Cochlear reimplantation
Objective: A small number of multichannel cochlear implant (CI) recipients require reimplantation. This study describes the causes of failure, surgical technique, and hearing outcomes in a consecutive series of 16 patients undergoing reimplantation of multichannel devices. We hypothesize that reimpl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Laryngoscope 1999-03, Vol.109 (3), p.351-355 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 355 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 351 |
container_title | The Laryngoscope |
container_volume | 109 |
creator | Balkany, Thomas J. Hodges, Annelle V. Gómez-Marín, Orlando Bird, Philip A. Dolan-Ash, Shelly Butts, Stacy Telischi Mee, Fred F. Lee, David |
description | Objective: A small number of multichannel cochlear implant (CI) recipients require reimplantation. This study describes the causes of failure, surgical technique, and hearing outcomes in a consecutive series of 16 patients undergoing reimplantation of multichannel devices. We hypothesize that reimplantation is safe and that hearing results are at least as good as those measured following primary implantation. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of consecutive clinical series. Methods: Chart analysis of 191 consecutive CI operations performed at the University of Miami Ear Institute between 1990 and 1997 revealed 16 patients who received a second multichannel device. All but one had a minimum follow‐up of 1 year after reimplantation. Ten of these patients had initial implantation performed by us, and six were initially operated on elsewhere. Main outcomes of the initial procedure were compared with those of the reimplantation, including electrode insertion length, number of channels programmed, and audiometric results. In addition, cause of failure and relevant surgical findings at the second procedure are described. Results: There were no surgical complications after reimplantation surgery. Device failure was the most frequent cause for reimplantation. Time between initial implantation and failure ranged from 0 to 46 months (mean, 22.4 mo; median, 23 mo). Common intraoperative findings include mastoid fibrosis, bone growth at the cochleostomy, and skin flap breakdown. Following reimplantation, mean length of insertion, number of channels actively programmed, and speech recognition scores were at least as good as findings before initial implant failure. Conclusion: CI reimplantation is safe and effective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00005537-199903000-00002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69646223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69646223</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5052-b78056aa02992087094cfd32f4c323f2ea866fae6bad304ec8a5631c5d3bc3a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFPAjEQhRujEUTP3gwH42112m7b7ZGggpFoJBj11HS73bi6sNguUf69hUX06Fwm8_LNm8lDqIvhHIMUFxCKMSoiLKUEGqZoJZEd1MaM4iiWku2idlBolDDy3EIH3r8BYEEZ7KMWBkgCwtvouF-Z19Jq13W2mM5LPat1XVSzQ7SX69Lbo03voMfrq0l_GI3uBzf93igyDBiJUpEA41oDkZJAIkDGJs8oyWNDCc2J1QnnubY81RmF2JpEM06xYRlNDdWSdtBZ4zt31cfC-lpNC29sGR6x1cIrLnnMCaEBTBrQuMp7Z3M1d8VUu6XCoFahqJ9Q1DaUtUTC6snmxiKd2uzPYpNCAE43gPZGl7nTM1P4X04QDsGxgy4b7LMo7fLf99WoN35hLMYrj_U7UWNT-Np-bW20e1dcUMHU091AjYdMsMHDrZrQb4aViRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69646223</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cochlear reimplantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Balkany, Thomas J. ; Hodges, Annelle V. ; Gómez-Marín, Orlando ; Bird, Philip A. ; Dolan-Ash, Shelly ; Butts, Stacy ; Telischi Mee, Fred F. ; Lee, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Balkany, Thomas J. ; Hodges, Annelle V. ; Gómez-Marín, Orlando ; Bird, Philip A. ; Dolan-Ash, Shelly ; Butts, Stacy ; Telischi Mee, Fred F. ; Lee, David</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: A small number of multichannel cochlear implant (CI) recipients require reimplantation. This study describes the causes of failure, surgical technique, and hearing outcomes in a consecutive series of 16 patients undergoing reimplantation of multichannel devices. We hypothesize that reimplantation is safe and that hearing results are at least as good as those measured following primary implantation. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of consecutive clinical series. Methods: Chart analysis of 191 consecutive CI operations performed at the University of Miami Ear Institute between 1990 and 1997 revealed 16 patients who received a second multichannel device. All but one had a minimum follow‐up of 1 year after reimplantation. Ten of these patients had initial implantation performed by us, and six were initially operated on elsewhere. Main outcomes of the initial procedure were compared with those of the reimplantation, including electrode insertion length, number of channels programmed, and audiometric results. In addition, cause of failure and relevant surgical findings at the second procedure are described. Results: There were no surgical complications after reimplantation surgery. Device failure was the most frequent cause for reimplantation. Time between initial implantation and failure ranged from 0 to 46 months (mean, 22.4 mo; median, 23 mo). Common intraoperative findings include mastoid fibrosis, bone growth at the cochleostomy, and skin flap breakdown. Following reimplantation, mean length of insertion, number of channels actively programmed, and speech recognition scores were at least as good as findings before initial implant failure. Conclusion: CI reimplantation is safe and effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199903000-00002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10089956</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LARYA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cochlear Implantation ; Deafness - rehabilitation ; Equipment Failure ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - rehabilitation ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the ear, the auditive nerve and the facial nerve ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 1999-03, Vol.109 (3), p.351-355</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1999 The Triological Society</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5052-b78056aa02992087094cfd32f4c323f2ea866fae6bad304ec8a5631c5d3bc3a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5052-b78056aa02992087094cfd32f4c323f2ea866fae6bad304ec8a5631c5d3bc3a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1097%2F00005537-199903000-00002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1097%2F00005537-199903000-00002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,1417,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1726090$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10089956$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balkany, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Annelle V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Marín, Orlando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bird, Philip A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolan-Ash, Shelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butts, Stacy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Telischi Mee, Fred F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, David</creatorcontrib><title>Cochlear reimplantation</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Objective: A small number of multichannel cochlear implant (CI) recipients require reimplantation. This study describes the causes of failure, surgical technique, and hearing outcomes in a consecutive series of 16 patients undergoing reimplantation of multichannel devices. We hypothesize that reimplantation is safe and that hearing results are at least as good as those measured following primary implantation. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of consecutive clinical series. Methods: Chart analysis of 191 consecutive CI operations performed at the University of Miami Ear Institute between 1990 and 1997 revealed 16 patients who received a second multichannel device. All but one had a minimum follow‐up of 1 year after reimplantation. Ten of these patients had initial implantation performed by us, and six were initially operated on elsewhere. Main outcomes of the initial procedure were compared with those of the reimplantation, including electrode insertion length, number of channels programmed, and audiometric results. In addition, cause of failure and relevant surgical findings at the second procedure are described. Results: There were no surgical complications after reimplantation surgery. Device failure was the most frequent cause for reimplantation. Time between initial implantation and failure ranged from 0 to 46 months (mean, 22.4 mo; median, 23 mo). Common intraoperative findings include mastoid fibrosis, bone growth at the cochleostomy, and skin flap breakdown. Following reimplantation, mean length of insertion, number of channels actively programmed, and speech recognition scores were at least as good as findings before initial implant failure. Conclusion: CI reimplantation is safe and effective.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation</subject><subject>Deafness - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the ear, the auditive nerve and the facial nerve</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFPAjEQhRujEUTP3gwH42112m7b7ZGggpFoJBj11HS73bi6sNguUf69hUX06Fwm8_LNm8lDqIvhHIMUFxCKMSoiLKUEGqZoJZEd1MaM4iiWku2idlBolDDy3EIH3r8BYEEZ7KMWBkgCwtvouF-Z19Jq13W2mM5LPat1XVSzQ7SX69Lbo03voMfrq0l_GI3uBzf93igyDBiJUpEA41oDkZJAIkDGJs8oyWNDCc2J1QnnubY81RmF2JpEM06xYRlNDdWSdtBZ4zt31cfC-lpNC29sGR6x1cIrLnnMCaEBTBrQuMp7Z3M1d8VUu6XCoFahqJ9Q1DaUtUTC6snmxiKd2uzPYpNCAE43gPZGl7nTM1P4X04QDsGxgy4b7LMo7fLf99WoN35hLMYrj_U7UWNT-Np-bW20e1dcUMHU091AjYdMsMHDrZrQb4aViRg</recordid><startdate>199903</startdate><enddate>199903</enddate><creator>Balkany, Thomas J.