Interstitial lung disease : A quantitative study using the adaptive multiple feature method
We have previously described an adaptive multiple feature method (AMFM) for the objective assessment of global and regional changes in pulmonary parenchyma to detect emphysema. This computerized method uses a combination of statistical and fractal texture features for characterization of lung tissue...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 1999-02, Vol.159 (2), p.519-525 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 525 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 519 |
container_title | American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine |
container_volume | 159 |
creator | UPPALURI, R HOFFMAN, E. A SONKA, M HUNNINGHAKE, G. W MCLENNAN, G |
description | We have previously described an adaptive multiple feature method (AMFM) for the objective assessment of global and regional changes in pulmonary parenchyma to detect emphysema. This computerized method uses a combination of statistical and fractal texture features for characterization of lung tissues based upon high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans. This present study was a substantial extension of the AMFM to simultaneously discriminate between multiple pulmonary disease processes. Normal subjects and those with emphysema, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), or sarcoidosis were studied. The AMFM was compared with two currently utilized computer-based methods: mean lung density (MLD) and the histogram analysis (HIST). Globally, when comparing two-subject groups the AMFM overall accuracy was 2 to 18% better than the overall accuracy of MLD and as much as 36% better than the accuracy of the HIST methods. In three-subject group discrimination tasks, the AMFM performed 7 to 27% better than the MLD and 4 to 36% better than the HIST methods. Finally, in discriminating all four subject groups at a time, the AMFM overall accuracy was 81%, which was 21% better than the MLD and 25% better than the HIST method. In most three-subject group comparisons and in the four-subject group comparison, the AMFM was significantly (p < 0.01) better than the MLD and HIST methods. Next, the AMFM was applied to local discrimination between normal and each disease group individually. The normal versus emphysema, normal versus IPF, and normal versus sarcoidosis samples were discriminated with an accuracy of 95, 86, and 77%, respectively. The AMFM is an objective quantitative method that can be adapted for successful discrimination of multiple parenchymal lung diseases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1164/ajrccm.159.2.9707145 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69574731</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69574731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-a864f1e0353ff031e01772dbf06d50581c060c601ebc365527c9c678b98c24e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtrHDEQhIWJ2fj1DxLQIeQ269Z7JjezJI7B4IsNgRyEVtMTy8zMrvUw-N9bzg7Jqau7quvwEfKJwZoxLS_dU_R-WjPVrfm6M2CYVEfkhCmhGln3D1WDEY2U3a-P5DSlJwDGWwYrsuo6boQ2J-T3zZwxphxycCMdy_yH9iGhS0i_0Sv6XNxcPZfDC9KUS_9KSwo1lB-Rut7t_xpTGXPYj0gHdLnEesD8uOvPyfHgxoQXyzwjDz--329-Nrd31zebq9vG8xZy41otB4YglBgGEFUxY3i_HUD3ClTLPGjwGhhuvdBKceM7r0277VrPJXJxRr4eevdx91wwZTuF5HEc3Yy7kqzulJFGsBqUh6CPu5QiDnYfw-Tiq2Vg35naA1NbmVpuF6b17fPSX7YT9v-eFojV_7L4Lnk3DtHNPqT_3QZkq0C8AUXSgSk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69574731</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interstitial lung disease : A quantitative study using the adaptive multiple feature method</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Thoracic Society (ATS) Journals Online</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>UPPALURI, R ; HOFFMAN, E. A ; SONKA, M ; HUNNINGHAKE, G. W ; MCLENNAN, G</creator><creatorcontrib>UPPALURI, R ; HOFFMAN, E. A ; SONKA, M ; HUNNINGHAKE, G. W ; MCLENNAN, G</creatorcontrib><description>We have previously described an adaptive multiple feature method (AMFM) for the objective assessment of global and regional changes in pulmonary parenchyma to detect emphysema. This computerized method uses a combination of statistical and fractal texture features for characterization of lung tissues based upon high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans. This present study was a substantial extension of the AMFM to simultaneously discriminate between multiple pulmonary disease processes. Normal subjects and those with emphysema, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), or sarcoidosis were studied. The AMFM was compared with two currently utilized computer-based methods: mean lung density (MLD) and the histogram analysis (HIST). Globally, when comparing two-subject groups the AMFM overall accuracy was 2 to 18% better than the overall accuracy of MLD and as much as 36% better than the accuracy of the HIST methods. In three-subject group discrimination tasks, the AMFM performed 7 to 27% better than the MLD and 4 to 36% better than the HIST methods. Finally, in discriminating all four subject groups at a time, the AMFM overall accuracy was 81%, which was 21% better than the MLD and 25% better than the HIST method. In most three-subject group comparisons and in the four-subject group comparison, the AMFM was significantly (p < 0.01) better than the MLD and HIST methods. Next, the AMFM was applied to local discrimination between normal and each disease group individually. The normal versus emphysema, normal versus IPF, and normal versus sarcoidosis samples were discriminated with an accuracy of 95, 86, and 77%, respectively. The