Prevention of Adhesions to Polypropylene Mesh in a Rabbit Model
The purpose of this study was to develop a quantitative model for evaluating adhesion formation and to determine whether Seprafilm (HAL-F) bioresorbable membrane (Genzyme Corp., Cambridge, MA) is effective in preventing adhesions to polypropylene mesh (PPM). PPM has been shown to be an effective mat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American surgeon 1999-04, Vol.65 (4), p.383-387 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 387 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 383 |
container_title | The American surgeon |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Dinsmore, Robert C. Calton, William C. |
description | The purpose of this study was to develop a quantitative model for evaluating adhesion formation and to determine whether Seprafilm (HAL-F) bioresorbable membrane (Genzyme Corp., Cambridge, MA) is effective in preventing adhesions to polypropylene mesh (PPM). PPM has been shown to be an effective material for the repair of abdominal wall defects. One disadvantage of PPM is its tendency to form dense adhesions when in contact with abdominal viscera. HAL-F, a sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose absorbable membrane, has been shown to prevent adhesion formation after midline closures. Its efficacy in preventing adhesions to PPM has not been examined previously. A 5 x 7-cm anterior abdominal wall defect was created in 24 New Zealand White rabbits. This defect was then repaired with PPM. In the experimental group, a 5 x 7-cm piece of HAL-F was placed between the mesh and the abdominal viscera. At 30 days, the animals were killed and adhesions were categorized and quantified using digital image analysis of inked specimens. The strength of mesh incorporation into surrounding tissues was also examined using an Instron tensiometer. The formation of adhesions between the viscera and mesh repair was significantly reduced by the use of HAL-F. The surface area involved for bowel adhesions was reduced 94 per cent (P = 0.00132). The strength of incorporation was not adversely affected. HAL-F is highly effective in preventing adhesions to PPM, without adversely effecting the strength of mesh incorporation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/000313489906500421 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69668937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_000313489906500421</sage_id><sourcerecordid>40396471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1c1f0a28d2f533b5aff1cc85b1497b459813681724651d2c478dc28bb5efb4f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90F1LwzAUBuAgis7pH_BCgoh3dTlJ0yZXIuIXOByi1yVJE610zUw6Yf_elA0UBa-SwHNOXl6EjoCcA5TlhBDCgOVCSlJwQnIKW2gEnPNMCsq20WgA2SD20H6M7-mZFxx20R4QkIQVcoQuZsF-2q5vfIe9w5f1m43pHnHv8cy3q0Xwi1VrO4unNr7hpsMKPymtmx5PfW3bA7TjVBvt4eYco5eb6-eru-zh8fb-6vIhM0zyPgMDjigqauo4Y5or58AYwTXkstQ5lwJYIaCkQ8CamrwUtaFCa26dzp1kY3S23psCfSxt7Kt5E41tW9VZv4xVIYtCSFYmePILvvtl6FK2igIVkCqjCdE1MsHHGKyrFqGZq7CqgFRDt9XfbtPQ8WbzUs9t_WNkXWYCpxugolGtC6ozTfx2JUtuSDhZs6he7Xe6f37-AveIi4U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212810312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevention of Adhesions to Polypropylene Mesh in a Rabbit Model</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Dinsmore, Robert C. ; Calton, William C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dinsmore, Robert C. ; Calton, William C.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to develop a quantitative model for evaluating adhesion formation and to determine whether Seprafilm (HAL-F) bioresorbable membrane (Genzyme Corp., Cambridge, MA) is effective in preventing adhesions to polypropylene mesh (PPM). PPM has been shown to be an effective material for the repair of abdominal wall defects. One disadvantage of PPM is its tendency to form dense adhesions when in contact with abdominal viscera. HAL-F, a sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose absorbable membrane, has been shown to prevent adhesion formation after midline closures. Its efficacy in preventing adhesions to PPM has not been examined previously. A 5 x 7-cm anterior abdominal wall defect was created in 24 New Zealand White rabbits. This defect was then repaired with PPM. In the experimental group, a 5 x 7-cm piece of HAL-F was placed between the mesh and the abdominal viscera. At 30 days, the animals were killed and adhesions were categorized and quantified using digital image analysis of inked specimens. The strength of mesh incorporation into surrounding tissues was also examined using an Instron tensiometer. The formation of adhesions between the viscera and mesh repair was significantly reduced by the use of HAL-F. The surface area involved for bowel adhesions was reduced 94 per cent (P = 0.00132). The strength of incorporation was not adversely affected. HAL-F is highly effective in preventing adhesions to PPM, without adversely effecting the strength of mesh incorporation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000313489906500421</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10190369</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMSUAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Abdominal Muscles - surgery ; Animals ; Biocompatible Materials ; Biological and medical sciences ; Hyaluronic Acid ; Intestines - pathology ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Membranes ; Membranes, Artificial ; Polypropylenes ; Rabbits ; Stomach ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgical Mesh - adverse effects ; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments ; Tissue Adhesions - pathology ; Tissue Adhesions - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 1999-04, Vol.65 (4), p.383-387</ispartof><rights>1999 Southeastern Surgical Congress</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright The Southeastern Surgical Congress Apr 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1c1f0a28d2f533b5aff1cc85b1497b459813681724651d2c478dc28bb5efb4f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1c1f0a28d2f533b5aff1cc85b1497b459813681724651d2c478dc28bb5efb4f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/000313489906500421$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000313489906500421$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1739037$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10190369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dinsmore, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calton, William C.