</creator><creator>Hodges, Annelle V.</creator><creator>Gómez-Marín, Orlando</creator><creator>Bird, Philip A.</creator><creator>Dolan-Ash, Shelly</creator><creator>Butts, Stacy</creator><creator>Telischi Mee, Fred F.</creator><creator>Lee, David</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199903</creationdate><title>Cochlear reimplantation</title><author>Balkany, Thomas J. ; Hodges, Annelle V. ; Gómez-Marín, Orlando ; Bird, Philip A. ; Dolan-Ash, Shelly ; Butts, Stacy ; Telischi Mee, Fred F. ; Lee, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5052-b78056aa02992087094cfd32f4c323f2ea866fae6bad304ec8a5631c5d3bc3a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation</topic><topic>Deafness - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the ear, the auditive nerve and the facial nerve</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balkany, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Annelle V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Marín, Orlando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bird, Philip A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolan-Ash, Shelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butts, Stacy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Telischi Mee, Fred F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balkany, Thomas J.</au><au>Hodges, Annelle V.</au><au>Gómez-Marín, Orlando</au><au>Bird, Philip A.</au><au>Dolan-Ash, Shelly</au><au>Butts, Stacy</au><au>Telischi Mee, Fred F.</au><au>Lee, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cochlear reimplantation</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>1999-03</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>355</epage><pages>351-355</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><coden>LARYA8</coden><abstract>Objective: A small number of multichannel cochlear implant (CI) recipients require reimplantation. This study describes the causes of failure, surgical technique, and hearing outcomes in a consecutive series of 16 patients undergoing reimplantation of multichannel devices. We hypothesize that reimplantation is safe and that hearing results are at least as good as those measured following primary implantation. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of consecutive clinical series. Methods: Chart analysis of 191 consecutive CI operations performed at the University of Miami Ear Institute between 1990 and 1997 revealed 16 patients who received a second multichannel device. All but one had a minimum follow‐up of 1 year after reimplantation. Ten of these patients had initial implantation performed by us, and six were initially operated on elsewhere. Main outcomes of the initial procedure were compared with those of the reimplantation, including electrode insertion length, number of channels programmed, and audiometric results. In addition, cause of failure and relevant surgical findings at the second procedure are described. Results: There were no surgical complications after reimplantation surgery. Device failure was the most frequent cause for reimplantation. Time between initial implantation and failure ranged from 0 to 46 months (mean, 22.4 mo; median, 23 mo). Common intraoperative findings include mastoid fibrosis, bone growth at the cochleostomy, and skin flap breakdown. Following reimplantation, mean length of insertion, number of channels actively programmed, and speech recognition scores were at least as good as findings before initial implant failure. Conclusion: CI reimplantation is safe and effective.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>10089956</pmid><doi>10.1097/00005537-199903000-00002</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-852X |
ispartof | The Laryngoscope, 1999-03, Vol.109 (3), p.351-355 |
issn | 0023-852X 1531-4995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69646223 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Child Child, Preschool Cochlear Implantation Deafness - rehabilitation Equipment Failure Female Follow-Up Studies Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Postoperative Complications - rehabilitation Reoperation Retrospective Studies Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the ear, the auditive nerve and the facial nerve Treatment Outcome |
title | Cochlear reimplantation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A06%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cochlear%20reimplantation&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Balkany,%20Thomas%20J.&rft.date=1999-03&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=355&rft.pages=351-355&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft.coden=LARYA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00005537-199903000-00002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69646223%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69646223&rft_id=info:pmid/10089956&rfr_iscdi=true |