The RAD51D E233G variant and breast cancer risk: population-based and clinic-based family studies of Australian women

RAD51D is a homolog of the RAD51 protein, which is known to be an important component of the DNA repair pathway. A rare missense variant in the RAD51D gene, E233G (c.A > G), has been reported to be more prevalent in breast cancer cases from specific multiple-case breast cancer families, with an o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2008-11, Vol.112 (1), p.35-39
Hauptverfasser: Dowty, James G., Lose, Felicity, Jenkins, Mark A., Chang, Jiun-Horng, Chen, XiaoQing, Beesley, Jonathan, Dite, Gillian S., Southey, Melissa C., Byrnes, Graham B., Tesoriero, Andrea, Giles, Graham G., Hopper, John L., Spurdle, Amanda B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 39
container_issue 1
container_start_page 35
container_title Breast cancer research and treatment
container_volume 112
creator Dowty, James G.
Lose, Felicity
Jenkins, Mark A.
Chang, Jiun-Horng
Chen, XiaoQing
Beesley, Jonathan
Dite, Gillian S.
Southey, Melissa C.
Byrnes, Graham B.
Tesoriero, Andrea
Giles, Graham G.
Hopper, John L.
Spurdle, Amanda B.
description RAD51D is a homolog of the RAD51 protein, which is known to be an important component of the DNA repair pathway. A rare missense variant in the RAD51D gene, E233G (c.A > G), has been reported to be more prevalent in breast cancer cases from specific multiple-case breast cancer families, with an odds ratio of 2.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12–6.03). We assessed whether this variant was associated with breast cancer risk using two studies: a population-based case–control-family study based on 1,110 cases and 629 controls, and a clinic-based study based on 390 cases from multiple-case breast cancer families. We conducted case–control analyses and modified segregation analyses of carrier families. The carrier frequencies (95% CI) of the RAD51D variant were 4.1% (2.4–6.6) for clinic-based cases, 3.9% (2.8–5.2) for population-based cases, and 3.7% (2.3–5.4) for population-based controls, and were not significantly higher in case groups than controls ( P  = 0.7 and P  = 0.8, respectively). After genotyping the relatives of cases who carried the variant, modified segregation analyses of these families were conducted, and the estimated hazard ratio for breast cancer corresponding to the E233G variant was 1.30 (95% CI: 0.66–2.58; P  = 0.4) for familial breast cancer families and 1.28 (95% CI: 0.47–3.43; P  = 0.6) for families unselected for family history. Therefore, despite being well powered to detect moderate risks, no evidence for an association between the E233G variant and breast cancer risk was observed in any setting. Larger studies would be required to determine if this variant is associated with a smaller risk of breast cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10549-007-9832-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69605969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69605969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-84fb57d63439a9b33e2e71ec6d1252fb81d8e16795117a91a389327728e67e9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtrFTEUhYMo9lj9Ab5IEPQtmsvk5tuhrbVQKEh9DpnMHk2dyRyTmUr_vTmewYJQ-pRN9rdWsvdC6DWjHxil-mNhVDaW1JJYIzihT9CGSS2I5kw_RRvKlCbKUHWEXpRyQym1mtrn6IgZKg3naoOW6x-Av25PJTvFZ1yIc3zrc_Rpxj51uM3gy4yDTwEyzrH8_IR3024Z_BynRFpfoPsLhiGmGNaL3o9xuMNlXroIBU893i5lzn6ovvj3NEJ6iZ71fijwaj2P0bfPZ9cnX8jl1fnFyfaShEbQmZimb6XulGiE9bYVAjhoBkF1jEvet4Z1BuqMVjKmvWVeGCu41tyA0lAFx-j9wXeXp18LlNmNsQQYBp9gWopTVlFplX0UZNZQXZddwbf_gTfTklMdwnHGm8YIvYfYAQp5KiVD73Y5jj7fOUbdPjl3SM7ty31yjlbNm9V4aUfo7hVrVBV4twK-BD_0uYYSyz-OUy2MlrJy_MCV2krfId__8OHX_wB7Dq3-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212448374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The RAD51D E233G variant and breast cancer risk: population-based and clinic-based family studies of Australian women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><creator>Dowty, James G. ; Lose, Felicity ; Jenkins, Mark A. ; Chang, Jiun-Horng ; Chen, XiaoQing ; Beesley, Jonathan ; Dite, Gillian S. ; Southey, Melissa C. ; Byrnes, Graham B. ; Tesoriero, Andrea ; Giles, Graham G. ; Hopper, John L. ; Spurdle, Amanda B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dowty, James G. ; Lose, Felicity ; Jenkins, Mark A. ; Chang, Jiun-Horng ; Chen, XiaoQing ; Beesley, Jonathan ; Dite, Gillian S. ; Southey, Melissa C. ; Byrnes, Graham B. ; Tesoriero, Andrea ; Giles, Graham G. ; Hopper, John L. ; Spurdle, Amanda B. ; kConFab Investigators ; Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS) ; kConFab Investigators ; Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS)</creatorcontrib><description>RAD51D is a homolog of the RAD51 protein, which is known to be an important component of the DNA repair pathway. A rare missense variant in the RAD51D gene, E233G (c.A &gt; G), has been reported to be more prevalent in breast cancer cases from specific multiple-case breast cancer families, with an odds ratio of 2.