Corrosion in stainless-steel and nickel-titanium files
This study evaluated and compared the corrosion susceptibility of stainless-steel and nickel-titanium (NiTi) endodontic files immersed in sodium hypochlorite. For each of the stainless-steel files (Kerr K-Flex, Caulk Flex-O, and Union Broach Flex-R) plus the NiTi files (Union Broach NiTi and Tulsa N...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endodontics 1999, Vol.25 (1), p.17-20 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 20 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 17 |
container_title | Journal of endodontics |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Stokes, Orsure W. Di Fiore, Peter M. Barss, Joseph T. Koerber, Anne Gilbert, Jeremy L. Lautenschlager, Eugene P. |
description | This study evaluated and compared the corrosion susceptibility of stainless-steel and nickel-titanium (NiTi) endodontic files immersed in sodium hypochlorite. For each of the stainless-steel files (Kerr K-Flex, Caulk Flex-O, and Union Broach Flex-R) plus the NiTi files (Union Broach NiTi and Tulsa NiTi), the cutting flutes of 24 ISO size 20 files were immersed into 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. Their open circuit potential (OCP) was recorded for 1 h on a strip chart with high impedance. The strip chart recording for each file was classified into a stability score: (i) stable, (ii) unstable, or (iii) erratic. The OCP was measured by a potentiostat and a standard calomel electrode reference. The OCP classification of unstable and erratic for the files evaluated were as follows: K-Flex (16%), Flex-R (12%), Flex-O (75%), Union Broach NiTi (62%), and Tulsa NiTi (0%). After OCP testing, each of the 120 files was inspected by light microscopy at ×25. The frequencies of visually observed corrosion were detected as follows: K-Flex (2/24), Flex-R (1/24), Flex-O (6/24), Union Broach NiTi (2/24), and Tulsa NiTi (0/24). There was a significant difference in corrosion frequency between brands when evaluated by OCP and light microscopy; however, there was no significant difference between stainless steel and NiTi. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80392-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69676452</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0099239999803926</els_id><sourcerecordid>69676452</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-6bfc737803dbf26522f6b0979fa8fa3936bc0eae8cb4f484b48bf89297004fa83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKxDAUhoMozjj6CEpXooto2rS5rEQGbzDgQl2HJD2BaJuOTSv49mamg7gTDpzN95_Lh9BpTq5ykrPrF0KkxAWV8kLKS0GoLDDbQ_NccIFpVZX7aP6LzNBRjO-E5JxSfohmaYJkgvI5Ysuu77vou5D5kMVB-9BAjDgOAE2mQ50Fbz-gwYMfdPBjmzmfgGN04HQT4WTXF-jt_u51-YhXzw9Py9sVtpTlA2bGWU55uq42rmBVUThmiOTSaeE0lZQZS0CDsKZ0pShNKYwTspCckDIxdIHOp7nrvvscIQ6q9dFC0-gA3RgVk4yzsioSWE2gTd_EHpxa977V_bfKidoIU1thamNDpdoKUyzlznYLRtNC_Sc1GUrAzQRAevPLQ6-i9RAs1L4HO6i68_-s-AEw_nq2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69676452</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Corrosion in stainless-steel and nickel-titanium files</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Stokes, Orsure W. ; Di Fiore, Peter M. ; Barss, Joseph T. ; Koerber, Anne ; Gilbert, Jeremy L. ; Lautenschlager, Eugene P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stokes, Orsure W. ; Di Fiore, Peter M. ; Barss, Joseph T. ; Koerber, Anne ; Gilbert, Jeremy L. ; Lautenschlager, Eugene P.</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated and compared the corrosion susceptibility of stainless-steel and nickel-titanium (NiTi) endodontic files immersed in sodium hypochlorite. For each of the stainless-steel files (Kerr K-Flex, Caulk Flex-O, and Union Broach Flex-R) plus the NiTi files (Union Broach NiTi and Tulsa NiTi), the cutting flutes of 24 ISO size 20 files were immersed into 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. Their open circuit potential (OCP) was recorded for 1 h on a strip chart with high impedance. The strip chart recording for each file was classified into a stability score: (i) stable, (ii) unstable, or (iii) erratic. The OCP was measured by a potentiostat and a standard calomel electrode reference. The OCP classification of unstable and erratic for the files evaluated were as follows: K-Flex (16%), Flex-R (12%), Flex-O (75%), Union Broach NiTi (62%), and Tulsa NiTi (0%). After OCP testing, each of the 120 files was inspected by light microscopy at ×25. The frequencies of visually observed corrosion were detected as follows: K-Flex (2/24), Flex-R (1/24), Flex-O (6/24), Union Broach NiTi (2/24), and Tulsa NiTi (0/24). There was a significant difference in corrosion frequency between brands when evaluated by OCP and light microscopy; however, there was no significant difference between stainless steel and NiTi.