The Association between Spouses' Self-Reports of Attachment Styles and Representations of Family Dynamics
The current research assesses the association between spouses' self‐reports of attachment style and their perceptions of family dynamics. The sample included 93 Israeli married couples with young children. Both husbands and wives completed the adult attachment style scale and the perceived and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Family process 1999-03, Vol.38 (1), p.69-83 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 83 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 69 |
| container_title | Family process |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | MIKULINCER, MARIO FLORIAN, VICTOR |
| description | The current research assesses the association between spouses' self‐reports of attachment style and their perceptions of family dynamics. The sample included 93 Israeli married couples with young children. Both husbands and wives completed the adult attachment style scale and the perceived and ideal versions of FACES III. Findings showed that spouses whose self‐reports endorsed the secure style perceived relatively high levels of family cohesion and adaptability; persons who endorsed the anxious‐ambivalent style reported high levels of family cohesion but low levels of adaptability; and persons who endorsed the avoidant style reported relatively low levels of both family dimensions. In addition, significant associations were found between reports of attachment styles, on the one hand, and ideal representations of family dynamics, the marital partner's representations of family dynamics, and spouses' discrepancies in these representations, on the other. Findings are discussed in terms of attachment theory. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00069.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69702591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>40645504</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4589-88178a2d2deb05ceb090bf54d6a7e114dee0aca92e369041e2c214d5675c43ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2PEyEUhonRuN3Vv2CIMe7VVGBgGBJvuqtdjWs1dtXEG0KZM1nqfFSg2c6_l3aa1XglF3ByeN4XOAeEMCVTmsar9ZQKLjKRk5RQSk0JIYWa7h6gyf3GQzQhhPJM5pKcoNMQ1gniqpSP0QkljEhJ6QS5m1vAsxB660x0fYdXEO8AOrzc9NsA4RwvoamzL7DpfQy4r_EsRmNvW-giXsahgYBNV-EEeAgpeXA5gHPTumbAb4YuBTY8QY9q0wR4elzP0Nf525vLd9n1p6v3l7PrzHJRqqwsqSwNq1gFKyJsmhRZ1YJXhZFAKa8AiLFGMcgLRTgFZlnKikIKy_O6zs_Qy9F34_tfWwhRty5YaBrTQXqSLpQkTCiawOf_gOt-67t0N81oWaqcCJagcoSs70PwUOuNd63xg6ZE73uh13pfcr0vud73Qh96oXdJ-uzov121UP0lHIufgBdHwARrmtqbzrrwh5O84GWesNcjducaGP77fD2fffxcqCTPRrkLEXb3cuN_6iL9DaG_L670t_mPxQdysdAX-W8t4bPU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218893052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Association between Spouses' Self-Reports of Attachment Styles and Representations of Family Dynamics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>MIKULINCER, MARIO ; FLORIAN, VICTOR</creator><creatorcontrib>MIKULINCER, MARIO ; FLORIAN, VICTOR</creatorcontrib><description>The current research assesses the association between spouses' self‐reports of attachment style and their perceptions of family dynamics. The sample included 93 Israeli married couples with young children. Both husbands and wives completed the adult attachment style scale and the perceived and ideal versions of FACES III. Findings showed that spouses whose self‐reports endorsed the secure style perceived relatively high levels of family cohesion and adaptability; persons who endorsed the anxious‐ambivalent style reported high levels of family cohesion but low levels of adaptability; and persons who endorsed the avoidant style reported relatively low levels of both family dimensions. In addition, significant associations were found between reports of attachment styles, on the one hand, and ideal representations of family dynamics, the marital partner's representations of family dynamics, and spouses' discrepancies in these representations, on the other. Findings are discussed in terms of attachment theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-7370</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-5300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00069.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10207711</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FAPRDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptability ; Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Attachment ; Biological and medical sciences ; Couple and family ; Couples ; Families & family life ; Family Health ; Family Relations ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Husbands ; Jews - psychology ; Male ; Marriage - psychology ; Object Attachment ; Parents - psychology ; Personality - classification ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Sampling Studies ; Self-Assessment ; Social Perception ; Social psychology ; Spouses - psychology ; Wives</subject><ispartof>Family process, 1999-03, Vol.38 (1), p.69-83</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Family Process, Inc. Spring 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4589-88178a2d2deb05ceb090bf54d6a7e114dee0aca92e369041e2c214d5675c43ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4589-88178a2d2deb05ceb090bf54d6a7e114dee0aca92e369041e2c214d5675c43ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1545-5300.1999.00069.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1545-5300.1999.00069.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,12846,27344,27924,27925,30999,33774,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1746483$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10207711$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MIKULINCER, MARIO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FLORIAN, VICTOR</creatorcontrib><title>The Association between Spouses' Self-Reports of Attachment Styles and Representations of Family Dynamics</title><title>Family process</title><addtitle>Fam Process</addtitle><description>The current research assesses the association between spouses' self‐reports of attachment style and their perceptions of family dynamics. The sample included 93 Israeli married couples with young children. Both husbands and wives completed the adult attachment style scale and the perceived and ideal versions of FACES III. Findings showed that spouses whose self‐reports endorsed the secure style perceived relatively high levels of family cohesion and adaptability; persons who endorsed the anxious‐ambivalent style reported high levels of family cohesion but low levels of adaptability; and persons who endorsed the avoidant style reported relatively low levels of both family dimensions. In addition, significant associations were found between reports of attachment styles, on the one hand, and ideal representations of family dynamics, the marital partner's representations of family dynamics, and spouses' discrepancies in these representations, on the other. Findings are discussed in terms of attachment theory.