Telemedicine precepting in a family practice center

This study assessed the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability of video teleconference precepting of residents practicing in rural sites. Precepting encounters were conducted between faculty at our home-base family practice center and third-year residents at a rural site. Full audio and video t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Family medicine 1999-04, Vol.31 (4), p.239-243
Hauptverfasser: Mills, O F, Tatarko, M, Bates, J F, Hunsberger, T A, Everhart-Yost, E, Pendleton, V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 243
container_issue 4
container_start_page 239
container_title Family medicine
container_volume 31
creator Mills, O F
Tatarko, M
Bates, J F
Hunsberger, T A
Everhart-Yost, E
Pendleton, V
description This study assessed the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability of video teleconference precepting of residents practicing in rural sites. Precepting encounters were conducted between faculty at our home-base family practice center and third-year residents at a rural site. Full audio and video teleconferencing equipment was used; data was transmitted by fractional T1 lines. Residents and faculty recorded patient demographics, rated the technical quality of the encounter, and noted equipment problems during encounters. Video teleconferencing was used for 137 patient encounters, which was 10% of all encounters. The self-reported technical quality of the encounter was acceptable (all 4 dimensions of quality rated a median score of 4 out of 5). Minor transmission or equipment problems were noted 20% of the time by residents. Use of teleconferencing diminished considerably over the 6-month period of the study. Most cases precepted by teleconferencing involved uncomplicated acute illnesses. Telemedicine precepting was technically feasible, generally reliable, and initially acceptable to the third-year residents. However, the cases precepted were mostly acute illnesses, and use of telemedicine for precepting diminished over time.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69714756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69714756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p122t-d6e20c6cb8ea9acc4383e9b188ed817a43e50797e4e79b1ae029d8d0760712f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j01LxDAURbNQnHH0L0hX7grJS5uXLmXwCwbcjOuSprcSaTO1aRfz7y04ri4cDhfOldhKLijXROVG3Kb0LSUxa3kjNkqSIja0FfqIHgPa4ENENk7wGOcQv7IQM5d1bgj9ecXOz8Ej84gzpjtx3bk-4f6yO_H58nzcv-WHj9f3_dMhHxXRnLcGJL3xjYWrnPeFthpVo6xFaxW7QqOUXDEK8IodJFWtbSUbyYq6Uu_E49_vOJ1-FqS5HkLy6HsXcVpSbSpWBZdmFR8u4tKsLfU4hcFN5_o_U_8CzVNMow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69714756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Telemedicine precepting in a family practice center</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Mills, O F ; Tatarko, M ; Bates, J F ; Hunsberger, T A ; Everhart-Yost, E ; Pendleton, V</creator><creatorcontrib>Mills, O F ; Tatarko, M ; Bates, J F ; Hunsberger, T A ; Everhart-Yost, E ; Pendleton, V</creatorcontrib><description>This study assessed the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability of video teleconference precepting of residents practicing in rural sites. Precepting encounters were conducted between faculty at our home-base family practice center and third-year residents at a rural site. Full audio and video teleconferencing equipment was used; data was transmitted by fractional T1 lines. Residents and faculty recorded patient demographics, rated the technical quality of the encounter, and noted equipment problems during encounters. Video teleconferencing was used for 137 patient encounters, which was 10% of all encounters. The self-reported technical quality of the encounter was acceptable (all 4 dimensions of quality rated a median score of 4 out of 5). Minor transmission or equipment problems were noted 20% of the time by residents. Use of teleconferencing diminished considerably over the 6-month period of the study. Most cases precepted by teleconferencing involved uncomplicated acute illnesses. Telemedicine precepting was technically feasible, generally reliable, and initially acceptable to the third-year residents. However, the cases precepted were mostly acute illnesses, and use of telemedicine for precepting diminished over time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-3225</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10212762</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Family Practice - education ; Feasibility Studies ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Internship and Residency - organization &amp; administration ; Pennsylvania ; Preceptorship ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Rural Health Services - manpower ; Rural Health Services - organization &amp; administration ; Telecommunications - utilization ; Telemedicine - standards</subject><ispartof>Family medicine, 1999-04, Vol.31 (4), p.239-243</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10212762$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mills, O F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatarko, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, J F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunsberger, T A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everhart-Yost, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendleton, V</creatorcontrib><title>Telemedicine precepting in a family practice center</title><title>Family medicine</title><addtitle>Fam Med</addtitle><description>This study assessed the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability of video teleconference precepting of residents practicing in rural sites. Precepting encounters were conducted between faculty at our home-base family practice center and third-year residents at a rural site. Full audio and video teleconferencing equipment was used; data was transmitted by fractional T1 lines. Residents and faculty recorded patient demographics, rated the technical quality of the encounter, and noted equipment problems during encounters. Video teleconferencing was used for 137 patient encounters, which was 10% of all encounters. The self-reported technical quality of the encounter was acceptable (all 4 dimensions of quality rated a median score of 4 out of 5). Minor transmission or equipment problems were noted 20% of the time by residents. Use of teleconferencing diminished considerably over the 6-month period of the study. Most cases precepted by teleconferencing involved uncomplicated acute illnesses. Telemedicine precepting was technically feasible, generally reliable, and initially acceptable to the third-year residents. However, the cases precepted were mostly acute illnesses, and use of telemedicine for precepting diminished over time.