A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys
To develop a grading scheme for the proficiency testing of small peer groups of fewer than 10 members for the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). A modified target value for small peer groups was derived based on the assumption that measurement variability in the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) 1999-03, Vol.123 (3), p.199-205 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 205 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 199 |
container_title | Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) |
container_volume | 123 |
creator | Cunningham, M T Praestgaard, J Styer, P E Brandt, J T Fairweather, R B Laposata, M Olson, J D Sosolik, R C Triplett, D A |
description | To develop a grading scheme for the proficiency testing of small peer groups of fewer than 10 members for the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT).
A modified target value for small peer groups was derived based on the assumption that measurement variability in the PT and APTT is more greatly influenced by variations in reagents than in instruments. Criteria for grading were established by statistical simulation to achieve misclassification errors of less than 5% for both incorrectly passing and failing participants. College of American Pathologists Coagulation Survey data were analyzed to determine the number of additional laboratories graded using the proposed scheme, as well as the failure rates among participants in the small peer groups.
The modified target value for small peer groups is a weighted average between the mean of the peer group and the mean of all participants using the same reagent (reagent group). Peer groups with as few as 4 members can be graded provided that specific criteria are satisfied: there must be at least 5 peer groups for the same reagent, at least 3 of these 5 peer groups must have more than 3 members, and the coefficient of variation for the reagent group must be less than 10%. This proposed grading scheme decreased the number of ungraded laboratories by 44% to 46% for the PT and 42% to 55% for the APTT. The percentage of failing grades among participants in the small peer groups ranged from 1.3% to 4.1% for the PT and 1.4% to 7.2% for the APTT. These failure rates were 2.8- to 13.0-fold higher than the failure rates in large peer groups (P < or = .05).
The proposed small peer group grading scheme can improve the effectiveness of College of American Pathologists proficiency testing for the PT and APTT and may also be generally applicable to other test methods and analytes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5858/1999-123-0199-AMFPTO |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69638672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69638672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d7a069343793b6b2f50b0bbef6e702351c6a03f48382c3bafec68fb8e7710a7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFKAzEQhoMoWqtvIJKTt9Vk080mx1KsChUF6zlk08k2kt3UZFfo25tSD55mBr7_h_kQuqHkvhKVeKBSyoKWrCB5K-avy_f12wma0GrGipLy6hRNCCGskFJUF-gypa98yrKk5-iCEiJ4ReoJ-p7jDoZt2GAbIt7FYJ1x0Js9HiANrm9xsDh12nu8A4i4jWHcJex6PGwBL4L30MKBmXcQndE9fte5zofWpSFlQLej14MLPf4Y4w_s0xU6s9onuP6bU_S5fFwvnovV29PLYr4qDCNsKDa1JlyyGasla3hT2oo0pGnAcqhJySpquCbMzgQTpWGNtmC4sI2AuqZE15pN0d2xNz_1PeZnVOeSAe91D2FMikvOBK_LDM6OoIkhpQhW7aLrdNwrStRBtTqoVlm1OqhWR9U5dvvXPzYdbP6Fjm7ZL-d6fEc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69638672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Cunningham, M T ; Praestgaard, J ; Styer, P E ; Brandt, J T ; Fairweather, R B ; Laposata, M ; Olson, J D ; Sosolik, R C ; Triplett, D A</creator><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, M T ; Praestgaard, J ; Styer, P E ; Brandt, J T ; Fairweather, R B ; Laposata, M ; Olson, J D ; Sosolik, R C ; Triplett, D A</creatorcontrib><description>To develop a grading scheme for the proficiency testing of small peer groups of fewer than 10 members for the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT).
A modified target value for small peer groups was derived based on the assumption that measurement variability in the PT and APTT is more greatly influenced by variations in reagents than in instruments. Criteria for grading were established by statistical simulation to achieve misclassification errors of less than 5% for both incorrectly passing and failing participants. College of American Pathologists Coagulation Survey data were analyzed to determine the number of additional laboratories graded using the proposed scheme, as well as the failure rates among participants in the small peer groups.
