Practice and perception—A nationwide survey of therapy habits in sepsis

OBJECTIVE:To simultaneously determine perceived vs. practiced adherence to recommended interventions for the treatment of severe sepsis or septic shock. DESIGN:One-day cross-sectional survey. SETTING:Representative sample of German intensive care units stratified by hospital size. PATIENTS:Adult pat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care medicine 2008-10, Vol.36 (10), p.2719-2725
Hauptverfasser: Brunkhorst, Frank M, Engel, Christoph, Ragaller, Max, Welte, Tobias, Rossaint, Rolf, Gerlach, Herwig, Mayer, Konstantin, John, Stefan, Stuber, Frank, Weiler, Norbert, Oppert, Michael, Moerer, Onnen, Bogatsch, Holger, Reinhart, Konrad, Loeffler, Markus, Hartog, Christiane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2725
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2719
container_title Critical care medicine
container_volume 36
creator Brunkhorst, Frank M
Engel, Christoph
Ragaller, Max
Welte, Tobias
Rossaint, Rolf
Gerlach, Herwig
Mayer, Konstantin
John, Stefan
Stuber, Frank
Weiler, Norbert
Oppert, Michael
Moerer, Onnen
Bogatsch, Holger
Reinhart, Konrad
Loeffler, Markus
Hartog, Christiane
description OBJECTIVE:To simultaneously determine perceived vs. practiced adherence to recommended interventions for the treatment of severe sepsis or septic shock. DESIGN:One-day cross-sectional survey. SETTING:Representative sample of German intensive care units stratified by hospital size. PATIENTS:Adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. INTERVENTIONS:None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Practice recommendations were selected by German Sepsis Competence Network (SepNet) investigators. External intensivists visited intensive care units randomly chosen and asked the responsible intensive care unit director how often these recommendations were used. Responses “always” and “frequently” were combined to depict perceived adherence. Thereafter patient files were audited. Three hundred sixty-six patients on 214 intensive care units fulfilled the criteria and received full support. One hundred fifty-two patients had acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Low-tidal volume ventilation ≤6 mL/kg/predicted body weight was documented in 2.6% of these patients. A total of 17.1% patients had tidal volume between 6 and 8 mL/kg predicted body weight and 80.3% >8 mL/kg predicted body weight. Mean tidal volume was 10.0 ± 2.4 mL/kg predicted body weight. Perceived adherence to low-tidal volume ventilation was 79.9%. Euglycemia (4.4–6.1 mmol/L) was documented in 6.2% of 355 patients. A total of 33.8% of patients had blood glucose levels ≤8.3 mmol/L and 66.2% were hyperglycemic (blood glucose >8.3 mmol/L). Among 207 patients receiving insulin therapy, 1.9% were euglycemic, 20.8% had blood glucose levels ≤8.3 mmol/L, and 1.0% were hypoglycemic. Overall, mean maximal glucose level was 10.0 ± 3.6 mmol/L. Perceived adherence to strict glycemic control was 65.9%. Although perceived adherence to recommendations was higher in academic and larger hospitals, actual practice was not significantly influenced by hospital size or university affiliation. CONCLUSIONS:This representative survey shows that current therapy of severe sepsis in German intensive care units complies poorly with practice recommendations. Intensive care unit directors perceive adherence to be higher than it actually is. Implementation strategies involving all intensive care unit staff are needed to overcome this gap between current evidence-based knowledge, practice, and perception.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186b6f3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69602548</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69602548</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3801-5c564169982687d1a170345749278bab874e2a49e385f6c131616a808cac6e6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1u1DAQxy1ERZfCGyDkC72lzMSOYx-rFZRKRfQAZ2vinWgN2STYSVd74yF4Qp6ErLqiEnOYD-k3X38h3iBcIbj6_Xr9-QoaQMUKLVrTmFY9EyusFBRQOvVcrAAcFEo7dS5e5vwdAHVVqxfiHG1tDAKsxO19ojDFwJL6jRw5BR6nOPR_fv2-lj0d033csMxzeuCDHFo5bTnReJBbauKUZexl5jHH_EqctdRlfn2KF-Lbxw9f15-Kuy83t-vruyIoC1hUoTIajXO2NLbeIGENajlLu7K2DTW21lySdqxs1ZqACg0asmADBcOmURfi8nHumIafM-fJ72IO3HXU8zBnb5yBstJ2AfUjGNKQc-LWjynuKB08gj9K6BcJ_f8SLm1vT_PnZsebp6aTZgvw7gRQDtS1ifoQ8z-uhBqXZ9TT_v3QTZzyj27ec_Jbpm7aelhMldoUJYDFY1UcHaq_fkCJaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69602548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practice and perception—A nationwide survey of therapy