Automated malaria detection by depolarization of laser light
Anecdotal experience with full blood count (FBC) technology incorporating analysis of depolarized laser light (DLL) for the enumeration of eosinophils showed that malaria infection generated unusual distributions in the white cell channels. The objective of this study was to identify and define crit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of haematology 1999-03, Vol.104 (3), p.499-503 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 503 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 499 |
container_title | British journal of haematology |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | MENDELOW, BARRY V. LYONS, CHERYL NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON TANA, MARJORIE MUNSTER, MARION WYPKEMA, EMMA LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE MARSHALL, LEONARD SCOTT, STEPHEN COETZER, THERESA L. |
description | Anecdotal experience with full blood count (FBC) technology incorporating analysis of depolarized laser light (DLL) for the enumeration of eosinophils showed that malaria infection generated unusual distributions in the white cell channels. The objective of this study was to identify and define criteria for a diagnosis of malaria using this technology. To determine sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, 224 directed samples referred specifically for malaria were used; true positives were defined as those in which malaria was identified by microscopic and/or immunological methods. For the DLL method, positive was defined as one or more large mononuclear cell(s) for which the 90° depolarized signal exceeded the 90° polarized signal. To determine possible utility in a routine haematology laboratory setting, 220 random undirected FBC samples were evaluated for possible malaria infection by the DLL method. Of the 224 directed samples, 95 were malaria positive as determined by microscopic and/or immunological methods, and 129 were negative. For the DLL method, overall sensitivity was 72% (90% in the case of Black Africans), and specificity 96%. Positive and negative predictive values overall were 93% and 82% respectively. In the utility study a single positive result was identified among the 220 samples studied. This was found to be from a patient with malaria. The detection of unexpected malaria by automated screening FBC analysis could substantially lower the mortality and morbidity from unascertained infection, especially in indigenous African peoples. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01199.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69637388</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>39818741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4219-23141cbd8ed66192fa6f68cdd7065462c01eea5611e3dea1ac1638604b27e7143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMoun78BSki3lozTXeagB5U_ETwoueQTafapd2uSYuuv97UXVQ8eZpk8ryT4WEsAp4Az_B4moDAcZxCBgkopRIOoSTva2z0_bDORpzzPA4BucW2vZ9yDoKPYZNtAecSc4kjdnLWd21jOiqixtTGVSYqqCPbVe0smizCZd4O7Q_z1WnLqDaeXFRXzy_dLtsoTe1pb1V32NPV5ePFTXz_cH17cXYf2ywFFacirGMnhaQCEVRaGixR2qLIOY4zTC0HIjNGABIFGTAWUEjk2STNKYdM7LCj5dy5a1978p1uKm-prs2M2t5rVChyIWUAD_6A07Z3s7CbBiUxBeQqQHIJWdd676jUc1c1xi00cD3o1VM9WNSDRT3o1V969XuI7q_m95OGil_Bpc8AHK4A462pS2dmtvI_HEop1YCdLrG3qqbFv__X53c3w0l8Asc1lAY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198621609</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated malaria detection by depolarization of laser light</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>MENDELOW, BARRY V. ; LYONS, CHERYL ; NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON ; TANA, MARJORIE ; MUNSTER, MARION ; WYPKEMA, EMMA ; LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE ; MARSHALL, LEONARD ; SCOTT, STEPHEN ; COETZER, THERESA L.</creator><creatorcontrib>MENDELOW, BARRY V. ; LYONS, CHERYL ; NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON ; TANA, MARJORIE ; MUNSTER, MARION ; WYPKEMA, EMMA ; LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE ; MARSHALL, LEONARD ; SCOTT, STEPHEN ; COETZER, THERESA L.</creatorcontrib><description>Anecdotal experience with full blood count (FBC) technology incorporating analysis of depolarized laser light (DLL) for the enumeration of eosinophils showed that malaria infection generated unusual distributions in the white cell channels. The objective of this study was to identify and define criteria for a diagnosis of malaria using this technology. To determine sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, 224 directed samples referred specifically for malaria were used; true positives were defined as those in which malaria was identified by microscopic and/or immunological methods. For the DLL method, positive was defined as one or more large mononuclear cell(s) for which the 90° depolarized signal exceeded the 90° polarized signal. To determine possible utility in a routine haematology laboratory setting, 220 random undirected FBC samples were evaluated for possible malaria infection by the DLL method. Of the 224 directed samples, 95 were malaria positive as determined by microscopic and/or immunological methods, and 129 were negative. For the DLL method, overall sensitivity was 72% (90% in the case of Black Africans), and specificity 96%. Positive and negative predictive values overall were 93% and 82% respectively. In the utility study a single positive result was identified among the 220 samples studied. This was found to be from a patient with malaria. The detection of unexpected malaria by automated screening FBC analysis could substantially lower the mortality and morbidity from unascertained infection, especially in indigenous African peoples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1048</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01199.