The Consent and Prescription Compliance (COPRECO) Study: Does Obtaining Consent in the Emergency Department Affect Study Results in a Telephone Follow‐up Study of Medication Compliance?
Objectives: The objectives were to determine whether mandated research requirements for consent in the emergency department (ED) falsely distorts the results of a survey of patient‐reported compliance with ED prescriptions and, in addition, to ascertain the level of patient compliance to medication...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Academic emergency medicine 2008-10, Vol.15 (10), p.932-938 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 938 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 932 |
container_title | Academic emergency medicine |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Campbell, Samuel G. McCarvill, Erin M. Magee, Kirk D. Cajee, Ismail Crawford, Megan |
description | Objectives: The objectives were to determine whether mandated research requirements for consent in the emergency department (ED) falsely distorts the results of a survey of patient‐reported compliance with ED prescriptions and, in addition, to ascertain the level of patient compliance to medication instructions and find out the degree of displeasure expressed by patients called without prior consent.
Methods: Patients given new prescriptions for a medicine to be taken regularly over a period of less than 30 days were eligible. A convenience sample of eligible patients was randomized to having consent obtained during their ED visit or at the time of telephone follow‐up. Patients were called 7–10 days after their ED visit to determine their compliance with the prescription. Compliance rates between the two groups were compared, as was the prevalence of displeasure expressed by patients called without prior consent.
Results: Of 430 enrolled patients, 221 were randomized to receive ED consent for telephone follow‐up, and 209 received telephone follow‐up without prior ED consent. Telephone follow‐up was successful in 318 patients (74%). The rate of noncompliance was slightly higher in the group without ED consent, 74/149 (50%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 41% to 58%) than the group who gave ED consent for telephone follow‐up, 67/169 (40%; 95% CI = 32% to 42%; p = 0.07). Among the two groups, 141/318 (44%) did not fill the prescription (n = 42) or took it incorrectly (n = 99). Only 1 (0.7%) of the 149 patients with successful telephone follow‐up without prior ED consent expressed displeasure at this telephone call.
Conclusions: Medicine noncompliance is a significant issue for patients discharged from the ED in this study. Although there was a trend toward greater compliance in patients who consented to the follow‐up call, this did not reach statistical significance. ED patients do not object to receiving telephone follow‐up for a research survey without giving prior consent. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00234.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69657529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69657529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4444-c7b01ab5c5344dd62b44562a6e906c2150e062dd9c20cb82dd8edba8a9ff5b833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFq3DAURU1paNK0v1BEFyVd2JVkS7YLJQzOpC0kTEinayHLz4kGW3Ilm2R2_YT-T_-mX1I5M6SQVd_mPbjnXh7cKEIEJyTMh01CGEtjmhOaUIyLBGOaZsn9s-joUXgebszLmDOeHkYvvd9gjFle5i-iQ1IUhPCUH0W_17eAKms8mBFJ06ArB145PYzamiD0Q6elUYBOqtXV9bJavUffxqnZfkRnFjxa1aPURpubxwxt0Bgilz24GzBqi85gkG7sZ23RtqDGXQC6Bj91o58NEq2hg-HWGkDntuvs3Z-fv6ZhD9oWXUKjlXzy0umr6KCVnYfX-30cfT9frqsv8cXq89dqcRGrLEys8hoTWTPF0ixrGk7rLGOcSg4l5ooShgFz2jSloljVRbgKaGpZyLJtWV2k6XH0bpc7OPtjAj-KXnsFXScN2MkLXnKWM1oG8O0TcGMnZ8JvglJcZCVOswAVO0g5672DVgxO99JtBcFibldsxFyimEsUc7vioV1xH6xv9vlT3UPzz7ivMwCfdsCd7mD738FiUS0vw5X-BdCNtdM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220849034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Consent and Prescription Compliance (COPRECO) Study: Does Obtaining Consent in the Emergency Department Affect Study Results in a Telephone Follow‐up Study of Medication Compliance?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Campbell, Samuel G. ; McCarvill, Erin M. ; Magee, Kirk D. ; Cajee, Ismail ; Crawford, Megan</creator><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Samuel G. ; McCarvill, Erin M. ; Magee, Kirk D. ; Cajee, Ismail ; Crawford, Megan</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: The objectives were to determine whether mandated research requirements for consent in the emergency department (ED) falsely distorts the results of a survey of patient‐reported compliance with ED prescriptions and, in addition, to ascertain the level of patient compliance to medication instructions and find out the degree of displeasure expressed by patients called without prior consent.
Methods: Patients given new prescriptions for a medicine to be taken regularly over a period of less than 30 days were eligible. A convenience sample of eligible patients was randomized to having consent obtained during their ED visit or at the time of telephone follow‐up. Patients were called 7–10 days after their ED visit to determine their compliance with the prescription. Compliance rates between the two groups were compared, as was the prevalence of displeasure expressed by patients called without prior consent.