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80392-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10196837</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Corrosion ; Dental Instruments ; Dentistry ; Electrochemistry ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Nickel - chemistry ; Random Allocation ; Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation ; Sodium Hypochlorite - chemistry ; Solvents - chemistry ; Spectrum Analysis - methods ; Stainless Steel - chemistry ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Titanium - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of endodontics, 1999, Vol.25 (1), p.17-20</ispartof><rights>1999 The American Association of Endodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-6bfc737803dbf26522f6b0979fa8fa3936bc0eae8cb4f484b48bf89297004fa83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-6bfc737803dbf26522f6b0979fa8fa3936bc0eae8cb4f484b48bf89297004fa83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80392-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10196837$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stokes, Orsure W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Fiore, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barss, Joseph T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koerber, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Jeremy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lautenschlager, Eugene P.</creatorcontrib><title>Corrosion in stainless-steel and nickel-titanium files</title><title>Journal of endodontics</title><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><description>This study evaluated and compared the corrosion susceptibility of stainless-steel and nickel-titanium (NiTi) endodontic files immersed in sodium hypochlorite. For each of the stainless-steel files (Kerr K-Flex, Caulk Flex-O, and Union Broach Flex-R) plus the NiTi files (Union Broach NiTi and Tulsa NiTi), the cutting flutes of 24 ISO size 20 files were immersed into 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. Their open circuit potential (OCP) was recorded for 1 h on a strip chart with high impedance. The strip chart recording for each file was classified into a stability score: (i) stable, (ii) unstable, or (iii) erratic. The OCP was measured by a potentiostat and a standard calomel electrode reference. The OCP classification of unstable and erratic for the files evaluated were as follows: K-Flex (16%), Flex-R (12%), Flex-O (75%), Union Broach NiTi (62%), and Tulsa NiTi (0%). After OCP testing, each of the 120 files was inspected by light microscopy at ×25. The frequencies of visually observed corrosion were detected as follows: K-Flex (2/24), Flex-R (1/24), Flex-O (6/24), Union Broach NiTi (2/24), and Tulsa NiTi (0/24). There was a significant difference in corrosion frequency between brands when evaluated by OCP and light microscopy; however, there was no significant difference between stainless steel and NiTi.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Corrosion</subject><subject>Dental Instruments</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Electrochemistry</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Nickel - chemistry</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Sodium Hypochlorite - chemistry</subject><subject>Solvents - chemistry</subject><subject>Spectrum Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Stainless Steel - chemistry</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Titanium - chemistry</subject><issn>0099-2399</issn><issn>1878-3554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtKxDAUhoMozjj6CEpXooto2rS5rEQGbzDgQl2HJD2BaJuOTSv49mamg7gTDpzN95_Lh9BpTq5ykrPrF0KkxAWV8kLKS0GoLDDbQ_NccIFpVZX7aP6LzNBRjO-E5JxSfohmaYJkgvI5Ysuu77vou5D5kMVB-9BAjDgOAE2mQ50Fbz-gwYMfdPBjmzmfgGN04HQT4WTXF-jt_u51-YhXzw9Py9sVtpTlA2bGWU55uq42rmBVUThmiOTSaeE0lZQZS0CDsKZ0pShNKYwTspCckDIxdIHOp7nrvvscIQ6q9dFC0-gA3RgVk4yzsioSWE2gTd_EHpxa977V_bfKidoIU1thamNDpdoKUyzlznYLRtNC_Sc1GUrAzQRAevPLQ6-i9RAs1L4HO6i68_-s-AEw_nq2</recordid><startdate>1999</startdate><enddate>1999</enddate><creator>Stokes, Orsure W.</creator><creator>Di Fiore, Peter M.</creator><creator>Barss, Joseph T.</creator><creator>Koerber, Anne</creator><creator>Gilbert, Jeremy L.