Satisfaction with and usage of a hand neuroprosthesis
Objective: To measure the satisfaction with, clinical impact of, and use of an implantable hand neuroprosthesis. Setting: Eight different medical centers. Participants: Thirty-four individuals with spinal cord injuries at the C5 or C6 motor level. Interventions: Participants were implemented with a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 1999-02, Vol.80 (2), p.206-213 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 213 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 206 |
| container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 80 |
| creator | Wuolle, Kathryn Stroh Van Doren, Clayton L. Bryden, Anne M. Hunter Peckham, P. Keith, Michael W. Kilgore, Kevin L. Grill, Julie H. |
| description | Objective: To measure the satisfaction with, clinical impact of, and use of an implantable hand neuroprosthesis.
Setting: Eight different medical centers.
Participants: Thirty-four individuals with spinal cord injuries at the C5 or C6 motor level.
Interventions: Participants were implemented with a hand neuroprosthesis that provides grasp and release. The neuroprosthesis includes a surgically implanted stimulator, implanted electrodes sutured to the hand and forearm muscles, and an externally mounted controller.
Main Outcome Measure: A survey was mailed to study participants, who were asked to respond to statements such as “If I had it to do over, I would have the hand system implanted again,” using a 5-level Likert scale (“strongly agree” to “strongly disagree”).
Results: Eighty-seven percent of participants were very satisfied with the neuroprosthesis, 88% reported a positive impact on their life, 87% reported improvements in activities of daily living, and 81% reported improved independence. Participants reported using the neuroprosthesis a median of 5.5 days per week; 15 participants used the neuroprosthesis 7 days per week, and 5 participants reported not using the device.
Conclusions: The neuroprosthesis was used by most participants. The neuroprosthesis performed satisfactorily, increased users' ability to perform activities of daily living and independence, and improved their quality of life. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90123-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69584508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003999399901235</els_id><sourcerecordid>69584508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-5c02feaa5961ca461fee3f6ee66bea389b5daf468faf7d9e284d66c0ab26ff593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_grIHET2sJptNujmJFL-g4KEK3sJsdmIj7a4mu4r_3rRb1JuXGQaemXl5CDlk9JxRJi9mlFKeKqX4qVJnirKMp2KLDJngWVpk7HmbDH-QAdkL4TWOUnC2SwaM0kzkSg2JmEHrggXTuqZOPl07T6Cuki7ACyaNTSCZr-YaO9-8-Sa0cwwu7JMdC4uAB5s-Ik8314-Tu3T6cHs_uZqmhqusTYWhmUUAoSQzkEtmEbmViFKWCLxQpajA5rKwYMeVwqzIKykNhTKT1grFR-Skvxtfv3cYWr10weBiATU2XdBSiSIXtIig6EETMwaPVr95twT_pRnVK1967UuvZMSi1760iHtHmwdducTqz1YvKALHGwCCgYX1UBsXfjk5zvkau-wxjDY-HHodjMPaYOU8mlZXjfsnyTceRIeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69584508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Satisfaction with and usage of a hand neuroprosthesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wuolle, Kathryn Stroh ; Van Doren, Clayton L. ; Bryden, Anne M. ; Hunter Peckham, P. ; Keith, Michael W. ; Kilgore, Kevin L. ; Grill, Julie H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wuolle, Kathryn Stroh ; Van Doren, Clayton L. ; Bryden, Anne M. ; Hunter Peckham, P. ; Keith, Michael W. ; Kilgore, Kevin L. ; Grill, Julie H.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To measure the satisfaction with, clinical impact of, and use of an implantable hand neuroprosthesis.
Setting: Eight different medical centers.
Participants: Thirty-four individuals with spinal cord injuries at the C5 or C6 motor level.
Interventions: Participants were implemented with a hand neuroprosthesis that provides grasp and release. The neuroprosthesis includes a surgically implanted stimulator, implanted electrodes sutured to the hand and forearm muscles, and an externally mounted controller.
Main Outcome Measure: A survey was mailed to study participants, who were asked to respond to statements such as “If I had it to do over, I would have the hand system implanted again,” using a 5-level Likert scale (“strongly agree” to “strongly disagree”).
Results: Eighty-seven percent of participants were very satisfied with the neuroprosthesis, 88% reported a positive impact on their life, 87% reported improvements in activities of daily living, and 81% reported improved independence. Participants reported using the neuroprosthesis a median of 5.5 days per week; 15 participants used the neuroprosthesis 7 days per week, and 5 participants reported not using the device.
Conclusions: The neuroprosthesis was used by most participants. The neuroprosthesis performed satisfactorily, increased users' ability to perform activities of daily living and independence, and improved their quality of life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90123-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10025499</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APMHAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Disability Evaluation ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment ; Electric Stimulation Therapy - instrumentation ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Female ; Hand - innervation ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Motor Skills - physiology ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Patient Satisfaction ; Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation ; Quality of Life ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology ; Spinal Cord Injuries - psychology ; Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1999-02, Vol.80 (2), p.206-213</ispartof><rights>1999</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-5c02feaa5961ca461fee3f6ee66bea389b5daf468faf7d9e284d66c0ab26ff593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-5c02feaa5961ca461fee3f6ee66bea389b5daf468faf7d9e284d66c0ab26ff593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90123-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1674399$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10025499$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wuolle, Kathryn Stroh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Doren, Clayton L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryden, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter Peckham, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgore, Kevin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grill, Julie H.</creatorcontrib><title>Satisfaction with and usage of a hand neuroprosthesis</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Objective: To measure the satisfaction with, clinical impact of, and use of an implantable hand neuroprosthesis.