</description><subject>Family Practice - education</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Preceptorship</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rural Health Services - manpower</subject><subject>Rural Health Services - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Telecommunications - utilization</subject><subject>Telemedicine - standards</subject><issn>0742-3225</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j01LxDAURbNQnHH0L0hX7grJS5uXLmXwCwbcjOuSprcSaTO1aRfz7y04ri4cDhfOldhKLijXROVG3Kb0LSUxa3kjNkqSIja0FfqIHgPa4ENENk7wGOcQv7IQM5d1bgj9ecXOz8Ej84gzpjtx3bk-4f6yO_H58nzcv-WHj9f3_dMhHxXRnLcGJL3xjYWrnPeFthpVo6xFaxW7QqOUXDEK8IodJFWtbSUbyYq6Uu_E49_vOJ1-FqS5HkLy6HsXcVpSbSpWBZdmFR8u4tKsLfU4hcFN5_o_U_8CzVNMow</recordid><startdate>199904</startdate><enddate>199904</enddate><creator>Mills, O F</creator><creator>Tatarko, M</creator><creator>Bates, J F</creator><creator>Hunsberger, T A</creator><creator>Everhart-Yost, E</creator><creator>Pendleton, V</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199904</creationdate><title>Telemedicine precepting in a family practice center</title><author>Mills, O F ; Tatarko, M ; Bates, J F ; Hunsberger, T A ; Everhart-Yost, E ; Pendleton, V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p122t-d6e20c6cb8ea9acc4383e9b188ed817a43e50797e4e79b1ae029d8d0760712f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Family Practice - education</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Preceptorship</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rural Health Services - manpower</topic><topic>Rural Health Services - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Telecommunications - utilization</topic><topic>Telemedicine - standards</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mills, O F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatarko, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, J F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunsberger, T A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everhart-Yost, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendleton, V</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Family medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mills, O F</au><au>Tatarko, M</au><au>Bates, J F</au><au>Hunsberger, T A</au><au>Everhart-Yost, E</au><au>Pendleton, V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Telemedicine precepting in a family practice center</atitle><jtitle>Family medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Fam Med</addtitle><date>1999-04</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>239-243</pages><issn>0742-3225</issn><abstract>This study assessed the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability of video teleconference precepting of residents practicing in rural sites. Precepting encounters were conducted between faculty at our home-base family practice center and third-year residents at a rural site. Full audio and video teleconferencing equipment was used; data was transmitted by fractional T1 lines. Residents and faculty recorded patient demographics, rated the technical quality of the encounter, and noted equipment problems during encounters. Video teleconferencing was used for 137 patient encounters, which was 10% of all encounters. The self-reported technical quality of the encounter was acceptable (all 4 dimensions of quality rated a median score of 4 out of 5). Minor transmission or equipment problems were noted 20% of the time by residents. Use of teleconferencing diminished considerably over the 6-month period of the study. Most cases precepted by teleconferencing involved uncomplicated acute illnesses. Telemedicine precepting was technically feasible, generally reliable, and initially acceptable to the third-year residents. However, the cases precepted were mostly acute illnesses, and use of telemedicine for precepting diminished over time.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>10212762</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0742-3225
ispartof Family medicine, 1999-04, Vol.31 (4), p.239-243
issn 0742-3225
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69714756
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Family Practice - education
Feasibility Studies
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Internship and Residency - organization & administration
Pennsylvania
Preceptorship
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Rural Health Services - manpower
Rural Health Services - organization & administration
Telecommunications - utilization
Telemedicine - standards
title Telemedicine precepting in a family practice center
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T04%3A32%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Telemedicine%20precepting%20in%20a%20family%20practice%20center&rft.jtitle=Family%20medicine&rft.au=Mills,%20O%20F&rft.date=1999-04&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=239-243&rft.issn=0742-3225&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69714756%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69714756&rft_id=info:pmid/10212762&rfr_iscdi=true