The modified target value for small peer groups is a weighted average between the mean of the peer group and the mean of all participants using the same reagent (reagent group). Peer groups with as few as 4 members can be graded provided that specific criteria are satisfied: there must be at least 5 peer groups for the same reagent, at least 3 of these 5 peer groups must have more than 3 members, and the coefficient of variation for the reagent group must be less than 10%. This proposed grading scheme decreased the number of ungraded laboratories by 44% to 46% for the PT and 42% to 55% for the APTT. The percentage of failing grades among participants in the small peer groups ranged from 1.3% to 4.1% for the PT and 1.4% to 7.2% for the APTT. These failure rates were 2.8- to 13.0-fold higher than the failure rates in large peer groups (P < or = .05).
The proposed small peer group grading scheme can improve the effectiveness of College of American Pathologists proficiency testing for the PT and APTT and may also be generally applicable to other test methods and analytes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5858/1999-123-0199-AMFPTO</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10086507</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Anticoagulants ; Blood Specimen Collection ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards ; Humans ; Laboratories, Hospital - standards ; Prothrombin Time ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards ; Quality Control</subject><ispartof>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 1999-03, Vol.123 (3), p.199-205</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d7a069343793b6b2f50b0bbef6e702351c6a03f48382c3bafec68fb8e7710a7a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d7a069343793b6b2f50b0bbef6e702351c6a03f48382c3bafec68fb8e7710a7a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10086507$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, M T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Praestgaard, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Styer, P E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, J T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairweather, R B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laposata, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, J D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sosolik, R C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triplett, D A</creatorcontrib><title>A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys</title><title>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)</title><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><description>To develop a grading scheme for the proficiency testing of small peer groups of fewer than 10 members for the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT).
A modified target value for small peer groups was derived based on the assumption that measurement variability in the PT and APTT is more greatly influenced by variations in reagents than in instruments. Criteria for grading were established by statistical simulation to achieve misclassification errors of less than 5% for both incorrectly passing and failing participants. College of American Pathologists Coagulation Survey data were analyzed to determine the number of additional laboratories graded using the proposed scheme, as well as the failure rates among participants in the small peer groups.
The modified target value for small peer groups is a weighted average between the mean of the peer group and the mean of all participants using the same reagent (reagent group). Peer groups with as few as 4 members can be graded provided that specific criteria are satisfied: there must be at least 5 peer groups for the same reagent, at least 3 of these 5 peer groups must have more than 3 members, and the coefficient of variation for the reagent group must be less than 10%. This proposed grading scheme decreased the number of ungraded laboratories by 44% to 46% for the PT and 42% to 55% for the APTT. The percentage of failing grades among participants in the small peer groups ranged from 1.3% to 4.1% for the PT and 1.4% to 7.2% for the APTT. These failure rates were 2.8- to 13.0-fold higher than the failure rates in large peer groups (P < or = .05).
