Automated malaria detection by depolarization of laser light

Anecdotal experience with full blood count (FBC) technology incorporating analysis of depolarized laser light (DLL) for the enumeration of eosinophils showed that malaria infection generated unusual distributions in the white cell channels. The objective of this study was to identify and define crit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of haematology 1999-03, Vol.104 (3), p.499-503
Hauptverfasser: MENDELOW, BARRY V., LYONS, CHERYL, NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON, TANA, MARJORIE, MUNSTER, MARION, WYPKEMA, EMMA, LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE, MARSHALL, LEONARD, SCOTT, STEPHEN, COETZER, THERESA L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 503
container_issue 3
container_start_page 499
container_title British journal of haematology
container_volume 104
creator MENDELOW, BARRY V.
LYONS, CHERYL
NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON
TANA, MARJORIE
MUNSTER, MARION
WYPKEMA, EMMA
LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE
MARSHALL, LEONARD
SCOTT, STEPHEN
COETZER, THERESA L.
description Anecdotal experience with full blood count (FBC) technology incorporating analysis of depolarized laser light (DLL) for the enumeration of eosinophils showed that malaria infection generated unusual distributions in the white cell channels. The objective of this study was to identify and define criteria for a diagnosis of malaria using this technology. To determine sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, 224 directed samples referred specifically for malaria were used; true positives were defined as those in which malaria was identified by microscopic and/or immunological methods. For the DLL method, positive was defined as one or more large mononuclear cell(s) for which the 90° depolarized signal exceeded the 90° polarized signal. To determine possible utility in a routine haematology laboratory setting, 220 random undirected FBC samples were evaluated for possible malaria infection by the DLL method. Of the 224 directed samples, 95 were malaria positive as determined by microscopic and/or immunological methods, and 129 were negative. For the DLL method, overall sensitivity was 72% (90% in the case of Black Africans), and specificity 96%. Positive and negative predictive values overall were 93% and 82% respectively. In the utility study a single positive result was identified among the 220 samples studied. This was found to be from a patient with malaria. The detection of unexpected malaria by automated screening FBC analysis could substantially lower the mortality and morbidity from unascertained infection, especially in indigenous African peoples.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01199.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69637388</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>39818741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4219-23141cbd8ed66192fa6f68cdd7065462c01eea5611e3dea1ac1638604b27e7143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMoun78BSki3lozTXeagB5U_ETwoueQTafapd2uSYuuv97UXVQ8eZpk8ryT4WEsAp4Az_B4moDAcZxCBgkopRIOoSTva2z0_bDORpzzPA4BucW2vZ9yDoKPYZNtAecSc4kjdnLWd21jOiqixtTGVSYqqCPbVe0smizCZd4O7Q_z1WnLqDaeXFRXzy_dLtsoTe1pb1V32NPV5ePFTXz_cH17cXYf2ywFFacirGMnhaQCEVRaGixR2qLIOY4zTC0HIjNGABIFGTAWUEjk2STNKYdM7LCj5dy5a1978p1uKm-prs2M2t5rVChyIWUAD_6A07Z3s7CbBiUxBeQqQHIJWdd676jUc1c1xi00cD3o1VM9WNSDRT3o1V969XuI7q_m95OGil_Bpc8AHK4A462pS2dmtvI_HEop1YCdLrG3qqbFv__X53c3w0l8Asc1lAY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198621609</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated malaria detection by depolarization of laser light</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>MENDELOW, BARRY V. ; LYONS, CHERYL ; NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON ; TANA, MARJORIE ; MUNSTER, MARION ; WYPKEMA, EMMA ; LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE ; MARSHALL, LEONARD ; SCOTT, STEPHEN ; COETZER, THERESA L.</creator><creatorcontrib>MENDELOW, BARRY V. ; LYONS, CHERYL ; NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON ; TANA, MARJORIE ; MUNSTER, MARION ; WYPKEMA, EMMA ; LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE ; MARSHALL, LEONARD ; SCOTT, STEPHEN ; COETZER, THERESA L.</creatorcontrib><description>Anecdotal experience with full blood count (FBC) technology incorporating analysis of depolarized laser light (DLL) for the enumeration of eosinophils showed that malaria infection generated unusual distributions in the white cell channels. The objective of this study was to identify and define criteria for a diagnosis of malaria using this technology. To determine sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, 224 directed samples referred specifically for malaria were used; true positives were defined as those in which malaria was identified by microscopic and/or immunological methods. For the DLL method, positive was defined as one or more large mononuclear cell(s) for which the 90° depolarized signal exceeded the 90° polarized signal. To determine possible utility in a routine haematology laboratory setting, 220 random undirected FBC samples were evaluated for possible malaria infection by the DLL method. Of the 224 directed samples, 95 were malaria positive as determined by microscopic and/or immunological methods, and 129 were negative. For the DLL method, overall sensitivity was 72% (90% in the case of Black Africans), and specificity 96%. Positive and negative predictive values overall were 93% and 82% respectively. In the utility study a single positive result was identified among the 220 samples studied. This was found to be from a patient with malaria. The detection of unexpected malaria by automated screening FBC analysis could substantially lower the mortality and morbidity from unascertained infection, especially in indigenous African peoples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1048</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01199.