 minutes (range 48–160) in the laparoscopic group and 50 minutes (range 20–160) in the open group. The median hospital stay was 8 days in both groups: range 3–23 days in the laparoscopic group and 2–28 days in the open group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to median number of doses of analgesic, median body temperature, complications or mortality.
Conclusion:
Laparoscopic operation for perforated peptic ulcer can be considered as safe as open operation. Copyright © 1999 Taylor and Francis Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1102-4151</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-9271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/110241599750007063</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10231653</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Taylor & Francis, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Duodenal Ulcer - complications ; Duodenal Ulcer - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Laparoscopy - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Peptic Ulcer Perforation - surgery ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Stomach Ulcer - complications ; Stomach Ulcer - surgery ; Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The European journal of surgery, 1999-03, Vol.165 (3), p.209-214</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1999 Taylor and Francis Ltd</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4130-1b106295eddc5dbba497f5062ff80fee3a87447f3f36d0767bf12ab7496380f93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1733578$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10231653$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Næsgaard, Jens Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwin, Bjørn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiertsen, Ola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trondsen, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Færden, Arne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosseland, Arne R.</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic and open operation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer</title><title>The European journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Surg</addtitle><description>Objectives:
To compare the results of laparoscopic and open operations in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.
Design:
Retrospective analysis.
Setting:
Central hospital, Norway
Subjects:
74 patients (36 men, 38 women, median age 69.5 years (18–86)) admitted with perforated peptic ulcers from November 1991‐May 1996.
Interventions:
Suture of the ulcer, patching with the greater omentum and lavage, in 49 by open operation and 25 laparoscopically.
Main outcome measures:
Duration of postoperative hospital stay, operating time, number of doses of analgesic, postoperative body temperature, complications, and mortality.
Results:
There was a significant difference (p = 0.0001) in median operating time: 100 minutes (range 48–160) in the laparoscopic group and 50 minutes (range 20–160) in the open group. The median hospital stay was 8 days in both groups: range 3–23 days in the laparoscopic group and 2–28 days in the open group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to median number of doses of analgesic, median body temperature, complications or mortality.
Conclusion:
Laparoscopic operation for perforated peptic ulcer can be considered as safe as open operation. Copyright © 1999 Taylor and Francis Ltd.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Duodenal Ulcer - complications</subject><subject>Duodenal Ulcer - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Peptic Ulcer Perforation - surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Stomach Ulcer - complications</subject><subject>Stomach Ulcer - surgery</subject><subject>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1102-4151</issn><issn>1741-9271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1PxCAQhonR-P0HPJgejLcqFMq0R7Pxe9WDGr0RSiGi3bZCN-q_d0w3auLFC0xmnmcILyE7jB4wWtBDxmgmWF6WkFNKgUq-RNYZCJaWGbBlrBFIkWBrZCPGZ4QYh2yVrGGfM5nzdXI21b0OXTRd702i2zrpett-HUEPvmsT3yY9VrYdYvLmh6cEJ67Doa2x7Ae05o2xYYusON1Eu724N8n9yfHd5Cyd3pyeT46mqRGM05RVjMqszG1dm7yuKi1KcDm2nCuos5brAoQAxx2XNQUJlWOZrkCUkiNQ8k2yP-7tQ_c6t3FQMx-NbRrd2m4elSyBC1kAgtkIGvxeDNapPviZDh-KUfWVn_qbH0q7i-3zambrX8oYGAJ7C0BHoxsXdGt8_OGA8xwKxOSIvfnGfvzjZXV8cQuSopiOoo-Dff8WdXhREjjk6uH6VF0JuHyQxaOa8E8LUJVN</recordid><startdate>199903</startdate><enddate>199903</enddate><creator>Næsgaard, Jens Marius</creator><creator>Edwin, Bjørn</creator><creator>Reiertsen, Ola</creator><creator>Trondsen, Erik</creator><creator>Færden, Arne E.</creator><creator>Rosseland, Arne R.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis, Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199903</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic and open operation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer</title><author>Næsgaard, Jens Marius ; Edwin, Bjørn ; Reiertsen, Ola ; Trondsen, Erik ; Færden, Arne E. ; Rosseland, Arne R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4130-1b106295eddc5dbba497f5062ff80fee3a87447f3f36d0767bf12ab7496380f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Duodenal Ulcer - complications</topic><topic>Duodenal Ulcer - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Peptic Ulcer Perforation - surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Stomach Ulcer - complications</topic><topic>Stomach Ulcer - surgery</topic><topic>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Næsgaard, Jens Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwin, Bjørn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiertsen, Ola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trondsen, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Færden, Arne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosseland, Arne R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The European journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Næsgaard, Jens Marius</au><au>Edwin, Bjørn</au><au>Reiertsen, Ola</au><au>Trondsen, Erik</au><au>Færden, Arne E.</au><au>Rosseland, Arne R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic and open operation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer</atitle><jtitle>The European journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Surg</addtitle><date>1999-03</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>165</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>214</epage><pages>209-214</pages><issn>1102-4151</issn><eissn>1741-9271</eissn><abstract>Objectives:
To compare the results of laparoscopic and open operations in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.
Design:
Retrospective analysis.
Setting:
Central hospital, Norway
Subjects:
74 patients (36 men, 38 women, median age 69.5 years (18–86)) admitted with perforated peptic ulcers from November 1991‐May 1996.
Interventions:
Suture of the ulcer, patching with the greater omentum and lavage, in 49 by open operation and 25 laparoscopically.
Main outcome measures:
Duration of postoperative hospital stay, operating time, number of doses of analgesic, postoperative body temperature, complications, and mortality.
Results:
There was a significant difference (p = 0.0001) in median operating time: 100 minutes (range 48–160) in the laparoscopic group and 50 minutes (range 20–160) in the open group. The median hospital stay was 8 days in both groups: range 3–23 days in the laparoscopic group and 2–28 days in the open group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to median number of doses of analgesic, median body temperature, complications or mortality.
Conclusion:
Laparoscopic operation for perforated peptic ulcer can be considered as safe as open operation. Copyright © 1999 Taylor and Francis Ltd.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis, Ltd</pub><pmid>10231653</pmid><doi>10.1080/110241599750007063</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1102-4151 |
| ispartof | The European journal of surgery, 1999-03, Vol.165 (3), p.209-214 |
| issn | 1102-4151 1741-9271 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69734687 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Analysis of Variance Biological and medical sciences Duodenal Ulcer - complications Duodenal Ulcer - surgery Female Humans Laparoscopy - adverse effects Laparoscopy - statistics & numerical data Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Peptic Ulcer Perforation - surgery Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Statistics, Nonparametric Stomach Ulcer - complications Stomach Ulcer - surgery Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the digestive system Treatment Outcome |
| title | Laparoscopic and open operation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T13%3A37%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20and%20open%20operation%20in%20patients%20with%20perforated%20peptic%20ulcer&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=N%C3%A6sgaard,%20Jens%20Marius&rft.date=1999-03&rft.volume=165&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=214&rft.pages=209-214&rft.issn=1102-4151&rft.eissn=1741-9271&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/110241599750007063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69734687%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69734687&rft_id=info:pmid/10231653&rfr_iscdi=true |