habits in sepsis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Brunkhorst, Frank M ; Engel, Christoph ; Ragaller, Max ; Welte, Tobias ; Rossaint, Rolf ; Gerlach, Herwig ; Mayer, Konstantin ; John, Stefan ; Stuber, Frank ; Weiler, Norbert ; Oppert, Michael ; Moerer, Onnen ; Bogatsch, Holger ; Reinhart, Konrad ; Loeffler, Markus ; Hartog, Christiane</creator><creatorcontrib>Brunkhorst, Frank M ; Engel, Christoph ; Ragaller, Max ; Welte, Tobias ; Rossaint, Rolf ; Gerlach, Herwig ; Mayer, Konstantin ; John, Stefan ; Stuber, Frank ; Weiler, Norbert ; Oppert, Michael ; Moerer, Onnen ; Bogatsch, Holger ; Reinhart, Konrad ; Loeffler, Markus ; Hartog, Christiane ; German Sepsis Competence Network (SepNet)</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE:To simultaneously determine perceived vs. practiced adherence to recommended interventions for the treatment of severe sepsis or septic shock. DESIGN:One-day cross-sectional survey. SETTING:Representative sample of German intensive care units stratified by hospital size. PATIENTS:Adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. INTERVENTIONS:None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Practice recommendations were selected by German Sepsis Competence Network (SepNet) investigators. External intensivists visited intensive care units randomly chosen and asked the responsible intensive care unit director how often these recommendations were used. Responses “always” and “frequently” were combined to depict perceived adherence. Thereafter patient files were audited. Three hundred sixty-six patients on 214 intensive care units fulfilled the criteria and received full support. One hundred fifty-two patients had acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Low-tidal volume ventilation ≤6 mL/kg/predicted body weight was documented in 2.6% of these patients. A total of 17.1% patients had tidal volume between 6 and 8 mL/kg predicted body weight and 80.3% &gt;8 mL/kg predicted body weight. Mean tidal volume was 10.0 ± 2.4 mL/kg predicted body weight. Perceived adherence to low-tidal volume ventilation was 79.9%. Euglycemia (4.4–6.1 mmol/L) was documented in 6.2% of 355 patients. A total of 33.8% of patients had blood glucose levels ≤8.3 mmol/L and 66.2% were hyperglycemic (blood glucose &gt;8.3 mmol/L). Among 207 patients receiving insulin therapy, 1.9% were euglycemic, 20.8% had blood glucose levels ≤8.3 mmol/L, and 1.0% were hypoglycemic. Overall, mean maximal glucose level was 10.0 ± 3.6 mmol/L. Perceived adherence to strict glycemic control was 65.9%. Although perceived adherence to recommendations was higher in academic and larger hospitals, actual practice was not significantly influenced by hospital size or university affiliation. CONCLUSIONS:This representative survey shows that current therapy of severe sepsis in German intensive care units complies poorly with practice recommendations. Intensive care unit directors perceive adherence to be higher than it actually is. Implementation strategies involving all intensive care unit staff are needed to overcome this gap between current evidence-based knowledge, practice, and perception.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-3493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186b6f3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18766100</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CCMDC7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; APACHE ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Glucose - analysis ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Critical Care - standards ; Critical Care - trends ; Critical Illness - mortality ; Critical Illness - therapy ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Emergency and intensive care: infection, septic shock ; Female ; Germany ; Guideline Adherence ; Hospital Mortality - trends ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Needs Assessment ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Probability ; Quality of Health Care ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - diagnosis ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy ; Sepsis - diagnosis ; Sepsis - mortality ; Sepsis - therapy ; Shock, Septic - diagnosis ; Shock, Septic - mortality ; Shock, Septic - therapy ; Survival Analysis ; Tidal Volume - physiology ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Critical care medicine, 2008-10, Vol.36 (10), p.2719-2725</ispartof><rights>2008 