Twenty years of single center experience in ESWL 1987-2007: an evaluation of 3079 patients

Since 1987 we have consecutively operated five different Dornier lithotriptors in the management of lithiasis at all levels of the urinary tract. At the time of usage of each machine we periodically evaluated the treatment results in order to eventually adapt treatment strategies to improve results....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endourology 2008-10, Vol.22 (10), p.2211-2222
Hauptverfasser: Tailly, Geert G, Baert, Joost A, Hente, K Robert, Tailly, Thomas O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2222
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2211
container_title Journal of endourology
container_volume 22
creator Tailly, Geert G
Baert, Joost A
Hente, K Robert
Tailly, Thomas O
description Since 1987 we have consecutively operated five different Dornier lithotriptors in the management of lithiasis at all levels of the urinary tract. At the time of usage of each machine we periodically evaluated the treatment results in order to eventually adapt treatment strategies to improve results. None of these evaluations comprised the totality of patients treated on a certain machine during the entire period it was in use. This overview retrospectively compares the results over the entire period in order to gauge the impact of the different machines and SW-sources on clinical results. A total of 3079 patients, treated from september 1987 till september 2006 with two electrohydraulic machines, HM4 (1987-1988) and MPL9000 (1988-1994), and three electromagnetic machines, Compact (1991-1999), DoLi U/50 (1996-1999) and DoLi S (1999-2006) were thus evaluated. Parameters reviewed were stone location and size, retreatment rate, auxiliary procedures, stone free rate and Effectiveness Quotient (EQ). There is no significant difference in stone size or stone free rate (p=0.4715) for the different groups. There is a significant difference for auxiliary procedure rate and retreatment rate for the different machines. The DoLiS with EMSE 220F-XXP scores significantly better than any of the other systems for auxiliary procedure rate pre-ESWL (p
doi_str_mv 10.1089/end.2008.9706
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69693979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A195919347</galeid><sourcerecordid>A195919347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-b5916d60bdae9682306db4e7bf85b710866f1f670b3389447cb9a0d3df7848a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc9r2zAUx0VZadJux12LYLCbUymyJb3dQukvCOzQlo5dhGw_FQ1HTiW7a_77yiRQBkMHoafP9-mJDyFfOVtwpuECQ7tYMqYXoJg8InNeVaoAxn59IvN8vyyUAjYjpyn9YYwLycUJmXENQlW6mpPfD38xDDu6QxsT7R1NPjx3SJtcxUjxbYvRY2iQ-kCv7p_WlINWRX5R_aA2UHy13WgH34cpLJgCus3HnE6fybGzXcIvh_2MPF5fPVzeFuufN3eXq3XRiEoPRV0Bl61kdWsRpF4KJtu6RFU7XdUq_1FKx51UrBZCQ1mqpgbLWtE6pUttl-KMfN_33cb-ZcQ0mI1PDXadDdiPyUiQIEBBBr_twWfbofHB9UO0zQSbFYc8BohSZWrxHyqvFje-6QM6n-v_BIp9oIl9ShGd2Ua_sXFnODOTI5MdmcmRmRxl_vww71hvsP2gD1LEO2TdiMc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69693979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Twenty years of single center experience in ESWL 1987-2007: an evaluation of 3079 patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tailly, Geert G ; Baert, Joost A ; Hente, K Robert ; Tailly, Thomas O</creator><creatorcontrib>Tailly, Geert G ; Baert, Joost A ; Hente, K Robert ; Tailly, Thomas O</creatorcontrib><description>Since 1987 we have consecutively operated five different Dornier lithotriptors in the management of lithiasis at all levels of the urinary tract. At the time of usage of each machine we periodically evaluated the treatment results in order to eventually adapt treatment strategies to improve results. None of these evaluations comprised the totality of patients treated on a certain machine during the entire period it was in use. This overview retrospectively compares the results over the entire period in order to gauge the impact of the different machines and SW-sources on clinical results. A total of 3079 patients, treated from september 1987 till september 2006 with two electrohydraulic machines, HM4 (1987-1988) and MPL9000 (1988-1994), and three electromagnetic machines, Compact (1991-1999), DoLi U/50 (1996-1999) and DoLi S (1999-2006) were thus evaluated. Parameters reviewed were stone location and size, retreatment rate, auxiliary procedures, stone free rate and Effectiveness Quotient (EQ). There is no significant difference in stone size or stone free rate (p=0.4715) for the different groups. There is a significant difference for auxiliary procedure rate and retreatment rate for the different machines. The DoLiS with EMSE 220F-XXP scores