Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting
Summary Background Dermoscopy is a noninvasive technique that enables the clinician to perform direct microscopic examination of diagnostic features, not seen by the naked eye, in pigmented skin lesions. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy has previously been assessed in meta‐analyses including studi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of dermatology (1951) 2008-09, Vol.159 (3), p.669-676 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 676 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 669 |
container_title | British journal of dermatology (1951) |
container_volume | 159 |
creator | Vestergaard, M.E. Macaskill, P. Holt, P.E. Menzies, S.W. |
description | Summary
Background Dermoscopy is a noninvasive technique that enables the clinician to perform direct microscopic examination of diagnostic features, not seen by the naked eye, in pigmented skin lesions. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy has previously been assessed in meta‐analyses including studies performed in experimental and clinical settings.
Objectives To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of melanoma compared with naked eye examination by performing a meta‐analysis exclusively on studies performed in a clinical setting.
Methods We searched for publications from 1987 to January 2008 and found nine eligible studies. The selected studies compare diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy with naked eye examination using a valid reference test on consecutive patients with a defined clinical presentation, performed in a clinical setting. Hierarchical summary receiver operator curve analysis was used to estimate the relative diagnostic accuracy for clinical examination with, and without, the use of dermoscopy.
Results We found the relative diagnostic odds ratio for melanoma, for dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination, to be 15·6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2·9–83·7, P = 0·016]; removal of two outlier studies changed this to 9·0 (95% CI 1·5–54·6, P = 0·03).
Conclusions Dermoscopy is more accurate than naked eye examination for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma in suspicious skin lesions when performed in the clinical setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08713.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69645937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69645937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4353-9da89aaad3085207c8ccd6acf134ad2b009acdce8fc5cce0b68284b8431a83cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhFZA3sEtqx4ljI7GgLZ2CKljw06V1x3FaTxM72Bl18hY8Mg4TDVu88ZX8nXt9zkUIU5LTdM62OWW8ygrKWF4QInIiasry_RO0Oj48RStCSJ0RydkJehHjlhDKSEWeoxMqOOU1lyv0-9KE3kfthwlr3w8QTIMf7XiPHTyk0kwGmz301sFovcOtD3i8N7ixcOd8tBH7Fg_B9hAm3JsOnO_hHYZUj5CBg25aoDjuGmsiHkxITfrU27rE6c46q6HD0YyjdXcv0bMWumheLfcp-nH18fvFdXbzdf3p4sNNpktWsUw2ICQANIyIqiC1Flo3HHRLWQlNsSFEgm60Ea2utDZkw0Uhyo0oGQXB9IadoreHvkPwv3Ymjqq3UZsuOTB-FxWXvKwkqxMoDqAOPsZgWrXYVZSoeRtqq-bQ1Ry6mreh_m5D7ZP09TJjt0mG_wmX-BPwZgEgpgzaAE7beOQKUsmirlji3h-4R9uZ6b8_oM4_X85V0mcHvY2j2R_1EB4Ur1ldqdsvayVu66uf629SSfYHYdW4Tw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69645937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Vestergaard, M.E. ; Macaskill, P. ; Holt, P.E. ; Menzies, S.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vestergaard, M.E. ; Macaskill, P. ; Holt, P.E. ; Menzies, S.W.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Background Dermoscopy is a noninvasive technique that enables the clinician to perform direct microscopic examination of diagnostic features, not seen by the naked eye, in pigmented skin lesions. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy has previously been assessed in meta‐analyses including studies performed in experimental and clinical settings.
Objectives To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of melanoma compared with naked eye examination by performing a meta‐analysis exclusively on studies performed in a clinical setting.
Methods We searched for publications from 1987 to January 2008 and found nine eligible studies. The selected studies compare diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy with naked eye examination using a valid reference test on consecutive patients with a defined clinical presentation, performed in a clinical setting. Hierarchical summary receiver operator curve analysis was used to estimate the relative diagnostic accuracy for clinical examination with, and without, the use of dermoscopy.