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10086786</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJHEAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, U.K. and Cambridge, USA: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Cell Count - methods ; eosinophils ; False Negative Reactions ; False Positive Reactions ; full blood count ; Hematology ; Human protozoal diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; laser light depolarization ; Lasers ; Malaria ; malaria pigment ; Malaria, Falciparum - blood ; Malaria, Falciparum - diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Parasitemia - blood ; Parasitemia - diagnosis ; Parasitic diseases ; Parasitology - methods ; Protozoal diseases ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>British journal of haematology, 1999-03, Vol.104 (3), p.499-503</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd. Mar 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4219-23141cbd8ed66192fa6f68cdd7065462c01eea5611e3dea1ac1638604b27e7143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4219-23141cbd8ed66192fa6f68cdd7065462c01eea5611e3dea1ac1638604b27e7143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2141.1999.01199.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2141.1999.01199.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1688896$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10086786$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MENDELOW, BARRY V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LYONS, CHERYL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TANA, MARJORIE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUNSTER, MARION</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WYPKEMA, EMMA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARSHALL, LEONARD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCOTT, STEPHEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COETZER, THERESA L.</creatorcontrib><title>Automated malaria detection by depolarization of laser light</title><title>British journal of haematology</title><addtitle>Br J Haematol</addtitle><description>Anecdotal experience with full blood count (FBC) technology incorporating analysis of depolarized laser light (DLL) for the enumeration of eosinophils showed that malaria infection generated unusual distributions in the white cell channels. The objective of this study was to identify and define criteria for a diagnosis of malaria using this technology. To determine sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, 224 directed samples referred specifically for malaria were used; true positives were defined as those in which malaria was identified by microscopic and/or immunological methods. For the DLL method, positive was defined as one or more large mononuclear cell(s) for which the 90° depolarized signal exceeded the 90° polarized signal. To determine possible utility in a routine haematology laboratory setting, 220 random undirected FBC samples were evaluated for possible malaria infection by the DLL method. Of the 224 directed samples, 95 were malaria positive as determined by microscopic and/or immunological methods, and 129 were negative. For the DLL method, overall sensitivity was 72% (90% in the case of Black Africans), and specificity 96%. Positive and negative predictive values overall were 93% and 82% respectively. In the utility study a single positive result was identified among the 220 samples studied. This was found to be from a patient with malaria. The detection of unexpected malaria by automated screening FBC analysis could substantially lower the mortality and morbidity from unascertained infection, especially in indigenous African peoples.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Cell Count - methods</subject><subject>eosinophils</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>full blood count</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Human protozoal diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>laser light depolarization</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Malaria</subject><subject>malaria pigment</subject><subject>Malaria, Falciparum - blood</subject><subject>Malaria, Falciparum - diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Parasitemia - blood</subject><subject>Parasitemia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Parasitic diseases</subject><subject>Parasitology - methods</subject><subject>Protozoal diseases</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0007-1048</issn><issn>1365-2141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMoun78BSki3lozTXeagB5U_ETwoueQTafapd2uSYuuv97UXVQ8eZpk8ryT4WEsAp4Az_B4moDAcZxCBgkopRIOoSTva2z0_bDORpzzPA4BucW2vZ9yDoKPYZNtAecSc4kjdnLWd21jOiqixtTGVSYqqCPbVe0smizCZd4O7Q_z1WnLqDaeXFRXzy_dLtsoTe1pb1V32NPV5ePFTXz_cH17cXYf2ywFFacirGMnhaQCEVRaGixR2qLIOY4zTC0HIjNGABIFGTAWUEjk2STNKYdM7LCj5dy5a1978p1uKm-prs2M2t5rVChyIWUAD_6A07Z3s7CbBiUxBeQqQHIJWdd676jUc1c1xi00cD3o1VM9WNSDRT3o1V969XuI7q_m95OGil_Bpc8AHK4A462pS2dmtvI_HEop1YCdLrG3qqbFv__X53c3w0l8Asc1lAY</recordid><startdate>199903</startdate><enddate>199903</enddate><creator>MENDELOW, BARRY V.</creator><creator>LYONS, CHERYL</creator><creator>NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON</creator><creator>TANA, MARJORIE</creator><creator>MUNSTER, MARION</creator><creator>WYPKEMA, EMMA</creator><creator>LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE</creator><creator>MARSHALL, LEONARD</creator><creator>SCOTT, STEPHEN</creator><creator>COETZER, THERESA L.