Survival Following Bilateral Staple Lung Volume Reduction Surgery for Emphysema

Despite numerous reports of short-term response to lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for treatment of emphysema, to our knowledge, longer-term survival has not been reported. We describe survival following LVRS in a large cohort of 256 patients treated with bilateral staple LVRS (n = 236 video-as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 1999-02, Vol.115 (2), p.390-396
Hauptverfasser: Brenner, Matthew, Mc Kenna, Robert J., Chen, John C., Osann, Kathy, Powell, Ledford, Gelb, Arthur F., Fischel, Richard J., Wilson, Archie F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 396
container_issue 2
container_start_page 390
container_title Chest
container_volume 115
creator Brenner, Matthew
Mc Kenna, Robert J.
Chen, John C.
Osann, Kathy
Powell, Ledford
Gelb, Arthur F.
Fischel, Richard J.
Wilson, Archie F.
description Despite numerous reports of short-term response to lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for treatment of emphysema, to our knowledge, longer-term survival has not been reported. We describe survival following LVRS in a large cohort of 256 patients treated with bilateral staple LVRS (n = 236 video-assisted thoracic surgery [VATS] approaches, n = 20 median sternotomy) by a single group of physicians over a 3 1/2-year period from April 1994 to November 1997. Prospective survival study. Overall survival, survival stratified by preoperative presentation, and acute postoperative response were investigated using Kaplan-Meier methods. The simultaneous effects of preoperative predictors and postoperative response variables on survival were examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. Community hospital and university medical center. We studied 256 consecutive patients with severe emphysema treated with LVRS. Bilateral staple LVRS by VATS. Overall survival information was known with certainty for 246 of 256 patients as of February 1, 1998. Median follow-up time was 623 days (range, 0 to 1,545 days). Mean FEV1 was 0.635L ± 0.015 L preoperatively and rose to 1.068L ± 0.029 L postoperatively. By standard analysis methods (missing patients censored at the time of last contact), 1-year survival was 85 ± 2.3% compared with 83 ± 2.4% 1-year survival with “worst case” analytic methods (assuming all missing patients died). Two-year survival averaged 81 ± 2.7% by standard analysis vs 76 ± 2.9% by worst case evaluation. Survival was significantly better for patients who were younger (≤ 70 years old, p = 0.02) and with higher baseline FEV1 (> 0.5, p < 0.03) and Po2 (> 54, p < 0.001). Patients who had greatest short-term improvement in FEV1 following surgery (> 0.56 L increase) also had significantly better longer-term survival following LVRS. To our knowledge, this is the first longer-term survival analysis of a large series of patients who underwent bilateral staple LVRS for emphysema. Substantial long-term mortality is seen, particularly within identifiable high-risk subgroups. Careful comparison to comparably matched control patients will be needed to definitively assess the benefits and risks of LVRS. This study suggests that prospective, controlled trials may need to stratify patient randomization based on preoperative risk factors to obtain meaningful results.
doi_str_mv 10.1378/chest.115.2.390
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69577019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0012369215505813</els_id><sourcerecordid>69577019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-cef8acbaad6af694015c4478d85f93de900d563063293435c9546b689f33f23f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF2L1DAUhoMo7jh67Z0UEe86m-Q0aXPpLvshDCy46m3IpCczWdJ2TNpZ5t8b7cAuglchh-c95-Uh5D2jKwZ1c253mMYVY2LFV6DoC7JgClgJooKXZEEp4yVIxc_Im5QeaP4zJV-TM0YpryuoF-TufooHfzChuB5CGB59vy0ufDAjxjy7H80-YLGe8vTnEKYOi2_YTnb0Q1_k5BbjsXBDLK66_e6YsDNvyStnQsJ3p3dJflxffb-8Ldd3N18vv6xLK2oxlhZdY-zGmFYaJ1VFmbBVVTdtI5yCFhWlrZBAJXAFFQirRCU3slEOwHFwsCSf5737OPyasgTd-WQxBNPjMCUtlahrmmUsycd_wIdhin3upjmlgjcUeIbOZ8jGIaWITu-j70w8akb1H9H6r2idRWuus-ic-HBaO206bJ_xs9kMfDoBJlkTXDS99emJk0rWwJ4u7_x29-gj6tSZEPJWmG-e2j6_rOYEZr0Hj1En67G32Oa0HXU7-P-2_g3PI6qd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200528032</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survival Following Bilateral Staple Lung Volume Reduction Surgery for Emphysema</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Brenner, Matthew ; Mc Kenna, Robert J. ; Chen, John C. ; Osann, Kathy ; Powell, Ledford ; Gelb, Arthur F. ; Fischel, Richard J. ; Wilson, Archie F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Matthew ; Mc Kenna, Robert J. ; Chen, John C. ; Osann, Kathy ; Powell, Ledford ; Gelb, Arthur F. ; Fischel, Richard J. ; Wilson, Archie F.