The influence of dietary and nondietary calcium supplementation on blood pressure: An updated metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials

We updated our previous systematic review of the effect of supplemental calcium on blood pressure. We extended our previous searches on MEDLINE and EMBASE to May 1997 and examined citations from relevant articles. We contacted the authors of eligible trials to ensure the accuracy and completeness of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of hypertension 1999, Vol.12 (1), p.84-92
Hauptverfasser: Griffith, Lauren E, Guyatt, Gordon H, Cook, Richard J, Bucher, Heiner C, Cook, Deborah J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 92
container_issue 1
container_start_page 84
container_title American journal of hypertension
container_volume 12
creator Griffith, Lauren E
Guyatt, Gordon H
Cook, Richard J
Bucher, Heiner C
Cook, Deborah J
description We updated our previous systematic review of the effect of supplemental calcium on blood pressure. We extended our previous searches on MEDLINE and EMBASE to May 1997 and examined citations from relevant articles. We contacted the authors of eligible trials to ensure the accuracy and completeness of data, and to identify unpublished trials. We included any study in which investigators randomized hypertensive or normotensive people to calcium supplementation or alternative therapy and measured blood pressure for at least 2 weeks. In addition to 32 trials included in the prior metaanalysis, 10 new trials contributed to this metaanalysis. Two pairs of independent reviewers abstracted data and assessed the validity of the study data according to six quality criteria. We calculated the differences in blood pressure change between the calcium supplementation and control groups and pooled the estimates with each trial weighted with the inverse of the variance using a random effects model. The predictors of blood pressure reduction that we examined included method of supplementation, baseline blood pressure, and the methodologic quality of the studies. The pooled analysis shows a reduction in systolic blood pressure of −1.44 mm Hg (95% confidence interval −2.20 to −0.68; P < .001) and in diastolic blood pressure of −0.84 mm Hg (95% confidence interval −1.44 to −0.24; P < .001). We found statistically significant heterogeneity of results across trials ( P ≤ .02), which persisted when we looked at the nondietary trials alone, but not when we restricted our analysis to dietary trials. Although there was a trend toward larger effects with dietary interventions, none of the possible mediators of blood pressure reduction explained differences in treatment effect. We conclude that calcium supplementation leads to a small reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The effect of supplemental calcium in the diet is at least as great as nondietary supplementation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0895-7061(98)00224-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69617411</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0895706198002246</els_id><sourcerecordid>69617411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-461d89aaca4506c94a3768d60064e1fdce23ceb5d89a609eb994ddbe84652aa63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd9qFTEQxoNY7Gn1EZRcib3YdrInm914U0rxHxR6Yb0O2WQWI9lkTbJCfQSf2mxPFe-EwGTIb76PfEPISwbnDJi4-AyD7JoeBHsjhzOAtuWNeEJ2bOhlwyR0T8nuL3JMTnL-BgBcCPaMHDOAvtvLdkd-3X1F6sLkVwwGaZyodVh0uqc6WBpi-NMa7Y1bZ5rXZfE4Yyi6uBhoPaOP0dIlYc5rwrf0KtB1sbqgpXMd1kH7--zyJp6qapzdz_pkYigpel-vJTnt83NyNNWCLx7rKfny_t3d9cfm5vbDp-urm8bwnpeGC2YHqbXRvANhJNf7XgxWAAiObLIG273BsdsgARJHKbm1Iw5cdK3WYn9KXh90lxS_r5iLml026L0OGNeshBSs54xVsDuAJsWcE05qSW6uYSgGaluCeliC2hJWclAPS1CbwatHg3Wc0f4zdUi9ApcHAOs3fzhMKhu35W9dQlOUje4_Fr8BeGSapg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69617411</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of dietary and nondietary calcium supplementation on blood pressure: An updated metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Griffith, Lauren E ; Guyatt, Gordon H ; Cook, Richard J ; Bucher, Heiner C ; Cook, Deborah J</creator><creatorcontrib>Griffith, Lauren E ; Guyatt, Gordon H ; Cook, Richard J ; Bucher, Heiner C ; Cook, Deborah J</creatorcontrib><description>We updated our previous systematic review of the effect of supplemental calcium on blood pressure. We extended our previous searches on MEDLINE and EMBASE to May 1997 and examined citations from relevant articles. We contacted the authors of eligible trials to ensure the accuracy and completeness of data, and to identify unpublished trials. We included any study in which investigators randomized hypertensive or normotensive people to calcium supplementation or alternative therapy and measured blood pressure for at least 2 weeks. In addition to 32 trials included in the prior metaanalysis, 10 new trials contributed to this metaanalysis. Two pairs of independent reviewers abstracted data and assessed the validity of the study data according to six quality criteria. We calculated the differences in blood pressure change between the calcium supplementation and control groups and pooled the estimates with each trial weighted with the inverse of the variance using a random effects model. The predictors of blood pressure reduction that