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10086786</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJHEAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, U.K. and Cambridge, USA: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Cell Count - methods ; eosinophils ; False Negative Reactions ; False Positive Reactions ; full blood count ; Hematology ; Human protozoal diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; laser light depolarization ; Lasers ; Malaria ; malaria pigment ; Malaria, Falciparum - blood ; Malaria, Falciparum - diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Parasitemia - blood ; Parasitemia - diagnosis ; Parasitic diseases ; Parasitology - methods ; Protozoal diseases ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>British journal of haematology, 1999-03, Vol.104 (3), p.499-503</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd. Mar 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4219-23141cbd8ed66192fa6f68cdd7065462c01eea5611e3dea1ac1638604b27e7143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4219-23141cbd8ed66192fa6f68cdd7065462c01eea5611e3dea1ac1638604b27e7143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2141.1999.01199.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2141.1999.01199.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1688896$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10086786$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MENDELOW, BARRY V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LYONS, CHERYL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TANA, MARJORIE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUNSTER, MARION</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WYPKEMA, EMMA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARSHALL, LEONARD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCOTT, STEPHEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COETZER, THERESA L.</creatorcontrib><title>Automated malaria detection by depolarization of laser light</title><title>British journal of haematology</title><addtitle>Br J Haematol</addtitle><description>Anecdotal experience with full blood count (FBC) technology incorporating analysis of depolarized laser light (DLL) for the enumeration of eosinophils showed that malaria infection generated unusual distributions in the white cell channels. The objective of this study was to identify and define criteria for a diagnosis of malaria using this technology. To determine sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, 224 directed samples referred specifically for malaria were used; true positives were defined as those in which malaria was identified by microscopic and/or immunological methods. For the DLL method, positive was defined as one or more large mononuclear cell(s) for which the 90° depolarized signal exceeded the 90° polarized signal. To determine possible utility in a routine haematology laboratory setting, 220 random undirected FBC samples were evaluated for possible malaria infection by the DLL method. Of the 224 directed samples, 95 were malaria positive as determined by microscopic and/or immunological methods, and 129 were negative. For the DLL method, overall sensitivity was 72% (90% in the case of Black Africans), and specificity 96%. Positive and negative predictive values overall were 93% and 82% respectively. In the utility study a single positive result was identified among the 220 samples studied. This was found to be from a patient with malaria. The detection of unexpected malaria by automated screening FBC analysis could substantially lower the mortality and morbidity from unascertained infection, especially in indigenous African peoples.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Cell Count - methods</subject><subject>eosinophils</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>full blood count</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Human protozoal diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>laser light depolarization</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Malaria</subject><subject>malaria pigment</subject><subject>Malaria, Falciparum - blood</subject><subject>Malaria, Falciparum - diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Parasitemia - blood</subject><subject>Parasitemia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Parasitic diseases</subject><subject>Parasitology - methods</subject><subject>Protozoal diseases</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0007-1048</issn><issn>1365-2141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMoun78BSki3lozTXeagB5U_ETwoueQTafapd2uSYuuv97UXVQ8eZpk8ryT4WEsAp4Az_B4moDAcZxCBgkopRIOoSTva2z0_bDORpzzPA4BucW2vZ9yDoKPYZNtAecSc4kjdnLWd21jOiqixtTGVSYqqCPbVe0smizCZd4O7Q_z1WnLqDaeXFRXzy_dLtsoTe1pb1V32NPV5ePFTXz_cH17cXYf2ywFFacirGMnhaQCEVRaGixR2qLIOY4zTC0HIjNGABIFGTAWUEjk2STNKYdM7LCj5dy5a1978p1uKm-prs2M2t5rVChyIWUAD_6A07Z3s7CbBiUxBeQqQHIJWdd676jUc1c1xi00cD3o1VM9WNSDRT3o1V969XuI7q_m95OGil_Bpc8AHK4A462pS2dmtvI_HEop1YCdLrG3qqbFv__X53c3w0l8Asc1lAY</recordid><startdate>199903</startdate><enddate>199903</enddate><creator>MENDELOW, BARRY V.</creator><creator>LYONS, CHERYL</creator><creator>NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON</creator><creator>TANA, MARJORIE</creator><creator>MUNSTER, MARION</creator><creator>WYPKEMA, EMMA</creator><creator>LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE</creator><creator>MARSHALL, LEONARD</creator><creator>SCOTT, STEPHEN</creator><creator>COETZER, THERESA L.