</creatorcontrib><title>Prevention of Adhesions to Polypropylene Mesh in a Rabbit Model</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to develop a quantitative model for evaluating adhesion formation and to determine whether Seprafilm (HAL-F) bioresorbable membrane (Genzyme Corp., Cambridge, MA) is effective in preventing adhesions to polypropylene mesh (PPM). PPM has been shown to be an effective material for the repair of abdominal wall defects. One disadvantage of PPM is its tendency to form dense adhesions when in contact with abdominal viscera. HAL-F, a sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose absorbable membrane, has been shown to prevent adhesion formation after midline closures. Its efficacy in preventing adhesions to PPM has not been examined previously. A 5 x 7-cm anterior abdominal wall defect was created in 24 New Zealand White rabbits. This defect was then repaired with PPM. In the experimental group, a 5 x 7-cm piece of HAL-F was placed between the mesh and the abdominal viscera. At 30 days, the animals were killed and adhesions were categorized and quantified using digital image analysis of inked specimens. The strength of mesh incorporation into surrounding tissues was also examined using an Instron tensiometer. The formation of adhesions between the viscera and mesh repair was significantly reduced by the use of HAL-F. The surface area involved for bowel adhesions was reduced 94 per cent (P = 0.00132). The strength of incorporation was not adversely affected. HAL-F is highly effective in preventing adhesions to PPM, without adversely effecting the strength of mesh incorporation.</description><subject>Abdominal Muscles - surgery</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Hyaluronic Acid</subject><subject>Intestines - pathology</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Membranes, Artificial</subject><subject>Polypropylenes</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh - adverse effects</subject><subject>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesions - pathology</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesions - prevention & control</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90F1LwzAUBuAgis7pH_BCgoh3dTlJ0yZXIuIXOByi1yVJE610zUw6Yf_elA0UBa-SwHNOXl6EjoCcA5TlhBDCgOVCSlJwQnIKW2gEnPNMCsq20WgA2SD20H6M7-mZFxx20R4QkIQVcoQuZsF-2q5vfIe9w5f1m43pHnHv8cy3q0Xwi1VrO4unNr7hpsMKPymtmx5PfW3bA7TjVBvt4eYco5eb6-eru-zh8fb-6vIhM0zyPgMDjigqauo4Y5or58AYwTXkstQ5lwJYIaCkQ8CamrwUtaFCa26dzp1kY3S23psCfSxt7Kt5E41tW9VZv4xVIYtCSFYmePILvvtl6FK2igIVkCqjCdE1MsHHGKyrFqGZq7CqgFRDt9XfbtPQ8WbzUs9t_WNkXWYCpxugolGtC6ozTfx2JUtuSDhZs6he7Xe6f37-AveIi4U</recordid><startdate>19990401</startdate><enddate>19990401</enddate><creator>Dinsmore, Robert C.</creator><creator>Calton, William C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Southeastern Surgical Congress</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990401</creationdate><title>Prevention of Adhesions to Polypropylene Mesh in a Rabbit Model</title><author>Dinsmore, Robert C. ; Calton, William C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1c1f0a28d2f533b5aff1cc85b1497b459813681724651d2c478dc28bb5efb4f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Muscles - surgery</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Hyaluronic Acid</topic><topic>Intestines - pathology</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Membranes, Artificial</topic><topic>Polypropylenes</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh - adverse effects</topic><topic>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesions - pathology</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesions - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dinsmore, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calton, William C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dinsmore, Robert C.</au><au>Calton, William C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevention of Adhesions to Polypropylene Mesh in a Rabbit Model</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>1999-04-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>387</epage><pages>383-387</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><coden>AMSUAW</coden><abstract>The purpose of this study was to develop a quantitative model for evaluating adhesion formation and to determine whether Seprafilm (HAL-F) bioresorbable membrane (Genzyme Corp., Cambridge, MA) is effective in preventing adhesions to polypropylene mesh (PPM). PPM has been shown to be an effective material for the repair of abdominal wall defects. One disadvantage of PPM is its tendency to form dense adhesions when in contact with abdominal viscera. HAL-F, a sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose absorbable membrane, has been shown to prevent adhesion formation after midline closures. Its efficacy in preventing adhesions to PPM has not been examined previously. A 5 x 7-cm anterior abdominal wall defect was created in 24 New Zealand White rabbits. This defect was then repaired with PPM. In the experimental group, a 5 x 7-cm piece of HAL-F was placed between the mesh and the abdominal viscera. At 30 days, the animals were killed and adhesions were categorized and quantified using digital image analysis of inked specimens. The strength of mesh incorporation into surrounding tissues was also examined using an Instron tensiometer. The formation of adhesions between the viscera and mesh repair was significantly reduced by the use of HAL-F. The surface area involved for bowel adhesions was reduced 94 per cent (P = 0.00132). The strength of incorporation was not adversely affected. HAL-F is highly effective in preventing adhesions to PPM, without adversely effecting the strength of mesh incorporation.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>10190369</pmid><doi>10.1177/000313489906500421</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-1348 |
ispartof | The American surgeon, 1999-04, Vol.65 (4), p.383-387 |
issn | 0003-1348 1555-9823 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69668937 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE |
subjects | Abdominal Muscles - surgery Animals Biocompatible Materials Biological and medical sciences Hyaluronic Acid Intestines - pathology Medical research Medical sciences Membranes Membranes, Artificial Polypropylenes Rabbits Stomach Surgery Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgical Mesh - adverse effects Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments Tissue Adhesions - pathology Tissue Adhesions - prevention & control |
title | Prevention of Adhesions to Polypropylene Mesh in a Rabbit Model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T12%3A51%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevention%20of%20Adhesions%20to%20Polypropylene%20Mesh%20in%20a%20Rabbit%20Model&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Dinsmore,%20Robert%20C.&rft.date=1999-04-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=387&rft.pages=383-387&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft.coden=AMSUAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000313489906500421&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E40396471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212810312&rft_id=info:pmid/10190369&rft_sage_id=10.1177_000313489906500421&rfr_iscdi=true |