we examined included method of supplementation, baseline blood pressure, and the methodologic quality of the studies. The pooled analysis shows a reduction in systolic blood pressure of −1.44 mm Hg (95% confidence interval −2.20 to −0.68; P &lt; .001) and in diastolic blood pressure of −0.84 mm Hg (95% confidence interval −1.44 to −0.24; P &lt; .001). We found statistically significant heterogeneity of results across trials ( P ≤ .02), which persisted when we looked at the nondietary trials alone, but not when we restricted our analysis to dietary trials. Although there was a trend toward larger effects with dietary interventions, none of the possible mediators of blood pressure reduction explained differences in treatment effect. We conclude that calcium supplementation leads to a small reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The effect of supplemental calcium in the diet is at least as great as nondietary supplementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-7061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7061(98)00224-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10075392</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>blood pressure ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Calcium supplementation ; Calcium, Dietary - therapeutic use ; diet ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension - diet therapy ; Hypertension - physiopathology ; Male ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>American journal of hypertension, 1999, Vol.12 (1), p.84-92</ispartof><rights>1999 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-461d89aaca4506c94a3768d60064e1fdce23ceb5d89a609eb994ddbe84652aa63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10075392$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Griffith, Lauren E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guyatt, Gordon H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucher, Heiner C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Deborah J</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of dietary and nondietary calcium supplementation on blood pressure: An updated metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials</title><title>American journal of hypertension</title><addtitle>Am J Hypertens</addtitle><description>We updated our previous systematic review of the effect of supplemental calcium on blood pressure. We extended our previous searches on MEDLINE and EMBASE to May 1997 and examined citations from relevant articles. We contacted the authors of eligible trials to ensure the accuracy and completeness of data, and to identify unpublished trials. We included any study in which investigators randomized hypertensive or normotensive people to calcium supplementation or alternative therapy and measured blood pressure for at least 2 weeks. In addition to 32 trials included in the prior metaanalysis, 10 new trials contributed to this metaanalysis. Two pairs of independent reviewers abstracted data and assessed the validity of the study data according to six quality criteria. We calculated the differences in blood pressure change between the calcium supplementation and control groups and pooled the estimates with each trial weighted with the inverse of the variance using a random effects model. The predictors of blood pressure reduction that we examined included method of supplementation, baseline blood pressure, and the methodologic quality of the studies. The pooled analysis shows a reduction in systolic blood pressure of −1.44 mm Hg (95% confidence interval −2.20 to −0.68; P &lt; .001) and in diastolic blood pressure of −0.84 mm Hg (95% confidence interval −1.44 to −0.24; P &lt; .001). We found statistically significant heterogeneity of results across trials ( P ≤ .02), which persisted when we looked at the nondietary trials alone, but not when we restricted our analysis to dietary trials. Although there was a trend toward larger effects with dietary interventions, none of the possible mediators of blood pressure reduction explained differences in treatment effect. We conclude that calcium supplementation leads to a small reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The effect of supplemental calcium in the diet is at least as great as nondietary supplementation.</description><subject>blood pressure</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Calcium supplementation</subject><subject>Calcium, Dietary - therapeutic use</subject><subject>diet</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension - diet therapy</subject><subject>Hypertension - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0895-7061</issn><issn>1879-1905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd9qFTEQxoNY7Gn1EZRcib3YdrInm914U0rxHxR6Yb0O2WQWI9lkTbJCfQSf2mxPFe-EwGTIb76PfEPISwbnDJi4-AyD7JoeBHsjhzOAtuWNeEJ2bOhlwyR0T8nuL3JMTnL-BgBcCPaMHDOAvtvLdkd-3X1F6sLkVwwGaZyodVh0uqc6WBpi-NMa7Y1bZ5rXZfE4Yyi6uBhoPaOP0dIlYc5rwrf0KtB1sbqgpXMd1kH7--zyJp6qapzdz_pkYigpel-vJTnt83NyNNWCLx7rKfny_t3d9cfm5vbDp-urm8bwnpeGC2YHqbXRvANhJNf7XgxWAAiObLIG273BsdsgARJHKbm1Iw5cdK3WYn9KXh90lxS_r5iLml026L0OGNeshBSs54xVsDuAJsWcE05qSW6uYSgGaluCeliC2hJWclAPS1CbwatHg3Wc0f4zdUi9ApcHAOs3fzhMKhu35W9dQlOUje4_Fr8BeGSapg</recordid><startdate>1999</startdate><enddate>1999</enddate><creator>Griffith, Lauren