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199903</creationdate><title>Automated malaria detection by depolarization of laser light</title><author>MENDELOW, BARRY V. ; LYONS, CHERYL ; NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON ; TANA, MARJORIE ; MUNSTER, MARION ; WYPKEMA, EMMA ; LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE ; MARSHALL, LEONARD ; SCOTT, STEPHEN ; COETZER, THERESA L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4219-23141cbd8ed66192fa6f68cdd7065462c01eea5611e3dea1ac1638604b27e7143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Cell Count - methods</topic><topic>eosinophils</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>full blood count</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Human protozoal diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>laser light depolarization</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Malaria</topic><topic>malaria pigment</topic><topic>Malaria, Falciparum - blood</topic><topic>Malaria, Falciparum - diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Parasitemia - blood</topic><topic>Parasitemia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Parasitic diseases</topic><topic>Parasitology - methods</topic><topic>Protozoal diseases</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MENDELOW, BARRY V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LYONS, CHERYL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TANA, MARJORIE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUNSTER, MARION</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WYPKEMA, EMMA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARSHALL, LEONARD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCOTT, STEPHEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COETZER, THERESA L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of haematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MENDELOW, BARRY V.</au><au>LYONS, CHERYL</au><au>NHLANGOTHI, PHILEMON</au><au>TANA, MARJORIE</au><au>MUNSTER, MARION</au><au>WYPKEMA, EMMA</au><au>LIEBOWITZ, LYNNE</au><au>MARSHALL, LEONARD</au><au>SCOTT, STEPHEN</au><au>COETZER, THERESA L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated malaria detection by depolarization of laser light</atitle><jtitle>British journal of haematology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Haematol</addtitle><date>1999-03</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>503</epage><pages>499-503</pages><issn>0007-1048</issn><eissn>1365-2141</eissn><coden>BJHEAL</coden><abstract>Anecdotal experience with full blood count (FBC) technology incorporating analysis of depolarized laser light (DLL) for the enumeration of eosinophils showed that malaria infection generated unusual distributions in the white cell channels. The objective of this study was to identify and define criteria for a diagnosis of malaria using this technology. To determine sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, 224 directed samples referred specifically for malaria were used; true positives were defined as those in which malaria was identified by microscopic and/or immunological methods. For the DLL method, positive was defined as one or more large mononuclear cell(s) for which the 90° depolarized signal exceeded the 90° polarized signal. To determine possible utility in a routine haematology laboratory setting, 220 random undirected FBC samples were evaluated for possible malaria infection by the DLL method. Of the 224 directed samples, 95 were malaria positive as determined by microscopic and/or immunological methods, and 129 were negative. For the DLL method, overall sensitivity was 72% (90% in the case of Black Africans), and specificity 96%. Positive and negative predictive values overall were 93% and 82% respectively. In the utility study a single positive result was identified among the 220 samples studied. This was found to be from a patient with malaria. The detection of unexpected malaria by automated screening FBC analysis could substantially lower the mortality and morbidity from unascertained infection, especially in indigenous African peoples.</abstract><cop>Oxford, U.K. and Cambridge, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>10086786</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01199.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1048 |
ispartof | British journal of haematology, 1999-03, Vol.104 (3), p.499-503 |
issn | 0007-1048 1365-2141 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69637388 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Blood Cell Count - methods eosinophils False Negative Reactions False Positive Reactions full blood count Hematology Human protozoal diseases Humans Infectious diseases laser light depolarization Lasers Malaria malaria pigment Malaria, Falciparum - blood Malaria, Falciparum - diagnosis Medical sciences Parasitemia - blood Parasitemia - diagnosis Parasitic diseases Parasitology - methods Protozoal diseases Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Automated malaria detection by depolarization of laser light |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T23%3A25%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20malaria%20detection%20by%20depolarization%20of%20laser%20light&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20haematology&rft.au=MENDELOW,%20BARRY%20V.&rft.date=1999-03&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=503&rft.pages=499-503&rft.issn=0007-1048&rft.eissn=1365-2141&rft.coden=BJHEAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01199.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E39818741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198621609&rft_id=info:pmid/10086786&rfr_iscdi=true |