AMFM is an objective quantitative method that can be adapted for successful discrimination of multiple parenchymal lung diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-449X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-4970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.2.9707145</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9927367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: American Lung Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data ; Discriminant Analysis ; Humans ; Lung Diseases, Interstitial - diagnostic imaging ; Lung Diseases, Interstitial - physiopathology ; Medical sciences ; Pneumology ; Pulmonary Emphysema - diagnostic imaging ; Pulmonary Emphysema - physiopathology ; Pulmonary Fibrosis - diagnostic imaging ; Pulmonary Fibrosis - physiopathology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Respiratory Function Tests ; Respiratory system : syndromes and miscellaneous diseases ; Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary - diagnostic imaging ; Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary - physiopathology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 1999-02, Vol.159 (2), p.519-525</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-a864f1e0353ff031e01772dbf06d50581c060c601ebc365527c9c678b98c24e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4011,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1704850$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9927367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>UPPALURI, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOFFMAN, E. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONKA, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNNINGHAKE, G. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCLENNAN, G</creatorcontrib><title>Interstitial lung disease : A quantitative study using the adaptive multiple feature method</title><title>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Respir Crit Care Med</addtitle><description>We have previously described an adaptive multiple feature method (AMFM) for the objective assessment of global and regional changes in pulmonary parenchyma to detect emphysema. This computerized method uses a combination of statistical and fractal texture features for characterization of lung tissues based upon high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans. This present study was a substantial extension of the AMFM to simultaneously discriminate between multiple pulmonary disease processes. Normal subjects and those with emphysema, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), or sarcoidosis were studied. The AMFM was compared with two currently utilized computer-based methods: mean lung density (MLD) and the histogram analysis (HIST). Globally, when comparing two-subject groups the AMFM overall accuracy was 2 to 18% better than the overall accuracy of MLD and as much as 36% better than the accuracy of the HIST methods. In three-subject group discrimination tasks, the AMFM performed 7 to 27% better than the MLD and 4 to 36% better than the HIST methods. Finally, in discriminating all four subject groups at a time, the AMFM overall accuracy was 81%, which was 21% better than the MLD and 25% better than the HIST method. In most three-subject group comparisons and in the four-subject group comparison, the AMFM was significantly (p < 0.01) better than the MLD and HIST methods. Next, the AMFM was applied to local discrimination between normal and each disease group individually. The normal versus emphysema, normal versus IPF, and normal versus sarcoidosis samples were discriminated with an accuracy of 95, 86, and 77%, respectively. The AMFM is an objective quantitative method that can be adapted for successful discrimination of multiple parenchymal lung diseases.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Discriminant Analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung Diseases, Interstitial - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lung Diseases, Interstitial - physiopathology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>Pulmonary Emphysema - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pulmonary Emphysema - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pulmonary Fibrosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pulmonary Fibrosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Respiratory Function Tests</subject><subject>Respiratory system : syndromes and miscellaneous diseases</subject><subject>Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary - physiopathology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>1073-449X</issn><issn>1535-4970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtrHDEQhIWJ2fj1DxLQIeQ269Z7JjezJI7B4IsNgRyEVtMTy8zMrvUw-N9bzg7Jqau7quvwEfKJwZoxLS_dU_R-WjPVrfm6M2CYVEfkhCmhGln3D1WDEY2U3a-P5DSlJwDGWwYrsuo6boQ2J-T3zZwxphxycCMdy_yH9iGhS0i_0Sv6XNxcPZfDC9KUS_9KSwo1lB-Rut7t_xpTGXPYj0gHdLnEesD8uOvPyfHgxoQXyzwjDz--329-Nrd31zebq9vG8xZy41otB4YglBgGEFUxY3i_HUD3ClTLPGjwGhhuvdBKceM7r0277VrPJXJxRr4eevdx91wwZTuF5HEc3Yy7kqzulJFGsBqUh6CPu5QiDnYfw-Tiq2Vg35naA1NbmVpuF6b17fPSX7YT9v-eFojV_7L4Lnk3DtHNPqT_3QZkq0C8AUXSgSk</recordid><startdate>19990201</startdate><enddate>19990201</enddate><creator>UPPALURI, R</creator><creator>HOFFMAN, E. A</creator><creator>SONKA, M</creator><creator>HUNNINGHAKE, G. W</creator><creator>MCLENNAN, G</creator><general>American Lung Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990201</creationdate><title>Interstitial lung disease : A quantitative study using the adaptive multiple feature method</title><author>UPPALURI, R ; HOFFMAN, E. A ; SONKA, M ; HUNNINGHAKE, G. W ; MCLENNAN, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-a864f1e0353ff031e01772dbf06d50581c060c601ebc365527c9c678b98c24e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Discriminant Analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung Diseases, Interstitial - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lung Diseases, Interstitial - physiopathology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>Pulmonary Emphysema - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pulmonary Emphysema - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pulmonary Fibrosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pulmonary Fibrosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Respiratory Function Tests</topic><topic>Respiratory system : syndromes and miscellaneous diseases</topic><topic>Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary - physiopathology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>UPPALURI, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOFFMAN, E. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONKA, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNNINGHAKE, G. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCLENNAN, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>UPPALURI, R</au><au>HOFFMAN, E. A</au><au>SONKA, M</au><au>HUNNINGHAKE, G. W</au><au>MCLENNAN, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interstitial lung disease : A quantitative study using the adaptive multiple feature method</atitle><jtitle>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Respir Crit Care Med</addtitle><date>1999-02-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>519</spage><epage>525</epage><pages>519-525</pages><issn>1073-449X</issn><eissn>1535-4970</eissn><abstract>We have previously described an adaptive multiple feature method (AMFM) for the objective assessment of global and regional changes in pulmonary parenchyma to detect emphysema. This computerized method uses a combination of statistical and fractal texture features for characterization of lung tissues based upon high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans. This present study was a substantial extension of the AMFM to simultaneously discriminate between multiple pulmonary disease processes. Normal subjects and those with emphysema, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), or sarcoidosis were studied. The AMFM was compared with two currently utilized computer-based methods: mean lung density (MLD) and the histogram analysis (HIST). Globally, when comparing two-subject groups the AMFM overall accuracy was 2 to 18% better than the overall accuracy of MLD and as much as 36% better than the accuracy of the HIST methods. In three-subject group discrimination tasks, the AMFM performed 7 to 27% better than the MLD and 4 to 36% better than the HIST methods. Finally, in discriminating all four subject groups at a time, the AMFM overall accuracy was 81%, which was 21% better than the MLD and 25% better than the HIST method. In most three-subject group comparisons and in the four-subject group comparison, the AMFM was significantly (p < 0.01) better than the MLD and HIST methods. Next, the AMFM was applied to local discrimination between normal and each disease group individually. The normal versus emphysema, normal versus IPF, and normal versus sarcoidosis samples were discriminated with an accuracy of 95, 86, and 77%, respectively. The AMFM is an objective quantitative method that can be adapted for successful discrimination of multiple parenchymal lung diseases.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>American Lung Association</pub><pmid>9927367</pmid><doi>10.1164/ajrccm.159.2.9707145</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1073-449X |
ispartof | American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 1999-02, Vol.159 (2), p.519-525 |
issn | 1073-449X 1535-4970 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69574731 |
source | MEDLINE; American Thoracic Society (ATS) Journals Online; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data Discriminant Analysis Humans Lung Diseases, Interstitial - diagnostic imaging Lung Diseases, Interstitial - physiopathology Medical sciences Pneumology Pulmonary Emphysema - diagnostic imaging Pulmonary Emphysema - physiopathology Pulmonary Fibrosis - diagnostic imaging Pulmonary Fibrosis - physiopathology Reproducibility of Results Respiratory Function Tests Respiratory system : syndromes and miscellaneous diseases Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary - diagnostic imaging Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary - physiopathology Sensitivity and Specificity Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
title | Interstitial lung disease : A quantitative study using the adaptive multiple feature method |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T01%3A01%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interstitial%20lung%20disease%20:%20A%20quantitative%20study%20using%20the%20adaptive%20multiple%20feature%20method&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20respiratory%20and%20critical%20care%20medicine&rft.au=UPPALURI,%20R&rft.date=1999-02-01&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=519&rft.epage=525&rft.pages=519-525&rft.issn=1073-449X&rft.eissn=1535-4970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1164/ajrccm.159.2.9707145&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69574731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69574731&rft_id=info:pmid/9927367&rfr_iscdi=true |