PAPNET for cervical cytology screening : Experience in Greece
To validate the efficacy of PAPNET for cervical cytology screening. From a total of 50,000 gynecologic cases we selected 24 primarily negative smears from patients who, during follow-up, developed a precancerous lesion or cancer in a short time, ranging from a few months to two years. These negative...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta cytologica 1999, Vol.43 (1), p.30-33 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 33 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 30 |
container_title | Acta cytologica |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | VENETI, S PAPAEFTHIMIOU, M SYMIAKAKI, H IOANNIDOU-MOUZAKA, L |
description | To validate the efficacy of PAPNET for cervical cytology screening.
From a total of 50,000 gynecologic cases we selected 24 primarily negative smears from patients who, during follow-up, developed a precancerous lesion or cancer in a short time, ranging from a few months to two years. These negative smears were rescreened by the PAPNET automated system and reevaluated by two observers. A third observer blindly reevaluated the same cases manually.
Reevaluation after PAPNET screening showed one false negative smear, for a rate comparable to that of manual reevaluation, which also reclassified the same case. The time required to interpret a smear using the PAPNET system was approximately one minute, while the time required for conventional manual screening was approximately five.
PAPNET is an efficient and fast screener for the detection of precancerous cervical lesions and cancer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000330865 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69569893</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69569893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-cabae200fbdf44c1462bdff44a0e667cfbb6a71ead4725bcb42033e3b854115a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j01LAzEQhoMotVYP_gAhB_G2mmyS2Y3goZT6AUV7qOclSWdLZLu7Jq3Yf2_ExdO8zPMwzEvIJWe3nCt9xxgTgpWgjsiYa1FmOSh2TMZpzzOlZHFKzmL8-LUAxIiMtC4LKYsxeVhOl6_zFa27QB2GL-9MQ91h1zXd5kCjC4itbzf0ns6_ewweW4fUt_QpAYfn5KQ2TcSLYU7I--N8NXvOFm9PL7PpIutzoXaZM9Zgzlht17WUjkvIU0rRMAQoXG0tmIKjWcsiV9ZZmadPUdhSydTPiAm5-bvbh-5zj3FXbX102DSmxW4fK9AKdKlFEq8GcW-3uK764LcmHKqhb-LXAzcxNa2DaZ2P_xoHUCVw8QOW2GHv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69569893</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PAPNET for cervical cytology screening : Experience in Greece</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals Complete</source><creator>VENETI, S ; PAPAEFTHIMIOU, M ; SYMIAKAKI, H ; IOANNIDOU-MOUZAKA, L</creator><creatorcontrib>VENETI, S ; PAPAEFTHIMIOU, M ; SYMIAKAKI, H ; IOANNIDOU-MOUZAKA, L</creatorcontrib><description>To validate the efficacy of PAPNET for cervical cytology screening.
From a total of 50,000 gynecologic cases we selected 24 primarily negative smears from patients who, during follow-up, developed a precancerous lesion or cancer in a short time, ranging from a few months to two years. These negative smears were rescreened by the PAPNET automated system and reevaluated by two observers. A third observer blindly reevaluated the same cases manually.
Reevaluation after PAPNET screening showed one false negative smear, for a rate comparable to that of manual reevaluation, which also reclassified the same case. The time required to interpret a smear using the PAPNET system was approximately one minute, while the time required for conventional manual screening was approximately five.
PAPNET is an efficient and fast screener for the detection of precancerous cervical lesions and cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-5547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000330865</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9987447</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACYTAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Louis, MO: Science Printers and Publishers</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; False Negative Reactions ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Genital system. Mammary gland ; Greece ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - standards ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Laboratories, Hospital - standards ; Mass Screening - instrumentation ; Mass Screening - standards ; Medical sciences ; Neural Networks (Computer) ; Pathology, Clinical - instrumentation ; Pathology, Clinical - standards ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Quality Control ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Vaginal Smears - instrumentation ; Vaginal Smears - standards</subject><ispartof>Acta cytologica, 1999, Vol.43 (1), p.30-33</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1665861$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9987447$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VENETI, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAPAEFTHIMIOU, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SYMIAKAKI, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IOANNIDOU-MOUZAKA, L</creatorcontrib><title>PAPNET for cervical cytology screening : Experience in Greece</title><title>Acta cytologica</title><addtitle>Acta Cytol</addtitle><description>To validate the efficacy of PAPNET for cervical cytology screening.
From a total of 50,000 gynecologic cases we selected 24 primarily negative smears from patients who, during follow-up, developed a precancerous lesion or cancer in a short time, ranging from a few months to two years. These negative smears were rescreened by the PAPNET automated system and reevaluated by two observers. A third observer blindly reevaluated the same cases manually.
Reevaluation after PAPNET screening showed one false negative smear, for a rate comparable to that of manual reevaluation, which also reclassified the same case. The time required to interpret a smear using the PAPNET system was approximately one minute, while the time required for conventional manual screening was approximately five.
