Influence of endoscopic variceal ligation on oesophageal motility

Background: To determine the change of oesophageal manometry in patients with oesophageal varices before and after oesophageal variceal ligation (EVL). Methods: Forty‐five patients who had liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with high risk of bleeding were managed by EVL. Oesophageal manometry w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 1999-03, Vol.14 (3), p.231-235
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Sam-Ming, Lo, Gin-Ho, Lai, Kwok-Hung, Jeng, Jing-Shiung, Shen, Ming-Tse, Huang, Rong-Long, Chang, Chia-Fu, Lin, Chiun-Ku, Wang, E-Ming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: To determine the change of oesophageal manometry in patients with oesophageal varices before and after oesophageal variceal ligation (EVL). Methods: Forty‐five patients who had liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with high risk of bleeding were managed by EVL. Oesophageal manometry was performed just prior to the ligation and 4–6 weeks after obliteration of varices. Another 45 age‐ and sex‐matched patients without hepatic, oesophageal or systemic disease served as the control group. Results: At 5 cm above the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES), the amplitude of the contractive wave was significantly lower in patients before EVL (56.9 ± 31.8 vs 80.1 ± 30.1, P < 0.05) and returned to the level of control subjects after EVL (76.5 ± 37.0 vs 80.1 ± 30.1, P > 0.05). At 10 cm above LES, the amplitude of the contractive wave was significantly lower in patients before and after EVL than the control group (54.3 ± 29.2 vs 68.1 ± 29.5, 54.2 ± 26.0 vs 68.1 ± 29.5, respectively, P < 0.05). The percentage of tertiary waves was significantly higher in patients before and after EVL than in the control group (31.4 ± 36.6 vs 5.8 ± 15.1, 26.9 ± 32.9 vs 5.8 ± 15.1, respectively, P < 0.05). However, no significant swallowing disturbance was noted in patients after EVL. There was significantly greater LES length in patients before EVL (4.0 ± 0.9 vs 3.4 ± 0.7, P < 0.05) but there was no significant difference in the LES length after EVL as compared with the control group. Eighty‐six per cent (39/45) of patients developed para‐oesophageal varices and 31% (14/45) developed new varices 6 months after variceal obliteration. However, there was no significant difference in manometry at the time of variceal obliteration between patients with variceal recurrence and those without. Conclusions: The presence of varices affected oesophageal motility. However, such abnormality had little clinical significance. Endoscopic variceal ligation normalized oesophageal motility and may not induce abnormal oesophageal motility. The manometric change can not be used to predict the recurrence of varices in cirrhotic patients after variceal obliteration.
ISSN:0815-9319
1440-1746
DOI:10.1046/j.1440-1746.1999.t01-1-01939.x