The RAD51D E233G variant and breast cancer risk: population-based and clinic-based family studies of Australian women
RAD51D is a homolog of the RAD51 protein, which is known to be an important component of the DNA repair pathway. A rare missense variant in the RAD51D gene, E233G (c.A > G), has been reported to be more prevalent in breast cancer cases from specific multiple-case breast cancer families, with an o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Breast cancer research and treatment 2008-11, Vol.112 (1), p.35-39 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 39 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 35 |
container_title | Breast cancer research and treatment |
container_volume | 112 |
creator | Dowty, James G. Lose, Felicity Jenkins, Mark A. Chang, Jiun-Horng Chen, XiaoQing Beesley, Jonathan Dite, Gillian S. Southey, Melissa C. Byrnes, Graham B. Tesoriero, Andrea Giles, Graham G. Hopper, John L. Spurdle, Amanda B. |
description | RAD51D
is a homolog of the RAD51 protein, which is known to be an important component of the DNA repair pathway. A rare missense variant in the
RAD51D
gene, E233G (c.A > G), has been reported to be more prevalent in breast cancer cases from specific multiple-case breast cancer families, with an odds ratio of 2.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12–6.03). We assessed whether this variant was associated with breast cancer risk using two studies: a population-based case–control-family study based on 1,110 cases and 629 controls, and a clinic-based study based on 390 cases from multiple-case breast cancer families. We conducted case–control analyses and modified segregation analyses of carrier families. The carrier frequencies (95% CI) of the
RAD51D
variant were 4.1% (2.4–6.6) for clinic-based cases, 3.9% (2.8–5.2) for population-based cases, and 3.7% (2.3–5.4) for population-based controls, and were not significantly higher in case groups than controls (
P
= 0.7 and
P
= 0.8, respectively). After genotyping the relatives of cases who carried the variant, modified segregation analyses of these families were conducted, and the estimated hazard ratio for breast cancer corresponding to the E233G variant was 1.30 (95% CI: 0.66–2.58;
P
= 0.4) for familial breast cancer families and 1.28 (95% CI: 0.47–3.43;
P
= 0.6) for families unselected for family history. Therefore, despite being well powered to detect moderate risks, no evidence for an association between the E233G variant and breast cancer risk was observed in any setting. Larger studies would be required to determine if this variant is associated with a smaller risk of breast cancer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10549-007-9832-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69605969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69605969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-84fb57d63439a9b33e2e71ec6d1252fb81d8e16795117a91a389327728e67e9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtrFTEUhYMo9lj9Ab5IEPQtmsvk5tuhrbVQKEh9DpnMHk2dyRyTmUr_vTmewYJQ-pRN9rdWsvdC6DWjHxil-mNhVDaW1JJYIzihT9CGSS2I5kw_RRvKlCbKUHWEXpRyQym1mtrn6IgZKg3naoOW6x-Av25PJTvFZ1yIc3zrc_Rpxj51uM3gy4yDTwEyzrH8_IR3024Z_BynRFpfoPsLhiGmGNaL3o9xuMNlXroIBU893i5lzn6ovvj3NEJ6iZ71fijwaj2P0bfPZ9cnX8jl1fnFyfaShEbQmZimb6XulGiE9bYVAjhoBkF1jEvet4Z1BuqMVjKmvWVeGCu41tyA0lAFx-j9wXeXp18LlNmNsQQYBp9gWopTVlFplX0UZNZQXZddwbf_gTfTklMdwnHGm8YIvYfYAQp5KiVD73Y5jj7fOUbdPjl3SM7ty31yjlbNm9V4aUfo7hVrVBV4twK-BD_0uYYSyz-OUy2MlrJy_MCV2krfId__8OHX_wB7Dq3-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212448374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The RAD51D E233G variant and breast cancer risk: population-based and clinic-based family studies of Australian women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><creator>Dowty, James G. ; Lose, Felicity ; Jenkins, Mark A. ; Chang, Jiun-Horng ; Chen, XiaoQing ; Beesley, Jonathan ; Dite, Gillian S. ; Southey, Melissa C. ; Byrnes, Graham B. ; Tesoriero, Andrea ; Giles, Graham G. ; Hopper, John L. ; Spurdle, Amanda B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dowty, James G. ; Lose, Felicity ; Jenkins, Mark A. ; Chang, Jiun-Horng ; Chen, XiaoQing ; Beesley, Jonathan ; Dite, Gillian S. ; Southey, Melissa C. ; Byrnes, Graham B. ; Tesoriero, Andrea ; Giles, Graham G. ; Hopper, John L. ; Spurdle, Amanda B. ; kConFab Investigators ; Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS) ; kConFab Investigators ; Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS)</creatorcontrib><description>RAD51D
is a homolog of the RAD51 protein, which is known to be an important component of the DNA repair pathway. A rare missense variant in the
RAD51D
gene, E233G (c.A > G), has been reported to be more prevalent in breast cancer cases from specific multiple-case breast cancer families, with an odds ratio of 2.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12–6.03). We assessed whether this variant was associated with breast cancer risk using two studies: a population-based case–control-family study based on 1,110 cases and 629 controls, and a clinic-based study based on 390 cases from multiple-case breast cancer families. We conducted case–control analyses and modified segregation analyses of carrier families. The carrier frequencies (95% CI) of the
RAD51D
variant were 4.1% (2.4–6.6) for clinic-based cases, 3.9% (2.8–5.2) for population-based cases, and 3.7% (2.3–5.4) for population-based controls, and were not significantly higher in case groups than controls (
P
= 0.7 and
P
= 0.8, respectively). After genotyping the relatives of cases who carried the variant, modified segregation analyses of these families were conducted, and the estimated hazard ratio for breast cancer corresponding to the E233G variant was 1.30 (95% CI: 0.66–2.58;
P
= 0.4) for familial breast cancer families and 1.28 (95% CI: 0.47–3.43;
P