</creator><creator>Lautenschlager, Eugene P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1999</creationdate><title>Corrosion in stainless-steel and nickel-titanium files</title><author>Stokes, Orsure W. ; Di Fiore, Peter M. ; Barss, Joseph T. ; Koerber, Anne ; Gilbert, Jeremy L. ; Lautenschlager, Eugene P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-6bfc737803dbf26522f6b0979fa8fa3936bc0eae8cb4f484b48bf89297004fa83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Corrosion</topic><topic>Dental Instruments</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Electrochemistry</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Nickel - chemistry</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Sodium Hypochlorite - chemistry</topic><topic>Solvents - chemistry</topic><topic>Spectrum Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Stainless Steel - chemistry</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Titanium - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stokes, Orsure W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Fiore, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barss, Joseph T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koerber, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Jeremy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lautenschlager, Eugene P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stokes, Orsure W.</au><au>Di Fiore, Peter M.</au><au>Barss, Joseph T.</au><au>Koerber, Anne</au><au>Gilbert, Jeremy L.</au><au>Lautenschlager, Eugene P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Corrosion in stainless-steel and nickel-titanium files</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><date>1999</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>17-20</pages><issn>0099-2399</issn><eissn>1878-3554</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated and compared the corrosion susceptibility of stainless-steel and nickel-titanium (NiTi) endodontic files immersed in sodium hypochlorite. For each of the stainless-steel files (Kerr K-Flex, Caulk Flex-O, and Union Broach Flex-R) plus the NiTi files (Union Broach NiTi and Tulsa NiTi), the cutting flutes of 24 ISO size 20 files were immersed into 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. Their open circuit potential (OCP) was recorded for 1 h on a strip chart with high impedance. The strip chart recording for each file was classified into a stability score: (i) stable, (ii) unstable, or (iii) erratic. The OCP was measured by a potentiostat and a standard calomel electrode reference. The OCP classification of unstable and erratic for the files evaluated were as follows: K-Flex (16%), Flex-R (12%), Flex-O (75%), Union Broach NiTi (62%), and Tulsa NiTi (0%). After OCP testing, each of the 120 files was inspected by light microscopy at ×25. The frequencies of visually observed corrosion were detected as follows: K-Flex (2/24), Flex-R (1/24), Flex-O (6/24), Union Broach NiTi (2/24), and Tulsa NiTi (0/24). There was a significant difference in corrosion frequency between brands when evaluated by OCP and light microscopy; however, there was no significant difference between stainless steel and NiTi.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10196837</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80392-6</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0099-2399 |
ispartof | Journal of endodontics, 1999, Vol.25 (1), p.17-20 |
issn | 0099-2399 1878-3554 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69676452 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Analysis of Variance Corrosion Dental Instruments Dentistry Electrochemistry Evaluation Studies as Topic Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Nickel - chemistry Random Allocation Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation Sodium Hypochlorite - chemistry Solvents - chemistry Spectrum Analysis - methods Stainless Steel - chemistry Statistics, Nonparametric Titanium - chemistry |
title | Corrosion in stainless-steel and nickel-titanium files |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A02%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Corrosion%20in%20stainless-steel%20and%20nickel-titanium%20files&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endodontics&rft.au=Stokes,%20Orsure%20W.&rft.date=1999&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=17-20&rft.issn=0099-2399&rft.eissn=1878-3554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80392-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69676452%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69676452&rft_id=info:pmid/10196837&rft_els_id=S0099239999803926&rfr_iscdi=true |