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3801-5c564169982687d1a170345749278bab874e2a49e385f6c131616a808cac6e6b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3801-5c564169982687d1a170345749278bab874e2a49e385f6c131616a808cac6e6b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20714923$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18766100$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brunkhorst, Frank M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engel, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragaller, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welte, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossaint, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerlach, Herwig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Konstantin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuber, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiler, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppert, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moerer, Onnen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogatsch, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhart, Konrad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loeffler, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartog, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>German Sepsis Competence Network (SepNet)</creatorcontrib><title>Practice and perception—A nationwide survey of therapy habits in sepsis</title><title>Critical care medicine</title><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE:To simultaneously determine perceived vs. practiced adherence to recommended interventions for the treatment of severe sepsis or septic shock. DESIGN:One-day cross-sectional survey. SETTING:Representative sample of German intensive care units stratified by hospital size. PATIENTS:Adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. INTERVENTIONS:None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Practice recommendations were selected by German Sepsis Competence Network (SepNet) investigators. External intensivists visited intensive care units randomly chosen and asked the responsible intensive care unit director how often these recommendations were used. Responses “always” and “frequently” were combined to depict perceived adherence. Thereafter patient files were audited. Three hundred sixty-six patients on 214 intensive care units fulfilled the criteria and received full support. One hundred fifty-two patients had acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Low-tidal volume ventilation ≤6 mL/kg/predicted body weight was documented in 2.6% of these patients. A total of 17.1% patients had tidal volume between 6 and 8 mL/kg predicted body weight and 80.3% &gt;8 mL/kg predicted body weight. Mean tidal volume was 10.0 ± 2.4 mL/kg predicted body weight. Perceived adherence to low-tidal volume ventilation was 79.9%. Euglycemia (4.4–6.1 mmol/L) was documented in 6.2% of 355 patients. A total of 33.8% of patients had blood glucose levels ≤8.3 mmol/L and 66.2% were hyperglycemic (blood glucose &gt;8.3 mmol/L). Among 207 patients receiving insulin therapy, 1.9% were euglycemic, 20.8% had blood glucose levels ≤8.3 mmol/L, and 1.0% were hypoglycemic. Overall, mean maximal glucose level was 10.0 ± 3.6 mmol/L. Perceived adherence to strict glycemic control was 65.9%. Although perceived adherence to recommendations was higher in academic and larger hospitals, actual practice was not significantly influenced by hospital size or university affiliation. CONCLUSIONS:This representative survey shows that current therapy of severe sepsis in German intensive care units complies poorly with practice recommendations. Intensive care unit directors perceive adherence to be higher than it actually is. Implementation strategies involving all intensive care unit staff are needed to overcome this gap between current evidence-based knowledge, practice, and perception.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>APACHE</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Critical Care - standards</subject><subject>Critical Care - trends</subject><subject>Critical Illness - mortality</subject><subject>Critical Illness - therapy</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: infection, septic shock</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - diagnosis</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy</subject><subject>Sepsis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sepsis - mortality</subject><subject>Sepsis - therapy</subject><subject>Shock, Septic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Shock, Septic - mortality</subject><subject>Shock, Septic - therapy</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Tidal Volume - physiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0090-3493</issn><issn>1530-0293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM1u1DAQxy1ERZfCGyDkC72lzMSOYx-rFZRKRfQAZ2vinWgN2STYSVd74yF4Qp6ErLqiEnOYD-k3X38h3iBcIbj6_Xr9-QoaQMUKLVrTmFY9EyusFBRQOvVcrAAcFEo7dS5e5vwdAHVVqxfiHG1tDAKsxO19ojDFwJL6jRw5BR6nOPR_fv2-lj0d033csMxzeuCDHFo5bTnReJBbauKUZexl5jHH_EqctdRlfn2KF-Lbxw9f15-Kuy83t-vruyIoC1hUoTIajXO2NLbeIGENajlLu7K2DTW21lySdqxs1ZqACg0asmADBcOmURfi8nHumIafM-fJ72IO3HXU8zBnb5yBstJ2AfUjGNKQc-LWjynuKB08gj9K6BcJ_f8SLm1vT_PnZsebp6aTZgvw7gRQDtS1ifoQ8z-uhBqXZ9TT_v3QTZzyj27ec_Jbpm7aelhMldoUJYDFY1UcHaq_fkCJaQ</recordid><startdate>200810</startdate><enddate>200810</enddate><creator>Brunkhorst, Frank M</creator><creator>Engel, Christoph</creator><creator>Ragaller, Max</creator><creator>Welte, Tobias</creator><creator>Rossaint, Rolf</creator><creator>Gerlach, Herwig</creator><creator>Mayer, Konstantin</creator><creator>John, Stefan</creator><creator>Stuber, Frank</creator><creator>Weiler, Norbert</creator><creator>Oppert, Michael</creator><creator>Moerer, Onnen</creator><creator>Bogatsch, Holger</creator><creator>Reinhart, Konrad</creator><creator>Loeffler, Markus</creator><creator>Hartog, Christiane</creator><general>by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200810</creationdate><title>Practice and perception—A nationwide survey of therapy habits in sepsis</title><author>Brunkhorst, Frank M ; Engel, Christoph ; Ragaller, Max ; Welte, Tobias ; Rossaint, Rolf ; Gerlach, Herwig ; Mayer, Konstantin ; John, Stefan ; Stuber, Frank ; Weiler, Norbert ; Oppert, Michael ; Moerer, Onnen ; Bogatsch, Holger ; Reinhart, Konrad ; Loeffler, Markus ; Hartog, Christiane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3801-5c564169982687d1a170345749278bab874e2a49e385f6c131616a808cac6e6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>APACHE</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - analysis</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Critical Care - standards</topic><topic>Critical Care - trends</topic><topic>Critical Illness - mortality</topic><topic>Critical Illness - therapy</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: infection, septic shock</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - diagnosis</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy</topic><topic>Sepsis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sepsis - mortality</topic><topic>Sepsis - therapy</topic><topic>Shock, Septic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Shock, Septic - mortality</topic><topic>Shock, Septic - therapy</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Tidal Volume - physiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brunkhorst, Frank M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engel, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragaller, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welte, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossaint, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerlach, Herwig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Konstantin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuber, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiler, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppert, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moerer, Onnen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogatsch, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhart, Konrad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loeffler, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartog, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>German Sepsis Competence Network (SepNet)</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brunkhorst, Frank M</au><au>Engel, Christoph</au><au>Ragaller, Max</au><au>Welte, Tobias</au><au>Rossaint, Rolf</au><au>Gerlach, Herwig</au><au>Mayer, Konstantin</au><au>John, Stefan</au><au>Stuber, Frank</au><au>Weiler, Norbert</au><au>Oppert, Michael</au><au>Moerer, Onnen</au><au>Bogatsch, Holger</au><au>Reinhart, Konrad</au><au>Loeffler, Markus</au><au>Hartog, Christiane</au><aucorp>German Sepsis Competence Network (SepNet)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practice and perception—A nationwide survey of therapy habits in sepsis</atitle><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><date>2008-10</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2719</spage><epage>2725</epage><pages>2719-2725</pages><issn>0090-3493</issn><eissn>1530-0293</eissn><coden>CCMDC7</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVE:To