Measurement of Body Fat in Healthy Elderly Men: A Comparison of Methods

Background. Nutritional evaluation of elderly people is of great importance. Two-component methods for body composition assessment, such as anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance (BIA), are widely used in clinical practice, but their fundamental assumptions may be invalid in older people. Dual-en...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences Biological sciences and medical sciences, 1999-02, Vol.54 (2), p.M70-M76
Hauptverfasser: Ravaglia, Giovanni, Forti, Paola, Maioli, Fabiola, Boschi, Federica, Cicognani, Annalena, Gasbarrini, Giovanni
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page M76
container_issue 2
container_start_page M70
container_title The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences
container_volume 54
creator Ravaglia, Giovanni
Forti, Paola
Maioli, Fabiola
Boschi, Federica
Cicognani, Annalena
Gasbarrini, Giovanni
description Background. Nutritional evaluation of elderly people is of great importance. Two-component methods for body composition assessment, such as anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance (BIA), are widely used in clinical practice, but their fundamental assumptions may be invalid in older people. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a relatively new method for reliable and direct measurements of body mass in its three basic components: total body bone mineral content (TBBMC), mineral free lean tissue mass (LTM), and fat. In this study, percent body fat (%BF) estimates from anthropometry and BIA in men of various ages were compared with corresponding measurements by DXA. Methods. Body fat percentage was estimated in 67 men aged 20–95 by anthropometric measurements (skinfold thickness, body mass index, or BMI), BIA, and DXA. Age-specific equations were used for anthropometry and BIA. Limits of agreement were calculated between DXA and the other methods. Results. The equations based on BMI and BIA systematically overestimated %BF with respect to %BF measured by DXA in people of all ages. Intermethod difference between DXA and skinfold thicknesses was less marked, but in over-80-year-olds %BF predicted by skinfold measurements underestimated %BF measured by DXA. Interindividual and age-related variation in TBBMC and in fat-free mass mineralization could partly explain the intermethod differences found between DXA and the other methods. Conclusions. Because of practical constraints, anthropometry and BIA are often the only available options for body composition assessment in clinical routine; therefore, further research on the validity and improvement of these methods in older people is indicated.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/gerona/54.2.M70
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69604147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/gerona/54.2.M70</oup_id><sourcerecordid>69604147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-44f918ceb0d100d6a0bb9bc9c292d97dfd3a8a20f8b59911e69152db1e48fa173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1LxDAQxYMofp-9SfDgQehu0jZp4m1dP1Z08aCCeAlpM9Vq26xJC-5_b5aKiCfn8ubwm8ebh9ABJSNKZDJ-AWdbPWbpKB7NM7KGtmnGRMQS9rQedpLJiBHCt9CO929kNSzeRFs0KBVMbKOrOWjfO2ig7bAt8Zk1S3ypO1y1eAa67l6X-KI24OolnkN7iid4apuFdpW37epgDt2rNX4PbZS69rD_rbvo8fLiYTqLbu-urqeT26gIObooTUtJRQE5MSGD4ZrkucwLWcQyNjIzpUm00DEpRc6kpBS4pCw2OYVUlJpmyS46HnwXzn704DvVVL6AutYt2N4rLjlJaboCj_6Ab7Z3bcimYiJ4Et5PAzQeoMJZ7x2UauGqRrulokStClZDwYqlKlah4HBx-G3b5w2YX_zQaABOBsD2i3-4RQNc-Q4-f3Dt3hXPkoyp2dOzuuf85mx6niiRfAHUYpM8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208631854</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measurement of Body Fat in Healthy Elderly Men: A Comparison of Methods</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Ravaglia, Giovanni ; Forti, Paola ; Maioli, Fabiola ; Boschi, Federica ; Cicognani, Annalena ; Gasbarrini, Giovanni</creator><creatorcontrib>Ravaglia, Giovanni ; Forti, Paola ; Maioli, Fabiola ; Boschi, Federica ; Cicognani, Annalena ; Gasbarrini, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Nutritional evaluation of elderly people is of great importance. Two-component methods for body composition assessment, such as anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance (BIA), are widely used in clinical practice, but their fundamental assumptions may be invalid in older people. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a relatively new method for reliable and direct measurements of body mass in its three basic components: total body bone mineral content (TBBMC), mineral free lean tissue mass (LTM), and fat. In this study, percent body fat (%BF) estimates from anthropometry and BIA in men of various ages were compared with corresponding measurements by DXA. Methods. Body fat percentage was estimated in 67 men aged 20–95 by anthropometric measurements (skinfold thickness, body mass index, or BMI), BIA, and DXA. Age-specific equations were used for anthropometry and BIA. Limits of agreement were calculated between DXA and the other methods. Results. The equations based on BMI and BIA systematically overestimated %BF with respect to %BF measured by DXA in people of all ages. Intermethod difference between DXA and skinfold thicknesses was less marked, but in over-80-year-olds %BF predicted by skinfold measurements underestimated %BF measured by DXA. Interindividual and age-related variation in TBBMC and in fat-free