Statistical Inference by Confidence Intervals: Issues of Interpretation and Utilization
This article examines the role of the confidence interval (CI) in statistical inference and its advantages over conventional hypothesis testing, particularly when data are applied in the context of clinical practice. A CI provides a range of population values with which a sample statistic is consist...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physical therapy 1999-02, Vol.79 (2), p.186-195 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 195 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 186 |
container_title | Physical therapy |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Sim, J Reid, N |
description | This article examines the role of the confidence interval (CI) in statistical inference and its advantages over conventional hypothesis testing, particularly when data are applied in the context of clinical practice. A CI provides a range of population values with which a sample statistic is consistent at a given level of confidence (usually 95%). Conventional hypothesis testing serves to either reject or retain a null hypothesis. A CI, while also functioning as a hypothesis test, provides additional information on the variability of an observed sample statistic (ie, its precision) and on its probable relationship to the value of this statistic in the population from which the sample was drawn (ie, its accuracy). Thus, the CI focuses attention on the magnitude and the probability of a treatment or other effect. It thereby assists in determining the clinical usefulness and importance of, as well as the statistical significance of, findings. The CI is appropriate for both parametric and nonparametric analyses and for both individual studies and aggregated data in meta-analyses. It is recommended that, when inferential statistical analysis is performed, CIs should accompany point estimates and conventional hypothesis tests wherever possible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ptj/79.2.186 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69588914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A53984500</galeid><sourcerecordid>A53984500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-f239b34abebb9718795cf0b9abec1bd36a64ae9ab735f588e174e21c7f9934753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1vEzEQxVcIREPhxhmtOHCBTf2xX-6tigpEqtQDVBwtr3ecOvLawXaA9q9n0q0QoMgHa0a_eXozryheU7KkRPCzXd6edWLJlrRvnxQL2vC-ajtWPy0WhHBaCcL4SfEipS0hhHa1eF6cUEKYIE2_KL59ySrblK1Wrlx7AxG8hnK4K1fBGzs-VGufIf5QLp2X65T2kMpg5uYuwmE--FL5sbzJ1tn7h_pl8czgALx6_E-Lm4-XX1efq6vrT-vVxVWlG0JyZRgXA6_VAMMgOtp3otGGDAIbmg4jb1VbK8Cy441p-h5wAWBUd0YIXncNPy3ezbq7GL6jsywnmzQ4pzyEfZKtwClBawTf_gduwz569CYZ45Qx2guEPszQRjmQ1puQo9Ib8BCVCx6MxfZFw0Vfo33EqyM4vhEmq4_x_8ojkuFX1sE52IDEw6yuj-E6hpQiGLmLdlLxTlIiD9lLzF52QjKJ2SP-5nHD_TDB-Bc8h43A-xm4tZvbnzaCTJNyDnF2UJrP8UfuN8mjuME</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223122189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Statistical Inference by Confidence Intervals: Issues of Interpretation and Utilization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Sim, J ; Reid, N</creator><creatorcontrib>Sim, J ; Reid, N</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the role of the confidence interval (CI) in statistical inference and its advantages over conventional hypothesis testing, particularly when data are applied in the context of clinical practice. A CI provides a range of population values with which a sample statistic is consistent at a given level of confidence (usually 95%). Conventional hypothesis testing serves to either reject or retain a null hypothesis. A CI, while also functioning as a hypothesis test, provides additional information on the variability of an observed sample statistic (ie, its precision) and on its probable relationship to the value of this statistic in the population from which the sample was drawn (ie, its accuracy). Thus, the CI focuses attention on the magnitude and the probability of a treatment or other effect. It thereby assists in determining the clinical usefulness and importance of, as well as the statistical significance of, findings. The CI is appropriate for both parametric and nonparametric analyses and for both individual studies and aggregated data in meta-analyses. It is recommended that, when inferential statistical analysis is performed, CIs should accompany point estimates and conventional hypothesis tests wherever possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9023</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-6724</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ptj/79.2.186</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10029058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Physical Therapy Association</publisher><subject>Bias ; Confidence Intervals ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Fibromyalgia - therapy ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Inference ; Medical research ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical hypothesis testing ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Physical therapy, 1999-02, Vol.79 (2), p.186-195</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 1999 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1999 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright American Physical Therapy Association Feb 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-f239b34abebb9718795cf0b9abec1bd36a64ae9ab735f588e174e21c7f9934753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-f239b34abebb9718795cf0b9abec1bd36a64ae9ab735f588e174e21c7f9934753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10029058$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sim, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, N</creatorcontrib><title>Statistical Inference by Confidence Intervals: Issues of Interpretation and Utilization</title><title>Physical therapy</title><addtitle>Phys Ther</addtitle><description>This article examines the role of the