Setting: Eight different medical centers.
Participants: Thirty-four individuals with spinal cord injuries at the C5 or C6 motor level.
Interventions: Participants were implemented with a hand neuroprosthesis that provides grasp and release. The neuroprosthesis includes a surgically implanted stimulator, implanted electrodes sutured to the hand and forearm muscles, and an externally mounted controller.
Main Outcome Measure: A survey was mailed to study participants, who were asked to respond to statements such as “If I had it to do over, I would have the hand system implanted again,” using a 5-level Likert scale (“strongly agree” to “strongly disagree”).
Results: Eighty-seven percent of participants were very satisfied with the neuroprosthesis, 88% reported a positive impact on their life, 87% reported improvements in activities of daily living, and 81% reported improved independence. Participants reported using the neuroprosthesis a median of 5.5 days per week; 15 participants used the neuroprosthesis 7 days per week, and 5 participants reported not using the device.
Conclusions: The neuroprosthesis was used by most participants. The neuroprosthesis performed satisfactorily, increased users' ability to perform activities of daily living and independence, and improved their quality of life.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electrodes, Implanted</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hand - innervation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor Skills - physiology</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - psychology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_grIHET2sJptNujmJFL-g4KEK3sJsdmIj7a4mu4r_3rRb1JuXGQaemXl5CDlk9JxRJi9mlFKeKqX4qVJnirKMp2KLDJngWVpk7HmbDH-QAdkL4TWOUnC2SwaM0kzkSg2JmEHrggXTuqZOPl07T6Cuki7ACyaNTSCZr-YaO9-8-Sa0cwwu7JMdC4uAB5s-Ik8314-Tu3T6cHs_uZqmhqusTYWhmUUAoSQzkEtmEbmViFKWCLxQpajA5rKwYMeVwqzIKykNhTKT1grFR-Skvxtfv3cYWr10weBiATU2XdBSiSIXtIig6EETMwaPVr95twT_pRnVK1967UuvZMSi1760iHtHmwdducTqz1YvKALHGwCCgYX1UBsXfjk5zvkau-wxjDY-HHodjMPaYOU8mlZXjfsnyTceRIeg</recordid><startdate>19990201</startdate><enddate>19990201</enddate><creator>Wuolle, Kathryn Stroh</creator><creator>Van Doren, Clayton L.</creator><creator>Bryden, Anne M.</creator><creator>Hunter Peckham, P.</creator><creator>Keith, Michael W.</creator><creator>Kilgore, Kevin L.</creator><creator>Grill, Julie H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990201</creationdate><title>Satisfaction with and usage of a hand neuroprosthesis</title><author>Wuolle, Kathryn Stroh ; Van Doren, Clayton L. ; Bryden, Anne M. ; Hunter Peckham, P. ; Keith, Michael W. ; Kilgore, Kevin L. ; Grill, Julie H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-5c02feaa5961ca461fee3f6ee66bea389b5daf468faf7d9e284d66c0ab26ff593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electrodes, Implanted</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hand - innervation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor Skills - physiology</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - psychology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wuolle, Kathryn Stroh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Doren, Clayton L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryden, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter Peckham, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgore, Kevin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grill, Julie H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wuolle, Kathryn Stroh</au><au>Van Doren, Clayton L.</au><au>Bryden, Anne M.</au><au>Hunter Peckham, P.</au><au>Keith, Michael W.</au><au>Kilgore, Kevin L.</au><au>Grill, Julie H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Satisfaction with and usage of a hand neuroprosthesis</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>1999-02-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>206</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>206-213</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><coden>APMHAI</coden><abstract>Objective: To measure the satisfaction with, clinical impact of, and use of an implantable hand neuroprosthesis.
Setting: Eight different medical centers.
Participants: Thirty-four individuals with spinal cord injuries at the C5 or C6 motor level.
Interventions: Participants were implemented with a hand neuroprosthesis that provides grasp and release. The neuroprosthesis includes a surgically implanted stimulator, implanted electrodes sutured to the hand and forearm muscles, and an externally mounted controller.
Main Outcome Measure: A survey was mailed to study participants, who were asked to respond to statements such as “If I had it to do over, I would have the hand system implanted again,” using a 5-level Likert scale (“strongly agree” to “strongly disagree”).
Results: Eighty-seven percent of participants were very satisfied with the neuroprosthesis, 88% reported a positive impact on their life, 87% reported improvements in activities of daily living, and 81% reported improved independence. Participants reported using the neuroprosthesis a median of 5.5 days per week; 15 participants used the neuroprosthesis 7 days per week, and 5 participants reported not using the device.
Conclusions: The neuroprosthesis was used by most participants. The neuroprosthesis performed satisfactorily, increased users' ability to perform activities of daily living and independence, and improved their quality of life.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10025499</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90123-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
| ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1999-02, Vol.80 (2), p.206-213 |
| issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69584508 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Biological and medical sciences Disability Evaluation Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment Electric Stimulation Therapy - instrumentation Electrodes, Implanted Female Hand - innervation Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Motor Skills - physiology Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Patient Acceptance of Health Care Patient Satisfaction Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation Quality of Life Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology Spinal Cord Injuries - psychology Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation |
| title | Satisfaction with and usage of a hand neuroprosthesis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A02%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Satisfaction%20with%20and%20usage%20of%20a%20hand%20neuroprosthesis&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Wuolle,%20Kathryn%20Stroh&rft.date=1999-02-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=206&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=206-213&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft.coden=APMHAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90123-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69584508%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69584508&rft_id=info:pmid/10025499&rft_els_id=S0003999399901235&rfr_iscdi=true |