Routine use of a SILASTIC spring-loaded silo for infants with gastroschisis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Retrospective studies have suggested that routine use of a preformed silo for infants with gastroschisis may be associated with improved outcomes. We performed a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial to test this hypothesis. Methods Eligible infants were randomized...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric surgery 2008-10, Vol.43 (10), p.1807-1812
Hauptverfasser: Pastor, Aimee C, Phillips, J. Duncan, Fenton, Stephen J, Meyers, Rebecka L, Lamm, Amy W, Raval, Mehul V, Lehman, Elizabeth, Karp, Tracy B, Wales, Paul W, Langer, Jacob C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1812
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1807
container_title Journal of pediatric surgery
container_volume 43
creator Pastor, Aimee C
Phillips, J. Duncan
Fenton, Stephen J
Meyers, Rebecka L
Lamm, Amy W
Raval, Mehul V
Lehman, Elizabeth
Karp, Tracy B
Wales, Paul W
Langer, Jacob C
description Abstract Background Retrospective studies have suggested that routine use of a preformed silo for infants with gastroschisis may be associated with improved outcomes. We performed a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial to test this hypothesis. Methods Eligible infants were randomized to (1) routine bedside placement of a preformed Silastic spring-loaded silo, with gradual reduction and elective abdominal wall closure, or (2) primary closure. Results There were 27 infants in each group. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to age, weight, sex, Apgar scores, prenatal diagnosis, or mode of delivery. The total number of days on the ventilator was lower in the spring-loaded silo group, although it did not reach statistical significance (3.2 vs 5.3, P = .07). There was no significant difference between groups with respect to length of time on total parenteral nutrition, length of stay, or incidence of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis. Conclusion Routine use of a preformed silo was associated with similar outcomes to primary closure for infants with gastroschisis but with a strong trend toward fewer days on the ventilator. Use of a preformed silo has the advantage of permitting definitive abdominal wall closure in a more elective setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.04.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69672696</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022346808003679</els_id><sourcerecordid>69672696</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-eeeb3c9689439974b3056b627bd0d06f0ffead9857a3a892a3fa9d990e5a965c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2O0zAURiMEYsrAK4y8YpdwHSdOzAIxqvipVAmJDmvLsW86Dq5d7GTQ8PS4ahESGza2F-e71nduUdxQqChQ_maqpiOatMR9VQP0FTQVAHtSrGjLaNkC654WK4C6LlnD-6viRUoTZKID-ry4or2oeU3rVfHwNSyz9UiWhCSMRJHdZnu7u9usSTpG6_elC8qgIcm6QMYQifWj8nMiP-18T_YqzTEkfW-TTW9z-rC42Wr0M0YSlTfhYH_ltA4-c87l5xytci-LZ6NyCV9d7uvi28cPd-vP5fbLp836dlvqpqZziYgD04L3omFCdM3AoOUDr7vBgAE-wjiiMqJvO8VU7qTYqIQRArBVgreaXRevz3OPMfxYMM3yYJNG55THsCTJBe_qfGSQn0Gd66SIo8ztDyo-SgryZFxO8o9xeTIuoZHZZw7eXH5YhgOav7GL4gy8PwOYez5YjDJpi16jsRH1LE2w___j3T8jtLPeauW-4yOmKSzRZ4uSylRLkLvT3k9rhz6neSfYb8dWrFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69672696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Routine use of a SILASTIC spring-loaded silo for infants with gastroschisis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Pastor, Aimee C ; Phillips, J. Duncan ; Fenton, Stephen J ; Meyers, Rebecka L ; Lamm, Amy W ; Raval, Mehul V ; Lehman, Elizabeth ; Karp, Tracy B ; Wales, Paul W ; Langer, Jacob C</creator><creatorcontrib>Pastor, Aimee C ; Phillips, J. Duncan ; Fenton, Stephen J ; Meyers, Rebecka L ; Lamm, Amy W ; Raval, Mehul V ; Lehman, Elizabeth ; Karp, Tracy B ; Wales, Paul W ; Langer, Jacob C</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Retrospective studies have suggested that routine use of a preformed silo for infants with gastroschisis may be associated with improved outcomes. We performed a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial to test this hypothesis. Methods Eligible infants were randomized to (1) routine bedside placement of a preformed Silastic spring-loaded silo, with gradual reduction and elective abdominal wall closure, or (2) primary closure. Results There were 27 infants in each group. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to age, weight, sex, Apgar scores, prenatal diagnosis, or mode of delivery. The total number of days on the ventilator was lower in the spring-loaded silo group, although it did not reach statistical significance (3.2 vs 5.3, P = .07). There was no significant difference between groups with respect to length of time on total parenteral nutrition, length of stay, or incidence of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis. Conclusion Routine use of a preformed silo was associated with similar outcomes to primary closure for infants with gastroschisis but with a strong trend toward fewer days on the ventilator. Use of a preformed silo has the advantage of permitting definitive abdominal wall closure in a more elective setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.04.