Optimal Left Ventricular Lead Position Predicts Reverse Remodeling and Survival After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Objectives The aim of the current study was to evaluate echocardiographic parameters after 6 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as well as long-term outcome in patients with the left ventricular (LV) lead positioned at the site of latest activation (concordant LV lead position) as com...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2008-10, Vol.52 (17), p.1402-1409
Hauptverfasser: Ypenburg, Claudia, MD, van Bommel, Rutger J., MD, Delgado, Victoria, MD, Mollema, Sjoerd A., MD, Bleeker, Gabe B., MD, PhD, Boersma, Eric, PhD, Schalij, Martin J., MD, PhD, Bax, Jeroen J., MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1409
container_issue 17
container_start_page 1402
container_title Journal of the American College of Cardiology
container_volume 52
creator Ypenburg, Claudia, MD
van Bommel, Rutger J., MD
Delgado, Victoria, MD
Mollema, Sjoerd A., MD
Bleeker, Gabe B., MD, PhD
Boersma, Eric, PhD
Schalij, Martin J., MD, PhD
Bax, Jeroen J., MD, PhD
description Objectives The aim of the current study was to evaluate echocardiographic parameters after 6 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as well as long-term outcome in patients with the left ventricular (LV) lead positioned at the site of latest activation (concordant LV lead position) as compared with that seen in patients with a discordant LV lead position. Background A nonoptimal LV pacing lead position may be a potential cause for nonresponse to CRT. Methods The site of latest mechanical activation was determined by speckle tracking radial strain analysis and related to the LV lead position on chest X-ray in 244 CRT candidates. Echocardiographic evaluation was performed after 6 months. Long-term follow-up included all-cause mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure. Results Significant LV reverse remodeling (reduction in LV end-systolic volume from 189 ± 83 ml to 134 ± 71 ml, p < 0.001) was noted in the group of patients with a concordant LV lead position (n = 153, 63%), whereas patients with a discordant lead position showed no significant improvements. In addition, during long-term follow-up (32 ± 16 months), less events (combined for heart failure hospitalizations and death) were reported in patients with a concordant LV lead position. Moreover, a concordant LV lead position appeared to be an independent predictor of hospitalization-free survival after long-term CRT (hazard ratio: 0.22, p = 0.004). Conclusions Pacing at the site of latest mechanical activation, as determined by speckle tracking radial strain analysis, resulted in superior echocardiographic response after 6 months of CRT and better prognosis during long-term follow-up.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.046
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69697914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735109708026314</els_id><sourcerecordid>69697914</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c583t-bb54f4d13c0d2ea674beb3a3457273b5a276c3759a023f6f048e2a9439911c863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9klGL1DAUhYMo7uzqH_BBCoJvrTdJkzQgwjK4Kgzs4q6-hjS9dVM77Zi0I-OvN3UGFvbBpwvhO4fccy4hrygUFKh81xWdda5gAFUBsoBSPiErKkSVc6HVU7ICxUVOQaszch5jBwCyovo5OaOVLkFwuiK_r3eT39o-22A7Zd9xmIJ3c29DerBNdjNGP_lxyG4CNt5NMfuKewwR09yODfZ--JHZoclu57D3--Rz2U4YsrUNjbcuUfEwuPswDv6P_Wd0d4_B7g4vyLPW9hFfnuYF-Xb18W79Od9cf_qyvtzkTlR8yutalG3ZUO6gYWilKmusueWlUEzxWlimpONKaAuMt7KFskJmdcm1ptRVkl-Qt0ffXRh_zRgns_XRYd_bAcc5GqmlVpqWCXzzCOzGOQzpb4YKkIwrXS0UO1IujDEGbM0upPjCwVAwSymmM0spZinFgDSplCR6fbKe6y02D5JTCwl4fwQwJbH3GEx0HgeXIg_oJtOM_v_-Hx7JXerFO9v_xAPGhz1MZAbM7XIWy1VABUzytPtfrbayyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1506237984</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal Left Ventricular Lead Position Predicts Reverse Remodeling and Survival After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ypenburg, Claudia, MD ; van Bommel, Rutger J., MD ; Delgado, Victoria, MD ; Mollema, Sjoerd A., MD ; Bleeker, Gabe B., MD, PhD ; Boersma, Eric, PhD ; Schalij, Martin J., MD, PhD ; Bax, Jeroen J., MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Ypenburg, Claudia, MD ; van Bommel, Rutger J., MD ; Delgado, Victoria, MD ; Mollema, Sjoerd A., MD ; Bleeker, Gabe B., MD, PhD ; Boersma, Eric, PhD ; Schalij, Martin J., MD, PhD ; Bax, Jeroen J., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The aim of the current study was to evaluate echocardiographic parameters after 6 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as well as long-term outcome in patients with the left ventricular (LV) lead positioned at the site of latest activation (concordant LV lead position) as compared with that seen in patients with a discordant LV lead position. Background A nonoptimal LV pacing lead position may be a potential cause for nonresponse to CRT. Methods The site of latest mechanical activation was determined by speckle tracking radial strain analysis and related to the LV lead position on chest X-ray in 244 CRT candidates. Echocardiographic evaluation was performed after 6 months. Long-term follow-up included all-cause mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure. Results Significant LV reverse remodeling (reduction in LV end-systolic volume from 189 ± 83 ml to 134 ± 71 ml, p &lt; 0.001) was noted in the group of patients with a concordant LV lead position (n = 153, 63%), whereas patients with a discordant lead position showed no significant improvements. In addition, during long-term follow-up (32 ± 16 months), less events (combined for heart failure hospitalizations and death) were reported in patients with a concordant LV lead position. Moreover, a concordant LV lead position appeared to be an independent predictor of hospitalization-free survival after long-term CRT (hazard ratio: 0.22, p = 0.004). Conclusions Pacing at the site of latest mechanical activation, as determined by speckle tracking radial strain analysis, resulted in superior echocardiographic response after 6 months of CRT and better prognosis during long-term follow-up.