= 0.6) for families unselected for family history. Therefore, despite being well powered to detect moderate risks, no evidence for an association between the E233G variant and breast cancer risk was observed in any setting. Larger studies would be required to determine if this variant is associated with a smaller risk of breast cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7217</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9832-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18058226</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BCTRD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Australia - epidemiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Cancer research ; Case-Control Studies ; DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics ; Female ; Genes ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Health risk assessment ; Humans ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Mutation, Missense ; Oncology ; Polymorphism, Genetic ; Preclinical Study ; Risk Factors ; Tumors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Breast cancer research and treatment, 2008-11, Vol.112 (1), p.35-39</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2007</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-84fb57d63439a9b33e2e71ec6d1252fb81d8e16795117a91a389327728e67e9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-84fb57d63439a9b33e2e71ec6d1252fb81d8e16795117a91a389327728e67e9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10549-007-9832-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10549-007-9832-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20738755$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18058226$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dowty, James G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lose, Felicity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Jiun-Horng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, XiaoQing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beesley, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dite, Gillian S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southey, Melissa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrnes, Graham B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tesoriero, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles, Graham G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopper, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spurdle, Amanda B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>kConFab Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>kConFab Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS)</creatorcontrib><title>The RAD51D E233G variant and breast cancer risk: population-based and clinic-based family studies of Australian women</title><title>Breast cancer research and treatment</title><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><description>RAD51D
is a homolog of the RAD51 protein, which is known to be an important component of the DNA repair pathway. A rare missense variant in the
RAD51D
gene, E233G (c.A > G), has been reported to be more prevalent in breast cancer cases from specific multiple-case breast cancer families, with an odds ratio of 2.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12–6.03). We assessed whether this variant was associated with breast cancer risk using two studies: a population-based case–control-family study based on 1,110 cases and 629 controls, and a clinic-based study based on 390 cases from multiple-case breast cancer families. We conducted case–control analyses and modified segregation analyses of carrier families. The carrier frequencies (95% CI) of the
RAD51D
variant were 4.1% (2.4–6.6) for clinic-based cases, 3.9% (2.8–5.2) for population-based cases, and 3.7% (2.3–5.4) for population-based controls, and were not significantly higher in case groups than controls (
P
= 0.7 and
P
= 0.8, respectively). After genotyping the relatives of cases who carried the variant, modified segregation analyses of these families were conducted, and the estimated hazard ratio for breast cancer corresponding to the E233G variant was 1.30 (95% CI: 0.66–2.58;
P
= 0.4) for familial breast cancer families and 1.28 (95% CI: 0.47–3.43;
P
= 0.6) for families unselected for family history. Therefore, despite being well powered to detect moderate risks, no evidence for an association between the E233G variant and breast cancer risk was observed in any setting. Larger studies would be required to determine if this variant is associated with a smaller risk of breast cancer.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mutation, Missense</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Genetic</subject><subject>Preclinical Study</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0167-6806</issn><issn>1573-7217</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtrFTEUhYMo9lj9Ab5IEPQtmsvk5tuhrbVQKEh9DpnMHk2dyRyTmUr_vTmewYJQ-pRN9rdWsvdC6DWjHxil-mNhVDaW1JJYIzihT9CGSS2I5kw_RRvKlCbKUHWEXpRyQym1mtrn6IgZKg3naoOW6x-Av25PJTvFZ1yIc3zrc_Rpxj51uM3gy4yDTwEyzrH8_IR3024Z_BynRFpfoPsLhiGmGNaL3o9xuMNlXroIBU893i5lzn6ovvj3NEJ6iZ71fijwaj2P0bfPZ9cnX8jl1fnFyfaShEbQmZimb6XulGiE9bYVAjhoBkF1jEvet4Z1BuqMVjKmvWVeGCu41tyA0lAFx-j9wXeXp18LlNmNsQQYBp9gWopTVlFplX0UZNZQXZddwbf_gTfTklMdwnHGm8YIvYfYAQp5KiVD73Y5jj7fOUbdPjl3SM7ty31yjlbNm9V4aUfo7hVrVBV4twK-BD_0uYYSyz-OUy2MlrJy_MCV2krfId__8OHX_wB7Dq3-</recordid><startdate>20081101</startdate><enddate>20081101</enddate><creator>Dowty, James G.</creator><creator>Lose, Felicity</creator><creator>Jenkins, Mark A.</creator><creator>Chang, Jiun-Horng</creator><creator>Chen, XiaoQing</creator><creator>Beesley, Jonathan</creator><creator>Dite, Gillian S.</creator><creator>Southey, Melissa C.</creator><creator>Byrnes, Graham B.</creator><creator>Tesoriero, Andrea</creator><creator>Giles, Graham G.</creator><creator>Hopper, John L.</creator><creator>Spurdle, Amanda B.