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199903</creationdate><title>Automated malaria detection by depolarization of laser light</title><author>MENDELOW, BARRY V. ; LYONS, CHERYL ; NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON ; TANA, MARJORIE ; MUNSTER, MARION ; WYPKEMA, EMMA ; LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE ; MARSHALL, LEONARD ; SCOTT, STEPHEN ; COETZER, THERESA L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4219-23141cbd8ed66192fa6f68cdd7065462c01eea5611e3dea1ac1638604b27e7143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Cell Count - methods</topic><topic>eosinophils</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>full blood count</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Human protozoal diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>laser light depolarization</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Malaria</topic><topic>malaria pigment</topic><topic>Malaria, Falciparum - blood</topic><topic>Malaria, Falciparum - diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Parasitemia - blood</topic><topic>Parasitemia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Parasitic diseases</topic><topic>Parasitology - methods</topic><topic>Protozoal diseases</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MENDELOW, BARRY V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LYONS, CHERYL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TANA, MARJORIE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUNSTER, MARION</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WYPKEMA, EMMA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARSHALL, LEONARD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCOTT, STEPHEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COETZER, THERESA L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of haematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MENDELOW, BARRY V.</au><au>LYONS, CHERYL</au><au>NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON</au><au>TANA, MARJORIE</au><au>MUNSTER, MARION</au><au>WYPKEMA, EMMA</au><au>LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE</au><au>MARSHALL, LEONARD</au><au>SCOTT, STEPHEN</au><au>COETZER, THERESA L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated malaria detection by depolarization of laser light</atitle><jtitle>British journal of haematology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Haematol</addtitle><date>1999-03</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>503</epage><pages>499-503</pages><issn>0007-1048</issn><eissn>1365-2141</eissn><coden>BJHEAL</coden><abstract>Anecdotal experience with full blood count (FBC) technology incorporating analysis of depolarized laser light (DLL) for the enumeration of eosinophils showed that malaria infection generated unusual distributions in the white cell channels. The objective of this study was to identify and define criteria for a diagnosis of malaria using this technology. To determine sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, 224 directed samples referred specifically for malaria were used; true positives were defined as those in which malaria was identified by microscopic and/or immunological methods. For the DLL method, positive was defined as one or more large mononuclear cell(s) for which the 90° depolarized signal exceeded the 90° polarized signal. To determine possible utility in a routine haematology laboratory setting, 220 random undirected FBC samples were evaluated for possible malaria infection by the DLL method. Of the 224 directed samples, 95 were malaria positive as determined by microscopic and/or immunological methods, and 129 were negative. For the DLL method, overall sensitivity was 72% (90% in the case of Black Africans), and specificity 96%. Positive and negative predictive values overall were 93% and 82% respectively. In the utility study a single positive result was identified among the 220 samples studied. This was found to be from a patient with malaria. The detection of unexpected malaria by automated screening FBC analysis could substantially lower the mortality and morbidity from unascertained infection, especially in indigenous African peoples.</abstract><cop>Oxford, U.K. and Cambridge, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>10086786</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01199.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1048
ispartof British journal of haematology, 1999-03, Vol.104 (3), p.499-503
issn 0007-1048
1365-2141
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69637388
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Blood Cell Count - methods
eosinophils
False Negative Reactions
False Positive Reactions
full blood count
Hematology
Human protozoal diseases
Humans
Infectious diseases
laser light depolarization
Lasers
Malaria
malaria pigment
Malaria, Falciparum - blood
Malaria, Falciparum - diagnosis
Medical sciences
Parasitemia - blood
Parasitemia - diagnosis
Parasitic diseases
Parasitology - methods
Protozoal diseases
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Automated malaria detection by depolarization of laser light
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T23%3A25%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20malaria%20detection%20by%20depolarization%20of%20laser%20light&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20haematology&rft.au=MENDELOW,%20BARRY%20V.&rft.date=1999-03&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=503&rft.pages=499-503&rft.issn=0007-1048&rft.eissn=1365-2141&rft.coden=BJHEAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01199.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E39818741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198621609&rft_id=info:pmid/10086786&rfr_iscdi=true