Evaluation of materials used for bedding encasement: Effect of pore size in blocking cat and dust mite allergen

Background: Mattress and pillow encasings are recommended for patients allergic to dust mites. Many encasements block allergen and are vapor permeable but do not allow free passage of air through the material. Recently, breathable fabrics made from tightly woven synthetic fibers or nonwoven syntheti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 1999-02, Vol.103 (2), p.227-231
Hauptverfasser: Vaughan, John W., McLaughlin, Timothy E., Perzanowski, Matthew S., Platts-Mills, Thomas A.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 231
container_issue 2
container_start_page 227
container_title Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
container_volume 103
creator Vaughan, John W.
McLaughlin, Timothy E.
Perzanowski, Matthew S.
Platts-Mills, Thomas A.E.
description Background: Mattress and pillow encasings are recommended for patients allergic to dust mites. Many encasements block allergen and are vapor permeable but do not allow free passage of air through the material. Recently, breathable fabrics made from tightly woven synthetic fibers or nonwoven synthetics have been recommend as encasements. Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a method for testing encasement materials made of breathable fabrics. Methods: Dust samples containing a known quantity of allergen (Der f 1, Der p 1, and Fel d 1) were pulled across a variety of fabrics using a modified dust trap. Airflow through the dust trap was controlled with a vacuum pump. Five minutes after dust was introduced, the pump was shut off. A filter located downstream of the fabric collected allergen passing through the fabric during the test and was assayed with ELISA for the relevant allergen. Fabrics to be tested were obtained from manufacturers and specialty catalogs. Results: As the average pore size decreases, the airflow through a fabric becomes restricted, and the pressure differential created by the vacuum pump increases. Dust mite allergens (Der f 1 and Der p 1) were blocked below detectable limits by fabrics of less than 10 μm in pore size. Fabrics with an average pore size of 6 μm or less blocked cat allergen (Fel d 1). Conclusion: The method we developed provided a rigorous and reliable test for leakage of common indoor allergens through breathable barrier fabrics. Our results show that tightly woven fabrics and nonwoven synthetic fabrics can block common indoor allergens but still allow airflow. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;103:227-31.)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70495-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69565592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0091674999704951</els_id><sourcerecordid>17329776</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-38bf14bc7ea0a11e13c0aedd4b4cd4a041c316fdb27237b57db6ef77eef870843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuLFTEQhYMo43X0JwxkIaKL1qQ7nXTcDDJcHzDgQl2HPCpDtDu5JukB_fWm517G5ZBFEeo7p4o6CF1Q8pYSyt99I0TSjgsmX0v5RhAmx44-QjtKpOj41I-P0e4eeYqelfKTtP8wyTN0JiWTA-13KO1v9bzqGlLEyeNFV8hBzwWvBRz2KWMDzoV4gyFaXWCBWN_jvfdg6yY4pAy4hL-AQ8RmTvbXxlpdsY4Ou7VUvIQKWM8z5BuIz9ET3-zhxameox8f99-vPnfXXz99ufpw3VnGRe2GyXjKjBWgiaYU6GCJbosww6xjmjBqB8q9M73oB2FG4QwHLwSAnwSZ2HCOXh19Dzn9XqFUtYRiYZ51hLQWxeXIx1H2D4JUDL0UgjdwPII2p1IyeHXIYdH5j6JEbYmou0TUdm4lpbpLRNGmuzgNWM0C7l51iqD1X576ulg9-6yjDeW_ORftbeMvjxi0q90GyKrY0DIBF3LLQrkUHljkH1-8qRk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17329776</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of materials used for bedding encasement: Effect of pore size in blocking cat and dust mite allergen</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Vaughan, John W. ; McLaughlin, Timothy E. ; Perzanowski, Matthew S. ; Platts-Mills, Thomas A.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, John W. ; McLaughlin, Timothy E. ; Perzanowski, Matthew S. ; Platts-Mills, Thomas A.E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Mattress and pillow encasings are recommended for patients allergic to dust mites. Many encasements block allergen and are vapor permeable but do not allow free passage of air through the material. Recently, breathable fabrics made from tightly woven synthetic fibers or nonwoven synthetics have been recommend as encasements. Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a method for testing encasement materials made of breathable fabrics. Methods: Dust samples containing a known quantity of allergen (Der f 1, Der p 1, and Fel d 1) were pulled across a variety of fabrics using a modified dust trap. Airflow through the dust trap was controlled with a vacuum pump. Five minutes after dust was introduced, the pump was shut off. A filter located downstream of the fabric collected allergen passing through the fabric during the test and was assayed with ELISA for the relevant allergen. Fabrics to be tested were obtained from manufacturers and specialty catalogs. Results: As the average pore size decreases, the airflow through a fabric becomes restricted, and the pressure differential created by the vacuum pump increases. Dust mite allergens (Der f 1 and Der p 1) were blocked below detectable limits by fabrics of less than 10 μm in pore size. Fabrics with an average pore size of 6 μm or less blocked cat allergen (Fel d 1). Conclusion: The method we developed provided a rigorous and reliable test for leakage of common indoor allergens through breathable barrier fabrics. Our results show that tightly woven fabrics and nonwoven synthetic fabrics can block common indoor allergens but still allow airflow. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;103:227-31.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70495-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9949312</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACIBY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>allergen avoidance ; Allergens - adverse effects ; Allergic diseases ; Animals ; Antigens, Dermatophagoides ; Bedding and Linens ; Biological and medical sciences ; breathable fabrics ; Cats ; Dust ; encasements ; Glycoproteins - adverse effects ; Immunopathology ; Materials Testing ; Medical sciences ; Mite avoidance ; Mites - immunology ; Particle Size ; Respiratory and ent allergic diseases</subject><ispartof>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1999-02, Vol.103 (2), p.227-231</ispartof><rights>1999 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-38bf14bc7ea0a11e13c0aedd4b4cd4a041c316fdb27237b57db6ef77eef870843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-38bf14bc7ea0a11e13c0aedd4b4cd4a041c316fdb27237b57db6ef77eef870843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091674999704951$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1676766$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9949312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Timothy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perzanowski, Matthew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platts-Mills, Thomas A.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of materials used for bedding encasement: Effect of pore size in blocking cat and dust mite allergen</title><title>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</title><addtitle>J Allergy Clin Immunol</addtitle><description>Background: Mattress and pillow encasings are recommended for patients allergic to dust mites. Many encasements block allergen and are vapor permeable but do not allow free passage of air through the material. Recently, breathable fabrics made from tightly woven synthetic fibers or nonwoven synthetics have been recommend as encasements. Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a method for testing encasement materials made of breathable fabrics. Methods: Dust samples containing a known quantity of allergen (Der f 1, Der p 1, and Fel d 1) were pulled across a variety of fabrics using a modified dust trap. Airflow through the dust trap was controlled with a vacuum pump. Five minutes after dust was introduced, the pump was shut off. A filter located downstream of the fabric collected allergen passing through the fabric during the test and was assayed with ELISA for the relevant allergen. Fabrics to be tested were obtained from manufacturers and specialty catalogs. Results: As the average pore size decreases, the airflow through a fabric becomes restricted, and the pressure differential created by the vacuum pump increases. Dust mite allergens (Der f 1 and Der p 1) were blocked below detectable limits by fabrics of less than 10 μm in pore size. Fabrics with an average pore size of 6 μm or less blocked cat allergen (Fel d 1). Conclusion: The method we developed provided a rigorous and reliable test for leakage of common indoor allergens through breathable barrier fabrics. Our results show that tightly woven fabrics and nonwoven synthetic fabrics can block common indoor allergens but still allow airflow. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;103:227-31.)</description><subject>allergen avoidance</subject><subject>Allergens - adverse effects</subject><subject>Allergic diseases</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antigens, Dermatophagoides</subject><subject>Bedding and Linens</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>breathable fabrics</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Dust</subject><subject>encasements</subject><subject>Glycoproteins - adverse effects</subject><subject>Immunopathology</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mite avoidance</subject><subject>Mites - immunology</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Respiratory and ent allergic diseases</subject><issn>0091-6749</issn><issn>1097-6825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUuLFTEQhYMo43X0JwxkIaKL1qQ7nXTcDDJcHzDgQl2HPCpDtDu5JukB_fWm517G5ZBFEeo7p4o6CF1Q8pYSyt99I0TSjgsmX0v5RhAmx44-QjtKpOj41I-P0e4eeYqelfKTtP8wyTN0JiWTA-13KO1v9bzqGlLEyeNFV8hBzwWvBRz2KWMDzoV4gyFaXWCBWN_jvfdg6yY4pAy4hL-AQ8RmTvbXxlpdsY4Ou7VUvIQKWM8z5BuIz9ET3-zhxameox8f99-vPnfXXz99ufpw3VnGRe2GyXjKjBWgiaYU6GCJbosww6xjmjBqB8q9M73oB2FG4QwHLwSAnwSZ2HCOXh19Dzn9XqFUtYRiYZ51hLQWxeXIx1H2D4JUDL0UgjdwPII2p1IyeHXIYdH5j6JEbYmou0TUdm4lpbpLRNGmuzgNWM0C7l51iqD1X576ulg9-6yjDeW_ORftbeMvjxi0q90GyKrY0DIBF3LLQrkUHljkH1-8qRk</recordid><startdate>19990201</startdate><enddate>19990201</enddate><creator>Vaughan, John W.</creator><creator>McLaughlin, Timothy E.</creator><creator>Perzanowski, Matthew S.