significantly better than any of the other systems for auxiliary procedure rate pre-ESWL (p&lt;0.05) and total auxiliary procedure rate (p&lt;0.05), and retreatment rate (p=0.0024). There is a gradual increase in EQ with the consecutive machines. Although stone free rates (85%-88.8%) remained constant, Effectiveness Quotients improved. This is largely due to reduced auxiliary procedure rates and reduced retreatment rates. The first effect is a consequence of improvement in treatment strategies and experience, the latter no doubt also of improvement in SW-sources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-7790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-900X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.9706</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18937585</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Analgesics ; Calculi, Urinary ; Care and treatment ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Lithotripsy ; Treatment Outcome ; Ureteral Calculi - pathology ; Ureteral Calculi - therapy</subject><ispartof>Journal of endourology, 2008-10, Vol.22 (10), p.2211-2222</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-b5916d60bdae9682306db4e7bf85b710866f1f670b3389447cb9a0d3df7848a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-b5916d60bdae9682306db4e7bf85b710866f1f670b3389447cb9a0d3df7848a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18937585$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tailly, Geert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baert, Joost A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hente, K Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tailly, Thomas O</creatorcontrib><title>Twenty years of single center experience in ESWL 1987-2007: an evaluation of 3079 patients</title><title>Journal of endourology</title><addtitle>J Endourol</addtitle><description>Since 1987 we have consecutively operated five different Dornier lithotriptors in the management of lithiasis at all levels of the urinary tract. At the time of usage of each machine we periodically evaluated the treatment results in order to eventually adapt treatment strategies to improve results. None of these evaluations comprised the totality of patients treated on a certain machine during the entire period it was in use. This overview retrospectively compares the results over the entire period in order to gauge the impact of the different machines and SW-sources on clinical results. A total of 3079 patients, treated from september 1987 till september 2006 with two electrohydraulic machines, HM4 (1987-1988) and MPL9000 (1988-1994), and three electromagnetic machines, Compact (1991-1999), DoLi U/50 (1996-1999) and DoLi S (1999-2006) were thus evaluated. Parameters reviewed were stone location and size, retreatment rate, auxiliary procedures, stone free rate and Effectiveness Quotient (EQ). There is no significant difference in stone size or stone free rate (p=0.4715) for the different groups. There is a significant difference for auxiliary procedure rate and retreatment rate for the different machines. The DoLiS with EMSE 220F-XXP scores significantly better than any of the other systems for auxiliary procedure rate pre-ESWL (p&lt;0.05) and total auxiliary procedure rate (p&lt;0.05), and retreatment rate (p=0.0024). There is a gradual increase in EQ with the consecutive machines. Although stone free rates (85%-88.8%) remained constant, Effectiveness Quotients improved. This is largely due to reduced auxiliary procedure rates and reduced retreatment rates. The first effect is a consequence of improvement in treatment strategies and experience, the latter no doubt also of improvement in SW-sources.</description><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Calculi, Urinary</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lithotripsy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ureteral Calculi - pathology</subject><subject>Ureteral Calculi - therapy</subject><issn>0892-7790</issn><issn>1557-900X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc9r2zAUx0VZadJux12LYLCbUymyJb3dQukvCOzQlo5dhGw_FQ1HTiW7a_77yiRQBkMHoafP9-mJDyFfOVtwpuECQ7tYMqYXoJg8InNeVaoAxn59IvN8vyyUAjYjpyn9YYwLycUJmXENQlW6mpPfD38xDDu6QxsT7R1NPjx3SJtcxUjxbYvRY2iQ-kCv7p_WlINWRX5R_aA2UHy13WgH34cpLJgCus3HnE6fybGzXcIvh_2MPF5fPVzeFuufN3eXq3XRiEoPRV0Bl61kdWsRpF4KJtu6RFU7XdUq_1FKx51UrBZCQ1mqpgbLWtE6pUttl-KMfN_33cb-ZcQ0mI1PDXadDdiPyUiQIEBBBr_twWfbofHB9UO0zQSbFYc8BohSZWrxHyqvFje-6QM6n-v_BIp9oIl9ShGd2Ua_sXFnODOTI5MdmcmRmRxl_vww71hvsP2gD1LEO2TdiMc</recordid><startdate>200810</startdate><enddate>200810</enddate><creator>Tailly, Geert G</creator><creator>Baert, Joost A</creator><creator>Hente, K