Coverage of the Victorian newborn screening programme in 2003: A retrospective population study
Objective: To assess the coverage of the newborn screening (NBS) program in Victoria, Australia, and identify potential predictors of not being screened. Setting: Victoria, Australia, 2003. The Victorian NBS program screens for phenylketonuria (PKU), cystic fibrosis, congenital hypothyroidism and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of paediatrics and child health 2008-09, Vol.44 (9), p.498-503 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 503 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 498 |
container_title | Journal of paediatrics and child health |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Jaques, Alice M Collins, Veronica R Pitt, James Halliday, Jane L |
description | Objective: To assess the coverage of the newborn screening (NBS) program in Victoria, Australia, and identify potential predictors of not being screened.
Setting: Victoria, Australia, 2003. The Victorian NBS program screens for phenylketonuria (PKU), cystic fibrosis, congenital hypothyroidism and more than 20 metabolic conditions, such as medium chain acyl‐coenzyme A dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency.
Methods: Victorian birth records (n = 63,018) were linked to Victorian NBS records (n = 62,876) using probabilistic record linkage. Binary logistic regression was used to identify potential predictors of not being screened.
Results: Uptake of NBS was 99.4% (62,643/63,018), resulting in 0.6% (375) of livebirths not matched to a NBS test. Neonatal death was the most significant factor associated with not being screened (relative risk (RR) = 407, 95%Cl = 314 to 526). After adjustment, surviving livebirths had an increased likelihood of not being matched to a NBS record if they: were transferred between hospitals (odds ratio (OR) = 2.4, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.5 to 3.9); were born at home (OR = 12.1, 95%Cl 6.3 to 23.3); resided in rural Victoria (OR = 2.6, 95%Cl 1.5 to 4.3); stayed in hospital for one day or less (OR = 4.6, 95%Cl 2.8 to 7.6); or whose mothers were primiparous (OR = 1.5, 95%Cl 1.1 to 2.1).
Conclusion: NBS uptake is extremely high in Victoria with over 99% of livebirths screened. Particular risk factors for not having NBS have now been identified, which could lead to changes around monitoring neonates who are not born in a hospital, or leave/transfer hospital, before the NBS period (48–72 hours). Future studies could determine whether those not screened had opted‐out or were not offered NBS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2008.01332.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69680682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69680682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4322-35a7e28763c594412f3ec376d49cbf9e014de6f57e1ba5386ac92ea4d1609bec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhSMEoqXwF5DFgl1Sv-MgsahGMBRGPCQeS8txbgYPSZzaSTvz73GYUZFY4Y2v5O_ce31OliGCC5LO5a4gnOOclIIXFGNVYMIYLfYPsvP7h4epxoznXBF8lj2JcYcxpkKox9kZUUKUCvPzTK_8LQSzBeRbNP0E9N3ZyQdnBjTAXe3DgKINAIMbtmgMfhtM3wNyA0pz2St0hQJMwccR7ORuAY1-nDszOZ9009wcnmaPWtNFeHa6L7Jvb998Xb3LN5_W16urTW45ozRnwpRAVSmZFRXnhLYMLCtlwytbtxVgwhuQrSiB1EYwJY2tKBjeEImrOqEX2ctj37TjzQxx0r2LFrrODODnqGUlFZaKJvDFP-DOz2FIu2mKlaywoCpB6gjZ9LUYoNVjcL0JB02wXhLQO70YrRej9ZKA_pOA3ifp81P_ue6h-Ss8WZ6A10fgznVw-O_G-v3n1VIlfX7UuzjB_l5vwi8tS1YK_ePjWn9gZL1Rkukv7Dd16KLO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208690528</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coverage of the Victorian newborn screening programme in 2003: A retrospective population study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Jaques, Alice M ; Collins, Veronica R ; Pitt, James ; Halliday, Jane L</creator><creatorcontrib>Jaques, Alice M ; Collins, Veronica R ; Pitt, James ; Halliday, Jane L</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To assess the coverage of the newborn screening (NBS) program in Victoria, Australia, and identify potential predictors of not being screened.
Setting: Victoria, Australia, 2003. The Victorian NBS program screens for phenylketonuria (PKU), cystic fibrosis, congenital hypothyroidism and more than 20 metabolic conditions, such as medium chain acyl‐coenzyme A dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency.
Methods: Victorian birth records (n = 63,018) were linked to Victorian NBS records (n = 62,876) using probabilistic record linkage. Binary logistic regression was used to identify potential predictors of not being screened.