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite numerous reports of short-term response to lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for treatment of emphysema, to our knowledge, longer-term survival has not been reported. We describe survival following LVRS in a large cohort of 256 patients treated with bilateral staple LVRS (n = 236 video-assisted thoracic surgery [VATS] approaches, n = 20 median sternotomy) by a single group of physicians over a 3 1/2-year period from April 1994 to November 1997. Prospective survival study. Overall survival, survival stratified by preoperative presentation, and acute postoperative response were investigated using Kaplan-Meier methods. The simultaneous effects of preoperative predictors and postoperative response variables on survival were examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. Community hospital and university medical center. We studied 256 consecutive patients with severe emphysema treated with LVRS. Bilateral staple LVRS by VATS. Overall survival information was known with certainty for 246 of 256 patients as of February 1, 1998. Median follow-up time was 623 days (range, 0 to 1,545 days). Mean FEV1 was 0.635L ± 0.015 L preoperatively and rose to 1.068L ± 0.029 L postoperatively. By standard analysis methods (missing patients censored at the time of last contact), 1-year survival was 85 ± 2.3% compared with 83 ± 2.4% 1-year survival with “worst case” analytic methods (assuming all missing patients died). Two-year survival averaged 81 ± 2.7% by standard analysis vs 76 ± 2.9% by worst case evaluation. Survival was significantly better for patients who were younger (≤ 70 years old, p = 0.02) and with higher baseline FEV1 (&gt; 0.5, p &lt; 0.03) and Po2 (&gt; 54, p &lt; 0.001). Patients who had greatest short-term improvement in FEV1 following surgery (&gt; 0.56 L increase) also had significantly better longer-term survival following LVRS. To our knowledge, this is the first longer-term survival analysis of a large series of patients who underwent bilateral staple LVRS for emphysema. Substantial long-term mortality is seen, particularly within identifiable high-risk subgroups. Careful comparison to comparably matched control patients will be needed to definitively assess the benefits and risks of LVRS. This study suggests that prospective, controlled trials may need to stratify patient randomization based on preoperative risk factors to obtain meaningful results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1378/chest.115.2.390</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10027437</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHETBF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Northbrook, IL: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carbon monoxide ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma ; duration ; Emphysema ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Humans ; long term ; LVRS ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mortality ; Patients ; Pneumology ; Pneumonectomy - methods ; predictors ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Prospective Studies ; Pulmonary Emphysema - mortality ; Pulmonary Emphysema - surgery ; Spirometry ; survival ; Survival analysis ; Thoracic surgery ; Thoracoscopy</subject><ispartof>Chest, 1999-02, Vol.115 (2), p.390-396</ispartof><rights>1999 The American College of Chest Physicians</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American College of Chest Physicians Feb 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-cef8acbaad6af694015c4478d85f93de900d563063293435c9546b689f33f23f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-cef8acbaad6af694015c4478d85f93de900d563063293435c9546b689f33f23f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1696731$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10027437$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mc Kenna, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osann, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Ledford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelb, Arthur F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischel, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Archie F.