Unsuspected Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography : Clinical and Economic Impact
To evaluate the frequency and estimated costs of additional diagnostic workup for extracolonic findings detected at computed tomographic (CT) colonography in a large screening cohort. This retrospective HIPAA-compliant study, which had institutional review board approval, evaluated extracolonic find...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiology 2008-10, Vol.249 (1), p.151-159 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 159 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 151 |
container_title | Radiology |
container_volume | 249 |
creator | PICKHARDT, Perry J HANSON, Meghan E VANNESS, David J LO, Justin Y KIM, David H TAYLOR, Andrew J WINTER, Thomas C HINSHAW, J. Louis |
description | To evaluate the frequency and estimated costs of additional diagnostic workup for extracolonic findings detected at computed tomographic (CT) colonography in a large screening cohort.
This retrospective HIPAA-compliant study, which had institutional review board approval, evaluated extracolonic findings in 2195 consecutive asymptomatic adults (1199 women, 996 men; age range, 40-90 years; mean age, 58.0 years +/- 8.1 [standard deviation]) undergoing low-dose CT colonographic screening performed without contrast material at a single institution over a 20-month period. All diagnostic workups generated because of extracolonic findings were reviewed. Associated costs were estimated by using 2006 Medicare average reimbursement. Testing for statistical significance was performed by using the chi(2) and t tests.
Further diagnostic workup for unsuspected extracolonic findings was performed in 133 (6.1%) of 2195 patients, including 18 patients in whom additional workup was not recommended by the radiologist. Additional testing included ultrasonography (n = 64), CT (n = 59), magnetic resonance imaging (n = 11), other diagnostic imaging tests (n = 19), nonsurgical invasive procedures (n = 19), and surgical procedures (n = 22). Benign findings were confirmed in the majority of cases, but relevant new diagnoses were made in 55 (2.5%) patients, including extracolonic malignancies in nine patients. The mean cost per patient for nonsurgical procedures was $31.02 (95% confidence interval: $23.72, $38.94); that for surgical procedures was $67.54 (95% confidence interval: $38.62, $101.55).
Detection of relevant unsuspected extracolonic disease at CT colonographic screening is not rare, accounting for a relatively large percentage of cases in which additional workup was recommended. Judicious handling of potential extracolonic findings is warranted to balance the cost of additional workup against the potential for early detection of important disease, because many findings will prove to be of no clinical consequence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1148/radiol.2491072148 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69552904</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69552904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p239t-425a64d56bcd705a7774e43ff90cd38b990baa7bce8caa7cd2610d1c36f235c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90M1OwzAMAOAIgdgYPAAXlAvcOvLbNNxQtcGkSRzYjmhKk3QEtWlJWom9PUEMTpbtz5ZsAK4xmmPMivugjOuaOWESI0FS5QRMMSciwxTzUzBFiNKsYFhOwEWMHwhhxgtxDia4EDLPBZ2Ct62PY-ytHqyBi68hKN01nXcaLp03zu8jVAN81cFanzJYbmD5A7p9UP37AT7AsnGJqwYqnzbo1GrT9KrtlR4uwVmtmmivjnEGtsvFpnzO1i9Pq_JxnfWEyiFjhKucGZ5X2gjElRCCWUbrWiJtaFFJiSqlRKVtoVPUhuQYGaxpXhPKtaAzcPe7tw_d52jjsGtd1LZplLfdGHe55JxIxBK8OcKxaq3Z9cG1Khx2fw9J4PYIVExH1UF57eK_IygXnBScfgNVknFM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69552904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unsuspected Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography : Clinical and Economic Impact</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>PICKHARDT, Perry J ; HANSON, Meghan E ; VANNESS, David J ; LO, Justin Y ; KIM, David H ; TAYLOR, Andrew J ; WINTER, Thomas C ; HINSHAW, J. Louis</creator><creatorcontrib>PICKHARDT, Perry J ; HANSON, Meghan E ; VANNESS, David J ; LO, Justin Y ; KIM, David H ; TAYLOR, Andrew J ; WINTER, Thomas C ; HINSHAW, J. Louis</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the frequency and estimated costs of additional diagnostic workup for extracolonic findings detected at computed tomographic (CT) colonography in a large screening cohort.