Results: Uptake of NBS was 99.4% (62,643/63,018), resulting in 0.6% (375) of livebirths not matched to a NBS test. Neonatal death was the most significant factor associated with not being screened (relative risk (RR) = 407, 95%Cl = 314 to 526). After adjustment, surviving livebirths had an increased likelihood of not being matched to a NBS record if they: were transferred between hospitals (odds ratio (OR) = 2.4, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.5 to 3.9); were born at home (OR = 12.1, 95%Cl 6.3 to 23.3); resided in rural Victoria (OR = 2.6, 95%Cl 1.5 to 4.3); stayed in hospital for one day or less (OR = 4.6, 95%Cl 2.8 to 7.6); or whose mothers were primiparous (OR = 1.5, 95%Cl 1.1 to 2.1).
Conclusion: NBS uptake is extremely high in Victoria with over 99% of livebirths screened. Particular risk factors for not having NBS have now been identified, which could lead to changes around monitoring neonates who are not born in a hospital, or leave/transfer hospital, before the NBS period (48–72 hours). Future studies could determine whether those not screened had opted‐out or were not offered NBS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1034-4810</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2008.01332.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18557804</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Birth Certificates ; coverage ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Logistic Models ; Medical Record Linkage ; Medical records ; Medical screening ; Neonatal care ; Neonatal Screening - organization & administration ; Neonatal Screening - utilization ; Newborn screening ; Predictions ; Regression analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk factors ; uptake ; Victoria</subject><ispartof>Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2008-09, Vol.44 (9), p.498-503</ispartof><rights>2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (Royal Australasian College of Physicians)</rights><rights>Journal compilation © 2008 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (Royal Australasian College of Physicians)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4322-35a7e28763c594412f3ec376d49cbf9e014de6f57e1ba5386ac92ea4d1609bec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4322-35a7e28763c594412f3ec376d49cbf9e014de6f57e1ba5386ac92ea4d1609bec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1754.2008.01332.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1754.2008.01332.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18557804$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jaques, Alice M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Veronica R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitt, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halliday, Jane L</creatorcontrib><title>Coverage of the Victorian newborn screening programme in 2003: A retrospective population study</title><title>Journal of paediatrics and child health</title><addtitle>J Paediatr Child Health</addtitle><description>Objective: To assess the coverage of the newborn screening (NBS) program in Victoria, Australia, and identify potential predictors of not being screened.
Setting: Victoria, Australia, 2003. The Victorian NBS program screens for phenylketonuria (PKU), cystic fibrosis, congenital hypothyroidism and more than 20 metabolic conditions, such as medium chain acyl‐coenzyme A dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency.
Methods: Victorian birth records (n = 63,018) were linked to Victorian NBS records (n = 62,876) using probabilistic record linkage. Binary logistic regression was used to identify potential predictors of not being screened.
Results: Uptake of NBS was 99.4% (62,643/63,018), resulting in 0.6% (375) of livebirths not matched to a NBS test. Neonatal death was the most significant factor associated with not being screened (relative risk (RR) = 407, 95%Cl = 314 to 526). After adjustment, surviving livebirths had an increased likelihood of not being matched to a NBS record if they: were transferred between hospitals (odds ratio (OR) = 2.4, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.5 to 3.9); were born at home (OR = 12.1, 95%Cl 6.3 to 23.3); resided in rural Victoria (OR = 2.6, 95%Cl 1.5 to 4.3); stayed in hospital for one day or less (OR = 4.6, 95%Cl 2.8 to 7.6); or whose mothers were primiparous (OR = 1.5, 95%Cl 1.1 to 2.1).