</creator><creator>Platts-Mills, Thomas A.E.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990201</creationdate><title>Evaluation of materials used for bedding encasement: Effect of pore size in blocking cat and dust mite allergen</title><author>Vaughan, John W. ; McLaughlin, Timothy E. ; Perzanowski, Matthew S. ; Platts-Mills, Thomas A.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-38bf14bc7ea0a11e13c0aedd4b4cd4a041c316fdb27237b57db6ef77eef870843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>allergen avoidance</topic><topic>Allergens - adverse effects</topic><topic>Allergic diseases</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antigens, Dermatophagoides</topic><topic>Bedding and Linens</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>breathable fabrics</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Dust</topic><topic>encasements</topic><topic>Glycoproteins - adverse effects</topic><topic>Immunopathology</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mite avoidance</topic><topic>Mites - immunology</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Respiratory and ent allergic diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Timothy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perzanowski, Matthew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platts-Mills, Thomas A.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaughan, John W.</au><au>McLaughlin, Timothy E.</au><au>Perzanowski, Matthew S.</au><au>Platts-Mills, Thomas A.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of materials used for bedding encasement: Effect of pore size in blocking cat and dust mite allergen</atitle><jtitle>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</jtitle><addtitle>J Allergy Clin Immunol</addtitle><date>1999-02-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>227-231</pages><issn>0091-6749</issn><eissn>1097-6825</eissn><coden>JACIBY</coden><abstract>Background: Mattress and pillow encasings are recommended for patients allergic to dust mites. Many encasements block allergen and are vapor permeable but do not allow free passage of air through the material. Recently, breathable fabrics made from tightly woven synthetic fibers or nonwoven synthetics have been recommend as encasements. Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a method for testing encasement materials made of breathable fabrics. Methods: Dust samples containing a known quantity of allergen (Der f 1, Der p 1, and Fel d 1) were pulled across a variety of fabrics using a modified dust trap. Airflow through the dust trap was controlled with a vacuum pump. Five minutes after dust was introduced, the pump was shut off. A filter located downstream of the fabric collected allergen passing through the fabric during the test and was assayed with ELISA for the relevant allergen. Fabrics to be tested were obtained from manufacturers and specialty catalogs. Results: As the average pore size decreases, the airflow through a fabric becomes restricted, and the pressure differential created by the vacuum pump increases. Dust mite allergens (Der f 1 and Der p 1) were blocked below detectable limits by fabrics of less than 10 μm in pore size. Fabrics with an average pore size of 6 μm or less blocked cat allergen (Fel d 1). Conclusion: The method we developed provided a rigorous and reliable test for leakage of common indoor allergens through breathable barrier fabrics. Our results show that tightly woven fabrics and nonwoven synthetic fabrics can block common indoor allergens but still allow airflow. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;103:227-31.)</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>9949312</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70495-1</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-6749
ispartof Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 1999-02, Vol.103 (2), p.227-231
issn 0091-6749
1097-6825
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69565592
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects allergen avoidance
Allergens - adverse effects
Allergic diseases
Animals
Antigens, Dermatophagoides
Bedding and Linens
Biological and medical sciences
breathable fabrics
Cats
Dust
encasements
Glycoproteins - adverse effects
Immunopathology
Materials Testing
Medical sciences
Mite avoidance
Mites - immunology
Particle Size
Respiratory and ent allergic diseases
title Evaluation of materials used for bedding encasement: Effect of pore size in blocking cat and dust mite allergen
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A08%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20materials%20used%20for%20bedding%20encasement:%20Effect%20of%20pore%20size%20in%20blocking%20cat%20and%20dust%20mite%20allergen&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20allergy%20and%20clinical%20immunology&rft.au=Vaughan,%20John%20W.&rft.date=1999-02-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=227-231&rft.issn=0091-6749&rft.eissn=1097-6825&rft.coden=JACIBY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70495-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17329776%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17329776&rft_id=info:pmid/9949312&rft_els_id=S0091674999704951&rfr_iscdi=true