Results We found the relative diagnostic odds ratio for melanoma, for dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination, to be 15·6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2·9–83·7, P = 0·016]; removal of two outlier studies changed this to 9·0 (95% CI 1·5–54·6, P = 0·03).
Conclusions Dermoscopy is more accurate than naked eye examination for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma in suspicious skin lesions when performed in the clinical setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08713.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18616769</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJDEAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Dermatology ; dermatoscopy ; dermoscopy ; Dermoscopy - methods ; Dermoscopy - standards ; diagnosis ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; melanoma ; Melanoma - diagnosis ; meta-analysis ; Nevus, Pigmented - diagnosis ; Physical Examination ; Pigmentary diseases of the skin ; pigmented skin lesions ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><ispartof>British journal of dermatology (1951), 2008-09, Vol.159 (3), p.669-676</ispartof><rights>2008 Australian Cancer Network. Journal Compilation © 2008 British Association of Dermatologists</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4353-9da89aaad3085207c8ccd6acf134ad2b009acdce8fc5cce0b68284b8431a83cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4353-9da89aaad3085207c8ccd6acf134ad2b009acdce8fc5cce0b68284b8431a83cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2133.2008.08713.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2133.2008.08713.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20592753$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18616769$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vestergaard, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macaskill, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holt, P.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menzies, S.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting</title><title>British journal of dermatology (1951)</title><addtitle>Br J Dermatol</addtitle><description>Summary
Background Dermoscopy is a noninvasive technique that enables the clinician to perform direct microscopic examination of diagnostic features, not seen by the naked eye, in pigmented skin lesions. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy has previously been assessed in meta‐analyses including studies performed in experimental and clinical settings.
Objectives To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of melanoma compared with naked eye examination by performing a meta‐analysis exclusively on studies performed in a clinical setting.
Methods We searched for publications from 1987 to January 2008 and found nine eligible studies. The selected studies compare diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy with naked eye examination using a valid reference test on consecutive patients with a defined clinical presentation, performed in a clinical setting. Hierarchical summary receiver operator curve analysis was used to estimate the relative diagnostic accuracy for clinical examination with, and without, the use of dermoscopy.
Results We found the relative diagnostic odds ratio for melanoma, for dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination, to be 15·6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2·9–83·7, P = 0·016]; removal of two outlier studies changed this to 9·0 (95% CI 1·5–54·6, P = 0·03).
Conclusions Dermoscopy is more accurate than naked eye examination for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma in suspicious skin lesions when performed in the clinical setting.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>dermatoscopy</subject><subject>dermoscopy</subject><subject>Dermoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Dermoscopy - standards</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>melanoma</subject><subject>Melanoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>meta-analysis</subject><subject>Nevus, Pigmented - diagnosis</subject><subject>Physical Examination</subject><subject>Pigmentary diseases of the skin</subject><subject>pigmented skin lesions</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><issn>0007-0963</issn><issn>1365-2133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhFZA3sEtqx4ljI7GgLZ2CKljw06V1x3FaTxM72Bl18hY8Mg4TDVu88ZX8nXt9zkUIU5LTdM62OWW8ygrKWF4QInIiasry_RO0Oj48RStCSJ0RydkJehHjlhDKSEWeoxMqOOU1lyv0-9KE3kfthwlr3w8QTIMf7XiPHTyk0kwGmz301sFovcOtD3i8N7ixcOd8tBH7Fg_B9hAm3JsOnO_hHYZUj5CBg25aoDjuGmsiHkxITfrU27rE6c46q6HD0YyjdXcv0bMWumheLfcp-nH18fvFdXbzdf3p4sNNpktWsUw2ICQANIyIqiC1Flo3HHRLWQlNsSFEgm60Ea2utDZkw0Uhyo0oGQXB9IadoreHvkPwv3Ymjqq3UZsuOTB-FxWXvKwkqxMoDqAOPsZgWrXYVZSoeRtqq-bQ1Ry6mreh_m5D7ZP09TJjt0mG_wmX-BPwZgEgpgzaAE7beOQKUsmirlji3h-4R9uZ6b8_oM4_X85V0mcHvY2j2R_1EB4Ur1ldqdsvayVu66uf629SSfYHYdW4Tw</recordid><startdate>200809</startdate><enddate>200809</enddate><creator>Vestergaard, M.E.