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12–6.03). We assessed whether this variant was associated with breast cancer risk using two studies: a population-based case–control-family study based on 1,110 cases and 629 controls, and a clinic-based study based on 390 cases from multiple-case breast cancer families. We conducted case–control analyses and modified segregation analyses of carrier families. The carrier frequencies (95% CI) of the RAD51D variant were 4.1% (2.4–6.6) for clinic-based cases, 3.9% (2.8–5.2) for population-based cases, and 3.7% (2.3–5.4) for population-based controls, and were not significantly higher in case groups than controls ( P  = 0.7 and P  = 0.8, respectively). After genotyping the relatives of cases who carried the variant, modified segregation analyses of these families were conducted, and the estimated hazard ratio for breast cancer corresponding to the E233G variant was 1.30 (95% CI: 0.66–2.58; P  = 0.4) for familial breast cancer families and 1.28 (95% CI: 0.47–3.43; P  = 0.6) for families unselected for family history. Therefore, despite being well powered to detect moderate risks, no evidence for an association between the E233G variant and breast cancer risk was observed in any setting. Larger studies would be required to determine if this variant is associated with a smaller risk of breast cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7217</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9832-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18058226</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BCTRD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Australia - epidemiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Cancer research ; Case-Control Studies ; DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics ; Female ; Genes ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Health risk assessment ; Humans ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Mutation, Missense ; Oncology ; Polymorphism, Genetic ; Preclinical Study ; Risk Factors ; Tumors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Breast cancer research and treatment, 2008-11, Vol.112 (1), p.35-39</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2007</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-84fb57d63439a9b33e2e71ec6d1252fb81d8e16795117a91a389327728e67e9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-84fb57d63439a9b33e2e71ec6d1252fb81d8e16795117a91a389327728e67e9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10549-007-9832-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10549-007-9832-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20738755$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18058226$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dowty, James G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lose, Felicity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Jiun-Horng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, XiaoQing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beesley, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dite, Gillian S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southey, Melissa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrnes, Graham B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tesoriero, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles, Graham G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopper, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spurdle, Amanda B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>kConFab Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>kConFab Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS)</creatorcontrib><title>The RAD51D E233G variant and breast cancer risk: population-based and clinic-based family studies of Australian women</title><title>Breast cancer research and treatment</title><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><description>RAD51D is a homolog of the RAD51 protein, which is known to be an important component of the DNA repair pathway. A rare missense variant in the RAD51D gene, E233G (c.A &gt; G), has been reported to be more prevalent in breast cancer cases from specific multiple-case breast cancer families, with an odds ratio of 2.