The proposed small peer group grading scheme can improve the effectiveness of College of American Pathologists proficiency testing for the PT and APTT and may also be generally applicable to other test methods and analytes.</description><subject>Anticoagulants</subject><subject>Blood Specimen Collection</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories, Hospital - standards</subject><subject>Prothrombin Time</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFKAzEQhoMoWqtvIJKTt9Vk080mx1KsChUF6zlk08k2kt3UZFfo25tSD55mBr7_h_kQuqHkvhKVeKBSyoKWrCB5K-avy_f12wma0GrGipLy6hRNCCGskFJUF-gypa98yrKk5-iCEiJ4ReoJ-p7jDoZt2GAbIt7FYJ1x0Js9HiANrm9xsDh12nu8A4i4jWHcJex6PGwBL4L30MKBmXcQndE9fte5zofWpSFlQLej14MLPf4Y4w_s0xU6s9onuP6bU_S5fFwvnovV29PLYr4qDCNsKDa1JlyyGasla3hT2oo0pGnAcqhJySpquCbMzgQTpWGNtmC4sI2AuqZE15pN0d2xNz_1PeZnVOeSAe91D2FMikvOBK_LDM6OoIkhpQhW7aLrdNwrStRBtTqoVlm1OqhWR9U5dvvXPzYdbP6Fjm7ZL-d6fEc</recordid><startdate>19990301</startdate><enddate>19990301</enddate><creator>Cunningham, M T</creator><creator>Praestgaard, J</creator><creator>Styer, P E</creator><creator>Brandt, J T</creator><creator>Fairweather, R B</creator><creator>Laposata, M</creator><creator>Olson, J D</creator><creator>Sosolik, R C</creator><creator>Triplett, D A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990301</creationdate><title>A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys</title><author>Cunningham, M T ; Praestgaard, J ; Styer, P E ; Brandt, J T ; Fairweather, R B ; Laposata, M ; Olson, J D ; Sosolik, R C ; Triplett, D A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d7a069343793b6b2f50b0bbef6e702351c6a03f48382c3bafec68fb8e7710a7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Anticoagulants</topic><topic>Blood Specimen Collection</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories, Hospital - standards</topic><topic>Prothrombin Time</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, M T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Praestgaard, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Styer, P E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, J T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairweather, R B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laposata, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, J D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sosolik, R C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triplett, D A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cunningham, M T</au><au>Praestgaard, J</au><au>Styer, P E</au><au>Brandt, J T</au><au>Fairweather, R B</au><au>Laposata, M</au><au>Olson, J D</au><au>Sosolik, R C</au><au>Triplett, D A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys</atitle><jtitle>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><date>1999-03-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>199-205</pages><issn>0003-9985</issn><eissn>1543-2165</eissn><abstract>To develop a grading scheme for the proficiency testing of small peer groups of fewer than 10 members for the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT).
A modified target value for small peer groups was derived based on the assumption that measurement variability in the PT and APTT is more greatly influenced by variations in reagents than in instruments. Criteria for grading were established by statistical simulation to achieve misclassification errors of less than 5% for both incorrectly passing and failing participants. College of American Pathologists Coagulation Survey data were analyzed to determine the number of additional laboratories graded using the proposed scheme, as well as the failure rates among participants in the small peer groups.
The modified target value for small peer groups is a weighted average between the mean of the peer group and the mean of all participants using the same reagent (reagent group). Peer groups with as few as 4 members can be graded provided that specific criteria are satisfied: there must be at least 5 peer groups for the same reagent, at least 3 of these 5 peer groups must have more than 3 members, and the coefficient of variation for the reagent group must be less than 10%. This proposed grading scheme decreased the number of ungraded laboratories by 44% to 46% for the PT and 42% to 55% for the APTT. The percentage of failing grades among participants in the small peer groups ranged from 1.3% to 4.1% for the PT and 1.4% to 7.2% for the APTT. These failure rates were 2.8- to 13.0-fold higher than the failure rates in large peer groups (P < or = .05).
The proposed small peer group grading scheme can improve the effectiveness of College of American Pathologists proficiency testing for the PT and APTT and may also be generally applicable to other test methods and analytes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>10086507</pmid><doi>10.5858/1999-123-0199-AMFPTO</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9985 |
ispartof | Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 1999-03, Vol.123 (3), p.199-205 |
issn | 0003-9985 1543-2165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69638672 |
source | MEDLINE; Allen Press Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Anticoagulants Blood Specimen Collection Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards Humans Laboratories, Hospital - standards Prothrombin Time Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards Quality Control |
title | A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T22%3A53%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20method%20for%20proficiency%20testing%20of%20small%20peer%20groups%20in%20the%20College%20of%20American%20Pathologists%20Coagulation%20Surveys&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20pathology%20&%20laboratory%20medicine%20(1976)&rft.au=Cunningham,%20M%20T&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=199-205&rft.issn=0003-9985&rft.eissn=1543-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.5858/1999-123-0199-AMFPTO&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69638672%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69638672&rft_id=info:pmid/10086507&rfr_iscdi=true |