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.046</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18940531</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular ; Cardiovascular disease ; Drug therapy ; echocardiography ; Echocardiography, Doppler ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Female ; Forecasting ; Heart attacks ; Heart failure ; Heart Failure - diagnostic imaging ; Heart Failure - therapy ; Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging ; Heart Ventricles - physiopathology ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; lead position ; Male ; Medical prognosis ; Middle Aged ; Ostomy ; Pacemaker, Artificial ; resynchronization therapy ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stroke Volume ; Studies ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors ; Tomography ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Remodeling</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2008-10, Vol.52 (17), p.1402-1409</ispartof><rights>American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>2008 American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 21, 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c583t-bb54f4d13c0d2ea674beb3a3457273b5a276c3759a023f6f048e2a9439911c863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c583t-bb54f4d13c0d2ea674beb3a3457273b5a276c3759a023f6f048e2a9439911c863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109708026314$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18940531$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ypenburg, Claudia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Bommel, Rutger J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado, Victoria, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mollema, Sjoerd A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleeker, Gabe B., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boersma, Eric, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schalij, Martin J., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bax, Jeroen J., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal Left Ventricular Lead Position Predicts Reverse Remodeling and Survival After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><description>Objectives The aim of the current study was to evaluate echocardiographic parameters after 6 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as well as long-term outcome in patients with the left ventricular (LV) lead positioned at the site of latest activation (concordant LV lead position) as compared with that seen in patients with a discordant LV lead position. Background A nonoptimal LV pacing lead position may be a potential cause for nonresponse to CRT. Methods The site of latest mechanical activation was determined by speckle tracking radial strain analysis and related to the LV lead position on chest X-ray in 244 CRT candidates. Echocardiographic evaluation was performed after 6 months. Long-term follow-up included all-cause mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure. Results Significant LV reverse remodeling (reduction in LV end-systolic volume from 189 ± 83 ml to 134 ± 71 ml, p &lt; 0.001) was noted in the group of patients with a concordant LV lead position (n = 153, 63%), whereas patients with a discordant lead position showed no significant improvements. In addition, during long-term follow-up (32 ± 16 months), less events (combined for heart failure hospitalizations and death) were reported in patients with a concordant LV lead position. Moreover, a concordant LV lead position appeared to be an independent predictor of hospitalization-free survival after long-term CRT (hazard ratio: 0.22, p = 0.004). Conclusions Pacing at the site of latest mechanical activation, as determined by speckle tracking radial strain analysis, resulted in superior echocardiographic response after 6 months of CRT and better prognosis during long-term follow-up.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>echocardiography</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Doppler</subject><subject>Electrodes, Implanted</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Heart Failure - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Heart Failure - therapy</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>lead position</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial</subject><subject>resynchronization therapy</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ventricular Remodeling</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9klGL1DAUhYMo7uzqH_BBCoJvrTdJkzQgwjK4Kgzs4q6-hjS9dVM77Zi0I-OvN3UGFvbBpwvhO4fccy4hrygUFKh81xWdda5gAFUBsoBSPiErKkSVc6HVU7ICxUVOQaszch5jBwCyovo5OaOVLkFwuiK_r3eT39o-22A7Zd9xmIJ3c29DerBNdjNGP_lxyG4CNt5NMfuKewwR09yODfZ--JHZoclu57D3--Rz2U4YsrUNjbcuUfEwuPswDv6P_Wd0d4_B7g4vyLPW9hFfnuYF-Xb18W79Od9cf_qyvtzkTlR8yutalG3ZUO6gYWilKmusueWlUEzxWlimpONKaAuMt7KFskJmdcm1ptRVkl-Qt0ffXRh_zRgns_XRYd_bAcc5GqmlVpqWCXzzCOzGOQzpb4YKkIwrXS0UO1IujDEGbM0upPjCwVAwSymmM0spZinFgDSplCR6fbKe6y02D5JTCwl4fwQwJbH3GEx0HgeXIg_oJtOM_v_-Hx7JXerFO9v_xAPGhz1MZAbM7XIWy1VABUzytPtfrbayyw</recordid><startdate>20081021</startdate><enddate>20081021</enddate><creator>Ypenburg, Claudia, MD</creator><creator>van Bommel, Rutger J., MD</creator><creator>Delgado, Victoria, MD</creator><creator>Mollema, Sjoerd A., MD</creator><creator>Bleeker, Gabe B., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Boersma, Eric, PhD</creator><creator>Schalij, Martin J., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Bax, Jeroen J., MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081021</creationdate><title>Optimal Left Ventricular Lead Position Predicts Reverse Remodeling and Survival After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy</title><author>Ypenburg, Claudia, MD ; van Bommel, Rutger J., MD ; Delgado, Victoria, MD ; Mollema, Sjoerd A., MD ; Bleeker, Gabe B., MD, PhD ; Boersma, Eric, PhD ; Schalij, Martin J., MD, PhD ; Bax, Jeroen J., MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c583t-bb54f4d13c0d2ea674beb3a3457273b5a276c3759a023f6f048e2a9439911c863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>echocardiography</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Doppler</topic><topic>Electrodes, Implanted</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Heart Failure - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Heart Failure - therapy</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>lead position</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial</topic><topic>resynchronization therapy</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ventricular Remodeling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ypenburg, Claudia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Bommel, Rutger J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado, Victoria, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mollema, Sjoerd A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleeker, Gabe B., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boersma, Eric, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schalij, Martin J., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bax, Jeroen J., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ypenburg, Claudia, MD</au><au>van Bommel, Rutger J., MD</au><au>Delgado, Victoria, MD</au><au>Mollema, Sjoerd A., MD</au><au>Bleeker, Gabe B., MD, PhD</au><au>Boersma, Eric, PhD</au><au>Schalij, Martin J., MD, PhD</au><au>Bax, Jeroen J., MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal Left Ventricular Lead Position Predicts Reverse Remodeling and Survival After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><date>2008-10-21</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>1402</spage><epage>1409</epage><pages>1402-1409</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><abstract>Objectives The aim of the current study was to evaluate echocardiographic parameters after 6 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as well as long-term outcome in patients with the left ventricular (LV) lead positioned at the site of latest activation (concordant LV lead position) as compared with that seen in patients with a discordant LV lead position. Background A nonoptimal LV pacing lead position may be a potential cause for nonresponse to CRT. Methods The site of latest mechanical activation was determined by speckle tracking radial strain analysis and related to the LV lead position on chest X-ray in 244 CRT candidates. Echocardiographic evaluation was performed after 6 months. Long-term follow-up included all-cause mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure. Results Significant LV reverse remodeling (reduction in LV end-systolic volume from 189 ± 83 ml to 134 ± 71 ml, p &lt; 0.001) was noted in the group of patients with a concordant LV lead position (n = 153, 63%), whereas patients with a discordant lead position showed no significant improvements. In addition, during long-term follow-up (32 ± 16 months), less events (combined for heart failure hospitalizations and death) were reported in patients with a concordant LV lead position. Moreover, a concordant LV lead position appeared to be an independent predictor of hospitalization-free survival after long-term CRT (hazard ratio: 0.22, p = 0.004). Conclusions Pacing at the site of latest mechanical activation, as determined by speckle tracking radial strain analysis, resulted in superior echocardiographic response after 6 months of CRT and better prognosis during long-term follow-up.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18940531</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.046</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-1097
ispartof Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2008-10, Vol.52 (17), p.1402-1409
issn 0735-1097
1558-3597
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69697914
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Cardiac arrhythmia
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods
Cardiology
Cardiovascular
Cardiovascular disease
Drug therapy
echocardiography
Echocardiography, Doppler
Electrodes, Implanted
Female
Forecasting
Heart attacks
Heart failure
Heart Failure - diagnostic imaging
Heart Failure - therapy
Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging
Heart Ventricles - physiopathology
Hospitalization
Humans
Internal Medicine
lead position
Male
Medical prognosis
Middle Aged
Ostomy
Pacemaker, Artificial
resynchronization therapy
Severity of Illness Index
Stroke Volume
Studies
Survival Analysis
Time Factors
Tomography
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Remodeling
title Optimal Left Ventricular Lead Position Predicts Reverse Remodeling and Survival After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T22%3A59%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20Left%20Ventricular%20Lead%20Position%20Predicts%20Reverse%20Remodeling%20and%20Survival%20After%20Cardiac%20Resynchronization%20Therapy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Ypenburg,%20Claudia,%20MD&rft.date=2008-10-21&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=1402&rft.epage=1409&rft.pages=1402-1409&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69697914%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1506237984&rft_id=info:pmid/18940531&rft_els_id=S0735109708026314&rfr_iscdi=true