This retrospective HIPAA-compliant study, which had institutional review board approval, evaluated extracolonic findings in 2195 consecutive asymptomatic adults (1199 women, 996 men; age range, 40-90 years; mean age, 58.0 years +/- 8.1 [standard deviation]) undergoing low-dose CT colonographic screening performed without contrast material at a single institution over a 20-month period. All diagnostic workups generated because of extracolonic findings were reviewed. Associated costs were estimated by using 2006 Medicare average reimbursement. Testing for statistical significance was performed by using the chi(2) and t tests.
Further diagnostic workup for unsuspected extracolonic findings was performed in 133 (6.1%) of 2195 patients, including 18 patients in whom additional workup was not recommended by the radiologist. Additional testing included ultrasonography (n = 64), CT (n = 59), magnetic resonance imaging (n = 11), other diagnostic imaging tests (n = 19), nonsurgical invasive procedures (n = 19), and surgical procedures (n = 22). Benign findings were confirmed in the majority of cases, but relevant new diagnoses were made in 55 (2.5%) patients, including extracolonic malignancies in nine patients. The mean cost per patient for nonsurgical procedures was $31.02 (95% confidence interval: $23.72, $38.94); that for surgical procedures was $67.54 (95% confidence interval: $38.62, $101.55).
Detection of relevant unsuspected extracolonic disease at CT colonographic screening is not rare, accounting for a relatively large percentage of cases in which additional workup was recommended. Judicious handling of potential extracolonic findings is warranted to balance the cost of additional workup against the potential for early detection of important disease, because many findings will prove to be of no clinical consequence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8419</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2491072148</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18796673</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RADLAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oak Brook, IL: Radiological Society of North America</publisher><subject>Abdominal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colonography, Computed Tomographic - economics ; Digestive system ; Female ; Humans ; Incidental Findings ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Radiology, 2008-10, Vol.249 (1), p.151-159</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20675285$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18796673$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PICKHARDT, Perry J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HANSON, Meghan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VANNESS, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LO, Justin Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIM, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINTER, Thomas C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HINSHAW, J. Louis</creatorcontrib><title>Unsuspected Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography : Clinical and Economic Impact</title><title>Radiology</title><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><description>To evaluate the frequency and estimated costs of additional diagnostic workup for extracolonic findings detected at computed tomographic (CT) colonography in a large screening cohort.
This retrospective HIPAA-compliant study, which had institutional review board approval, evaluated extracolonic findings in 2195 consecutive asymptomatic adults (1199 women, 996 men; age range, 40-90 years; mean age, 58.0 years +/- 8.1 [standard deviation]) undergoing low-dose CT colonographic screening performed without contrast material at a single institution over a 20-month period. All diagnostic workups generated because of extracolonic findings were reviewed. Associated costs were estimated by using 2006 Medicare average reimbursement. Testing for statistical significance was performed by using the chi(2) and t tests.
Further diagnostic workup for unsuspected extracolonic findings was performed in 133 (6.1%) of 2195 patients, including 18 patients in whom additional workup was not recommended by the radiologist. Additional testing included ultrasonography (n = 64), CT (n = 59), magnetic resonance imaging (n = 11), other diagnostic imaging tests (n = 19), nonsurgical invasive procedures (n = 19), and surgical procedures (n = 22). Benign findings were confirmed in the majority of cases, but relevant new diagnoses were made in 55 (2.5%) patients, including extracolonic malignancies in nine patients. The mean cost per patient for nonsurgical procedures was $31.02 (95% confidence interval: $23.72, $38.94); that for surgical procedures was $67.54 (95% confidence interval: $38.62, $101.55).