</description><subject>Adaptability</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attachment</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Couple and family</subject><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Family Health</subject><subject>Family Relations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Husbands</subject><subject>Jews - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marriage - psychology</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><subject>Parents - psychology</subject><subject>Personality - classification</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Sampling Studies</subject><subject>Self-Assessment</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Spouses - psychology</subject><subject>Wives</subject><issn>0014-7370</issn><issn>1545-5300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2PEyEUhonRuN3Vv2CIMe7VVGBgGBJvuqtdjWs1dtXEG0KZM1nqfFSg2c6_l3aa1XglF3ByeN4XOAeEMCVTmsar9ZQKLjKRk5RQSk0JIYWa7h6gyf3GQzQhhPJM5pKcoNMQ1gniqpSP0QkljEhJ6QS5m1vAsxB660x0fYdXEO8AOrzc9NsA4RwvoamzL7DpfQy4r_EsRmNvW-giXsahgYBNV-EEeAgpeXA5gHPTumbAb4YuBTY8QY9q0wR4elzP0Nf525vLd9n1p6v3l7PrzHJRqqwsqSwNq1gFKyJsmhRZ1YJXhZFAKa8AiLFGMcgLRTgFZlnKikIKy_O6zs_Qy9F34_tfWwhRty5YaBrTQXqSLpQkTCiawOf_gOt-67t0N81oWaqcCJagcoSs70PwUOuNd63xg6ZE73uh13pfcr0vud73Qh96oXdJ-uzov121UP0lHIufgBdHwARrmtqbzrrwh5O84GWesNcjducaGP77fD2fffxcqCTPRrkLEXb3cuN_6iL9DaG_L670t_mPxQdysdAX-W8t4bPU</recordid><startdate>199903</startdate><enddate>199903</enddate><creator>MIKULINCER, MARIO</creator><creator>FLORIAN, VICTOR</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199903</creationdate><title>The Association between Spouses' Self-Reports of Attachment Styles and Representations of Family Dynamics</title><author>MIKULINCER, MARIO ; FLORIAN, VICTOR</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4589-88178a2d2deb05ceb090bf54d6a7e114dee0aca92e369041e2c214d5675c43ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adaptability</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attachment</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Couple and family</topic><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Family Health</topic><topic>Family Relations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Husbands</topic><topic>Jews - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marriage - psychology</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><topic>Parents - psychology</topic><topic>Personality - classification</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Sampling Studies</topic><topic>Self-Assessment</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Spouses - psychology</topic><topic>Wives</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MIKULINCER, MARIO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FLORIAN, VICTOR</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Family process</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MIKULINCER, MARIO</au><au>FLORIAN, VICTOR</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Association between Spouses' Self-Reports of Attachment Styles and Representations of Family Dynamics</atitle><jtitle>Family process</jtitle><addtitle>Fam Process</addtitle><date>1999-03</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>69-83</pages><issn>0014-7370</issn><eissn>1545-5300</eissn><coden>FAPRDG</coden><abstract>The current research assesses the association between spouses' self‐reports of attachment style and their perceptions of family dynamics. The sample included 93 Israeli married couples with young children. Both husbands and wives completed the adult attachment style scale and the perceived and ideal versions of FACES III. Findings showed that spouses whose self‐reports endorsed the secure style perceived relatively high levels of family cohesion and adaptability; persons who endorsed the anxious‐ambivalent style reported high levels of family cohesion but low levels of adaptability; and persons who endorsed the avoidant style reported relatively low levels of both family dimensions. In addition, significant associations were found between reports of attachment styles, on the one hand, and ideal representations of family dynamics, the marital partner's representations of family dynamics, and spouses' discrepancies in these representations, on the other. Findings are discussed in terms of attachment theory.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>10207711</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00069.x</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0014-7370 |
| ispartof | Family process, 1999-03, Vol.38 (1), p.69-83 |
| issn | 0014-7370 1545-5300 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69702591 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Adaptability Adult Analysis of Variance Attachment Biological and medical sciences Couple and family Couples Families & family life Family Health Family Relations Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Husbands Jews - psychology Male Marriage - psychology Object Attachment Parents - psychology Personality - classification Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Sampling Studies Self-Assessment Social Perception Social psychology Spouses - psychology Wives |
| title | The Association between Spouses' Self-Reports of Attachment Styles and Representations of Family Dynamics |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A14%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Association%20between%20Spouses'%20Self-Reports%20of%20Attachment%20Styles%20and%20Representations%20of%20Family%20Dynamics&rft.jtitle=Family%20process&rft.au=MIKULINCER,%20MARIO&rft.date=1999-03&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=69-83&rft.issn=0014-7370&rft.eissn=1545-5300&rft.coden=FAPRDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00069.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E40645504%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218893052&rft_id=info:pmid/10207711&rfr_iscdi=true |