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081101</creationdate><title>The RAD51D E233G variant and breast cancer risk: population-based and clinic-based family studies of Australian women</title><author>Dowty, James G. ; Lose, Felicity ; Jenkins, Mark A. ; Chang, Jiun-Horng ; Chen, XiaoQing ; Beesley, Jonathan ; Dite, Gillian S. ; Southey, Melissa C. ; Byrnes, Graham B. ; Tesoriero, Andrea ; Giles, Graham G. ; Hopper, John L. ; Spurdle, Amanda B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-84fb57d63439a9b33e2e71ec6d1252fb81d8e16795117a91a389327728e67e9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mutation, Missense</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Genetic</topic><topic>Preclinical Study</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dowty, James G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lose, Felicity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Jiun-Horng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, XiaoQing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beesley, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dite, Gillian S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southey, Melissa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrnes, Graham B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tesoriero, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles, Graham G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopper, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spurdle, Amanda B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>kConFab Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>kConFab Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS)</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dowty, James G.</au><au>Lose, Felicity</au><au>Jenkins, Mark A.</au><au>Chang, Jiun-Horng</au><au>Chen, XiaoQing</au><au>Beesley, Jonathan</au><au>Dite, Gillian S.</au><au>Southey, Melissa C.</au><au>Byrnes, Graham B.</au><au>Tesoriero, Andrea</au><au>Giles, Graham G.</au><au>Hopper, John L.</au><au>Spurdle, Amanda B.</au><aucorp>kConFab Investigators</aucorp><aucorp>Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS)</aucorp><aucorp>kConFab Investigators</aucorp><aucorp>Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The RAD51D E233G variant and breast cancer risk: population-based and clinic-based family studies of Australian women</atitle><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle><stitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</stitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><date>2008-11-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>35-39</pages><issn>0167-6806</issn><eissn>1573-7217</eissn><coden>BCTRD6</coden><abstract>RAD51D
is a homolog of the RAD51 protein, which is known to be an important component of the DNA repair pathway. A rare missense variant in the
RAD51D
gene, E233G (c.A > G), has been reported to be more prevalent in breast cancer cases from specific multiple-case breast cancer families, with an odds ratio of 2.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12–6.03). We assessed whether this variant was associated with breast cancer risk using two studies: a population-based case–control-family study based on 1,110 cases and 629 controls, and a clinic-based study based on 390 cases from multiple-case breast cancer families. We conducted case–control analyses and modified segregation analyses of carrier families. The carrier frequencies (95% CI) of the
RAD51D
variant were 4.1% (2.4–6.6) for clinic-based cases, 3.9% (2.8–5.2) for population-based cases, and 3.7% (2.3–5.4) for population-based controls, and were not significantly higher in case groups than controls (
P
= 0.7 and
P
= 0.8, respectively). After genotyping the relatives of cases who carried the variant, modified segregation analyses of these families were conducted, and the estimated hazard ratio for breast cancer corresponding to the E233G variant was 1.30 (95% CI: 0.66–2.58;
P
= 0.4) for familial breast cancer families and 1.28 (95% CI: 0.47–3.43;
P
= 0.6) for families unselected for family history. Therefore, despite being well powered to detect moderate risks, no evidence for an association between the E233G variant and breast cancer risk was observed in any setting. Larger studies would be required to determine if this variant is associated with a smaller risk of breast cancer.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>18058226</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10549-007-9832-0</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6806 |
ispartof | Breast cancer research and treatment, 2008-11, Vol.112 (1), p.35-39 |
issn | 0167-6806 1573-7217 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69605969 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Complete Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Australia - epidemiology Biological and medical sciences Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology Breast Neoplasms - genetics Cancer research Case-Control Studies DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics Female Genes Genetic Predisposition to Disease Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Health risk assessment Humans Mammary gland diseases Medical sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Mutation, Missense Oncology Polymorphism, Genetic Preclinical Study Risk Factors Tumors Young Adult |
title | The RAD51D E233G variant and breast cancer risk: population-based and clinic-based family studies of Australian women |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A31%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20RAD51D%20E233G%20variant%20and%20breast%20cancer%20risk:%20population-based%20and%20clinic-based%20family%20studies%20of%20Australian%20women&rft.jtitle=Breast%20cancer%20research%20and%20treatment&rft.au=Dowty,%20James%20G.&rft.aucorp=kConFab%20Investigators&rft.date=2008-11-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=35-39&rft.issn=0167-6806&rft.eissn=1573-7217&rft.coden=BCTRD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10549-007-9832-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69605969%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212448374&rft_id=info:pmid/18058226&rfr_iscdi=true |