A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys

To develop a grading scheme for the proficiency testing of small peer groups of fewer than 10 members for the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). A modified target value for small peer groups was derived based on the assumption that measurement variability in the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) 1999-03, Vol.123 (3), p.199-205
Hauptverfasser: Cunningham, M T, Praestgaard, J, Styer, P E, Brandt, J T, Fairweather, R B, Laposata, M, Olson, J D, Sosolik, R C, Triplett, D A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 205
container_issue 3
container_start_page 199
container_title Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)
container_volume 123
creator Cunningham, M T
Praestgaard, J
Styer, P E
Brandt, J T
Fairweather, R B
Laposata, M
Olson, J D
Sosolik, R C
Triplett, D A
description To develop a grading scheme for the proficiency testing of small peer groups of fewer than 10 members for the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). A modified target value for small peer groups was derived based on the assumption that measurement variability in the PT and APTT is more greatly influenced by variations in reagents than in instruments. Criteria for grading were established by statistical simulation to achieve misclassification errors of less than 5% for both incorrectly passing and failing participants. College of American Pathologists Coagulation Survey data were analyzed to determine the number of additional laboratories graded using the proposed scheme, as well as the failure rates among participants in the small peer groups. The modified target value for small peer groups is a weighted average between the mean of the peer group and the mean of all participants using the same reagent (reagent group). Peer groups with as few as 4 members can be graded provided that specific criteria are satisfied: there must be at least 5 peer groups for the same reagent, at least 3 of these 5 peer groups must have more than 3 members, and the coefficient of variation for the reagent group must be less than 10%. This proposed grading scheme decreased the number of ungraded laboratories by 44% to 46% for the PT and 42% to 55% for the APTT. The percentage of failing grades among participants in the small peer groups ranged from 1.3% to 4.1% for the PT and 1.4% to 7.2% for the APTT. These failure rates were 2.8- to 13.0-fold higher than the failure rates in large peer groups (P < or = .05). The proposed small peer group grading scheme can improve the effectiveness of College of American Pathologists proficiency testing for the PT and APTT and may also be generally applicable to other test methods and analytes.
doi_str_mv 10.5858/1999-123-0199-AMFPTO
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69638672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69638672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d7a069343793b6b2f50b0bbef6e702351c6a03f48382c3bafec68fb8e7710a7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFKAzEQhoMoWqtvIJKTt9Vk080mx1KsChUF6zlk08k2kt3UZFfo25tSD55mBr7_h_kQuqHkvhKVeKBSyoKWrCB5K-avy_f12wma0GrGipLy6hRNCCGskFJUF-gypa98yrKk5-iCEiJ4ReoJ-p7jDoZt2GAbIt7FYJ1x0Js9HiANrm9xsDh12nu8A4i4jWHcJex6PGwBL4L30MKBmXcQndE9fte5zofWpSFlQLej14MLPf4Y4w_s0xU6s9onuP6bU_S5fFwvnovV29PLYr4qDCNsKDa1JlyyGasla3hT2oo0pGnAcqhJySpquCbMzgQTpWGNtmC4sI2AuqZE15pN0d2xNz_1PeZnVOeSAe91D2FMikvOBK_LDM6OoIkhpQhW7aLrdNwrStRBtTqoVlm1OqhWR9U5dvvXPzYdbP6Fjm7ZL-d6fEc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69638672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Cunningham, M T ; Praestgaard, J ; Styer, P E ; Brandt, J T ; Fairweather, R B ; Laposata, M ; Olson, J D ; Sosolik, R C ; Triplett, D A</creator><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, M T ; Praestgaard, J ; Styer, P E ; Brandt, J T ; Fairweather, R B ; Laposata, M ; Olson, J D ; Sosolik, R C ; Triplett, D A</creatorcontrib><description>To develop a grading scheme for the proficiency testing of small peer groups of fewer than 10 members for the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). A modified target value for small peer groups was derived based on the assumption that measurement variability in the PT and APTT is more greatly influenced by variations in reagents than in instruments. Criteria for grading were established by statistical simulation to achieve misclassification errors of less than 5% for both incorrectly passing and failing participants. College of American Pathologists Coagulation Survey data were analyzed to determine the number of additional laboratories graded using the proposed scheme, as well as the failure rates among participants in the small peer groups. The modified target value for small peer groups is a weighted average between the mean of the peer group and the mean of all participants using the same reagent (reagent group). Peer groups with as few as 4 members can be graded provided that specific criteria are satisfied: there must be at least 5 peer groups for the same reagent, at