Results: Of 430 enrolled patients, 221 were randomized to receive ED consent for telephone follow‐up, and 209 received telephone follow‐up without prior ED consent. Telephone follow‐up was successful in 318 patients (74%). The rate of noncompliance was slightly higher in the group without ED consent, 74/149 (50%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 41% to 58%) than the group who gave ED consent for telephone follow‐up, 67/169 (40%; 95% CI = 32% to 42%; p = 0.07). Among the two groups, 141/318 (44%) did not fill the prescription (n = 42) or took it incorrectly (n = 99). Only 1 (0.7%) of the 149 patients with successful telephone follow‐up without prior ED consent expressed displeasure at this telephone call.
Conclusions: Medicine noncompliance is a significant issue for patients discharged from the ED in this study. Although there was a trend toward greater compliance in patients who consented to the follow‐up call, this did not reach statistical significance. ED patients do not object to receiving telephone follow‐up for a research survey without giving prior consent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-6563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-2712</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00234.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18811636</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Confidence Intervals ; Discharge ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Informed Consent ; Male ; Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data ; medication compliance ; noncompliance ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Telephone ; telephone study</subject><ispartof>Academic emergency medicine, 2008-10, Vol.15 (10), p.932-938</ispartof><rights>2008 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright Hanley & Belfus, Inc. Oct 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4444-c7b01ab5c5344dd62b44562a6e906c2150e062dd9c20cb82dd8edba8a9ff5b833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4444-c7b01ab5c5344dd62b44562a6e906c2150e062dd9c20cb82dd8edba8a9ff5b833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1553-2712.2008.00234.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1553-2712.2008.00234.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18811636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Samuel G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarvill, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magee, Kirk D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cajee, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Megan</creatorcontrib><title>The Consent and Prescription Compliance (COPRECO) Study: Does Obtaining Consent in the Emergency Department Affect Study Results in a Telephone Follow‐up Study of Medication Compliance?</title><title>Academic emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Acad Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Objectives: The objectives were to determine whether mandated research requirements for consent in the emergency department (ED) falsely distorts the results of a survey of patient‐reported compliance with ED prescriptions and, in addition, to ascertain the level of patient compliance to medication instructions and find out the degree of displeasure expressed by patients called without prior consent.
Methods: Patients given new prescriptions for a medicine to be taken regularly over a period of less than 30 days were eligible. A convenience sample of eligible patients was randomized to having consent obtained during their ED visit or at the time of telephone follow‐up. Patients were called 7–10 days after their ED visit to determine their compliance with the prescription. Compliance rates between the two groups were compared, as was the prevalence of displeasure expressed by patients called without prior consent.
Results: Of 430 enrolled patients, 221 were randomized to receive ED consent for telephone follow‐up, and 209 received telephone follow‐up without prior ED consent. Telephone follow‐up was successful in 318 patients (74%). The rate of noncompliance was slightly higher in the group without ED consent, 74/149 (50%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 41% to 58%) than the group who gave ED consent for telephone follow‐up, 67/169 (40%; 95% CI = 32% to 42%; p = 0.07). Among the two groups, 141/318 (44%) did not fill the prescription (n = 42) or took it incorrectly (n = 99). Only 1 (0.7%) of the 149 patients with successful telephone follow‐up without prior ED consent expressed displeasure at this telephone call.