simultaneously determine perceived vs. practiced adherence to recommended interventions for the treatment of severe sepsis or septic shock. DESIGN:One-day cross-sectional survey. SETTING:Representative sample of German intensive care units stratified by hospital size. PATIENTS:Adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. INTERVENTIONS:None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Practice recommendations were selected by German Sepsis Competence Network (SepNet) investigators. External intensivists visited intensive care units randomly chosen and asked the responsible intensive care unit director how often these recommendations were used. Responses “always” and “frequently” were combined to depict perceived adherence. Thereafter patient files were audited. Three hundred sixty-six patients on 214 intensive care units fulfilled the criteria and received full support. One hundred fifty-two patients had acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Low-tidal volume ventilation ≤6 mL/kg/predicted body weight was documented in 2.6% of these patients. A total of 17.1% patients had tidal volume between 6 and 8 mL/kg predicted body weight and 80.3% &gt;8 mL/kg predicted body weight. Mean tidal volume was 10.0 ± 2.4 mL/kg predicted body weight. Perceived adherence to low-tidal volume ventilation was 79.9%. Euglycemia (4.4–6.1 mmol/L) was documented in 6.2% of 355 patients. A total of 33.8% of patients had blood glucose levels ≤8.3 mmol/L and 66.2% were hyperglycemic (blood glucose &gt;8.3 mmol/L). Among 207 patients receiving insulin therapy, 1.9% were euglycemic, 20.8% had blood glucose levels ≤8.3 mmol/L, and 1.0% were hypoglycemic. Overall, mean maximal glucose level was 10.0 ± 3.6 mmol/L. Perceived adherence to strict glycemic control was 65.9%. Although perceived adherence to recommendations was higher in academic and larger hospitals, actual practice was not significantly influenced by hospital size or university affiliation. CONCLUSIONS:This representative survey shows that current therapy of severe sepsis in German intensive care units complies poorly with practice recommendations. Intensive care unit directors perceive adherence to be higher than it actually is. Implementation strategies involving all intensive care unit staff are needed to overcome this gap between current evidence-based knowledge, practice, and perception.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>18766100</pmid><doi>10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186b6f3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-3493
ispartof Critical care medicine, 2008-10, Vol.36 (10), p.2719-2725
issn 0090-3493
1530-0293
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69602548
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
APACHE
Attitude of Health Personnel
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Glucose - analysis
Combined Modality Therapy
Critical Care - standards
Critical Care - trends
Critical Illness - mortality
Critical Illness - therapy
Cross-Sectional Studies
Emergency and intensive care: infection, septic shock
Female
Germany
Guideline Adherence
Hospital Mortality - trends
Humans
Intensive care medicine
Intensive Care Units
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Needs Assessment
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Probability
Quality of Health Care
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - diagnosis
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy
Sepsis - diagnosis
Sepsis - mortality
Sepsis - therapy
Shock, Septic - diagnosis
Shock, Septic - mortality
Shock, Septic - therapy
Survival Analysis
Tidal Volume - physiology
Treatment Outcome
title Practice and perception—A nationwide survey of therapy habits in sepsis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T22%3A56%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practice%20and%20perception%E2%80%94A%20nationwide%20survey%20of%20therapy%20habits%20in%20sepsis&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Brunkhorst,%20Frank%20M&rft.aucorp=German%20Sepsis%20Competence%20Network%20(SepNet)&rft.date=2008-10&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2719&rft.epage=2725&rft.pages=2719-2725&rft.issn=0090-3493&rft.eissn=1530-0293&rft.coden=CCMDC7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186b6f3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69602548%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69602548&rft_id=info:pmid/18766100&rfr_iscdi=true