Detection of relevant unsuspected extracolonic disease at CT colonographic screening is not rare, accounting for a relatively large percentage of cases in which additional workup was recommended. Judicious handling of potential extracolonic findings is warranted to balance the cost of additional workup against the potential for early detection of important disease, because many findings will prove to be of no clinical consequence.</description><subject>Abdominal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colonography, Computed Tomographic - economics</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidental Findings</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0033-8419</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo90M1OwzAMAOAIgdgYPAAXlAvcOvLbNNxQtcGkSRzYjmhKk3QEtWlJWom9PUEMTpbtz5ZsAK4xmmPMivugjOuaOWESI0FS5QRMMSciwxTzUzBFiNKsYFhOwEWMHwhhxgtxDia4EDLPBZ2Ct62PY-ytHqyBi68hKN01nXcaLp03zu8jVAN81cFanzJYbmD5A7p9UP37AT7AsnGJqwYqnzbo1GrT9KrtlR4uwVmtmmivjnEGtsvFpnzO1i9Pq_JxnfWEyiFjhKucGZ5X2gjElRCCWUbrWiJtaFFJiSqlRKVtoVPUhuQYGaxpXhPKtaAzcPe7tw_d52jjsGtd1LZplLfdGHe55JxIxBK8OcKxaq3Z9cG1Khx2fw9J4PYIVExH1UF57eK_IygXnBScfgNVknFM</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>PICKHARDT, Perry J</creator><creator>HANSON, Meghan E</creator><creator>VANNESS, David J</creator><creator>LO, Justin Y</creator><creator>KIM, David H</creator><creator>TAYLOR, Andrew J</creator><creator>WINTER, Thomas C</creator><creator>HINSHAW, J. Louis</creator><general>Radiological Society of North America</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Unsuspected Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography : Clinical and Economic Impact</title><author>PICKHARDT, Perry J ; HANSON, Meghan E ; VANNESS, David J ; LO, Justin Y ; KIM, David H ; TAYLOR, Andrew J ; WINTER, Thomas C ; HINSHAW, J. Louis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p239t-425a64d56bcd705a7774e43ff90cd38b990baa7bce8caa7cd2610d1c36f235c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colonography, Computed Tomographic - economics</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidental Findings</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PICKHARDT, Perry J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HANSON, Meghan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VANNESS, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LO, Justin Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIM, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINTER, Thomas C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HINSHAW, J. Louis</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PICKHARDT, Perry J</au><au>HANSON, Meghan E</au><au>VANNESS, David J</au><au>LO, Justin Y</au><au>KIM, David H</au><au>TAYLOR, Andrew J</au><au>WINTER, Thomas C</au><au>HINSHAW, J. Louis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unsuspected Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography : Clinical and Economic Impact</atitle><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>249</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>151-159</pages><issn>0033-8419</issn><eissn>1527-1315</eissn><coden>RADLAX</coden><abstract>To evaluate the frequency and estimated costs of additional diagnostic workup for extracolonic findings detected at computed tomographic (CT) colonography in a large screening cohort.
This retrospective HIPAA-compliant study, which had institutional review board approval, evaluated extracolonic findings in 2195 consecutive asymptomatic adults (1199 women, 996 men; age range, 40-90 years; mean age, 58.0 years +/- 8.1 [standard deviation]) undergoing low-dose CT colonographic screening performed without contrast material at a single institution over a 20-month period. All diagnostic workups generated because of extracolonic findings were reviewed. Associated costs were estimated by using 2006 Medicare average reimbursement. Testing for statistical significance was performed by using the chi(2) and t tests.
Further diagnostic workup for unsuspected extracolonic findings was performed in 133 (6.1%) of 2195 patients, including 18 patients in whom additional workup was not recommended by the radiologist. Additional testing included ultrasonography (n = 64), CT (n = 59), magnetic resonance imaging (n = 11), other diagnostic imaging tests (n = 19), nonsurgical invasive procedures (n = 19), and surgical procedures (n = 22). Benign findings were confirmed in the majority of cases, but relevant new diagnoses were made in 55 (2.5%) patients, including extracolonic malignancies in nine patients. The mean cost per patient for nonsurgical procedures was $31.02 (95% confidence interval: $23.72, $38.94); that for surgical procedures was $67.54 (95% confidence interval: $38.62, $101.55).
Detection of relevant unsuspected extracolonic disease at CT colonographic screening is not rare, accounting for a relatively large percentage of cases in which additional workup was recommended. Judicious handling of potential extracolonic findings is warranted to balance the cost of additional workup against the potential for early detection of important disease, because many findings will prove to be of no clinical consequence.</abstract><cop>Oak Brook, IL</cop><pub>Radiological Society of North America</pub><pmid>18796673</pmid><doi>10.1148/radiol.2491072148</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-8419 |
ispartof | Radiology, 2008-10, Vol.249 (1), p.151-159 |
issn | 0033-8419 1527-1315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69552904 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Abdominal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Colonography, Computed Tomographic - economics Digestive system Female Humans Incidental Findings Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry Retrospective Studies |
title | Unsuspected Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography : Clinical and Economic Impact |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T06%3A32%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unsuspected%20Extracolonic%20Findings%20at%20Screening%20CT%20Colonography%20:%20Clinical%20and%20Economic%20Impact&rft.jtitle=Radiology&rft.au=PICKHARDT,%20Perry%20J&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=249&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=151-159&rft.issn=0033-8419&rft.eissn=1527-1315&rft.coden=RADLAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2491072148&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69552904%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69552904&rft_id=info:pmid/18796673&rfr_iscdi=true |