mass mineralization could partly explain the intermethod differences found between DXA and the other methods. Conclusions. Because of practical constraints, anthropometry and BIA are often the only available options for body composition assessment in clinical routine; therefore, further research on the validity and improvement of these methods in older people is indicated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-5006</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-535X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/gerona/54.2.M70</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10051858</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Gerontological Society of America</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon ; Adipose Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging - pathology ; Analysis of Variance ; Anthropometry ; Body Composition ; Body fat ; Body Mass Index ; Bone Density ; Electric Impedance ; Geriatric Assessment ; Humans ; Italy ; Male ; Medical screening ; Men ; Middle Aged ; Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy &amp; histology ; Nutrition Assessment ; Older people ; Reproducibility of Results ; Skinfold Thickness</subject><ispartof>The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 1999-02, Vol.54 (2), p.M70-M76</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 by The Gerontological Society of America 1999</rights><rights>Copyright Gerontological Society of America, Incorporated Feb 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-44f918ceb0d100d6a0bb9bc9c292d97dfd3a8a20f8b59911e69152db1e48fa173</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10051858$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ravaglia, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forti, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maioli, Fabiola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boschi, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cicognani, Annalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasbarrini, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><title>Measurement of Body Fat in Healthy Elderly Men: A Comparison of Methods</title><title>The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences</title><addtitle>Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biomedical Sciences and Medical Sciences</addtitle><addtitle>Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biomedical Sciences and Medical Sciences</addtitle><description>Background. Nutritional evaluation of elderly people is of great importance. Two-component methods for body composition assessment, such as anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance (BIA), are widely used in clinical practice, but their fundamental assumptions may be invalid in older people. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a relatively new method for reliable and direct measurements of body mass in its three basic components: total body bone mineral content (TBBMC), mineral free lean tissue mass (LTM), and fat. In this study, percent body fat (%BF) estimates from anthropometry and BIA in men of various ages were compared with corresponding measurements by DXA. Methods. Body fat percentage was estimated in 67 men aged 20–95 by anthropometric measurements (skinfold thickness, body mass index, or BMI), BIA, and DXA. Age-specific equations were used for anthropometry and BIA. Limits of agreement were calculated between DXA and the other methods. Results. The equations based on BMI and BIA systematically overestimated %BF with respect to %BF measured by DXA in people of all ages. Intermethod difference between DXA and skinfold thicknesses was less marked, but in over-80-year-olds %BF predicted by skinfold measurements underestimated %BF measured by DXA. Interindividual and age-related variation in TBBMC and in fat-free mass mineralization could partly explain the intermethod differences found between DXA and the other methods. Conclusions. Because of practical constraints, anthropometry and BIA are often the only available options for body composition assessment in clinical routine; therefore, further research on the validity and improvement of these methods in older people is indicated.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Adipose Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging - pathology</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Body fat</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Electric Impedance</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Nutrition Assessment</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Skinfold Thickness</subject><issn>1079-5006</issn><issn>1758-535X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1LxDAQxYMofp-9SfDgQehu0jZp4m1dP1Z08aCCeAlpM9Vq26xJC-5_b5aKiCfn8ubwm8ebh9ABJSNKZDJ-AWdbPWbpKB7NM7KGtmnGRMQS9rQedpLJiBHCt9CO929kNSzeRFs0KBVMbKOrOWjfO2ig7bAt8Zk1S3ypO1y1eAa67l6X-KI24OolnkN7iid4apuFdpW37epgDt2rNX4PbZS69rD_rbvo8fLiYTqLbu-urqeT26gIObooTUtJRQE5MSGD4ZrkucwLWcQyNjIzpUm00DEpRc6kpBS4pCw2OYVUlJpmyS46HnwXzn704DvVVL6AutYt2N4rLjlJaboCj_6Ab7Z3bcimYiJ4Et5PAzQeoMJZ7x2UauGqRrulokStClZDwYqlKlah4HBx-G3b5w2YX_zQaABOBsD2i3-4RQNc-Q4-f3Dt3hXPkoyp2dOzuuf85mx6niiRfAHUYpM8</recordid><startdate>19990201</startdate><enddate>19990201</enddate><creator>Ravaglia, Giovanni</creator><creator>Forti, Paola</creator><creator>Maioli, Fabiola</creator><creator>Boschi, Federica</creator><creator>Cicognani, Annalena</creator><creator>Gasbarrini, Giovanni</creator><general>The