</creatorcontrib><title>Survival Following Bilateral Staple Lung Volume Reduction Surgery for Emphysema</title><title>Chest</title><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><description>Despite numerous reports of short-term response to lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for treatment of emphysema, to our knowledge, longer-term survival has not been reported. We describe survival following LVRS in a large cohort of 256 patients treated with bilateral staple LVRS (n = 236 video-assisted thoracic surgery [VATS] approaches, n = 20 median sternotomy) by a single group of physicians over a 3 1/2-year period from April 1994 to November 1997. Prospective survival study. Overall survival, survival stratified by preoperative presentation, and acute postoperative response were investigated using Kaplan-Meier methods. The simultaneous effects of preoperative predictors and postoperative response variables on survival were examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. Community hospital and university medical center. We studied 256 consecutive patients with severe emphysema treated with LVRS. Bilateral staple LVRS by VATS. Overall survival information was known with certainty for 246 of 256 patients as of February 1, 1998. Median follow-up time was 623 days (range, 0 to 1,545 days). Mean FEV1 was 0.635L ± 0.015 L preoperatively and rose to 1.068L ± 0.029 L postoperatively. By standard analysis methods (missing patients censored at the time of last contact), 1-year survival was 85 ± 2.3% compared with 83 ± 2.4% 1-year survival with “worst case” analytic methods (assuming all missing patients died). Two-year survival averaged 81 ± 2.7% by standard analysis vs 76 ± 2.9% by worst case evaluation. Survival was significantly better for patients who were younger (≤ 70 years old, p = 0.02) and with higher baseline FEV1 (&gt; 0.5, p &lt; 0.03) and Po2 (&gt; 54, p &lt; 0.001). Patients who had greatest short-term improvement in FEV1 following surgery (&gt; 0.56 L increase) also had significantly better longer-term survival following LVRS. To our knowledge, this is the first longer-term survival analysis of a large series of patients who underwent bilateral staple LVRS for emphysema. Substantial long-term mortality is seen, particularly within identifiable high-risk subgroups. Careful comparison to comparably matched control patients will be needed to definitively assess the benefits and risks of LVRS. This study suggests that prospective, controlled trials may need to stratify patient randomization based on preoperative risk factors to obtain meaningful results.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carbon monoxide</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma</subject><subject>duration</subject><subject>Emphysema</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>long term</subject><subject>LVRS</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>Pneumonectomy - methods</subject><subject>predictors</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pulmonary Emphysema - mortality</subject><subject>Pulmonary Emphysema - surgery</subject><subject>Spirometry</subject><subject>survival</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Thoracic surgery</subject><subject>Thoracoscopy</subject><issn>0012-3692</issn><issn>1931-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF2L1DAUhoMo7jh67Z0UEe86m-Q0aXPpLvshDCy46m3IpCczWdJ2TNpZ5t8b7cAuglchh-c95-Uh5D2jKwZ1c253mMYVY2LFV6DoC7JgClgJooKXZEEp4yVIxc_Im5QeaP4zJV-TM0YpryuoF-TufooHfzChuB5CGB59vy0ufDAjxjy7H80-YLGe8vTnEKYOi2_YTnb0Q1_k5BbjsXBDLK66_e6YsDNvyStnQsJ3p3dJflxffb-8Ldd3N18vv6xLK2oxlhZdY-zGmFYaJ1VFmbBVVTdtI5yCFhWlrZBAJXAFFQirRCU3slEOwHFwsCSf5737OPyasgTd-WQxBNPjMCUtlahrmmUsycd_wIdhin3upjmlgjcUeIbOZ8jGIaWITu-j70w8akb1H9H6r2idRWuus-ic-HBaO206bJ_xs9kMfDoBJlkTXDS99emJk0rWwJ4u7_x29-gj6tSZEPJWmG-e2j6_rOYEZr0Hj1En67G32Oa0HXU7-P-2_g3PI6qd</recordid><startdate>19990201</startdate><enddate>19990201</enddate><creator>Brenner, Matthew</creator><creator>Mc Kenna, Robert J.</creator><creator>Chen, John C.</creator><creator>Osann, Kathy</creator><creator>Powell, Ledford</creator><creator>Gelb, Arthur F.</creator><creator>Fischel, Richard J.</creator><creator>Wilson, Archie F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American College of Chest Physicians</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990201</creationdate><title>Survival Following Bilateral Staple Lung Volume Reduction Surgery for Emphysema</title><author>Brenner, Matthew ; Mc Kenna, Robert J. ; Chen, John C. ; Osann, Kathy ; Powell, Ledford ; Gelb, Arthur F. ; Fischel, Richard J. ; Wilson, Archie F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-cef8acbaad6af694015c4478d85f93de900d563063293435c9546b689f33f23f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carbon monoxide</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma</topic><topic>duration</topic><topic>Emphysema</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>long term</topic><topic>LVRS</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>Pneumonectomy - methods</topic><topic>predictors</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pulmonary Emphysema - mortality</topic><topic>Pulmonary Emphysema - surgery</topic><topic>Spirometry</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Thoracic surgery</topic><topic>Thoracoscopy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mc Kenna, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osann, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Ledford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelb, Arthur F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischel, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Archie F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brenner, Matthew</au><au>Mc Kenna, Robert J.