Conclusion: NBS uptake is extremely high in Victoria with over 99% of livebirths screened. Particular risk factors for not having NBS have now been identified, which could lead to changes around monitoring neonates who are not born in a hospital, or leave/transfer hospital, before the NBS period (48–72 hours). Future studies could determine whether those not screened had opted‐out or were not offered NBS.</description><subject>Birth Certificates</subject><subject>coverage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Medical Record Linkage</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Neonatal care</subject><subject>Neonatal Screening - organization & administration</subject><subject>Neonatal Screening - utilization</subject><subject>Newborn screening</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>uptake</subject><subject>Victoria</subject><issn>1034-4810</issn><issn>1440-1754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhSMEoqXwF5DFgl1Sv-MgsahGMBRGPCQeS8txbgYPSZzaSTvz73GYUZFY4Y2v5O_ce31OliGCC5LO5a4gnOOclIIXFGNVYMIYLfYPsvP7h4epxoznXBF8lj2JcYcxpkKox9kZUUKUCvPzTK_8LQSzBeRbNP0E9N3ZyQdnBjTAXe3DgKINAIMbtmgMfhtM3wNyA0pz2St0hQJMwccR7ORuAY1-nDszOZ9009wcnmaPWtNFeHa6L7Jvb998Xb3LN5_W16urTW45ozRnwpRAVSmZFRXnhLYMLCtlwytbtxVgwhuQrSiB1EYwJY2tKBjeEImrOqEX2ctj37TjzQxx0r2LFrrODODnqGUlFZaKJvDFP-DOz2FIu2mKlaywoCpB6gjZ9LUYoNVjcL0JB02wXhLQO70YrRej9ZKA_pOA3ifp81P_ue6h-Ss8WZ6A10fgznVw-O_G-v3n1VIlfX7UuzjB_l5vwi8tS1YK_ePjWn9gZL1Rkukv7Dd16KLO</recordid><startdate>200809</startdate><enddate>200809</enddate><creator>Jaques, Alice M</creator><creator>Collins, Veronica R</creator><creator>Pitt, James</creator><creator>Halliday, Jane L</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200809</creationdate><title>Coverage of the Victorian newborn screening programme in 2003: A retrospective population study</title><author>Jaques, Alice M ; Collins, Veronica R ; Pitt, James ; Halliday, Jane L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4322-35a7e28763c594412f3ec376d49cbf9e014de6f57e1ba5386ac92ea4d1609bec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Birth Certificates</topic><topic>coverage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Medical Record Linkage</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Neonatal care</topic><topic>Neonatal Screening - organization & administration</topic><topic>Neonatal Screening - utilization</topic><topic>Newborn screening</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>uptake</topic><topic>Victoria</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jaques, Alice M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Veronica R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitt, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halliday, Jane L</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of paediatrics and child health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jaques, Alice M</au><au>Collins, Veronica R</au><au>Pitt, James</au><au>Halliday, Jane L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coverage of the Victorian newborn screening programme in 2003: A retrospective population study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of paediatrics and child health</jtitle><addtitle>J Paediatr Child Health</addtitle><date>2008-09</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>498</spage><epage>503</epage><pages>498-503</pages><issn>1034-4810</issn><eissn>1440-1754</eissn><abstract>Objective: To assess the coverage of the newborn screening (NBS) program in Victoria, Australia, and identify potential predictors of not being screened.
Setting: Victoria, Australia, 2003. The Victorian NBS program screens for phenylketonuria (PKU), cystic fibrosis, congenital hypothyroidism and more than 20 metabolic conditions, such as medium chain acyl‐coenzyme A dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency.
Methods: Victorian birth records (n = 63,018) were linked to Victorian NBS records (n = 62,876) using probabilistic record linkage. Binary logistic regression was used to identify potential predictors of not being screened.
Results: Uptake of NBS was 99.4% (62,643/63,018), resulting in 0.6% (375) of livebirths not matched to a NBS test. Neonatal death was the most significant factor associated with not being screened (relative risk (RR) = 407, 95%Cl = 314 to 526). After adjustment, surviving livebirths had an increased likelihood of not being matched to a NBS record if they: were transferred between hospitals (odds ratio (OR) = 2.4, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.5 to 3.9); were born at home (OR = 12.1, 95%Cl 6.3 to 23.3); resided in rural Victoria (OR = 2.6, 95%Cl 1.5 to 4.3); stayed in hospital for one day or less (OR = 4.6, 95%Cl 2.8 to 7.6); or whose mothers were primiparous (OR = 1.5, 95%Cl 1.1 to 2.1).
Conclusion: NBS uptake is extremely high in Victoria with over 99% of livebirths screened. Particular risk factors for not having NBS have now been identified, which could lead to changes around monitoring neonates who are not born in a hospital, or leave/transfer hospital, before the NBS period (48–72 hours). Future studies could determine whether those not screened had opted‐out or were not offered NBS.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>18557804</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1440-1754.2008.01332.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1034-4810 |
ispartof | Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2008-09, Vol.44 (9), p.498-503 |
issn | 1034-4810 1440-1754 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69680682 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Birth Certificates coverage Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Logistic Models Medical Record Linkage Medical records Medical screening Neonatal care Neonatal Screening - organization & administration Neonatal Screening - utilization Newborn screening Predictions Regression analysis Retrospective Studies Risk factors uptake Victoria |
title | Coverage of the Victorian newborn screening programme in 2003: A retrospective population study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T07%3A03%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coverage%20of%20the%20Victorian%20newborn%20screening%20programme%20in%202003:%20A%20retrospective%20population%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20paediatrics%20and%20child%20health&rft.au=Jaques,%20Alice%20M&rft.date=2008-09&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=498&rft.epage=503&rft.pages=498-503&rft.issn=1034-4810&rft.eissn=1440-1754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2008.01332.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69680682%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208690528&rft_id=info:pmid/18557804&rfr_iscdi=true |