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12–6.03). We assessed whether this variant was associated with breast cancer risk using two studies: a population-based case–control-family study based on 1,110 cases and 629 controls, and a clinic-based study based on 390 cases from multiple-case breast cancer families. We conducted case–control analyses and modified segregation analyses of carrier families. The carrier frequencies (95% CI) of the RAD51D variant were 4.1% (2.4–6.6) for clinic-based cases, 3.9% (2.8–5.2) for population-based cases, and 3.7% (2.3–5.4) for population-based controls, and were not significantly higher in case groups than controls ( P  = 0.7 and P  = 0.8, respectively). After genotyping the relatives of cases who carried the variant, modified segregation analyses of these families were conducted, and the estimated hazard ratio for breast cancer corresponding to the E233G variant was 1.30 (95% CI: 0.66–2.58; P  = 0.4) for familial breast cancer families and 1.28 (95% CI: 0.47–3.43; P  = 0.6) for families unselected for family history. Therefore, despite being well powered to detect moderate risks, no evidence for an association between the E233G variant and breast cancer risk was observed in any setting. Larger studies would be required to determine if this variant is associated with a smaller risk of breast cancer.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mutation, Missense</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Genetic</subject><subject>Preclinical Study</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0167-6806</issn><issn>1573-7217</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtrFTEUhYMo9lj9Ab5IEPQtmsvk5tuhrbVQKEh9DpnMHk2dyRyTmUr_vTmewYJQ-pRN9rdWsvdC6DWjHxil-mNhVDaW1JJYIzihT9CGSS2I5kw_RRvKlCbKUHWEXpRyQym1mtrn6IgZKg3naoOW6x-Av25PJTvFZ1yIc3zrc_Rpxj51uM3gy4yDTwEyzrH8_IR3024Z_BynRFpfoPsLhiGmGNaL3o9xuMNlXroIBU893i5lzn6ovvj3NEJ6iZ71fijwaj2P0bfPZ9cnX8jl1fnFyfaShEbQmZimb6XulGiE9bYVAjhoBkF1jEvet4Z1BuqMVjKmvWVeGCu41tyA0lAFx-j9wXeXp18LlNmNsQQYBp9gWopTVlFplX0UZNZQXZddwbf_gTfTklMdwnHGm8YIvYfYAQp5KiVD73Y5jj7fOUbdPjl3SM7ty31yjlbNm9V4aUfo7hVrVBV4twK-BD_0uYYSyz-OUy2MlrJy_MCV2krfId__8OHX_wB7Dq3-</recordid><startdate>20081101</startdate><enddate>20081101</enddate><creator>Dowty, James G.</creator><creator>Lose, Felicity</creator><creator>Jenkins, Mark A.</creator><creator>Chang, Jiun-Horng</creator><creator>Chen, XiaoQing</creator><creator>Beesley, Jonathan</creator><creator>Dite, Gillian S.</creator><creator>Southey, Melissa C.</creator><creator>Byrnes, Graham B.</creator><creator>Tesoriero, Andrea</creator><creator>Giles, Graham G.</creator><creator>Hopper, John L.</creator><creator>Spurdle, Amanda B.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081101</creationdate><title>The RAD51D E233G variant and breast cancer risk: population-based and clinic-based family studies of Australian women</title><author>Dowty, James G. ; Lose, Felicity ; Jenkins, Mark A. ; Chang, Jiun-Horng ; Chen, XiaoQing ; Beesley, Jonathan ; Dite, Gillian S. ; Southey, Melissa C. ; Byrnes, Graham B. ; Tesoriero, Andrea ; Giles, Graham G. ; Hopper, John L. ; Spurdle, Amanda B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-84fb57d63439a9b33e2e71ec6d1252fb81d8e16795117a91a389327728e67e9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mutation, Missense</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Genetic</topic><topic>Preclinical Study</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dowty, James G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lose, Felicity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Jiun-Horng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, XiaoQing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beesley, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dite, Gillian S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southey, Melissa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrnes, Graham B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tesoriero, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles, Graham G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopper, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spurdle, Amanda B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>kConFab Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>kConFab Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS)</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dowty, James G.