Gerontological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990201</creationdate><title>Measurement of Body Fat in Healthy Elderly Men: A Comparison of Methods</title><author>Ravaglia, Giovanni ; Forti, Paola ; Maioli, Fabiola ; Boschi, Federica ; Cicognani, Annalena ; Gasbarrini, Giovanni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-44f918ceb0d100d6a0bb9bc9c292d97dfd3a8a20f8b59911e69152db1e48fa173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Adipose Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging - pathology</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Body fat</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Electric Impedance</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Nutrition Assessment</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Skinfold Thickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ravaglia, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forti, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maioli, Fabiola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boschi, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cicognani, Annalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasbarrini, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ravaglia, Giovanni</au><au>Forti, Paola</au><au>Maioli, Fabiola</au><au>Boschi, Federica</au><au>Cicognani, Annalena</au><au>Gasbarrini, Giovanni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measurement of Body Fat in Healthy Elderly Men: A Comparison of Methods</atitle><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences</jtitle><stitle>Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biomedical Sciences and Medical Sciences</stitle><addtitle>Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biomedical Sciences and Medical Sciences</addtitle><date>1999-02-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>M70</spage><epage>M76</epage><pages>M70-M76</pages><issn>1079-5006</issn><eissn>1758-535X</eissn><abstract>Background. Nutritional evaluation of elderly people is of great importance. Two-component methods for body composition assessment, such as anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance (BIA), are widely used in clinical practice, but their fundamental assumptions may be invalid in older people. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a relatively new method for reliable and direct measurements of body mass in its three basic components: total body bone mineral content (TBBMC), mineral free lean tissue mass (LTM), and fat. In this study, percent body fat (%BF) estimates from anthropometry and BIA in men of various ages were compared with corresponding measurements by DXA. Methods. Body fat percentage was estimated in 67 men aged 20–95 by anthropometric measurements (skinfold thickness, body mass index, or BMI), BIA, and DXA. Age-specific equations were used for anthropometry and BIA. Limits of agreement were calculated between DXA and the other methods. Results. The equations based on BMI and BIA systematically overestimated %BF with respect to %BF measured by DXA in people of all ages. Intermethod difference between DXA and skinfold thicknesses was less marked, but in over-80-year-olds %BF predicted by skinfold measurements underestimated %BF measured by DXA. Interindividual and age-related variation in TBBMC and in fat-free mass mineralization could partly explain the intermethod differences found between DXA and the other methods. Conclusions. Because of practical constraints, anthropometry and BIA are often the only available options for body composition assessment in clinical routine; therefore, further research on the validity and improvement of these methods in older people is indicated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Gerontological Society of America</pub><pmid>10051858</pmid><doi>10.1093/gerona/54.2.M70</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1079-5006
ispartof The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 1999-02, Vol.54 (2), p.M70-M76
issn 1079-5006
1758-535X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69604147
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon
Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging - pathology
Analysis of Variance
Anthropometry
Body Composition
Body fat
Body Mass Index
Bone Density
Electric Impedance
Geriatric Assessment
Humans
Italy
Male
Medical screening
Men
Middle Aged
Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy & histology
Nutrition Assessment
Older people
Reproducibility of Results
Skinfold Thickness
title Measurement of Body Fat in Healthy Elderly Men: A Comparison of Methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T16%3A53%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measurement%20of%20Body%20Fat%20in%20Healthy%20Elderly%20Men:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Methods&rft.jtitle=The%20journals%20of%20gerontology.%20Series%20A,%20Biological%20sciences%20and%20medical%20sciences&rft.au=Ravaglia,%20Giovanni&rft.date=1999-02-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=M70&rft.epage=M76&rft.pages=M70-M76&rft.issn=1079-5006&rft.eissn=1758-535X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/gerona/54.2.M70&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69604147%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208631854&rft_id=info:pmid/10051858&rft_oup_id=10.1093/gerona/54.2.M70&rfr_iscdi=true