Robert</creator><creator>Tailly, Thomas O</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200810</creationdate><title>Twenty years of single center experience in ESWL 1987-2007: an evaluation of 3079 patients</title><author>Tailly, Geert G ; Baert, Joost A ; Hente, K Robert ; Tailly, Thomas O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-b5916d60bdae9682306db4e7bf85b710866f1f670b3389447cb9a0d3df7848a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Calculi, Urinary</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lithotripsy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ureteral Calculi - pathology</topic><topic>Ureteral Calculi - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tailly, Geert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baert, Joost A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hente, K Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tailly, Thomas O</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endourology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tailly, Geert G</au><au>Baert, Joost A</au><au>Hente, K Robert</au><au>Tailly, Thomas O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Twenty years of single center experience in ESWL 1987-2007: an evaluation of 3079 patients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endourology</jtitle><addtitle>J Endourol</addtitle><date>2008-10</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2211</spage><epage>2222</epage><pages>2211-2222</pages><issn>0892-7790</issn><eissn>1557-900X</eissn><abstract>Since 1987 we have consecutively operated five different Dornier lithotriptors in the management of lithiasis at all levels of the urinary tract. At the time of usage of each machine we periodically evaluated the treatment results in order to eventually adapt treatment strategies to improve results. None of these evaluations comprised the totality of patients treated on a certain machine during the entire period it was in use. This overview retrospectively compares the results over the entire period in order to gauge the impact of the different machines and SW-sources on clinical results. A total of 3079 patients, treated from september 1987 till september 2006 with two electrohydraulic machines, HM4 (1987-1988) and MPL9000 (1988-1994), and three electromagnetic machines, Compact (1991-1999), DoLi U/50 (1996-1999) and DoLi S (1999-2006) were thus evaluated. Parameters reviewed were stone location and size, retreatment rate, auxiliary procedures, stone free rate and Effectiveness Quotient (EQ). There is no significant difference in stone size or stone free rate (p=0.4715) for the different groups. There is a significant difference for auxiliary procedure rate and retreatment rate for the different machines. The DoLiS with EMSE 220F-XXP scores significantly better than any of the other systems for auxiliary procedure rate pre-ESWL (p&lt;0.05) and total auxiliary procedure rate (p&lt;0.05), and retreatment rate (p=0.0024). There is a gradual increase in EQ with the consecutive machines. Although stone free rates (85%-88.8%) remained constant, Effectiveness Quotients improved. This is largely due to reduced auxiliary procedure rates and reduced retreatment rates. The first effect is a consequence of improvement in treatment strategies and experience, the latter no doubt also of improvement in SW-sources.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>18937585</pmid><doi>10.1089/end.2008.9706</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0892-7790
ispartof Journal of endourology, 2008-10, Vol.22 (10), p.2211-2222
issn 0892-7790
1557-900X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69693979
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analgesics
Calculi, Urinary
Care and treatment
Health aspects
Humans
Lithotripsy
Treatment Outcome
Ureteral Calculi - pathology
Ureteral Calculi - therapy
title Twenty years of single center experience in ESWL 1987-2007: an evaluation of 3079 patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A34%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Twenty%20years%20of%20single%20center%20experience%20in%20ESWL%201987-2007:%20an%20evaluation%20of%203079%20patients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endourology&rft.au=Tailly,%20Geert%20G&rft.date=2008-10&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2211&rft.epage=2222&rft.pages=2211-2222&rft.issn=0892-7790&rft.eissn=1557-900X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/end.2008.9706&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA195919347%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69693979&rft_id=info:pmid/18937585&rft_galeid=A195919347&rfr_iscdi=true