least 3 of these 5 peer groups must have more than 3 members, and the coefficient of variation for the reagent group must be less than 10%. This proposed grading scheme decreased the number of ungraded laboratories by 44% to 46% for the PT and 42% to 55% for the APTT. The percentage of failing grades among participants in the small peer groups ranged from 1.3% to 4.1% for the PT and 1.4% to 7.2% for the APTT. These failure rates were 2.8- to 13.0-fold higher than the failure rates in large peer groups (P &lt; or = .05). The proposed small peer group grading scheme can improve the effectiveness of College of American Pathologists proficiency testing for the PT and APTT and may also be generally applicable to other test methods and analytes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5858/1999-123-0199-AMFPTO</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10086507</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Anticoagulants ; Blood Specimen Collection ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards ; Humans ; Laboratories, Hospital - standards ; Prothrombin Time ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards ; Quality Control</subject><ispartof>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976), 1999-03, Vol.123 (3), p.199-205</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d7a069343793b6b2f50b0bbef6e702351c6a03f48382c3bafec68fb8e7710a7a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d7a069343793b6b2f50b0bbef6e702351c6a03f48382c3bafec68fb8e7710a7a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10086507$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, M T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Praestgaard, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Styer, P E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, J T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairweather, R B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laposata, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, J D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sosolik, R C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triplett, D A</creatorcontrib><title>A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys</title><title>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</title><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><description>To develop a grading scheme for the proficiency testing of small peer groups of fewer than 10 members for the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). A modified target value for small peer groups was derived based on the assumption that measurement variability in the PT and APTT is more greatly influenced by variations in reagents than in instruments. Criteria for grading were established by statistical simulation to achieve misclassification errors of less than 5% for both incorrectly passing and failing participants. College of American Pathologists Coagulation Survey data were analyzed to determine the number of additional laboratories graded using the proposed scheme, as well as the failure rates among participants in the small peer groups. The modified target value for small peer groups is a weighted average between the mean of the peer group and the mean of all participants using the same reagent (reagent group). Peer groups with as few as 4 members can be graded provided that specific criteria are satisfied: there must be at least 5 peer groups for the same reagent, at least 3 of these 5 peer groups must have more than 3 members, and the coefficient of variation for the reagent group must be less than 10%. This proposed grading scheme decreased the number of ungraded laboratories by 44% to 46% for the PT and 42% to 55% for the APTT. The percentage of failing grades among participants in the small peer groups ranged from 1.3% to 4.1% for the PT and 1.4% to 7.2% for the APTT. These failure rates were 2.8- to 13.0-fold higher than the failure rates in large peer groups (P &lt; or = .05). The proposed small peer group grading scheme can improve the effectiveness of College of American Pathologists proficiency testing for the PT and APTT and may also be generally applicable to other test methods and analytes.</description><subject>Anticoagulants</subject><subject>Blood Specimen Collection</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories, Hospital - standards</subject><subject>Prothrombin Time</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFKAzEQhoMoWqtvIJKTt9Vk080mx1KsChUF6zlk08k2kt3UZFfo25tSD55mBr7_h_kQuqHkvhKVeKBSyoKWrCB5K-avy_f12wma0GrGipLy6hRNCCGskFJUF-gypa98yrKk5-iCEiJ4ReoJ-p7jDoZt2GAbIt7FYJ1x0Js9HiANrm9xsDh12nu8A4i4jWHcJex6PGwBL4L30MKBmXcQndE9fte5zofWpSFlQLej14MLPf4Y4w_s0xU6s9onuP6bU_S5fFwvnovV29PLYr4qDCNsKDa1JlyyGasla3hT2oo0pGnAcqhJySpquCbMzgQTpWGNtmC4sI2AuqZE15pN0d2xNz_1PeZnVOeSAe91D2FMikvOBK_LDM6OoIkhpQhW7aLrdNwrStRBtTqoVlm1OqhWR9U5dvvXPzYdbP6Fjm7ZL-d6fEc</recordid><startdate>19990301</startdate><enddate>19990301</enddate><creator>Cunningham, M T</creator><creator>Praestgaard, J</creator><creator>Styer, P E</creator><creator>Brandt, J