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18926212</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abdominal Wall - surgery ; Abdominal wall defects ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Dimethylpolysiloxanes ; Elective Surgical Procedures ; Enterocolitis, Necrotizing - epidemiology ; Enterocolitis, Necrotizing - etiology ; Equipment Design ; Gastroschisis - epidemiology ; Gastroschisis - surgery ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intestinal Atresia - epidemiology ; Intestinal Atresia - surgery ; Intraabdominal pressure ; Length of Stay ; Parenteral Nutrition, Total - utilization ; Pediatrics ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Protective Devices ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Respiration, Artificial - utilization ; Sepsis - epidemiology ; Sepsis - etiology ; Spring-loaded silo ; Surgery ; Surgical Flaps - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric surgery, 2008-10, Vol.43 (10), p.1807-1812</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-eeeb3c9689439974b3056b627bd0d06f0ffead9857a3a892a3fa9d990e5a965c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-eeeb3c9689439974b3056b627bd0d06f0ffead9857a3a892a3fa9d990e5a965c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.04.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18926212$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pastor, Aimee C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, J. Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenton, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyers, Rebecka L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamm, Amy W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raval, Mehul V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehman, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karp, Tracy B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wales, Paul W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langer, Jacob C</creatorcontrib><title>Routine use of a SILASTIC spring-loaded silo for infants with gastroschisis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial</title><title>Journal of pediatric surgery</title><addtitle>J Pediatr Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Retrospective studies have suggested that routine use of a preformed silo for infants with gastroschisis may be associated with improved outcomes. We performed a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial to test this hypothesis. Methods Eligible infants were randomized to (1) routine bedside placement of a preformed Silastic spring-loaded silo, with gradual reduction and elective abdominal wall closure, or (2) primary closure. Results There were 27 infants in each group. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to age, weight, sex, Apgar scores, prenatal diagnosis, or mode of delivery. The total number of days on the ventilator was lower in the spring-loaded silo group, although it did not reach statistical significance (3.2 vs 5.3, P = .07). There was no significant difference between groups with respect to length of time on total parenteral nutrition, length of stay, or incidence of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis. Conclusion Routine use of a preformed silo was associated with similar outcomes to primary closure for infants with gastroschisis but with a strong trend toward fewer days on the ventilator. Use of a preformed silo has the advantage of permitting definitive abdominal wall closure in a more elective setting.</description><subject>Abdominal Wall - surgery</subject><subject>Abdominal wall defects</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Dimethylpolysiloxanes</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Enterocolitis, Necrotizing - epidemiology</subject><subject>Enterocolitis, Necrotizing - etiology</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Gastroschisis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gastroschisis - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Intestinal Atresia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Intestinal Atresia - surgery</subject><subject>Intraabdominal pressure</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Parenteral Nutrition, Total - utilization</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Protective Devices</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - utilization</subject><subject>Sepsis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Sepsis - etiology</subject><subject>Spring-loaded silo</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-3468</issn><issn>1531-5037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2O0zAURiMEYsrAK4y8YpdwHSdOzAIxqvipVAmJDmvLsW86Dq5d7GTQ8PS4ahESGza2F-e71nduUdxQqChQ_maqpiOatMR9VQP0FTQVAHtSrGjLaNkC654WK4C6LlnD-6viRUoTZKID-ry4or2oeU3rVfHwNSyz9UiWhCSMRJHdZnu7u9usSTpG6_elC8qgIcm6QMYQifWj8nMiP-18T_YqzTEkfW-TTW9z-rC42Wr0M0YSlTfhYH_ltA4-c87l5xytci-LZ6NyCV9d7uvi28cPd-vP5fbLp836dlvqpqZziYgD04L3omFCdM3AoOUDr7vBgAE-wjiiMqJvO8VU7qTYqIQRArBVgreaXRevz3OPMfxYMM3yYJNG55THsCTJBe_qfGSQn0Gd66SIo8ztDyo-SgryZFxO8o9xeTIuoZHZZw7eXH5YhgOav7GL4gy8PwOYez5YjDJpi16jsRH1LE2w___j3T8jtLPeauW-4yOmKSzRZ4uSylRLkLvT3k9rhz6neSfYb8dWrFw</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Pastor, Aimee C</creator><creator>Phillips, J. Duncan</creator><creator>Fenton, Stephen J</creator><creator>Meyers, Rebecka L</creator><creator>Lamm, Amy W</creator><creator>Raval, Mehul V</creator><creator>Lehman, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Karp, Tracy B</creator><creator>Wales, Paul W</creator><creator>Langer, Jacob C</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Routine use of a SILASTIC spring-loaded silo for infants with gastroschisis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial</title><author>Pastor, Aimee C ; Phillips, J. Duncan ; Fenton, Stephen J ; Meyers, Rebecka L ; Lamm, Amy W ; Raval, Mehul V ; Lehman, Elizabeth ; Karp, Tracy B ; Wales, Paul W ; Langer, Jacob