</au><au>Lose, Felicity</au><au>Jenkins, Mark A.</au><au>Chang, Jiun-Horng</au><au>Chen, XiaoQing</au><au>Beesley, Jonathan</au><au>Dite, Gillian S.</au><au>Southey, Melissa C.</au><au>Byrnes, Graham B.</au><au>Tesoriero, Andrea</au><au>Giles, Graham G.</au><au>Hopper, John L.</au><au>Spurdle, Amanda B.</au><aucorp>kConFab Investigators</aucorp><aucorp>Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS)</aucorp><aucorp>kConFab Investigators</aucorp><aucorp>Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The RAD51D E233G variant and breast cancer risk: population-based and clinic-based family studies of Australian women</atitle><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle><stitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</stitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><date>2008-11-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>35-39</pages><issn>0167-6806</issn><eissn>1573-7217</eissn><coden>BCTRD6</coden><abstract>RAD51D is a homolog of the RAD51 protein, which is known to be an important component of the DNA repair pathway. A rare missense variant in the RAD51D gene, E233G (c.A &gt; G), has been reported to be more prevalent in breast cancer cases from specific multiple-case breast cancer families, with an odds ratio of 2.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12–6.03). We assessed whether this variant was associated with breast cancer risk using two studies: a population-based case–control-family study based on 1,110 cases and 629 controls, and a clinic-based study based on 390 cases from multiple-case breast cancer families. We conducted case–control analyses and modified segregation analyses of carrier families. The carrier frequencies (95% CI) of the RAD51D variant were 4.1% (2.4–6.6) for clinic-based cases, 3.9% (2.8–5.2) for population-based cases, and 3.7% (2.3–5.4) for population-based controls, and were not significantly higher in case groups than controls ( P  = 0.7 and P  = 0.8, respectively). After genotyping the relatives of cases who carried the variant, modified segregation analyses of these families were conducted, and the estimated hazard ratio for breast cancer corresponding to the E233G variant was 1.30 (95% CI: 0.66–2.58; P  = 0.4) for familial breast cancer families and 1.28 (95% CI: 0.47–3.43; P  = 0.6) for families unselected for family history. Therefore, despite being well powered to detect moderate risks, no evidence for an association between the E233G variant and breast cancer risk was observed in any setting. Larger studies would be required to determine if this variant is associated with a smaller risk of breast cancer.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>18058226</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10549-007-9832-0</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6806
ispartof Breast cancer research and treatment, 2008-11, Vol.112 (1), p.35-39
issn 0167-6806
1573-7217
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69605969
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Complete Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Australia - epidemiology
Biological and medical sciences
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology
Breast Neoplasms - genetics
Cancer research
Case-Control Studies
DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics
Female
Genes
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Health risk assessment
Humans
Mammary gland diseases
Medical sciences
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Mutation, Missense
Oncology
Polymorphism, Genetic
Preclinical Study
Risk Factors
Tumors
Young Adult
title The RAD51D E233G variant and breast cancer risk: population-based and clinic-based family studies of Australian women
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A31%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20RAD51D%20E233G%20variant%20and%20breast%20cancer%20risk:%20population-based%20and%20clinic-based%20family%20studies%20of%20Australian%20women&rft.jtitle=Breast%20cancer%20research%20and%20treatment&rft.au=Dowty,%20James%20G.&rft.aucorp=kConFab%20Investigators&rft.date=2008-11-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=35-39&rft.issn=0167-6806&rft.eissn=1573-7217&rft.coden=BCTRD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10549-007-9832-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69605969%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212448374&rft_id=info:pmid/18058226&rfr_iscdi=true