Conclusions: Medicine noncompliance is a significant issue for patients discharged from the ED in this study. Although there was a trend toward greater compliance in patients who consented to the follow‐up call, this did not reach statistical significance. ED patients do not object to receiving telephone follow‐up for a research survey without giving prior consent.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>medication compliance</subject><subject>noncompliance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Telephone</subject><subject>telephone study</subject><issn>1069-6563</issn><issn>1553-2712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFq3DAURU1paNK0v1BEFyVd2JVkS7YLJQzOpC0kTEinayHLz4kGW3Ilm2R2_YT-T_-mX1I5M6SQVd_mPbjnXh7cKEIEJyTMh01CGEtjmhOaUIyLBGOaZsn9s-joUXgebszLmDOeHkYvvd9gjFle5i-iQ1IUhPCUH0W_17eAKms8mBFJ06ArB145PYzamiD0Q6elUYBOqtXV9bJavUffxqnZfkRnFjxa1aPURpubxwxt0Bgilz24GzBqi85gkG7sZ23RtqDGXQC6Bj91o58NEq2hg-HWGkDntuvs3Z-fv6ZhD9oWXUKjlXzy0umr6KCVnYfX-30cfT9frqsv8cXq89dqcRGrLEys8hoTWTPF0ixrGk7rLGOcSg4l5ooShgFz2jSloljVRbgKaGpZyLJtWV2k6XH0bpc7OPtjAj-KXnsFXScN2MkLXnKWM1oG8O0TcGMnZ8JvglJcZCVOswAVO0g5672DVgxO99JtBcFibldsxFyimEsUc7vioV1xH6xv9vlT3UPzz7ivMwCfdsCd7mD738FiUS0vw5X-BdCNtdM</recordid><startdate>200810</startdate><enddate>200810</enddate><creator>Campbell, Samuel G.</creator><creator>McCarvill, Erin M.</creator><creator>Magee, Kirk D.</creator><creator>Cajee, Ismail</creator><creator>Crawford, Megan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200810</creationdate><title>The Consent and Prescription Compliance (COPRECO) Study: Does Obtaining Consent in the Emergency Department Affect Study Results in a Telephone Follow‐up Study of Medication Compliance?</title><author>Campbell, Samuel G. ; McCarvill, Erin M. ; Magee, Kirk D. ; Cajee, Ismail ; Crawford, Megan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4444-c7b01ab5c5344dd62b44562a6e906c2150e062dd9c20cb82dd8edba8a9ff5b833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>medication compliance</topic><topic>noncompliance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Telephone</topic><topic>telephone study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Samuel G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarvill, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magee, Kirk D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cajee, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Megan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Academic emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campbell, Samuel G.</au><au>McCarvill, Erin M.</au><au>Magee, Kirk D.</au><au>Cajee, Ismail</au><au>Crawford, Megan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Consent and Prescription Compliance (COPRECO) Study: Does Obtaining Consent in the Emergency Department Affect Study Results in a Telephone Follow‐up Study of Medication Compliance?</atitle><jtitle>Academic emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Acad Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2008-10</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>932</spage><epage>938</epage><pages>932-938</pages><issn>1069-6563</issn><eissn>1553-2712</eissn><abstract>Objectives: The objectives were to determine whether mandated research requirements for consent in the emergency department (ED) falsely distorts the results of a survey of patient‐reported compliance with ED prescriptions and, in addition, to ascertain the level of patient compliance to medication instructions and find out the degree of displeasure expressed by patients called without prior consent.
Methods: Patients given new prescriptions for a medicine to be taken regularly over a period of less than 30 days were eligible. A convenience sample of eligible patients was randomized to having consent obtained during their ED visit or at the time of telephone follow‐up. Patients were called 7–10 days after their ED visit to determine their compliance with the prescription. Compliance rates between the two groups were compared, as was the prevalence of displeasure expressed by patients called without prior consent.
Results: Of 430 enrolled patients, 221 were randomized to receive ED consent for telephone follow‐up, and 209 received telephone follow‐up without prior ED consent. Telephone follow‐up was successful in 318 patients (74%). The rate of noncompliance was slightly higher in the group without ED consent, 74/149 (50%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 41% to 58%) than the group who gave ED consent for telephone follow‐up, 67/169 (40%; 95% CI = 32% to 42%; p = 0.07). Among the two groups, 141/318 (44%) did not fill the prescription (n = 42) or took it incorrectly (n = 99). Only 1 (0.7%) of the 149 patients with successful telephone follow‐up without prior ED consent expressed displeasure at this telephone call.
Conclusions: Medicine noncompliance is a significant issue for patients discharged from the ED in this study. Although there was a trend toward greater compliance in patients who consented to the follow‐up call, this did not reach statistical significance. ED patients do not object to receiving telephone follow‐up for a research survey without giving prior consent.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>18811636</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00234.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1069-6563 |
ispartof | Academic emergency medicine, 2008-10, Vol.15 (10), p.932-938 |
issn | 1069-6563 1553-2712 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69657529 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Chi-Square Distribution Confidence Intervals Discharge Emergency medical care Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Informed Consent Male Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data medication compliance noncompliance Studies Surveys and Questionnaires Telephone telephone study |
title | The Consent and Prescription Compliance (COPRECO) Study: Does Obtaining Consent in the Emergency Department Affect Study Results in a Telephone Follow‐up Study of Medication Compliance? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A55%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Consent%20and%20Prescription%20Compliance%20(COPRECO)%20Study:%20Does%20Obtaining%20Consent%20in%20the%20Emergency%20Department%20Affect%20Study%20Results%20in%20a%20Telephone%20Follow%E2%80%90up%20Study%20of%20Medication%20Compliance?&rft.jtitle=Academic%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Campbell,%20Samuel%20G.&rft.date=2008-10&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=932&rft.epage=938&rft.pages=932-938&rft.issn=1069-6563&rft.eissn=1553-2712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00234.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69657529%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220849034&rft_id=info:pmid/18811636&rfr_iscdi=true |