C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-eeeb3c9689439974b3056b627bd0d06f0ffead9857a3a892a3fa9d990e5a965c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Wall - surgery</topic><topic>Abdominal wall defects</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Dimethylpolysiloxanes</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Enterocolitis, Necrotizing - epidemiology</topic><topic>Enterocolitis, Necrotizing - etiology</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Gastroschisis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gastroschisis - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Intestinal Atresia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Intestinal Atresia - surgery</topic><topic>Intraabdominal pressure</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Parenteral Nutrition, Total - utilization</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Protective Devices</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - utilization</topic><topic>Sepsis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Sepsis - etiology</topic><topic>Spring-loaded silo</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pastor, Aimee C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, J. Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenton, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyers, Rebecka L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamm, Amy W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raval, Mehul V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehman, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karp, Tracy B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wales, Paul W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langer, Jacob C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pastor, Aimee C</au><au>Phillips, J. Duncan</au><au>Fenton, Stephen J</au><au>Meyers, Rebecka L</au><au>Lamm, Amy W</au><au>Raval, Mehul V</au><au>Lehman, Elizabeth</au><au>Karp, Tracy B</au><au>Wales, Paul W</au><au>Langer, Jacob C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Routine use of a SILASTIC spring-loaded silo for infants with gastroschisis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr Surg</addtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1807</spage><epage>1812</epage><pages>1807-1812</pages><issn>0022-3468</issn><eissn>1531-5037</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Retrospective studies have suggested that routine use of a preformed silo for infants with gastroschisis may be associated with improved outcomes. We performed a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial to test this hypothesis. Methods Eligible infants were randomized to (1) routine bedside placement of a preformed Silastic spring-loaded silo, with gradual reduction and elective abdominal wall closure, or (2) primary closure. Results There were 27 infants in each group. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to age, weight, sex, Apgar scores, prenatal diagnosis, or mode of delivery. The total number of days on the ventilator was lower in the spring-loaded silo group, although it did not reach statistical significance (3.2 vs 5.3, P = .07). There was no significant difference between groups with respect to length of time on total parenteral nutrition, length of stay, or incidence of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis. Conclusion Routine use of a preformed silo was associated with similar outcomes to primary closure for infants with gastroschisis but with a strong trend toward fewer days on the ventilator. Use of a preformed silo has the advantage of permitting definitive abdominal wall closure in a more elective setting.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18926212</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.04.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3468
ispartof Journal of pediatric surgery, 2008-10, Vol.43 (10), p.1807-1812
issn 0022-3468
1531-5037
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69672696
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Abdominal Wall - surgery
Abdominal wall defects
Adolescent
Adult
Dimethylpolysiloxanes
Elective Surgical Procedures
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing - epidemiology
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing - etiology
Equipment Design
Gastroschisis - epidemiology
Gastroschisis - surgery
Humans
Incidence
Intestinal Atresia - epidemiology
Intestinal Atresia - surgery
Intraabdominal pressure
Length of Stay
Parenteral Nutrition, Total - utilization
Pediatrics
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Prospective Studies
Protective Devices
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods
Respiration, Artificial - utilization
Sepsis - epidemiology
Sepsis - etiology
Spring-loaded silo
Surgery
Surgical Flaps - statistics & numerical data
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Routine use of a SILASTIC spring-loaded silo for infants with gastroschisis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T13%3A54%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Routine%20use%20of%20a%20SILASTIC%20spring-loaded%20silo%20for%20infants%20with%20gastroschisis:%20a%20multicenter%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20surgery&rft.au=Pastor,%20Aimee%20C&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1807&rft.epage=1812&rft.pages=1807-1812&rft.issn=0022-3468&rft.eissn=1531-5037&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.04.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69672696%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69672696&rft_id=info:pmid/18926212&rft_els_id=S0022346808003679&rfr_iscdi=true