</creator><creator>Macaskill, P.</creator><creator>Holt, P.E.</creator><creator>Menzies, S.W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200809</creationdate><title>Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting</title><author>Vestergaard, M.E. ; Macaskill, P. ; Holt, P.E. ; Menzies, S.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4353-9da89aaad3085207c8ccd6acf134ad2b009acdce8fc5cce0b68284b8431a83cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>dermatoscopy</topic><topic>dermoscopy</topic><topic>Dermoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Dermoscopy - standards</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>melanoma</topic><topic>Melanoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>meta-analysis</topic><topic>Nevus, Pigmented - diagnosis</topic><topic>Physical Examination</topic><topic>Pigmentary diseases of the skin</topic><topic>pigmented skin lesions</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vestergaard, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macaskill, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holt, P.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menzies, S.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of dermatology (1951)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vestergaard, M.E.</au><au>Macaskill, P.</au><au>Holt, P.E.</au><au>Menzies, S.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting</atitle><jtitle>British journal of dermatology (1951)</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Dermatol</addtitle><date>2008-09</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>669</spage><epage>676</epage><pages>669-676</pages><issn>0007-0963</issn><eissn>1365-2133</eissn><coden>BJDEAZ</coden><abstract>Summary
Background Dermoscopy is a noninvasive technique that enables the clinician to perform direct microscopic examination of diagnostic features, not seen by the naked eye, in pigmented skin lesions. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy has previously been assessed in meta‐analyses including studies performed in experimental and clinical settings.
Objectives To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of melanoma compared with naked eye examination by performing a meta‐analysis exclusively on studies performed in a clinical setting.
Methods We searched for publications from 1987 to January 2008 and found nine eligible studies. The selected studies compare diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy with naked eye examination using a valid reference test on consecutive patients with a defined clinical presentation, performed in a clinical setting. Hierarchical summary receiver operator curve analysis was used to estimate the relative diagnostic accuracy for clinical examination with, and without, the use of dermoscopy.
Results We found the relative diagnostic odds ratio for melanoma, for dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination, to be 15·6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2·9–83·7, P = 0·016]; removal of two outlier studies changed this to 9·0 (95% CI 1·5–54·6, P = 0·03).
Conclusions Dermoscopy is more accurate than naked eye examination for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma in suspicious skin lesions when performed in the clinical setting.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>18616769</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08713.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0963 |
ispartof | British journal of dermatology (1951), 2008-09, Vol.159 (3), p.669-676 |
issn | 0007-0963 1365-2133 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69645937 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Clinical Trials as Topic Dermatology dermatoscopy dermoscopy Dermoscopy - methods Dermoscopy - standards diagnosis Humans Medical sciences melanoma Melanoma - diagnosis meta-analysis Nevus, Pigmented - diagnosis Physical Examination Pigmentary diseases of the skin pigmented skin lesions ROC Curve Sensitivity and Specificity Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions |
title | Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T19%3A16%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dermoscopy%20compared%20with%20naked%20eye%20examination%20for%20the%20diagnosis%20of%20primary%20melanoma:%20a%20meta-analysis%20of%20studies%20performed%20in%20a%20clinical%20setting&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20dermatology%20(1951)&rft.au=Vestergaard,%20M.E.&rft.date=2008-09&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=669&rft.epage=676&rft.pages=669-676&rft.issn=0007-0963&rft.eissn=1365-2133&rft.coden=BJDEAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08713.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69645937%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69645937&rft_id=info:pmid/18616769&rfr_iscdi=true |