confidence interval (CI) in statistical inference and its advantages over conventional hypothesis testing, particularly when data are applied in the context of clinical practice. A CI provides a range of population values with which a sample statistic is consistent at a given level of confidence (usually 95%). Conventional hypothesis testing serves to either reject or retain a null hypothesis. A CI, while also functioning as a hypothesis test, provides additional information on the variability of an observed sample statistic (ie, its precision) and on its probable relationship to the value of this statistic in the population from which the sample was drawn (ie, its accuracy). Thus, the CI focuses attention on the magnitude and the probability of a treatment or other effect. It thereby assists in determining the clinical usefulness and importance of, as well as the statistical significance of, findings. The CI is appropriate for both parametric and nonparametric analyses and for both individual studies and aggregated data in meta-analyses. It is recommended that, when inferential statistical analysis is performed, CIs should accompany point estimates and conventional hypothesis tests wherever possible.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Fibromyalgia - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Inference</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical hypothesis testing</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0031-9023</issn><issn>1538-6724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1vEzEQxVcIREPhxhmtOHCBTf2xX-6tigpEqtQDVBwtr3ecOvLawXaA9q9n0q0QoMgHa0a_eXozryheU7KkRPCzXd6edWLJlrRvnxQL2vC-ajtWPy0WhHBaCcL4SfEipS0hhHa1eF6cUEKYIE2_KL59ySrblK1Wrlx7AxG8hnK4K1fBGzs-VGufIf5QLp2X65T2kMpg5uYuwmE--FL5sbzJ1tn7h_pl8czgALx6_E-Lm4-XX1efq6vrT-vVxVWlG0JyZRgXA6_VAMMgOtp3otGGDAIbmg4jb1VbK8Cy441p-h5wAWBUd0YIXncNPy3ezbq7GL6jsywnmzQ4pzyEfZKtwClBawTf_gduwz569CYZ45Qx2guEPszQRjmQ1puQo9Ib8BCVCx6MxfZFw0Vfo33EqyM4vhEmq4_x_8ojkuFX1sE52IDEw6yuj-E6hpQiGLmLdlLxTlIiD9lLzF52QjKJ2SP-5nHD_TDB-Bc8h43A-xm4tZvbnzaCTJNyDnF2UJrP8UfuN8mjuME</recordid><startdate>19990201</startdate><enddate>19990201</enddate><creator>Sim, J</creator><creator>Reid, N</creator><general>American Physical Therapy Association</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990201</creationdate><title>Statistical Inference by Confidence Intervals: Issues of Interpretation and Utilization</title><author>Sim, J ; Reid, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-f239b34abebb9718795cf0b9abec1bd36a64ae9ab735f588e174e21c7f9934753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Fibromyalgia - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Inference</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical hypothesis testing</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sim, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physical therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sim, J</au><au>Reid, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Statistical Inference by Confidence Intervals: Issues of Interpretation and Utilization</atitle><jtitle>Physical therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Ther</addtitle><date>1999-02-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>186</spage><epage>195</epage><pages>186-195</pages><issn>0031-9023</issn><eissn>1538-6724</eissn><abstract>This article examines the role of the confidence interval (CI) in statistical inference and its advantages over conventional hypothesis testing, particularly when data are applied in the context of clinical practice. A CI provides a range of population values with which a sample statistic is consistent at a given level of confidence (usually 95%). Conventional hypothesis testing serves to either reject or retain a null hypothesis. A CI, while also functioning as a hypothesis test, provides additional information on the variability of an observed sample statistic (ie, its precision) and on its probable relationship to the value of this statistic in the population from which the sample was drawn (ie, its accuracy). Thus, the CI focuses attention on the magnitude and the probability of a treatment or other effect. It thereby assists in determining the clinical usefulness and importance of, as well as the statistical significance of, findings. The CI is appropriate for both parametric and nonparametric analyses and for both individual studies and aggregated data in meta-analyses. It is recommended that, when inferential statistical analysis is performed, CIs should accompany point estimates and conventional hypothesis tests wherever possible.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Physical Therapy Association</pub><pmid>10029058</pmid><doi>10.1093/ptj/79.2.186</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-9023 |
ispartof | Physical therapy, 1999-02, Vol.79 (2), p.186-195 |
issn | 0031-9023 1538-6724 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69588914 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Bias Confidence Intervals Data Interpretation, Statistical Fibromyalgia - therapy Humans Hypotheses Inference Medical research Meta-Analysis as Topic Methods Reproducibility of Results Statistical analysis Statistical hypothesis testing Statistics, Nonparametric Treatment Outcome |
title | Statistical Inference by Confidence Intervals: Issues of Interpretation and Utilization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A36%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Statistical%20Inference%20by%20Confidence%20Intervals:%20Issues%20of%20Interpretation%20and%20Utilization&rft.jtitle=Physical%20therapy&rft.au=Sim,%20J&rft.date=1999-02-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=186&rft.epage=195&rft.pages=186-195&rft.issn=0031-9023&rft.eissn=1538-6724&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ptj/79.2.186&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA53984500%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223122189&rft_id=info:pmid/10029058&rft_galeid=A53984500&rfr_iscdi=true |