E</creator><creator>Guyatt, Gordon H</creator><creator>Cook, Richard J</creator><creator>Bucher, Heiner C</creator><creator>Cook, Deborah J</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1999</creationdate><title>The influence of dietary and nondietary calcium supplementation on blood pressure: An updated metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials</title><author>Griffith, Lauren E ; Guyatt, Gordon H ; Cook, Richard J ; Bucher, Heiner C ; Cook, Deborah J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-461d89aaca4506c94a3768d60064e1fdce23ceb5d89a609eb994ddbe84652aa63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>blood pressure</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Calcium supplementation</topic><topic>Calcium, Dietary - therapeutic use</topic><topic>diet</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension - diet therapy</topic><topic>Hypertension - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Griffith, Lauren E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guyatt, Gordon H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucher, Heiner C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Deborah J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of hypertension</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Griffith, Lauren E</au><au>Guyatt, Gordon H</au><au>Cook, Richard J</au><au>Bucher, Heiner C</au><au>Cook, Deborah J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of dietary and nondietary calcium supplementation on blood pressure: An updated metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials</atitle><jtitle>American journal of hypertension</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Hypertens</addtitle><date>1999</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>84-92</pages><issn>0895-7061</issn><eissn>1879-1905</eissn><abstract>We updated our previous systematic review of the effect of supplemental calcium on blood pressure. We extended our previous searches on MEDLINE and EMBASE to May 1997 and examined citations from relevant articles. We contacted the authors of eligible trials to ensure the accuracy and completeness of data, and to identify unpublished trials. We included any study in which investigators randomized hypertensive or normotensive people to calcium supplementation or alternative therapy and measured blood pressure for at least 2 weeks. In addition to 32 trials included in the prior metaanalysis, 10 new trials contributed to this metaanalysis. Two pairs of independent reviewers abstracted data and assessed the validity of the study data according to six quality criteria. We calculated the differences in blood pressure change between the calcium supplementation and control groups and pooled the estimates with each trial weighted with the inverse of the variance using a random effects model. The predictors of blood pressure reduction that we examined included method of supplementation, baseline blood pressure, and the methodologic quality of the studies. The pooled analysis shows a reduction in systolic blood pressure of −1.44 mm Hg (95% confidence interval −2.20 to −0.68; P &lt; .001) and in diastolic blood pressure of −0.84 mm Hg (95% confidence interval −1.44 to −0.24; P &lt; .001). We found statistically significant heterogeneity of results across trials ( P ≤ .02), which persisted when we looked at the nondietary trials alone, but not when we restricted our analysis to dietary trials. Although there was a trend toward larger effects with dietary interventions, none of the possible mediators of blood pressure reduction explained differences in treatment effect. We conclude that calcium supplementation leads to a small reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The effect of supplemental calcium in the diet is at least as great as nondietary supplementation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10075392</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0895-7061(98)00224-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-7061
ispartof American journal of hypertension, 1999, Vol.12 (1), p.84-92
issn 0895-7061
1879-1905
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69617411
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects blood pressure
Blood Pressure - drug effects
Calcium supplementation
Calcium, Dietary - therapeutic use
diet
Female
Humans
Hypertension - diet therapy
Hypertension - physiopathology
Male
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
title The influence of dietary and nondietary calcium supplementation on blood pressure: An updated metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A08%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20dietary%20and%20nondietary%20calcium%20supplementation%20on%20blood%20pressure:%20An%20updated%20metaanalysis%20of%20randomized%20controlled%20trials&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20hypertension&rft.au=Griffith,%20Lauren%20E&rft.date=1999&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=84-92&rft.issn=0895-7061&rft.eissn=1879-1905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0895-7061(98)00224-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69617411%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69617411&rft_id=info:pmid/10075392&rft_els_id=S0895706198002246&rfr_iscdi=true