PAPNET is an efficient and fast screener for the detection of precancerous cervical lesions and cancer.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Genital system. Mammary gland</subject><subject>Greece</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - standards</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Laboratories, Hospital - standards</subject><subject>Mass Screening - instrumentation</subject><subject>Mass Screening - standards</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neural Networks (Computer)</subject><subject>Pathology, Clinical - instrumentation</subject><subject>Pathology, Clinical - standards</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears - instrumentation</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears - standards</subject><issn>0001-5547</issn><issn>1938-2650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9j01LAzEQhoMotVYP_gAhB_G2mmyS2Y3goZT6AUV7qOclSWdLZLu7Jq3Yf2_ExdO8zPMwzEvIJWe3nCt9xxgTgpWgjsiYa1FmOSh2TMZpzzOlZHFKzmL8-LUAxIiMtC4LKYsxeVhOl6_zFa27QB2GL-9MQ91h1zXd5kCjC4itbzf0ns6_ewweW4fUt_QpAYfn5KQ2TcSLYU7I--N8NXvOFm9PL7PpIutzoXaZM9Zgzlht17WUjkvIU0rRMAQoXG0tmIKjWcsiV9ZZmadPUdhSydTPiAm5-bvbh-5zj3FXbX102DSmxW4fK9AKdKlFEq8GcW-3uK764LcmHKqhb-LXAzcxNa2DaZ2P_xoHUCVw8QOW2GHv</recordid><startdate>1999</startdate><enddate>1999</enddate><creator>VENETI, S</creator><creator>PAPAEFTHIMIOU, M</creator><creator>SYMIAKAKI, H</creator><creator>IOANNIDOU-MOUZAKA, L</creator><general>Science Printers and Publishers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1999</creationdate><title>PAPNET for cervical cytology screening : Experience in Greece</title><author>VENETI, S ; PAPAEFTHIMIOU, M ; SYMIAKAKI, H ; IOANNIDOU-MOUZAKA, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-cabae200fbdf44c1462bdff44a0e667cfbb6a71ead4725bcb42033e3b854115a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Genital system. Mammary gland</topic><topic>Greece</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - standards</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Laboratories, Hospital - standards</topic><topic>Mass Screening - instrumentation</topic><topic>Mass Screening - standards</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neural Networks (Computer)</topic><topic>Pathology, Clinical - instrumentation</topic><topic>Pathology, Clinical - standards</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears - instrumentation</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VENETI, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAPAEFTHIMIOU, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SYMIAKAKI, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IOANNIDOU-MOUZAKA, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta cytologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VENETI, S</au><au>PAPAEFTHIMIOU, M</au><au>SYMIAKAKI, H</au><au>IOANNIDOU-MOUZAKA, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PAPNET for cervical cytology screening : Experience in Greece</atitle><jtitle>Acta cytologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Cytol</addtitle><date>1999</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>30-33</pages><issn>0001-5547</issn><eissn>1938-2650</eissn><coden>ACYTAN</coden><abstract>To validate the efficacy of PAPNET for cervical cytology screening.
From a total of 50,000 gynecologic cases we selected 24 primarily negative smears from patients who, during follow-up, developed a precancerous lesion or cancer in a short time, ranging from a few months to two years. These negative smears were rescreened by the PAPNET automated system and reevaluated by two observers. A third observer blindly reevaluated the same cases manually.
Reevaluation after PAPNET screening showed one false negative smear, for a rate comparable to that of manual reevaluation, which also reclassified the same case. The time required to interpret a smear using the PAPNET system was approximately one minute, while the time required for conventional manual screening was approximately five.
PAPNET is an efficient and fast screener for the detection of precancerous cervical lesions and cancer.</abstract><cop>St. Louis, MO</cop><pub>Science Printers and Publishers</pub><pmid>9987447</pmid><doi>10.1159/000330865</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-5547 |
ispartof | Acta cytologica, 1999, Vol.43 (1), p.30-33 |
issn | 0001-5547 1938-2650 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69569893 |
source | MEDLINE; Karger Journals Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences False Negative Reactions Female Follow-Up Studies Genital system. Mammary gland Greece Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - standards Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Laboratories, Hospital - standards Mass Screening - instrumentation Mass Screening - standards Medical sciences Neural Networks (Computer) Pathology, Clinical - instrumentation Pathology, Clinical - standards Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques Quality Control Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology Vaginal Smears - instrumentation Vaginal Smears - standards |
title | PAPNET for cervical cytology screening : Experience in Greece |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T01%3A19%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PAPNET%20for%20cervical%20cytology%20screening%20:%20Experience%20in%20Greece&rft.jtitle=Acta%20cytologica&rft.au=VENETI,%20S&rft.date=1999&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=30-33&rft.issn=0001-5547&rft.eissn=1938-2650&rft.coden=ACYTAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000330865&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69569893%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69569893&rft_id=info:pmid/9987447&rfr_iscdi=true |