T</creator><creator>Fairweather, R B</creator><creator>Laposata, M</creator><creator>Olson, J D</creator><creator>Sosolik, R C</creator><creator>Triplett, D A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990301</creationdate><title>A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys</title><author>Cunningham, M T ; Praestgaard, J ; Styer, P E ; Brandt, J T ; Fairweather, R B ; Laposata, M ; Olson, J D ; Sosolik, R C ; Triplett, D A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d7a069343793b6b2f50b0bbef6e702351c6a03f48382c3bafec68fb8e7710a7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Anticoagulants</topic><topic>Blood Specimen Collection</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories, Hospital - standards</topic><topic>Prothrombin Time</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, M T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Praestgaard, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Styer, P E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, J T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairweather, R B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laposata, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, J D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sosolik, R C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triplett, D A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cunningham, M T</au><au>Praestgaard, J</au><au>Styer, P E</au><au>Brandt, J T</au><au>Fairweather, R B</au><au>Laposata, M</au><au>Olson, J D</au><au>Sosolik, R C</au><au>Triplett, D A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys</atitle><jtitle>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><date>1999-03-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>199-205</pages><issn>0003-9985</issn><eissn>1543-2165</eissn><abstract>To develop a grading scheme for the proficiency testing of small peer groups of fewer than 10 members for the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). A modified target value for small peer groups was derived based on the assumption that measurement variability in the PT and APTT is more greatly influenced by variations in reagents than in instruments. Criteria for grading were established by statistical simulation to achieve misclassification errors of less than 5% for both incorrectly passing and failing participants. College of American Pathologists Coagulation Survey data were analyzed to determine the number of additional laboratories graded using the proposed scheme, as well as the failure rates among participants in the small peer groups. The modified target value for small peer groups is a weighted average between the mean of the peer group and the mean of all participants using the same reagent (reagent group). Peer groups with as few as 4 members can be graded provided that specific criteria are satisfied: there must be at least 5 peer groups for the same reagent, at least 3 of these 5 peer groups must have more than 3 members, and the coefficient of variation for the reagent group must be less than 10%. This proposed grading scheme decreased the number of ungraded laboratories by 44% to 46% for the PT and 42% to 55% for the APTT. The percentage of failing grades among participants in the small peer groups ranged from 1.3% to 4.1% for the PT and 1.4% to 7.2% for the APTT. These failure rates were 2.8- to 13.0-fold higher than the failure rates in large peer groups (P &lt; or = .05). The proposed small peer group grading scheme can improve the effectiveness of College of American Pathologists proficiency testing for the PT and APTT and may also be generally applicable to other test methods and analytes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>10086507</pmid><doi>10.5858/1999-123-0199-AMFPTO</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9985
ispartof Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 1999-03, Vol.123 (3), p.199-205
issn 0003-9985
1543-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69638672
source MEDLINE; Allen Press Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Anticoagulants
Blood Specimen Collection
Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards
Humans
Laboratories, Hospital - standards
Prothrombin Time
Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards
Quality Control
title A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T22%3A53%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20method%20for%20proficiency%20testing%20of%20small%20peer%20groups%20in%20the%20College%20of%20American%20Pathologists%20Coagulation%20Surveys&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20pathology%20&%20laboratory%20medicine%20(1976)&rft.au=Cunningham,%20M%20T&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=199-205&rft.issn=0003-9985&rft.eissn=1543-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.5858/1999-123-0199-AMFPTO&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69638672%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69638672&rft_id=info:pmid/10086507&rfr_iscdi=true