</au><au>Chen, John C.</au><au>Osann, Kathy</au><au>Powell, Ledford</au><au>Gelb, Arthur F.</au><au>Fischel, Richard J.</au><au>Wilson, Archie F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survival Following Bilateral Staple Lung Volume Reduction Surgery for Emphysema</atitle><jtitle>Chest</jtitle><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><date>1999-02-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>390</spage><epage>396</epage><pages>390-396</pages><issn>0012-3692</issn><eissn>1931-3543</eissn><coden>CHETBF</coden><abstract>Despite numerous reports of short-term response to lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for treatment of emphysema, to our knowledge, longer-term survival has not been reported. We describe survival following LVRS in a large cohort of 256 patients treated with bilateral staple LVRS (n = 236 video-assisted thoracic surgery [VATS] approaches, n = 20 median sternotomy) by a single group of physicians over a 3 1/2-year period from April 1994 to November 1997. Prospective survival study. Overall survival, survival stratified by preoperative presentation, and acute postoperative response were investigated using Kaplan-Meier methods. The simultaneous effects of preoperative predictors and postoperative response variables on survival were examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. Community hospital and university medical center. We studied 256 consecutive patients with severe emphysema treated with LVRS. Bilateral staple LVRS by VATS. Overall survival information was known with certainty for 246 of 256 patients as of February 1, 1998. Median follow-up time was 623 days (range, 0 to 1,545 days). Mean FEV1 was 0.635L ± 0.015 L preoperatively and rose to 1.068L ± 0.029 L postoperatively. By standard analysis methods (missing patients censored at the time of last contact), 1-year survival was 85 ± 2.3% compared with 83 ± 2.4% 1-year survival with “worst case” analytic methods (assuming all missing patients died). Two-year survival averaged 81 ± 2.7% by standard analysis vs 76 ± 2.9% by worst case evaluation. Survival was significantly better for patients who were younger (≤ 70 years old, p = 0.02) and with higher baseline FEV1 (&gt; 0.5, p &lt; 0.03) and Po2 (&gt; 54, p &lt; 0.001). Patients who had greatest short-term improvement in FEV1 following surgery (&gt; 0.56 L increase) also had significantly better longer-term survival following LVRS. To our knowledge, this is the first longer-term survival analysis of a large series of patients who underwent bilateral staple LVRS for emphysema. Substantial long-term mortality is seen, particularly within identifiable high-risk subgroups. Careful comparison to comparably matched control patients will be needed to definitively assess the benefits and risks of LVRS. This study suggests that prospective, controlled trials may need to stratify patient randomization based on preoperative risk factors to obtain meaningful results.</abstract><cop>Northbrook, IL</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10027437</pmid><doi>10.1378/chest.115.2.390</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-3692
ispartof Chest, 1999-02, Vol.115 (2), p.390-396
issn 0012-3692
1931-3543
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69577019
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Carbon monoxide
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma
duration
Emphysema
Endoscopy
Female
Humans
long term
LVRS
Male
Medical sciences
Mortality
Patients
Pneumology
Pneumonectomy - methods
predictors
Proportional Hazards Models
Prospective Studies
Pulmonary Emphysema - mortality
Pulmonary Emphysema - surgery
Spirometry
survival
Survival analysis
Thoracic surgery
Thoracoscopy
title Survival Following Bilateral Staple Lung Volume Reduction Surgery for Emphysema
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A44%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survival%20Following%20Bilateral%20Staple%20Lung%20Volume%20Reduction%20Surgery%20for%20Emphysema&rft.jtitle=Chest&rft.au=Brenner,%20Matthew&rft.date=1999-02-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=390&rft.epage=396&rft.pages=390-396&rft.issn=0012-3692&rft.eissn=1931-3543&rft.coden=CHETBF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1378/chest.115.2.390&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69577019%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200528032&rft_id=info:pmid/10027437&rft_els_id=S0012369215505813&rfr_iscdi=true